Published Saturday, March 20, 2010 @ 11:58 am

If you are like most Americans who are out of work today—and there’s a lot you—the seemingly perpetual job search may eventually take a toll on your psyche. There is just so much out of your control.

As soon as that resume leaves your e-mail, it could be weeks before you receive an acknowledgment- if you even get one. Even when you do, it’s probably some automated response promising that “one of our professionals will soon be in touch.” Heard that one before? Every job that seems like a great match just restarts the cycle.

Add to that a boiling personal financial crisis and the job search can seem like a completely fruitless effort. No doubt, it’s tough out there.

What’s making matters worse for this job market is that it is occurring during such a heated political climate. Washington is divided and everyone seems on edge, especially when discussions involve companies or parts of the country that have received stimulus, or “bailout” money. Everyone wants a piece. Or heck, we just want to know it’s helping.

Well, we came across a helpful blog called My Bank Tracker (mybanktracker.com) that outlines some useful tips on how to locate where stimulus money is creating jobs. If you think you can afford a relocation or even if you have the ability to relocate temporarily for work, following the stimulus money could be useful.

The site advises readers to take full advantage of the government’s Web site established to record the use of the stimulus funds. If you visit www.recovery.gov, you can track down recipients of the money, as it contains an large database on grants and funding awards. Then, narrow it down by state. See what North Carolina has to offer. For example, the LED lighting company, CREE, was given a $39 million in stimulus money to create “green” jobs and manufacturing positions. To date, they have hired 375 people.

The most simple way to locate potential employment is under the “Opportunities” menu on the government site. There is a direct link to jobs that allows you to search by phrase and job type, for example, “marketing jobs in Washington DC” or Electrical work in Omaha NE.” Hey, if you have a cousin in an area that’s hiring, it could work for a while.

You can also look under USAjobs.gov for work that is backed by the Recovery Act. However, it is important to note that this site highlights government and public service jobs. Nevertheless, the federal government has been known to pay well, offer great benefits and provide terrific job security. So it’s certainly worth a shot.

As we mentioned, politics have been hampering employment aid. Last week, as we discussed here, it took days of political grandstanding to pass a $140 million bill that would extend unemployment benefits. It’s passing offers the unemployment and potentially bankrupt a small cushion.

Unemployment is directly related to debt problems and thus, the tremendous increase in personal bankruptcies. Maybe, in a couple more years (we don’t want to sound bleak) when unemployment is back at reasonable levels, the government can fund more training programs or maybe use stimulus money to support proactive job growth efforts so we don’t have assemble the dike during the flood.

Look, we want to help as many clients as we can. We just wish there was more we could do before they call us. Good luck, stay positive and call us- we can get rid of your debt while you look for a job, and give your family some well-deserved relief from relentless creditor calls. Call today to set up a free debt consultation- 1-800-899-1414. Convenient offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, March 11, 2010 @ 2:40 pm

Currently unemployed and getting unemployment benefits?
Then, this message is for you.

In this horrible economy, there is no guarantee that you will get another job or…even if you do…when.

And…those life-saving unemployment benefits? They are going to run out and when they do…that’s it.

Imagine the worse…no job…and no more unemployment benefits.

What would (will) you do? Will you look back and wish you had saved some of these benefits for your “rainy day”?

When you are sitting there with no job and no more unemployment benefits…when you are not able to put food on your table or pay your rent or mortgage…or put gas in the car…will you look back and wish you had done something more to make those unemployment benefits stretch a lot further?

Will you look back and kick yourself?

Will you look back and wonder what you were thinking…now that you can’t even pay your essential monthly bills…when you were using those precious unemployment benefits to pay on non-essential items like credit cards and medical bills…especially when you find out that there was something huge you could have done…when you find out that…in these dire straits…in this horrible economy…with no end in sight…you could have filed bankruptcy and gotten rid of all those debts?

Without doubt…you are a good person and good people do their best to pay all their bills. That’s what makes you honest.

But…when it comes down to having made a choose to pay on credit cards and medical bills, rather than having made a choice to save up some of that money to keep a roof over your family…and you ask yourself…in retrospect…which was more important…your creditors or your family…what will be your answer?

Your family of course.

Well…you already lost one or more jobs.

What makes you so sure that you will get another job…or get another soon enough to avert disaster?

And…even if you do get another job…maybe even one as good as you used to have…what says you won’t lose that job too?

The fact is that this economy is the worst that any of us have ever seen and…for as much as we all want to believe otherwise…there is no end in sight.

Quite the contrary! We have all dug ourselves a huge hole and it could well be 10 years before we dig out.

You have a chance here…if you will grab it…to look back and know that you make the tough choice and filed bankruptcy and gotten rid of all those debts…and…more importantly…put yourself in a position to keep some of those precious unemployment benefits in your pocket as a hedge against running out of money before, if and when things pick back up for you and your family.

Think about it. Are you on unemployment? Are you paying out any of this precious…one-time-only…money on credit card debt, medical bills and other “unsecured” debts?

If things don’t work out for you…if things don’t pick up and quickly…won’t you need this money to…make sure that your family survives…no matter how bad things get?

Filing bankruptcy NOW…before your unemployment benefits run out…may be the smartest thing…looking back…you ever did. It could well be the difference between your family surviving…when other families do not.

This is your chance to invest in your future…by making sure you don’t keep dragging along with you debts you know are sucking up money that you may well need to take care of your family.

Do you really want to chance it…by not filing bankruptcy?

Wouldn’t it at least make sense to find out how this whole bankruptcy thing works and what all it could do for you…to take away the guesswork and find out for sure from a lawfirm that does this stuff for a living 24/7/365?

You certainly don’t want to be looking back later, wishing you had taken the time to find out more and thinking “That was dumb.”…or worse.

And the best thing is…you can find out all about bankruptcy and what it can do for your family…for FREE…and at NO-RISK.

Find out answers & options for FREE!

Why? Because we offer a totally FREE ANALYSIS of your entire financial situation.

This means you can come in, sit down, get all the answers, and find out all your options (bankruptcy and othewise)…and do it for FREE. GUARANTEED!

Our 10 EXCLUSIVE GUARANTEES!

And…that’s not all. To make you feel more willing and less hesitant to come see us…know that we offer 10 different GUARANTEES. We just want you to get this valuable information…and to know that you can do so…AT ABSOLUTELY NO-RISK.

Want to find out about our 10 GUARANTEES? (Click Here)

If you know us at all, you know that we are not high-pressure. That’s just not who we are or how we work. The truth is…we don’t need to “sell you” on anything. If you need it…the help and relief the bankruptcy laws provide sells itself.

Trust me on this…when I say “You will be amazed when you find out…not what you have always heard but…how bankruptcy really works”…we’re not kidding and we’re not exaggerating.

The truth is the Bankruptcy Laws are the biggest secret there is…right in plain view.

You see, what happens is that you have heard so much bad about bankruptcy that…if you are like most people…you turn off at the mere mention or thought of filing bankruptcy.

But…even though you don’t know me…do me one favor. Don’t believe it. Don’t believe what you have heard. It does not work at all the way you have been told.

There is a good reason why 1.5 million families filed for bankruptcy last year…and it wasn’t because bankruptcy was so bad. Think about it…Maybe it was because…in reality…bankruptcy was so GOOD.

Maybe filing bankruptcy is right for you…maybe not.

But with a totally FREE ANALYSIS available to you…you have nothing to lose.

So, don’t wait. Call today!

Better yet, call now because every dollar of your hard earned unemployment benefits you spend on bills and debts you could get rid of…is…arguably…a dollar wasted…and a dollar wasted is a dollar no longer there to take care of your family.

During normal business hours…call toll free 1-800-899-1414

The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt
Offices in Raleigh – Durham – Fayetteville – Wilson

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, March 7, 2010 @ 8:10 am

Before you begin the bankruptcy process, it’s important to understand a few helpful hints to make it a more painless process:

(1) Remember: You are not Alone.
Maybe you think of bankruptcy as something for “other people.” But the days of bankruptcy as a means of financial respite for the perpetually poor are no more: everyone from the solidly middle class to formerly wealthy Americans are being forced into bankruptcy more than ever before. Because of steady declines in real estate values, and rises in health care costs, credit card interest and unemployment in all sectors, more than 8% of bankruptcy filings in 2009 came from people who made over $60,000. So, begin by dispensing with any preconceived ideas of bankruptcy in lieu of a successful strategy for setting off on a sound path to personal financial freedom.

(2) Personal Bankruptcy Puts You in Control
While people who drown in debt remain at the mercy of their creditors, bankruptcy can actually be a better way to take control of your financial future. If you file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you play an integral role in determining how you’ll pay off your debt, including a trusty payment plan that works for you. Even Chapter 7 bankruptcy can buy precious time to halt creditor harassment, save money and plan your next best fiscal moves.

(3) Bankruptcy Can Be a Key to Better Credit
As counter-intuitive as it may seem, bankruptcy could potentially improve your credit scores in the long run. Obviously, the immediate effect of bankruptcy is a lowering of your credit scores. However, filing can be the better option for your long-term credit than enduring late payments on credit cards for years in an attempt to stave off what is more than likely inevitable: default. Because some 35% of your credit score is based on your payment past, it is vital to your financial future to avoid missed payments and establish new credit as soon, and as much, as possible. Even though bankruptcy stays on your credit report for 7 to 10 years, it does not necessarily follow that your credit score will be low for that entire time. If you take steps to rebuild after your bankruptcy, your FICO score can quickly be restored to where it was prior to your filing.

(4) With Bankruptcy, Timing is, in Fact, Everything
When you’re facing insolvency, timing can be especially important. And that’s also the reason it’s the best time to talk to a qualified bankruptcy lawyer. But just because you’ve consulted a lawyer does not necessary mean that bankruptcy is the next step. While it’s hard to believe, it is sometimes your best move to hold off on your filing until the worst of your financial situation is over. For example, if you are facing impending medical costs, you may want to wait to file until you’ve recovered fully before filing for bankruptcy, simply to avoid accruing more medical expenses during the process. In the alternative, some situations demand that you file sooner than later, such as if your car’s been repossessed and you need it back immediately. As a result, consulting a bankruptcy expert is your best bet to making your bankruptcy work for you.

(5) With Bankruptcy, You Never Have to Go it on Your Own
Bankruptcy isn’t a cakewalk, but you never have to go it alone. In fact, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future. The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, March 6, 2010 @ 8:59 am

Just when the credit card industry thought it was safe in Washington, Uncle Sam has decided to keep them over his knee for a few last good swats of discipline in the form of tighter regulations on late fees.

For many who struggle with credit cards, the problem is not always uncontrollable spending—it’s the fees. Late fees, annual fees and over the limit fees can pile up faster than Feburary snow in Minnesota, pushing customers over the edge into an avalanche of additional credit problems.

However, earlier this week the Federal Reserve proposed new limits on how credit card companies apply penalty fees for things like missing a deadline or going over the limit.

The proposal suggests that these new restrictions go into effect in late summer 2010. Earlier provisions in the credit card bill began last May and were phased in over time. The introduction of this latest component of the bill may signal to the credit card companies that they are now an ongoing target in the sights of pro-consumer members of the House and Senate.

The Fed is concerned with the fact that a $5 surpassing of one’s credit limit triggers a charge of $40. The new law is recommending that the penalty be more closely aligned with the dollar amount in question. More clearly, if you spend $5 over the limit, that will be your penalty.

One thing to consider is what impact this will have on those who consistently teeter on the edge of their limit. By lessening the consequences, is there a risk more people will no longer fear the penalties? A penalty needs to send a message.

Other facets of the proposed action include a limit on late payment penalties to only the amount of the cardholder’s current minimum payment. Thus, the $39 late fee average that so many of us see from month to month would be a thing of the past.

One of the more important components addresses multiple fees for a single action. For example, if you are late and over your limit, you can only be assessed one fee. The beauty in this part is that it will include the fees that some banks are now charging for not using your card, called an inactivity fee.

Still, there are some aspects of the bill that may warrant additional debate. It does not prohibit the application of a $39 late fee for someone who has a $70 minimum payment. The new laws that just became active include six month interest rate increase reviews that require banks to review, six months after they increased your interest rate, if the reason for the increase is still valid. However, they can also consider current market conditions, which may lead to reasoning on why the rate should remain higher.

A lot of our readers struggle with credit card debt, which has carved out a deep niche in the financial struggles of us Americans. Thankfully, some of these laws may lessen the credit card companies’ role in our financial problems. The rest of it though, is up to us.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, March 2, 2010 @ 11:52 am

As we’re all aware, this decade’s Great Recession has dealt, and continues to deal, a significant blow to the budgets of many American families, leaving millions in debt, underwater in their mortgages, and looking for any means necessary to get back on a financially-healthy course.  Now, we’re finding that tax time is also yielding it’s own set of challenges for some cash-strapped citizens.

In his recent New York Times article, “Paying the Price for Survival Tactics,” Charles Delafuente reports on how the I.R.S. treats many kinds of written-off debts, some distressed home sales, and many emergency withdrawals from retirement accounts as taxable income.

Debt Forgiven By A Lender
In his timely piece, Delafuente introduces the concept of “phantom income:” an amount a lender forgives but for which the debtor still owes tax. In your case, this taxable amount becomes essentially the difference between what the lender would have received from you and what it will receive under your new agreement. As Delafuente explains, “These taxes are imposed even if only the interest rate, not the amount of principal, is reduced. That happens, for example, to consumers who renegotiate credit card debt. A lender is supposed to issue a 1099-C form reporting forgiven debt, but that doesn’t always happen if the principal is not reduced.”

As is normally true in the tax world, there are exceptions to the forgiven-debt rule. Keep in mind, forgiven debt is not taxable income if it is discharged by bankruptcy, or if you are considered insolvent—whereby your liabilities exceed the fair market value of your assets—when the debt is forgiven.

Mortgage Debt
While recent bailout measures enacted to help homeowners generally won’t trigger the forgiven-debt tax on a principal home, “foreclosures, short sales and other loss-of-home scenarios could bring on capital gains tax.” For example, if your home is worth significantly more than a mortgage and is repossessed and sold by the lender, you are entitled to the difference. As Delafuente explains, “The difference is a taxable profit, which will cause a capital gain. Fortunately for the masses, the first $500,000 on gains on a main home for couples ($250,000 for single taxpayers) may be covered by a tax exclusion. Further, nonrecourse mortgages, in which the lender can’t touch any assets other than the property, generally don’t cause such a gain.”

Retirement Withdrawals
Aside from your mortgage, if you withdraw money prematurely from their retirement accounts because of a job loss or a reduction in hours, you will also face extra taxes.  Holders of traditional I.R.A.’s and I.R.A. rollover accounts must pay 10 percent of any amount withdrawn before they reach 59 1/2 as a penalty on top of the traditional taxes on money taken out, which must be paid regardless of your age.

If you have a Roth I.R.A., you’ll face different rules. Your contributions—but not the account earnings—can be withdrawn without penalty after five years.

If you have an employer-sponsored plan, like 401(k)s and 403(b)s, you face yet another set of rules. For you, withdrawals are penalty-free if you left the employer that set up your plan after you turned 55. However, money rolled over to an I.R.A. from a former employer’s plan is subject to the 59 1/2-age rule.

Most 401(k) and 403(b) plans do not allow current employees to make withdrawals; instead they often have loan provisions. But another tax nightmare occurs if you have an outstanding loan and lose your job. In that case, you must repay the loan quickly or have the balance treated as a withdrawal, making it subject to tax and to the 10 percent penalty if you’re under 55, unless an equal-payment plan is used.

But remember, before borrowing from your retirement accounts, one of the best debt forgiveness plans comes from a personal bankruptcy. In these taxing times, a qualified bankruptcy attorney can help you conquer your fears before losing it all.  Specifically, the bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, March 2, 2010 @ 10:09 am

Developed to slow the rate of Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings, the Means Test helps determine whether or not someone qualifies to file Chapter 7, and in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, to what extent you might be able to pay back some of your creditors. It’s become a very frustrating part of the bankruptcy process because it implies, “Hey, you just don’t want to pay your bills.”  Not only that, it also subjects filers to additional frustration, confusion and widens the gap between citizens and the law in place to protect them.

However, there are ways to overcome the restrictions and complications of the Means Test.  Of course, this is where the insight of an experienced bankruptcy attorney is especially beneficial, as it can take some time and expert handling.

Called “special circumstances,” a judge may grant you permission to file Chapter 7 in spite of failing the Means Test. (Failing, in this context, indicates that you have some ability to pay and that you would have to file under Chapter 13 and pay your monthly disposable income to your unsecured creditors through a Chapter 13 plan.)  If you are a member of the Armed Forces and a call to duty dramatically alters your income and there is no reasonable alternative money source, the results of the Means Test can be rendered non-applicable.

You can also be granted a special circumstance for a sudden, serious illness that will take you out of your job or further damage the economic viability of your family.  Job loss, in some cases, can lead to ability to file under the “special circumstance” exception to means test applicability.  However, the job loss would have to be sudden, proven legitimate (you can’t be found to have provoked it) and the income from that particular job itself would most likely have to had been the reason you failed the test.

There are other ways the results of the Means Test can be put aside. However, it is very important for you to understand that these are actual, legal strategies, not encouraged methods by which to circumvent the court. That’s called fraud, and you’ll be nailed for it.

The means test uses an average of your income over the six months prior to filing your case.  That being said, you have the ability to time your bankruptcy filing according to a period in time when your income will be at its lowest. If you know bankruptcy is on the horizon but can sustain a few months without employment, you can file down the road to ensure your last six months of income fall below the state median, which is a major factor in the Means Test.

Additionally, expert bankruptcy attorneys can advise you on a number of ways that you can reduce the amount you will have to pay through a Chapter 13 plan.  This is what bankruptcy professionals call “means test planning.”  Need health insurance? Purchasing a plan for you and your family before your bankruptcy is a good way to add expenses and reduce income. The code allows you to deduct what you pay for health insurance. The same applies for disability insurance.  Been wanting to put away more for retirement?  You can increase your 401(k) or 403(b) contributions through your employer and take the contributions as a deduction against your six-month average income in the means test.

You may not realize it, and in fact, they may be a reason for your having to file, but your rising mortgage and car payment may contribute to your passing the means test. Or, if you are expecting an increase in any of the interest rates on those loans, considering waiting until they kick-in to file.

The term “household” does not mean family. It means, quite literally, how many your “house holds.”  This means relatives, children who have moved back in after the backpacking trip around Europe and even that weird guy that rents the storage loft in the garage. And since the reform act in 2005 bases the median incomes for the means test on “household” and not family, the size of your household can have a serious impact in your favor.  The more people who live in a house, the higher the threshold of income required to qualify for the means test.

It can be scary thing, the means test. It literally changed the benefits of bankruptcy for thousands and thousands of Americans. If you are worried about it or just have additional questions, don’t hesitate to contact us.  We have helped over 40,000 North Carolina families through the process of bankruptcy and our attorneys know the means test inside and out.  Call The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to schedule your FREE consultation at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, February 28, 2010 @ 9:26 pm

Bankruptcy is one of the most important decisions you may ever have to make. It’s not a decision to take lightly, and our office understands that you and your family have a lot of questions. While many of the same laws apply to many cases, rarely is your financial situation the same as another person’s. We all have different reasons for needing to rely on the bankruptcy code and just about every reason is as justifiable as the next.

To assist you in the most direct and non-invasive method possible, we have created three communication vehicles by which you can begin to explore why bankruptcy may be your best way out from under an impending financial crisis.

1. First, you can arrange a face-to-face meeting with us. Our practice serves North Carolina residents in 30 of our 100 counties and we have offices in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville.

We structure these meetings to be confidential and without obligation. That means you are not encouraged to file bankruptcy or beholden to us in any way. We feel that because financial stress can be such a difficult matter with which to cope, it is best for us to be there for people who have questions. Maybe you’re worried about a collection agency. Or your bank isn’t returning calls about a mortgage modification. Whatever the nature of your debt question, a one-on-one meeting in one of our four offices can help you get it answered.

And best of all, there is no charge for this meeting. The introduction of money to a meeting such as this would only apply undue pressure and in many cases, add to your debt load. That is not what we want.

if you feel a personal meeting is for you, call us at 1.800.899.1414.

2. Another way to get things started or to ask questions is over the phone. If you can’t make it to one of our offices or only have time on your lunch break, maybe a phone call is the best way.

We understand that those in serious debt often develop a mistrust of those who want to help, especially given the ubiquity of shady “credit doctors” and debt settlement programs. Too many people have lost a lot of money to these bogus outfits. Please understand, we’re here to help you get out of debt using the strength of federal bankruptcy law. If you don’t believe us, take a look at our client testimonials at http://www.billsbills.com/testimonials.php. Talk to us in person or over the phone. We’ve helped thousands of families get through the very same financial challenges you’re going through right now.

3. Lastly, you can reach us via the Web. Our site, www.billsbills.com, has an easy form, available here, that you can fill out for us to call you. If you choose too, you can add some basic information about your situation, which will help us get some questions answered before we speak and thus, help you make a decision quickly about the best way to proceed. It won’t take more than five minutes to complete.

Again, we know that making the decision to file for bankruptcy is a serious one that deserves a lot of research. Our goal is to help you clearly understand the nature of your debt and how it can best be settled. If you can think of some additional ways to engage us or have suggestions for us, please let us know.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, February 26, 2010 @ 4:19 pm

Everyone—from the halls of Congress to the many channels of media—is paying a ton of attention to those Americans who have lost their homes in the seemingly endless mortgage meltdown. Virtually ignored have been the millions who continue to pay their mortgage every month, even when they really can’t afford to. As a result, most homeowners are losing big on what used to be their biggest investment.

Which begs the question: Is the best solution to stop paying your mortgage?

For homeowners around the country who haven’t skipped their mortgage payments—but are seriously struggling—there are several reasons why homeownership is going less than swimmingly:

You’re Trying to Staying Afloat While You’re Underwater
Many of you are struggling to pay off a mortgage balance that is significantly higher than the value of your home. As a result, selling your home is simply not an option, since you would ultimately have to come up with the difference to settle with your lender.

You’re Drowning in the Deep End of Debt
Many homeowners just like you are spending down their savings, taking cash advances and/or relying on credit cards to buy bare necessities. Why? Because you’re using every actual dime that’s coming in to keep up with your mortgage payments. The result is millions of Americans who are not only underwater on the their mortgages, but who are also drowning in debt.

While staying current on your home commitment is admirable, and very much the American way, it’s also a quick and easy way to drain your savings, retirement, or nest egg, while also accumulating enormous debt, simply to avoid the dreaded “F-word.”

Consider Foreclosure
While it can be scary, this particular “F-word” can be your first, best step to a pair of “F” positives: financial freedom. If you are now hundreds of thousands of dollars underwater and go into foreclosure, your losses are essentially erased. In most cases, your lender can take the house, but not your future earnings with the only real financial consequence being trouble getting a loan for almost a decade (in an era when getting a loan isn’t easy even for those with stellar credit).

Unfortunately, most foreclosure alternatives are simply bad ideas. Let’s take, for example, the short sale. In a short sale, the lender is agreeing to accept less than what is owed to satisfy your loan. Assuming you find a buyer, you will then have run the offer by your lender. Even if they decide to go along with it, you could still be stuck with the deficiency if you’re not careful. That’s not to mention the tax implications of the forgiven debt. Why go through the hassle of a short sale, if it’s just as likely to hurt your credit, and may lead to even more debt.

Another foreclosure alternative, the loan modification, would be an option if lenders were granting permanent modifications. The problem is, most lenders are understaffed, behind on applications, and you’re likely to get lost in the shuffle. As of 9/1/09, over 362,000 loans have been granted a trial modification. Of those trial modifications, only 1,711 have been approved for permanent modifications.

And Then There’s Bankruptcy
If your credit score is going to suffer anyway, why not create a completely clean slate? As a hurting homeowner, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, February 26, 2010 @ 7:15 am

For most bankruptcy bound individuals, a discharge of all individual debts is considered the Holy Grail of any bankruptcy filing, yielding a permanent injunction that prevents creditors from collecting on debts. However, any good discussion of debt dischargeability also tackles the primary exceptions to look out for when considering any bankruptcy filing.

Exceptions to the power of a bankruptcy discharge, include:

Certain Tax Obligations
Withholding taxes are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, although you may be able to use a Chapter 13 case to pay these over time (notwithstanding any accrued penalties and interest).  Similarly, sales taxes are not dischargeable, but again, Chapter 13 can establish a payment plan for lessening the load and paying this out over the long haul.

The question of whether your income tax can be discharged ultimately depends on how old the tax debt is and when you filed the tax return.  In order to be dischargeable, your tax debt for the tax year in question must meet the following conditions: the due date for filing your tax return is at least three years ago; your tax return was filed at least two years ago; the tax assessment is at least 240 days old; your tax return was not fraudulent; and you are not guilty of tax evasion.

For example, in a 2009 bankruptcy filing:

• Taxes from 2006-2008 are not dischargeable;
• Taxes from 2004 and before are eligible for review; and
• Taxes from 2005 are potentially dischargeable if the return was filed by the debtor on or before April 15, 2006. If the return was filed under an extension, then the 2005 taxes are not eligible for the following review unless the debtor files after October 15, 2009.

Fraud and Certain Credit Usages Before Filing
Fraud is a valid creditor objection to a bankruptcy discharge. To find fraud, a creditor must prove: (1) a statement made under false pretenses; (2) a material fact; (3) designed to deceive the creditor; (4) that does in fact deceive the creditor; (5) the creditor reasonably relies on the statement; and (6) the creditor suffers actual damages resulting from the reliance.

The general rule here is this: if you’re considering bankruptcy it’s best to avoid maxing out (or in some cases simply using) consumer credit, credit cards, or loans. Bankruptcy law now demands that bankruptcy bound debtors like you do not take cash advances or purchase luxury items on credit 90-days prior to your filing bankruptcy. If you do purchase large or luxury items through these means, creditors may challenge you (and these discharging these debts) in Court if they believe that you have acted in bad faith in using credit excessively.

Domestic Obligations
Alimony, child support and spousal maintenance debts are not dischargeable in either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Additionally, the first prong of bankruptcy, the automatic stay, does not act to stop most collection efforts for these claims. An exception to this exception comes in the second type of domestic asset splitting known as equitable distribution. While equitable distribution—a dividing of martial property as a result of dissolution of the marriage—is no longer dischargeable in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the same is not true in Chapter 13. Chapter 13 bankruptcy, in what is called as its “super discharge,” can aid a former spouse having trouble paying their bills to eliminate this type of burden. These issues are complex, and it is important that you speak with a bankruptcy expert if you have these types of issues.

Student Loans
In an effort to protect the education lending industry, and allow student loan money for almost anyone who wants it, Congress has made virtually every advance in connection with education non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. To that end, these loans are non-dischargeable “unless excepting such debt from discharge…would impose an undue hardship on the debtor.” While the definition of “undue hardship” is ultimately to the discretion of your bankruptcy judge, if precedent is any “judge,” this is a high hurdle to surmount. As a result, if you’re considering a bankruptcy filing simply to discharge a large student loan bill, don’t lose hope, it may just be best to wait: the tide appears to be turning in Congress to loosen this exemption as the costs of education skyrocket and more and more Americans face insurmountable educational tabs.

Because of the complexities of bankruptcy law, a qualified bankruptcy attorney is a necessary tool in your financial toolbox to help you conquer your creditors and face your fiscal  fears, yielding the right kinds of debt relief—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, February 25, 2010 @ 6:05 am

In an era of extreme economic downturns and rising unemployment, having a car at your disposal has never been more necessary for work, job interviews and providing other basic fiscal needs…even as you consider a personal bankruptcy.

Yet, if you’re on the road to bankruptcy, these same economic issues and employment woes can mean you may have fallen behind on your most recent car payments, leaving your precious vehicle as a prime target for repossession by your car’s creditors. And while your bankruptcy filing’s “automatic stay” suspends a creditor’s ability to repossess most assets, you may be wondering what happens when your car is taken prior to your filing.

As with most things in bankruptcy, whether you can get your car back from your creditors largely depends on your ability to act quickly, diligently and with a purpose.

Once your vehicle has been repossessed, it is absolutely vital that you immediately seek the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy attorney, informing the attorney of the status of your car and that you need to file bankruptcy right away. While the repossession was likely caused by an inability to afford your car payment, this first, best step to get your car back through bankruptcy will require that you have enough funds to pay your attorney, the bankruptcy court filing costs, as well as the requisite credit counseling fees.

Another potential challenge, comes in the form of one word: paperwork. As time is of the essence to save your car, you must be able to provide instant information about your current financial situation so that you can file quickly and without any hidden loopholes. Typically, you will have ten days between the date of your car’s repossession to the time that the creditor actually sells the car. As a result, you and your lawyer will need to move fast.

Once you file for bankruptcy, it’s important to note that any further creditor action is stopped by the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay.  While the automatic stay also means that the creditor cannot sell the car once you file, it does not assure the return of your vehicle. But take heart: for a pre-petition repossession, most bankruptcy courts have procedures by which a debtor whose car was repossessed may be allowed to get the vehicle back once the bankruptcy case is filed, including the potential that the debtor will be required to pay back possession and storage fees accrued in the interim, provide proof of car insurance, and have money on-hand to pay the various court and repossession fees.  In all cases, though, the process is neither cheap, nor easy: something the bankruptcy bound individual may always want to avoid.

So, to avoid any headaches, hassles or hardships the best rule of thumb is, if you are going to file bankruptcy, do so before your car gets repossessed.  In short, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you not only conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, but also keep a much-needed car, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— to keep you moving (literally and figuratively) in your fiscally-viable future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button and let these experts take the wheel to so you can start down the road to your next best financial steps.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 9, 2010 @ 6:39 pm

If you couldn’t tell by the utter onslaught of tax preparation service ads and the sudden presence of temporary cubicles in that once abandoned retail space at the corner of your favorite strip mall, let us be the first to remind you that it’s tax season.

We take interest in this time of year because tax returns can mean one of two things to our readers: more debt or more money. Since we are all about helping you figure out what to do with your debt, we hope this post will educate you regarding what tax season can mean for your financial well-being.

There are number of tax deductions out there that get ignored by a lot of families. Worse yet, they are not even addressed by many of the “come-and-go” tax return preparation services out there. On that note, we encourage you to take caution when deciding who to work with if you are not someone who handles returns on your own. We should also point out that there is good reason to hire someone to help with your tax returns, primarily to alleviate stress and ensure they get done correctly.

That being said, make sure that the person you hire is an actual financial professional, not someone who was just trained to punch data into a computer program. Ask friends or co-workers if they can recommend a reliable Certified Public Accountant that has a tax service. Yes, it will cost you more money, but not that much more.

If you have no choice but to use a temporary tax shop, ask for the most senior member of the team. Many of these operations do have supervisors on staff with actual accounting and tax experience. Remind them that there are countless shops just like theirs that would prefer your business to encourage the top person to give you appropriate attention.

To further ensure you are getting the service you deserve, remind your tax preparer about the most often missed tax deductions. An article on MSNBC.com highlighted seven of them, which do require you to itemize:

• Home ownership deductions can include mortgage interest, property taxes, fees involving the sale of your home and agent commissions.
• In North Carolina, the personal property tax you pay on your car each year can also be a deduction.
• Always hang on to your receipts for charitable donations, even the bags of clothes you gave to Goodwill. When any charity asks you if you want a receipt, say yes.
• Did you know you can deduct mileage expenses if you use your own car in a charitable effort? You can. Go back and write down when you did and even keep receipts for bus trips to the location of your volunteering. Parking fees and other tolls count, too.
• If you had to travel for work, keep track of any dry cleaning and laundering receipts for clothes you needed on behalf of the company. This only counts if you are required to look the part and don’t try it with the torn jeans you wear on the flight.
• Also related to business travel are the costs of shipping materials or paying for your baggage, which many airlines now require. So hang on to those receipts as well.
• Other miscellaneous deductions related to work include costs for faxes, Internet access or hotel phone calls.  You may also be able to deduct moving expenses. Make sure you provide good proof that the costs you incurred are directly related to the available deduction category.

We would hate to see your tax bills become the reason you have to file bankruptcy.   However, if you have been stuck with a large tax bill from the past, or if you anticipate owing taxes that you can’t pay all at once, you should consider bankruptcy as an option to either discharge taxes eligible for discharge or pay certain taxes that can’t be discharged over a period of several years through a Chapter 13 plan.   If you have any questions about how tax bills are handled in Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, give us a call, we’ll be glad to help.  Call 1-800-899-1414 to schedule a FREE consultation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 9, 2010 @ 6:25 pm

Very few people set out to open a credit card account intent on not paying off the balance.  Those who do are assumed to be criminals, usually identity thieves or some other sort of con artist.

Credit card debt, and all other forms of long term financial drain that lead good people into the need to file bankruptcy, is very often caused by a setback of some kind, like illness or job loss.  And if recent unemployment predictions are on track, we can expect the bankruptcy rate to continue to climb.

The News & Observer published an Associated Press report about the impact job losses are having across the country. The piece also warned of a dire future.

On February 5, the Labor Department will release its January unemployment numbers. Industry analysts expect to read that an additional 800,000 positions have been lost since March of last year. That’s almost 1,000,000 more people out of work. In total, we can blame the loss of almost 8 million jobs on the Great Recession.

The Labor Department’s report will also illustrate the theory that another four years of healthy fiscal growth will be needed to return to the country’s employment figures to stable.

Job reports are notoriously vague, as the report will demonstrate that 5,000 jobs were added to the economy last month. For some, that signifies a positive sign. As does the rise of gross domestic product statistics, which show that this critical metric has climbed for the second quarter in a row.

Nevertheless, that small number is not enough to prevent the national unemployment rate from experiencing a slight increase. When the numbers come out, which are based on unemployment insurance tax figures turned in to state governments by companies, most are expecting to see 10.1 percent of the country’s workforce out of job.

As our economy becomes ever more global and harder to track, the further out of touch those making the important decisions about our country’s financial health become with the everyday workforce. All the statistics, theories and Wall Street rallies do not mean anything to the unemployed parents of four children.

Whether it’s out of fear of new taxes, the expiration of existing tax programs, health care requirements or lack of credit to fuel growth, the fact remains that companies are simply not hiring. Stimulus projects designed to spark growth, like home buyer tax credits, are soon to expire and creating the fear that the faint signs of recovery will dissipate.

Signs of productivity increases can be attributed in part to business practices designed to get more out of fewer employees. It helps that those still holding a job are willing to do more to protect it, now that the realization of the recession has become clear to everybody, not just line workers and cubicle drones.

So what does all this mean for bankruptcy rates? Quite a bit actually. It isn’t difficult to connect the sudden loss of income with the inability to pay bills. Today’s conditions are making it worse though. At one time, jobs were easily found, shortening the time frame a person was without income. In that window of unemployment, people could get by on savings or available credit. With credit limits being reduced, loans hard to come by and savings at all time lows, the need to file for legal protection becomes necessary sooner than ever.

If you are out of work and see the window of financial viability starting to close, maybe it’s time to call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 to explore some options.  Bankruptcy might just be your best way “Out of the Red and Back in the Black.”

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, February 5, 2010 @ 10:06 am

Try as we might to understand some the esoteric banking principles that contributed to the recession or give the industry any benefit of the doubt, the folks on Wall Street just keep giving us reasons to believe they are, and will forever be, drastically out of touch with the way the rest of America lives.

Last year, CitiBank, one the nation’s major banking services players, announced a plan to provide customers with a truly free checking account, provided some account usage stipulations were met, in an effort to attract new accounts and to do their part in helping us stave off the effects of the recession. However, come November 2009, an announcement was made that additional fees would be applied to individuals that carried less than $1,500 in all accounts.

The fees were going to be applied to “EZ Checking” and “Access” accounts. The products would allow customers who made at least two monthly online bill payments or used direct deposit to not be subject to maintenance fees and per-check charges.

Needless to say, this did not sit well with a lot of people. Nor did it pass the smell test for the New York State Attorney General’s office. Citing that the bank did not make it known within a reasonable timeframe that the fees would kick-in, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo managed to convince the bank to suspend any impending costs for consumers who had signed up for the accounts.

Those who registered for one the “free accounts” can continue to bank free of charge until the end of January of next year. Despite the case being tackled in New York State, customers across the country are eligible to continue using their accounts without being subject to the announced fees.

Cuomo, in a press conference about the settlement, spelled it out clearly for CitiBank customers. “If you signed up for free checking, the bank can’t change the terms and must extend the offer for a reasonable period of time. We are defining reasonable, in this context, to be for one year.”

The practice of surprising consumers with short notice announcements of interest rate hikes or banking fees is exactly what led to the recently enacted credit card reform. Far too many Americans have been subject to incentives that promise free services and discounts only to have them yanked away at the moment it hurts the most.

There is nothing wrong with a company making money. However, doing so with deliberately vague or misleading tactics is an entirely different story. There is not one in the industry that believes CitiBank intended to continually provide its customers with free checking; not in this economy. And sure, their marketing is most likely perfectly legal. But is it ethical?

These tactics can lead those teetering on financial ruin right over the edge and often into bankruptcy. Worse yet, it can severely disrupt the plans of a person emerging from bankruptcy who was seeking affordable checking options.

Consumers continue to be victimized in today’s post recession-landscape. And while Washington is doing what it can to adjust mortgages, ease bankruptcies and fix unemployment, there seems to still be too many sharks and plenty of guppies. Stay on your toes, folks.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 2, 2010 @ 3:29 pm

It’s almost February and ‘tis the season for thinking about tax time—even more so if you find yourself considering the benefits of bankruptcy. So, if you believe bankruptcy is the right option to help you start fresh in 2010, in addition to trying to get your 2009 taxes filed in a timely manner, and wondering whether you can discharge any income tax debt in your bankruptcy filing, you may also be thinking about how you can protect your precious tax refund from creditor claims.

But, just in time to file (for taxes and/or bankruptcy), here are some timely tips for protecting your tax refund:

Alter Your Exemptions
If you’re expecting a larger tax refund in the same year you plan to file for bankruptcy, your first best step is to alter your tax exemptions and allowances in the months prior to a bankruptcy filing. Increasing your exemptions now means you’ll receive more money in your paycheck to use throughout the year and less money in the form of a lump sum tax return. In addition to the benefit of being able to apply that money to necessities throughout the year, that’ll be less money available for creditors to seize at the time of any necessary bankruptcy filing.

Apply for Advanced Earned Income
If you receive what’s known as an “earned income” tax credit you can also head off some bankruptcy issues by providing your employer with a W-5.  This special tax form allows you to receive your earned income credit on a monthly, weekly or quarterly basis. And like the tax refund, this process disburses this money directly to you, keeping your money out of government coffers and potentially out the hands of awaiting creditors.

Know Your Refund
While some can’t wait to file, many people time their bankruptcy for a time following the potential for receiving a non-exempt, but sizeable, sum.  As such, when considering your bankruptcy, it’s important to determine what your refund will be. Depending on whether you’re receiving a generous refund, you may consider holding off on your bankruptcy filing until you have had an opportunity to use the refund on your family’s necessities—spending the money on food, clothing, medical co-pays, car repairs, etc., keeping all receipts as you spend.  In the alternative, if you are planning to file for bankruptcy, do not use your tax refund to pay back relatives or friends, large sums of unsecured debt to any one unsecured creditor, or purchase luxury items, all of which could cause a problem with your bankruptcy filing in terms of creditor claims.

Know the Rules for the State You’re In
Your own state’s laws could mean your refund is partially or fully exempt from creditor claims. As a result, it is essential that you consult with a qualified bankruptcy attorney to review your individual bankruptcy situation in and around tax time. This consultation can assure you’ve attempted to protected your precious tax refund from every imaginable angle.

If you are considering bankruptcy, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you with additional tax decisions, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a financially viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at http://www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 2, 2010 @ 2:30 pm

Many of our clients automatically assume they will lose their rental property if they file for bankruptcy. Isn’t that the whole idea of bankruptcy? That you give up everything you have, with a few exceptions, in exchange for getting the debt collectors off your back?

Well, no. Many factors come in to play in determining whether or not you will be forced to sell your rental property, including whether you file chapter 7 or chapter 13, how much money you owe on the property and how much income you receive from it.

Let’s start with chapter 7. If you file chapter 7, you get an exemption for the equity in your primary residence – how much depends on the state you live in – but rental property doesn’t qualify for the standard residence exemption. Therefore, you will only be able to protect the property from sale if you can cover it under your available wildcard exemption. The North Carolina wildcard exemption is $5,000.00 per filer- not much. However, your state may have additional protections if you own the property jointly with your spouse. In North Carolina, if you own the property jointly with your spouse, the property is only subject to claims of joint creditors. If all of your debt is in the name of one spouse or the other, the property may be protected- regardless of the amount of equity. Talk to a experienced bankruptcy attorney, who can examine how you hold title and if you have any joint debt.

But what if you don’t have any equity in the house, or minimal equity? What if, for example, the house is worth $100,000 and you owe $120,000, or even $99,000? The trustee’s job is to determine whether or not there is money for your creditors, not to take away everything that belongs to you. He will determine the property’s worth, then subtract the projected sales costs, selling it and paying taxes on the proceeds. If it’s not worth the trustee’s time and effort, it’s unlikely that he will try to sell it.

With Chapter 13, there are additional caveats and concerns. In general, you should be able to keep your rental property in a Chapter 13 filing. In fact, since the rental property is not your primary residence, you might be eligible for cramdown under chapter 13 – meaning that if you owe more than the property is worth, the bankruptcy judge is able to alter the terms of the mortgage to reflect the property’s current value rather than the amount you originally agreed to pay for it. This could lower your monthly mortgage payments, as well as the long term amount you have to pay to the bank for the property. Cramdown isn’t allowed on primary residences, but it is allowed on other secured debts, including rental property.

Do note, however, that rental property can, under certain circumstances, cost you money. The trustee in a Chapter 13 case will look at all the costs associated with the property – your mortgage payments, plus taxes, insurance, upkeep and repairs. If these costs outweigh the income the property brings in, the trustee may object to your plan on the basis that the money you’re spending on the property should be distributed to your unsecured creditors. In such a case, surrendering the property may be your best option. However, this is a very fact-sensitive issue and depends on how your jurisdiction interprets very complex provisions of the bankruptcy code. Only an experienced bankruptcy attorney can advise you on your specific situation. Bottom line- if you’re deeply in debt, talk to a bankruptcy attorney and get the real facts. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville. Call today: 1-800-899-1414 or visit www.billsbills.com for more information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 4:46 pm

You may have read on the blog, or elsewhere, that many are calling our current economy a “middle class recession.” This is because the numbers are way up on bankruptcies filed by those who make more than $60,000 per year, up 6.9 percent from 2008. Bankruptcies on the whole are up 36.5 percent from this time last year.

So why does it matter how much money a person makes when filing bankruptcy? Well, because bankruptcy is often considered an escape route for the financially unreliable or worse yet, “something poor people do.” It’s just not true.

Today, bankruptcies are increasing among people in the real estate profession, namely developers and agents. When the housing bubble dissolved, so did the incomes for a lot of American families.

There are different types, or “chapters” of bankruptcy for a reason. Basically, some versions are better suited to different situations. Chapter 7, for example, is typically filed by those who may have lost a job or for some reason may not have regular source of income. It wipes out all debts, but also mandates a person dispose of their “non-exempt assets” as a way to repay creditors to whatever extent possible. If you have equity in property beyond available exemption limitations, you may have a “non-exempt asset”.  Many states’ exemptions, as well as the federal exemptions, provide some measure of protection for everything from your home to retirement accounts. It is not often the case that a family has assets beyond what available exemptions can protect.  Even if available exemptions do not cover all of a person’s property, Chapter 13 provides a way to pay the equity above available exemptions to unsecured creditors, so that a person may keep his property, if he can afford to do so.

For those who are still earning a living or at least have a source of money, Chapter 13 creates a three- to five-year payment plan. Your plan payment will largely consist of secured debt, like your car and mortgage payments. Because the plan payment can include your attorney fees, Chapter 13 is an attractive option if you do not have enough up-front money for Chapter 7 attorney fees.

Maybe you’re giving some thought to a debt-settlement firm instead of bankruptcy. Sure, it’s natural for you to want to negotiate your way out of debt. Unfortunately, many of these companies position themselves as an alternative to bankruptcy that will save your credit. More often, however, these debt settlement companies end up doing far more damage to your credit than if you had simply filed for bankruptcy from the start. Remember, just because you’re in a “debt-settlement” program, your creditors will continue to report your missed payments to the credit bureaus. A bankruptcy, while causing an initial hit to your credit score, will stop the negative reporting and allow you to rebuild your credit score faster.

Bankruptcy is an organized, legal process with pre-defined results. Debt settlement firms function under very little regulation and ask for payments before all the debts are settled, therefore the incentive to settle the debt is not as strong as if they were paid based on results or after everything is taken care of.  Thus, your “debt settlement” is by no means guaranteed.

And one more point on debt settlement agencies: the IRS considers forgiven debt as taxable income. In contrast, debt erased as part of a bankruptcy is not taxable.

Another important point about bankruptcy has to do with timing. It’s key that you don’t file too early or wait too long. Start by simply adding up what you owe and making a simple estimate on what it would take to pay it off yourself. If the discrepancy seems impossible to make up, or would force you to sacrifice your family’s needs just to make a dent in your debt load, then consult an experienced consumer bankruptcy attorney.

On the other hand, don’t wait until the car has been repossessed or the foreclosure notices start arriving. Use your head, remain calm, and speak with an attorney. The bankruptcy concept itself is fairly straightforward.  The process however, requires a good deal of legal expertise.  Engage it wisely.  Take time to understand the basics of filing.

From the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.  Helping families through bankruptcy since 1995. Call today to set up a free initial debt consultation in one of our 4 convenient office locations. Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 2:14 pm

One thing you may already know about most court proceedings, is that parties usually have the option to represent themselves without the aid of an attorney. This is called appearing ‘Pro Se’, which, in Latin means “for oneself”. In a bankruptcy proceeding, when money is tight, the thought of saving money by cutting out attorneys and their fees can be pretty tempting. But there are many reasons this is a bad idea.

Bankruptcy can be complicated and bankruptcy judges are a picky bunch. They expect that the preparation of the voluntary petition, schedules, or other documents will be done accurately and on time. A bankruptcy attorney can usually prepare the documents in much less time than it would take for you to figure it out on your own. He or she knows what items of personal property should or should not be included on the petition to avoid a dismissal of your case, and how to apply the Means Test to your situation.

Some courts may give pro se applicants some minor concessions or leeway so that the case can be moved along, but they are careful to avoid crossing the threshold of what may arise to the level of the Court doing the job that a litigant – or his or her counsel – should be doing. Also, many different communications are exchanged between a party and the court, the trustees reviewing the petition, as well as the creditors. Your actions, or lack thereof, during this time, can seriously affect the outcome of your petition, and may even lead to the worst outcome- a dismissal of your case.

Normally, when you retain an attorney to handle a bankruptcy, the attorney will contact creditors on your behalf and attempt to stop any embarrassing, annoying, or even harassing debt-collecting activities. Usually this stops the behavior, even though legally, the creditor still has the right to contact you. He or she can also give you advice on seemingly innocuous activities that could negatively impact your case, such as drawing on retirement funds to pay bills.

Then there is the significant issue of knowing the law. Since there are several sets of rules governing bankruptcy proceedings, trying to navigate all the rules at once can get very confusing. All parties to any bankruptcy proceeding must comply with the Local Bankruptcy Rules, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the case or other sanctions. Other important aspects of law can come into play at any time during this process as well, such as statutes of limitations, transfer of assets, or tax issues that can have a big impact on your proceedings as well.

Finally, many bankruptcy proceedings are entangled with other legal issues, such as divorce, civil court action, or foreclosure, which could affect the outcome of your bankruptcy proceeding, and vice versa.

Before deciding to gamble with your future, talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney about it. You will find the cost well worth it.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 10:48 am

The decision to file for bankruptcy is never an easy one, especially where married couples are involved. Spouses must settle issues of dishonesty, mistrust, and frustration–and that’s even before any of the complex steps of collecting necessary documents and filing papers.

But the story for insolvent couples does have a caveat: joint bankruptcy protection. Married debtors can file their cases jointly with one trustee, one filing fee, and one total case. Debtors can bring to the table their joint debts as well as debts they hold only in their name. To be a joint case, the debtors need only be legally married.  And they must be a man and a woman.

Sounds simple right?

Well, for thousands of individuals living in America today, the latter designation raises difficult questions—especially in the growing number of states that recognize same-sex marriage or its legal equivalent (“civil unions”). Yet, as the constitutionality of laws and amendments forbidding marriage equality continue to be litigated across the country, same-sex debtors seeking bankruptcy relief  face even tougher challenges.

Because it is generally accepted that the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) would preclude the filing of a joint bankruptcy petition by a same sex married couple, these folks face two very different options: (1) make two separate bankruptcy filings, or (2) pursue the right to seek bankruptcy relief as would an opposite-sex married couple. 

While the second option would be a precedent-setting endeavor, fulfilling the true meaning of marriage equality, in reality pursuing this groundbreaking goal is largely antithetical to the larger motivations of most bankruptcy bound individuals, gay or straight: getting out of debt.

In practice, a married same-sex couple will need, more than their heterosexual counterparts, the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy attorney to pull together all of their required financial information;  ensure that it is complete and their disclosures accurate; and research and prepare a case that anticipates a variety of motions attacking the joint filing. Regardless of what “party-in-interest” files the case (as defined by the Bankruptcy Code and common law), the filing will likely be challenged, even before a judge reaches such substantive issues as income, assets, liabilities, and creditors.

In this case, like others for same-sex couples seeking right-giving precedents, while the Bankruptcy Code provides one standard, constitutional arguments will inevitably reveal others that need to be briefed and raised.  Same-sex couples must expect that any decision in their favor will be appealed, perhaps more than once to a US District Court, a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, a Circuit Court of Appeals, or maybe even the Supreme Court of the United States.  For debtors, this type legal wrangling adds ,ore time, more fees and inevitably more stress to what is undoubtedly an already nerve-racking situation.

As a result, for a married same-sex couple facing the need to file bankruptcy, the next steps can mark a tough decision: file singly or fight the system; seek your family’s financial security or a denigrated group’s fundamental rights; moving forward for your family or moving your family forward.  In the end, changing the current state of the law will take either an act of Congress or one or more very brave and very patient married same-sex couples who find themselves drowning in debt and who–in spite of these debts—also feel empowered to fight the good fight.

The state of marriage equality is not yet where it should be in the United States, and this seriously affects the legal rights of same-sex families.  But until the law changes, same-sex couples need expertise in the handling of their cases.

If you live in North Carolina where same-sex marriage is not legal, but are still considering bankruptcy, the bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, January 30, 2010 @ 3:37 pm

This unrelenting economic downturn has been rough on all Americans—whether they be single, dating, engaged, married or widowed. But, as anyone who has ever been married already knows: money can be the main cause of many a marriage’s marital strife. As a result, in this especially difficult economic climate—full of job insecurity, rising mortgage costs, health care uncertainties and other mounting money woes—times have never been tougher for couples pushed to the brink of bankruptcy.  Many are left to wonder, who or what can help?

Yet, no matter how tough the economic tide, laying blame to your spouse for your family’s financial problems can be a dead end road that often leads to, at best, long-term distrust, and, at worst, the dissolution of the entire marriage. As unfortunate as it is that one or the other spouse may be the cause of the couple’s insolvency, fortunately, the power of the Bankruptcy Code can provide hard-hit couples with a clean slate by which to not only discharge their shared debt but also provide a unique opportunity to learn valuable lessons in budgeting and other healthy financial behaviors, together. These lessons include:

Bankruptcy Ends the Blame
Unlike a disgruntled spouse, bankruptcy does not blame either party or search for a decisive reason behind a debtor’s insolvency.  Instead, a bankruptcy filing means an accounting of all relevant debts and responsive solutions to how to discharge them. As a result, this process takes the pressure out of solving previously insurmountable problems with debt and creditor claims, granting a clean slate by which one spouse can be forgiven, another can forget, and both can move forward into a financially viable future.

Bankruptcy Ends Arguments at Their Source
As anyone who is married can attest, marriage and debt can make for a very volatile mix.  Bankruptcy removes divisive topics like debt from most marital arguments—discharging creditor claims and giving the previously cash-strapped couple the chance to begin to save for their next best steps.

Bankruptcy Protects Marital Assets
Bankruptcy shields a married couple’s most valuable assets and precious income using the power of an “automatic stay.”  This court-mandated suspension of creditor claims can shield the marriage by protecting the innocent spouse from the financial indiscretions of the other—preventing wage garnishment, creditor lawsuits, and unwieldy interest fees.   

Bankruptcy Can Sooth Marital Stress
Finally, in addition to wiping away many of the most pressing debts affecting many couples these days—and thereby relieving some of the fodder for arguments and discord—being honest with your spouse, or each other, about a dire financial situation, will provide a healthy framework for your relationship. This honest dialogue sets a perfect stage for a safe financial future and provides a strong marital precedent to overcome other challenges that both husband and wife may face in the weeks, months, and years ahead.

If you are considering filing for bankruptcy to strengthen your union, as well as your finances, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you make the right spending decisions, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a fiscally viable and secure portfolio.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 6:57 pm

Ugh. Debt. These days most Americans are sick of hearing the d-word. And who can blame us? Americans are in more debt now than ever before. Avoiding debt seems impossible…there are so many things you can’t even do without credit cards or loans that we now take debt as a matter of course. Despite our negative feelings about debt, Americans want to repay what we owe. In fact, this noble instinct is what keeps some people from filing for bankruptcy when they desperately need to do just that. Not only are people afraid of having a negative impact on their credit scores (which in fact may already be in the basement), they also feel that the right thing to do is pay back debt.

When it is possible, paying back debt is the right thing to do, no doubt about it, but most people who declare bankruptcy don’t end up in a bad situation because they made negligent mistakes or don’t feel like paying; instead, dealing with the curve-balls life throws at us can prevent us from meeting obligations. By the time people opt to declare bankruptcy, they are not unwilling to pay back debt they simply can’t. The thing to remember is that creditors know that and take these factors into account. This is the reason creditors charge higher interest rates when they extend unsecured credit. If bankruptcy is the right decision, you shouldn’t allow misgivings about not paying certain kinds of debts hold you back.

What many people don’t even consider is that declaring bankruptcy can actually help you pay back debts. Consider this example: Say you are considerably behind on payments that are secured by your home or your car. In such a situation, filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy can allow you to reach a compromise between what is feasible and what your creditors expect. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, a repayment plan could save your home from foreclosure by allowing you to catch up on back payments. Similarly, a Chapter 13 repayment plan can allow you to catch up on back payments for your car, helping you to avoid losing your vehicle to repossession. In both situations, the creditor is receiving payments for the credit they have extended, and you are working with a plan you can actually meet. This also applies to debts that you would not be able to discharge in a bankruptcy, such as child support payments and back taxes owed to the IRS. A Chapter 13 plan can help you make up for missed payments in the past while easing the pressure of being hassled and worried about never catching up. Eventually, with a good Chapter 13 plan, you are more likely to succeed in getting current on all your required payments.

A strategically timed bankruptcy can also help you in those situations where you may be able to pay off all your debts by selling assets, but you simply need more time. With aggressive creditors hassling you constantly, you may end up selling assets for less than they are worth, just to do so more quickly or to avoid penalties. This could land you with debts still to be paid and no assets to boot. A typical example is if your home is foreclosed on. Your home is not likely to sell for what it is actually worth if it goes through foreclosure. This means that you will no longer owe the mortgage company, but you will also lose the value in your home, if any, that exceeded the value of the mortgage. By declaring bankruptcy and forestalling foreclosure, you reap the actual benefit of your investment and potentially pay back everyone you owe.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 6:33 pm

It’s tax season. Which means that for most people, it’s time to realize just how much we give to Uncle Sam every year. For some, the prospect of a refund provides a glimmer of hope that some new money is coming in soon to pay off debts.

Just a quick little note on your tax dollars before we get into the meat of this post: it is actually better to owe just a little bit of money after filing because that means that you have used more of our your own money throughout the year instead of giving it all to the government. Sure, a nice windfall come April is a nice thing. But keep in mind that it’s your money—you’re just getting it later. And, when it comes to investing, “money now” is always better than “money later.”

Because it’s tax season, we thought it important to discuss how taxes and personal bankruptcy can relate to one another. It is possible to use bankruptcy as a way to get rid of large, outstanding tax obligations but it’s not as easy as discharging a few grand in credit card debt.

Chapter 13 bankruptcy in most cases requires you to pay back what’s owed within your monthly payment plan and Chapter 7 rarely allows for the complete expulsion of your tax debts. (If you’re not sure of the differences between Chapters 13 and 7, simply do a search on our blog for each.)

There are, however, some precedents set for removing tax obligations as part of a bankruptcy. Although we encourage you to understand that it is a complicated process and the results are not always what you may be hoping for.

(Understand this post is only scratching the surface. Only in person can we provide a full breakdown of taxes and bankruptcy.)

One reason tax debt and bankruptcy tend to get tangled is that past due taxes can fall into all three categories of debt type: Dischargeable, Nondischargebale priority debts, and Nondischargeable priority debts.

Provided you filed your taxes on time, legally and provide no evidence of tax evasion other than legitimately being unable to pay, you can discharge tax debt in Chapter 7 and 13. Still, what’s owed must be more than three years late and assessed more than 240 days before you file. That means that you were officially declared late and in debt that many days before you filed. This ensures the IRS that you are not declaring just to get rid of a recent tax debt.

BUT (you knew there was one), that 240 day window starts only after the last extension expires, not when the original debt was assessed. Other impediments to that three year time-frame include a 90-day addition if a previous bankruptcy case of yours was still open while you were assessed the tax debt; the addition of any time the IRS was prevented from collecting as a result of a court ordered due process hearing plus an additional 90 days; and any time that a debt assistance professional formally asked the IRS to temporarily halt collection efforts.

Basically, any effort you make to delay the collection of tax debt, even if perfectly legal, counts against your ability to discharge tax debt in a bankruptcy.

The key to bankruptcy and taxes, like all things in life really, is to be completely honest and upfront. Any attempt to hide or even coyly plead ignorance will be considered an attempt to obscure or defraud the court and even worse, the IRS. Not being able to pay your taxes, especially after a mid-year job loss, is a common thing. Don’t make it worse.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 8:41 am

Part of understanding bankruptcy is knowing who the professionals are that you will meet and deal with along the way. From your attorney to even your creditors, it helps provide a solid foundation of comfort to actually understand the role of those who are playing a role in your financial future.

One of those individuals is the case Trustee, the most prominent member of the bankruptcy process. And, the involvement you have with the case trustee depends on which chapter of bankruptcy you are filing.

As you may know, the 2 main “chapters” are 7 and 13. Well over 95% of all bankruptcy cases filed are filed under Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.

Let’s start by talking about the Chapter 7 trustee.

In every district in the country, there are 1 or more attorneys who have been appointed to act as a Chapter 7 Trustee. These Trustees are also sometimes called panel Trustees. When you file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, one of these panel Trustees is assigned to your case.

The best way to think of this person is as an intermediary between you and the Court, an attorney whose job it is to make sure you have told the truth, the truth and nothing but the truth, to make sure that you have disclosed everything you are legally obligated to disclose, and to find and sell any ‘assets above exemptions’.

Fortunately, in our experience, in about 98% of Chapter 7 cases filed, there are no ‘assets above exemptions’ to sell. What does this mean for you? Just that if you file Chapter 7, there is very little chance you will lose any property you don’t want to lose.

As long as you have told the truth, disclosed everything, cooperate, and have no assets that cannot be protected by available ‘exemptions’, your contact with the Trustee should be a positive one.

However, the best approach is to assume that the Trustee assigned to your case is not your friend, so that you stay cautious and alert.

In most cases, you are first introduced to the trustee at your 341 meeting, also known as the “Meeting of Creditors”. Technically speaking, this meeting is held to provide your creditor an opportunity (in most cases, one last opportunity) to ask you questions. However, most of the time, none of the creditors show up, and then, it’s just you, your attorney and the Trustee. At this meeting the Trustee will ask you questions necessary to get to know you and your case better and necessary for the Trustee to carry out his or her duties. (There a number of posts here on the blog about this meeting. Take a look.)

Let’s say you are unlucky enough that your case falls in the approximately 2% of cases with more assets than can be protected. In this case, it is important that you understand that it is the Trustee’s duty to sell or dispose of those assets ‘above exemptions’, and to then distribute the proceeds to your creditors. Basically, anything not considered exempt property must be seized and sold by the trustee.

The type and amount of exemptions are, for the most part, set by the law of the State where you live. There are exceptions. Being set by State law, exemptions vary greatly. However, since in 98% of bankruptcy cases filed, there are no assets not covered by available exemptions, the exemptions statutes are, for the most part, fairly generous. However, make no assumptions in this regard. Always, always seek the help of an experienced, full time bankruptcy attorney. Such an attorney will be an expert in what exemptions are available in your State and how best to apply them. Such an attorney will also be able to tell you what is not protected.

The Chapter 7 Trustee is also responsible for tracking down any gifts you made just before filing, whether or not they were made in an attempt to hide assets or not. For example, if your nephew got a few thousand from you for his birthday the week before you filed bankruptcy, rest assured that your Trustee will be looking to get this money back. And, it’s not even safe to pay back relatives or friends prior to filing. These people are generally considered “insiders”, and, subject to certain exceptions, paying back insiders during the 12 months before filing bankruptcy is a “no no”, which will result in your Trustee being forced to try to get the money back.

Chapter 7 trustees are paid by a commission based on the amount of money they recover, so it stands to reason they’ll work hard to find and sell what property they can.

Now, let’s talk about Chapter 13.

The Chapter 13 Trustee, aka the Standing Trustee, is also first introduced to you at the 341 meeting. However, their role is more about ensuring your income is sufficient to pay your monthly Chapter 13 plan payment and that your proposed Chapter 13 plan is properly calculated. Assuming all goes well, it is then this Trustee’s job to collect from you your plan payment and to distribute it to your creditors.

Like the Panel Trustee, the Standing Trustee is paid a commission. However, unlike a Chapter 7 Trustee, the Chapter 13 Trustee gets his commission not from what he takes and sells, but rather out of the money you send in each month. Chapter 13 Trustees do not sell things. That’s just not his job.

The best way to think of your Chapter 13 Trustee is as the Chief Financial Officer in charge of your Chapter 13 plan. He runs the business of your Chapter 13 case. He figures out what is needed, and then accounts for and distributes the money you send in each month.

Your relationship with your Chapter 13 Trustee will be vastly different than the one you would have with a Chapter 7 Trustee. Chapter 7 Trustees live, for lack of a better way of saying it, for what they can “kill and eat”. Chapter 13 Trustee do not. Chapter 13 Trustees live off a percentage of what you send in each month. The Chapter 13 Trustee only succeeds in getting paid, if you succeed in making your payments. Therefore, as a general rule, Chapter 13 Trustees, at least those who recognize, so to speak, which “side their bread is buttered”, will go everything in their power to help you make a go of it in Chapter 13.

In most cases, as long as you make your required Chapter 13 plan payment, you can think of the Chapter 13 Trustee as more of a friend than adversary. He or she still has to do the job, but doing the job includes doing the best that can be done to make sure you do yours and that you get the full benefit of bankruptcy, all the way to the desired “discharge”.

If all of this is confusing and scary, we understand. Bankruptcy law is complicated and complex, to say the least. Need an expert? In North Carolina, there are many, good, experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

One is the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, serving 30 counties in middle and eastern North Carolina. John Orcutt offers a Free initial consultation at 4 different locations: Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson. Call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 or visit his website for tons of info on bankruptcy: www.billsbillsb.com .

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, January 24, 2010 @ 8:18 am

Brent T. White, a law professor at the University of Arizona, has a provocative new study out, “Underwater and Not Walking Away.” He points out that as many as 32 percent of all homeowners are ‘underwater’ on their mortgages – they owe more money than their houses are worth. The media has produced a series of articles decrying homeowners who simply stop paying on these ‘upside down’ mortgages as irresponsible and even obscene. In fact, White notes, less than three percent of people whose primary residences are foreclosed on are people who could have continued to pay their mortgages. There are no discernible difference in foreclosure rates in places where housing prices have dropped steeply. Rather, foreclosure rates closely track unemployment rates, suggesting that it’s generally people who lose their jobs and are no longer able to pay their mortgages who lose their homes to foreclosure.

This is true even when it would make more financial sense for people to walk away. Nationwide, housing prices have dropped 30 percent since their peak in 2006; in some cities, drops have been much steeper. Parts of California, for example, have seen drops of 65%. The result is that many people could pay rent on a new house at only a fraction of their monthly mortgage. Homeowners in this situation could save tens of thousands of dollars by walking away. So why don’t more of them do so?

Emotions of fear, guilt and shame come together to encourage people to act against their own self-interests, White argues. There’s a concerted message being put out not only by the banking industry, but also by the government, the media and even non profit consumer counseling agencies that ‘good people’ live up to their responsibilities and don’t walk away from their obligations. That message is allowing the banking industry to shift not only the responsibility, but also the consequences, of the housing crisis entirely onto the shoulders of homeowners.

Certainly there are some negative consequences to society of walking away – foreclosures tend to cluster in neighborhoods, and neighborhoods with a large number of foreclosed homes often become run down and dangerous. But what about the consequences to society of staying and struggling to pay these huge mortgages? Doesn’t that empower a banking industry that made poor decisions and led the economy into this trap?

White points out that in a stable housing market, a house should be about 15 to 16 times the price of a year’s worth of rent. In some markets, the average mortgage being written was 38 times the price of a year’s rent. Shouldn’t the bankers, experts in housing prices, be held to some account for writing these kinds of mortgages and letting housing prices get out of control?

The guilt, shame and fear that White writes about seems to apply only to consumers. We see this echoed in the way people think about credit card debt and bankruptcy. When consumers are unable to pay their debts, they are somehow shirking their responsibilities; when banks can’t pay what they owe, they find themselves ‘undercapitalized.’

This isn’t to say that financial irresponsibility should be more acceptable. However, maybe we need to rethink the way we hold consumers to a higher moral standard than lenders, and instead force the same financial accountability on all parties.

If you’re considering letting your house go, protect yourself from deficiency liability by filing for bankruptcy. For more information, visit our website www.billsbills.com and call to set up your free initial debt consultation. Serving North Carolina families since 1995, the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, January 23, 2010 @ 7:15 am

You know your creditors: those nice folks who give you something you want — goods, services, or money — in exchange for your promise to pay them back at a later date.  In practical terms, a creditor can be a credit card company, a bank, a hospital, your local dentist, or any person or company to whom you owe a debt.

But, in these unfriendly economic times, [exactly] what happens when you can’t or won’t pay back that debt? What should you do when your creditors come calling? Can you keep creditors at bay or are you bankruptcy bound? Conquer your fears of dealing with your debt and remember the bankruptcy basics necessary to keep you from a creditor crunch.

Remember: Filing a Lawsuit Against a Debtor is not a Creditor’s First Choice
Keep in mind, creditors normally don’t want a lawsuit any more than you do. In fact, a creditor will not normally file a lawsuit against you until after many months and sometimes years of pursuing you for non-payment. Plus, creditors know that even if they file a lawsuit, it can be quickly neutralized by your bankruptcy filing—dispensing with your unsecured, and in some cases, even secured debt.

To Answer or Not to Answer
When you fail to respond to a creditor’s lawsuit, the creditor will gain a default judgment. This judgment will give the creditor the right to take certain collection actions against you, which could include seizing your bank accounts or garnishing your wages. In the alternative, if you respond to a creditor’s lawsuit—providing an “answer”—it can buy you precious time to secure more savings or take an excellent opportunity to file Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

The Consequences of Judgment Day
A judgment is a judicial order that, if it is not obeyed, will invoke legal consequences.  In extreme cases, a failure to pay a judgment filed on behalf of your creditors could result in a bench warrant issued by the court for your arrest. Keep in mind, only bankruptcy can help you avoid this type of judgment.

Settling What Constitutes A Settlement
Creditors file lawsuits because they simply want some kind of payment and, in the process, are often willing to settle for a lesser amount for repayment. Yet, while creditors want these types of settlements, it’s important to make sure your settlement offers are in writing.  Additionally, you should also be wary of so-called “debt settlement” firms who claim they can settle your debts for pennies on the dollar. Remember: you don’t need a firm to settle your debts…creditors filing lawsuits often offer settlement amounts; but the forgiven debt may be taxable. In the end, keep in mind that debts settled or discharged in bankruptcy are not taxable.

Worried About Wage Garnishment?
As mentioned, any creditor who wins a judgment against you can also garnish your wages or seize your bank accounts.  Only bankruptcy can stop your wages garnishment or a bank seizure order to raid your valuable accounts.  If a creditor seizes your wages or accounts after you file bankruptcy, you do have legal recourse and it’s even possible to get those assets back.

Knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 22, 2010 @ 7:59 pm

Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren met with David Axelrod, one of President Obama’s senior advisors, Wednesday night. On Thursday, President Obama announced sweeping new restrictions on the largest banks: they will no longer be able to operate hedge funds and new policies will restrict how large a bank can be. Obama also called for an end to the obscene profits and enormous bonuses at firms that claim any additional fees or taxes would have to be passed on to consumers.

Is there a connection between Warren’s meeting and Obama’s proposed reforms? And, more importantly, could an increased role for Warren in Obama’s administration be good news for people who would like to see better bankruptcy laws and more bank and lender accountability?

Possibly yes, to both. Warren is an expert on bankruptcy who has spent two decades studying not just the economics of bankruptcy but its effect on real people. Her landmark study in the 1990s showed that the majority of people who declare bankruptcy do so not because of profligate spending but because of unexpected life events like divorce, loss of a job or enormous medical bills. Warren admits that it was not what she expected to find, and that this study changed the focus of her research. Her book The Two Income Trap: Why Middle Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke, builds on this idea, pointing out that core costs, like mortgages, health care, transportation and child care have all increased enormously over the last few years. In addition, if families are living paycheck to paycheck on two incomes, they have twice as much chance that one of the breadwinners will lose their job, and then send the family spiraling toward poverty.

Warren has been an outspoken advocate for better bankruptcy laws, and testified against the bill in the hearings before it was passed in 2005. Last year, she was appointed chair of the congressional oversight panel appointed to investigate TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program). Under her direction the panel has published easily-understood reports calling attention to the Treasury’s failure to ensure that taxpayers receive a fair deal. She’s also proposed a Financial Product Safety Commission, along the lines of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. This commission would be able to regulate financial products like mortgages and credit cards based on fairness, simplicity and appropriate risk. President Obama is insisting that any overhaul of financial rules include this commission; rumors are swirling that he will appoint Warren to head it.

That would be the banking industry’s worst nightmare. The major banks argue that The Financial Product Safety Commission would bring us back to the 1970s, with double digit interest rates and a sharp dip in available consumer credit. But it seems likely that most bankers are more concerned over limits to their bonuses than limits to the average Americans access to credit. Appointing Warren would tell the banks that Obama is serious about regulating banking abuses.

Obviously, the commission hasn’t been created yet, and Warren hasn’t been appointed to run it. But it’s hard not to see that only good things will come of having a powerful advocate for the financial distressed given such a role.

From the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, helping North Carolina families get out of debt for over 15 years. Call today for your free initial debt consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 21, 2010 @ 11:50 am

The latest chapter in the Obama administration’s attempts to make lenders modify mortgages is to send SWAT teams – no, I’m not kidding, really, SWAT teams – into the call centers of major lenders to try to ensure that they follow the proper procedures and actually modify loans. Seriously, wouldn’t it be a whole lot easier just to pass cramdown and allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages than to try to sweet talk, bribe or otherwise convince bankers to do it on their own?

Because they’re not. Making Homes Affordable, the program implemented by the government last May, is designed to encourage banks to modify the loans of homeowners who are having trouble making mortgage payments. Mortgage companies are reluctant to do that, however: they make more money in interest and fees when a mortgage goes into foreclosure, than they make from the government when they successfully modify it. The government had hoped to have 3-4 million mortgages modified by the end of last year. As of mid December, the count was at 750,000 – the vast majority of those were still in the trial stages.

The news reports of lenders dragging their feet are backed up with anecdotal evidence from homeowners, who report that they call the lenders over and over, file and refile the same documents, and then call back, only to be told that no one knows anything about their case. Lenders counter that people don’t send them the requested documents. Really? Desperate homeowner, one last shot at keeping their home, and they can’t be bothered to fax some papers? The lender argument is a little hard to believe.

Hence, the SWAT teams. These are teams of three people, sent into the call centers of the seven largest loan servicers to make sure that the bank representatives are giving accurate information, filing forms properly, etc. Experts are not impressed – many say the initiative is unlikely to work. Some have called for putting permanent government observers in the call centers. They note that private insurers already have their people inside the call center, to help prevent the loans they’ve insured from going into foreclosure.

Unfortunately, neither temporary nor permanent government observers in the call centers seems likely to work. This is another initiative – like the ‘foreclosure hall of shame’ that was supposed to embarrass the lenders into modifying loans – that the banks will evade and ignore until the administration acknowledges it isn’t working and moves on to something else. The fact is, lenders aren’t going to modify substantial numbers of mortgages until they are forced to. Unless an initiative like cramdown is passed, which takes the decision to modify or not and how much out of the bank’s hands and gives it to a neutral party, foreclosures will continue to rise.

Fortunately, homeowners finding it difficult to pay their mortgage may have another option to save their home: bankruptcy. Your bankruptcy attorney will return your phone calls, keep your files organized, and not make you fax documents four or five times. In addition, he or she will help you map out a plan that will lead you to financial freedom. The Obama administration may sincerely want to help homeowners. But as long as they expect bankers to do it out of the kindness of their hearts, you’re probable better off filing for bankruptcy.

Brought to you by the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Providing North Carolina homeowners real foreclosure relief since 1995. Is your lender not working with you? Call today and find out how a bankruptcy can save your home. 1-800-899-1414. Convenient offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville, and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, January 20, 2010 @ 11:34 am

In this special series, entitled “Bad Ideas for the Bankruptcy Bound,” we’ll introduce what to avoid when bankruptcy is your next, best step.

Love may move mountains,
but money can crumble the strongest marriage.
– Ron, Lieber, The New York Times

Everyone who’s married knows: money can be a primary cause of marital strife. As a result, in this especially difficult economic climate—full of job insecurity, rising mortgage costs, health care uncertainties and other mounting money woes—many debtors who have accumulated all kinds of debt without the knowledge of their spouse are sometimes tempted to file for bankruptcy “secretly” and avoid sharing the financial “bad news” with their spouse.

Regardless of the fiscal reason, this path can lead to losing it all with your better half. While one petitioning spouse doesn’t mean the other has to file for bankruptcy also, it’s assuredly never a good idea to hide a filing from your husband or wife. Here’s why:

Disclosure of Your Debts is Inevitable
While married people like you have a legal right to file for bankruptcy by your lonesome, what you don’t have readily available is any way to keep the news of your bankruptcy filing from your spouse. When you stop paying your creditors in anticipation of your bankruptcy filing, inevitably these same creditors will begin calling and writing your home—the same space you share with your unknowing spouse.  Remember, the bad news of your insolvency can come from you or them, with a bit less sensitivity from the latter.

You’ll Need Your Spouse’s Support
Married folks who file for bankruptcy must provide information regarding their spouse’s pay, last year’s tax returns, proof of retirement and an array of other information that might require your better half’s information and input.  Keep in mind, your requests for this information will ultimately raise your spouse’s suspicions and the likelihood of your spouse finding out—one way or another.

Joint Accounts Automatically Get Your Spouse Involved
Filing for bankruptcy means that if your spouse’s name appears on any of your debts—such as joint credit cards, mortgages, or the like—they’ll find out the hard way when creditors pursue them for an alternative way to get paid.  In addition, if your spouse is using one of the forms of credit that will be included in the bankruptcy filing, you’ll need to tell him or her to stop using this credit before you file—another reason your spouse will be alerted to your insolvency.

Don’t Risk More Stress in Insolvency
Obviously, hiding your debts from your spouse is dishonest. Hiding your bankruptcy from your spouse, as you’ve seen, is almost impossible.  Both non-disclosures will add unnecessary stress and strife to your relationships. And amid these harsh economic times, life can be tough enough without all of this interpersonal withholding.  The first step to a fresh financial start together, is being honest about your bankruptcy with your spouse. Don’t forget, there is no more ruinous a financial move than a divorce and no greater road to divorce than fiscal dishonesty.

Knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help lessen the marital stress of bankruptcy, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a financially viable and secure future.  A good bankruptcy attorney can also dispel the many myths and stigmas of bankruptcy, offering truthful information about this powerful form of debt elimination. The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 19, 2010 @ 3:02 pm

So you’re drowning in debt and desperate for a way out. A friend or relative asks if you’ve considered a 401k loan. “They’re quick, simple to qualify for, and here’s the best part: you’re paying the interest to yourself.” Sounds like a brilliant solution, right? Why pay 25% interest to a credit card company when you could be paying 6% interest to yourself?

Stop. You want to think long and hard before you take out a 401k loan, especially if you’re already in debt.
Fayetteville debt relief,
The most important thing to know is that, in bankruptcy, your retirement savings – 401k accounts, pensions, 403b accounts, traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs and even plans for small business owners and the self employed – are protected from your creditors. That bears repeating. If you declare bankruptcy, you keep all the money in your retirement accounts.

If you’ve taken the money out in the form of the loan, however, your creditors can take that money.

Moreover, failure to pay back a 401k loan comes with serious drawbacks. If you lose or change jobs, you have to pay back the entire sum within 60 days. If you’re unable to make payments on the loan – or the lump payment in the case of changing jobs – you’re required to pay all taxes on the outstanding money, plus a 10% penalty.

In addition, recent court cases have determined that because you’re paying the money to your own account, a 401k loan cannot count as debt, and is not part of the Means Test. This means that you could be tipped into a Chapter 13 plan even if you’re spending significant amounts of money repaying a 401k loan. If you’ve already borrowed the money, though, don’t despair. It’s true that it might bump you into filing Chapter 13 rather than Chapter 7. However, while the Means Test is very similar to the disposable income formula in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, there’s one important difference and that’s the 401k. You’re allowed to both contribute to your 401k in a Chapter 13 plan, and to repay your 401k loan, and take both as a deduction on the means test. This means your plan payment may actually be lowered if you are making a 401k repayment.

There may be times when 401k loans aren’t a terrible idea, even if you’re facing bankruptcy. It might make sense, for example, to take out the loan in order to catch up with mortgage payments before you file bankruptcy. But this is a situation where you should really discuss the pros and cons of your actions with a bankruptcy attorney before undertaking the loan. One important rule of thumb: it doesn’t make sense to take the loan out to repay unsecured debt, debt that will most likely simply be dismissed in bankruptcy.

One final note: not every 401k plan permits loans for any reason. Some plans restrict them to specific purposes, such as first time home loans, medical expenses, college tuition or mortgage payments. Before even considering this option, you need to make sure it’s available to you.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 19, 2010 @ 2:48 am

The holidays are now officially over. The New Year has begun in earnest. And ‘tis the season for tax time. If you believe you’re bankruptcy bound in 2010, that definitely means it’s also time to get your 2009 returns in order.

Thinking About Chapter 13 Bankruptcy?

Chapter 13 bankruptcy helps restructure your debt into a more manageable payment plan—allowing you to pay back what you owe over time, often at a percentage of the cost. If you’re considering this type of bankruptcy, it’s important to remember that tax returns should be provided in Chapter 13 cases.  You must file all tax returns for all tax years – including returns for 2009.  Bankruptcy Code Section 1308 provides:

(a) Not later than the day before the date on which the meeting of the creditors is first scheduled to be held under section 341(a), if the debtor was required to file a tax return under applicable non-bankruptcy law, the debtor shall file with appropriate tax authorities all tax returns for all taxable periods ending during the 4-year period ending on the date of the filing of the petition.

(b) (1) Subject to paragraph (2), if the tax returns required by subsection (a) have not been filed by the date on which the meeting of creditors is first scheduled to be held under section 341(a), the trustee may hold open that meeting for a reasonable period of time to allow the debtor an additional period of time to file any unfiled returns, but such additional period of time shall not extend beyond–

(A) for any return that is past due as of the date of the filing of the petition, the date that is 120 days after the date of that meeting; or

(B) for any return that is not past due as of the date of the filing of the petition, the later of–

(i) the date that is 120 days after the date of that meeting; or

(ii) the date on which the return is due under the last automatic extension of time for filing that return to which the debtor is entitled, and for which request is timely made, in accordance with applicable nonbankruptcy law.

In plain English, this verbose section of the Bankruptcy Code means that if you’re a Chapter 13 filer, you must file your tax returns before the creditor’s meeting to assess your ability to repay your debts.  If you have yet to file, your bankruptcy trustee (appointed to evaluate the case and serve as an agent for collecting your payments and making distributions to your creditors), may continue the meeting until it is filed, up to 120 days.  After this 120-day window, your case can be dismissed.  As such, it’s best to be proactive, avoiding any reliance on an extension.

What About Chapter 7?

If you’re considering filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in order to dispense all of your unsecured debts, the tax implications are a bit different.  In this case (as in a Chapter 13 case), it is vital to alert your bankruptcy attorney if you expect that you will owe taxes pending the filing of your 2009 return.

On the other hand, if you expect a refund, like the majority of Americans, based on where you live and other considerations, this financial return (or a portion of it) may be considered an asset of the bankruptcy estate, and, as such, will only be protected to the extent you can protect it with state exemptions (up to $10,000.00 for a married couple in North Carolina).

If you’re considering bankruptcy in 2010 and are concerned about the tax implications, including when to file, whether you can keep your tax refund, and any other factors in your personal circumstances that might require consideration, it’s important to speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney who can competently guide you on the right path to the best result.

The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 11:34 am

It’s 2010, the year we take charge, so to speak, of our credit cards. In only a couple of months, credit card companies will have to fully abide by the provisions of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act (CARD). Some components of the act have already been in action.

Nevertheless, consumer advocates are expecting a slew of new credit card company tactics to increase, damage and elevate our debt, credit reports and heart rates. This is especially frustrating for those trying to re-establish a sound credit rating after bankruptcy. If more fees and restrictions come into play, it will take that much longer to use a credit card as a reputable credit source. (Remember though, this may not be a bad thing. Charge cards are a good way to use plastic and remain on top of your balance.)

We’ve discussed several times on the blog how credit issuers have started to counteract the measures by pushing interest rates just enough to not warrant any additional legislation yet get as much as possible from those Americans who already carry a significant monthly balance. For those with solid credit who manage a small balance over multiple cards, lenders have seized credit limits, decreasing what’s available and consequently creating marks on credit reports.

(It should be noted that action is underway to prevent those specific initiatives from harming a credit rating.)

Here are a few new methods by which credit card companies will be able to gouge their customers.

• Expect many cards to start charging annual fees. Currently, 80 percent of the available credit cards in the marketplace do not charge an annual fee. For those carrying solid credit ratings, annual charges are rare. Reports are coming in nationwide about some banks delivering notices about annual fees, which can in some cases climb to around $100. Other banks will only charge if you fall below a specific balance, which encourages card holders to not pay off a balance in order to avoid additional costs.
• Your one-time fixed rate card may suddenly shift to a variable rate, leaving you open to rapid jumps in balance. This is actually a byproduct of the law that prevents surprise interest rate hikes. Lenders bypassed it by simply creating credit cards with interest rates that will vary on their own. In other words, your card company isn’t deliberately increasing your rate, the market is doing it. Granted, that means your rate can sometimes go down, too. However, take a look at the markets. The Prime Rate is already as low as its been in a long, long time. It’s only going up from here.
• While the CARD act will prevent sudden rate hikes on existing cards, it does not address rate limits on new cards. Clearly, you don’t have to apply to a high rate card but the practice will make it much more difficult for people to obtain cards and also limit consumer choice.
• Scaring consumer advocates the most is the expected new fee strategy. It is believed that the credit card industry will start assigning fees for an array of membership services and card ownership privileges. You may also see vague charges on your statement, not unlike what’s found on most phone bills. For example, keep an eye out for inactivity or minimum balance fees.

Thankfully, consumers’ use of credit cards is at its lowest point in more than two decades. And it looks as if it may stay that way.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 9:30 am

More than 1.4 million Americans filed for bankruptcy in 2009; surprisingly, a large number of filers were over the age of 65. Senior citizens were traditionally less likely to file bankruptcy for a number of reasons. Until recently, for example, senior citizens held less credit card debt than younger people. They have less time to repair their credit rating after a bankruptcy as well, and may feel that the perceived harmful effects of bankruptcy will haunt them forever. Considering that many myths about bankruptcy are deep-rooted, older Americans may be more likely to hold strong feelings associating bankruptcy with shame and failure.

Nonetheless, bankruptcies among the plus 65 set continue to grow. Between 1991 and 2007, bankruptcy filings among Americans 65 and older went up 125 percent; for those between ages 75 and 84 they increased an astonishing 433 percent. The recession that began at the end of 2007 has hit seniors particularly hard. The crash of the stock market meant that many seniors wound up having far less money to see them through retirement than they had hoped. While younger workers have a couple of decades to rebuild their portfolios and 401k accounts, older Americans, who need to use that money now, do not. Furthermore, many older Americans live on a fixed income – social security payments or pension payments – and they have few options to increase that income. With a national unemployment rate hovering around 10%, jobs are difficult to find for anyone. Given that many companies have a bias – legal or not – against hiring older workers, senior citizens often find it difficult to get work.

While seniors once had a reputation for eschewing credit cards and paying with cash, in recent years, credit card companies have been aggressively marketing to senior citizens. Most doctors and pharmacies now take credit cards for prescriptions and co-pays; many strapped seniors have no choice but to put those purchases on credit. The average senior now has slightly more credit cards debt than his or her younger counterparts.

The good news is that bankruptcy offers seniors the same protections it offers all Americans: a chance to keep your home. Freedom from the incessant calls of creditors. If you’re on a fixed income, chances are good that you will qualify for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which will simply discharge your unsecured debt.

Why waste your golden years worrying about credit card debt? See a bankruptcy attorney today, and determine the best course for you, to bring you to financial freedom.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 8, 2010 @ 8:34 am

Bankruptcy should not be an embarrassing process. It’s bad enough the credit industry has surrounded it with negative stereotypes to make people believe it’s a life-altering decision.

However, for a number of people in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, filing Chapter 13 has become a series of perpetual embarrassments and ceaseless frustration as a result of a healthcare provider making public the medical conditions of patients who have filed for protection when their bills became too much to manage.

A 53-year-old college admissions employee filed Chapter 13 in an effort to clean up a difficult financial period of her life. Susan Dandridge understood that a good deal of private financial information will become public record. However, she did not count on an extensive list of her personal medical conditions being included in the claims filed by Aurora Health Care, a regional medical center to which she became indebted.

When she found out her privacy had been violated, she pursued legal action. In turn, a class action lawsuit was filed as it was revealed that Aurora had done the same thing with other patients’ billing records when submitting bankruptcy information.

This very compelling case not only brings to light once more the role medical bills play in the nation’s personal bankruptcy rate but also introduces the question about what medical information, considered private under HIPPAA laws, can be revealed during the bankruptcy process.

HIPPAA, or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, requires strict public protection of an individual’s health history by the entities that handle it, such as insurance companies and hospitals. Essentially, it is in place to protect citizens when medical information is transferred between health care providers or when people switch insurance companies. It is a private entity’s responsibility to protect your medical past.

Unfortunately, in Ms. Dandridge’s case, medical information became very public. Although those specific records have since been sealed, her suit contends they were available for months prior to her realizing they had been exposed. The suit also claims Aurora intentionally disclosed the records because of her inability to pay. Thus, her medical privacy was egregiously violated and, according to the lawsuit, the organization’s actions left her open to medical identity theft.

The lawsuit contends that Aurora could have filed summary information as a way to protect the consumers’ medical background while still adhering to state and federal medical privacy laws. However, the Wisconsin Hospital Association has jumped into the mix, stating that Dandridge’s attorney misinterpreted the law and that such information can be revealed in matters of billing and collections.

The realization that the information was made public came after a separate trustee in a Chapter 7 case noticed the amount of detail in Aurora’s claims and initiated legal action that eventually ended in a settlement. From there, the issue spiraled throughout the community and to those who had financial issues with the organization.

It does not matter whether or not anyone found or used for ill will the medical information revealed in the claims. The mere exposure of them is enough to constitute harm, according to Dandrige’s attorney. He also argues that now that the information is “out there” it is subject to additional exposure by third party companies who scan and archive court records.

It is the hope of Ms. Dandridge and the other class members that the practice of including conditions and reason for treatment in the collections and bankruptcy process be halted on a national level.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 8, 2010 @ 8:27 am

It is a good idea to seek out alternatives to bankruptcy when such alternatives are in fact available. As you may have discovered, though, that can be a big “if” to overcome. So what kinds of alternatives are worth the trouble…and what alternatives are not all they are cracked up to be?

Budgeting your money, restructuring your debt, seeking better loans to replace your existing debt and selling valuable assets are all alternatives to consider if they are available to you…but that can be a big “if.” Budgeting your money may be impossible if even basic survival expenses are beyond your means; budgeting is an essential financial skill to master, but in some cases it may be too little, too slow or too late. Restructuring debt by refinancing or other options can also allow you to reap benefits, but you may not have the credit rating or the kind of debt that will allow you to refinance to your benefit. In addition, refinancing savings can sometimes be lost to third party fees and commissions, so that all you are doing in the end is renaming your loan, replacing the lender and not the principal. Finally, selling assets can help you get out of trouble, but you may not have such assets if you are seeking bankruptcy protection. In addition, if you sell an asset and end up having to file for bankruptcy protection anyway, certain sales and transfers could land you in hot water with the bankruptcy court or cause other complications in your filing. (So before you do it, check with a bankruptcy attorney!)

But what about other alternatives? Are any of them worth the trouble? Unfortunately, many debtors have learned the hard way that some of the non-bankruptcy solutions out there are not all they’re cracked up to be. A lot of them may not work at all; some may get you in bigger financial trouble, or cause you to be ripped off. And to add insult to injury, while you waste time with ineffective solutions, you may be delaying filing for bankruptcy protection to the detriment of your case.

You definitely want to think twice before opting to forgo bankruptcy in favor of “credit counseling” or debt consolidation. Government consumer watchdogs and other debtor advocates have been warning the public for a long time that outfits claiming to be able to get rid of your debt by consolidation are often not worth tangling with.  Unfortunately, even organizations claiming to be nonprofits may not have your best interest for their priorities; keep in mind that many have cast their lots with the creditors. Already, from the beginning, they are not on your side!

As you tackle financial problems, it’s better not to mess with your retirement. Reverse mortgages schemes target older folks who are cash-strapped and may make for nasty surprises for the heirs of the estate, as well as taking advantage of retirees to rack up fees and other forfeitures. Younger people may put their retirements at risk if they opt to address debt problems by dipping into their retirement funds, which are normally protected from bankruptcy proceedings. Dipping into retirement funds can also result in increased tax liability.

And speaking of increased taxes, keep in mind that any debts that are forgiven by creditors of all stripes are considered income by the IRS. According to the Tax Code, only debts that are discharged in official bankruptcy proceedings will not be considered income, so even if you catch a break negotiating with creditors, you may pay the price in increased tax liability. Remember also that often taxes are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, so if you end up having to file anyway, a debt forgiven by an unsecured creditor could saddle you with a more permanent type of debt.

Alternatives to bankruptcy are available, and you shouldn’t be totally discouraged just because  each of these solutions carries some drawbacks and warnings; the point is merely that ALL viable solutions to serious debt issues carry drawbacks. Much like you shouldn’t be discouraged to attempt the alternatives because they have drawbacks, don’t be discouraged from looking into bankruptcy protection if that could be the solution for you.

In North Carolina, you may want to check with the Law Offices if John T. Orcutt, a bankruptcy law firm offering a FREE initial consultation and offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 or visit their website at www.billsbills.com .

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 7, 2010 @ 12:27 pm

Are you putting off declaring bankruptcy because you’re afraid you’ll never be able to rent an apartment again? Have you heard horror stories from friends or relatives about how they got turned down for a rental because of their bad credit? Relax. Having a bankruptcy on your credit report won’t prevent you from finding a great place to live.

It’s true that some places – particularly apartment complexes – do check your credit, and do accept or deny your application based on the results. If you have your heart set on living in a place like this, do yourself a favor: call them up beforehand, and ask what their requirements are. Be specific. Ask if they refuse to rent to anyone with a bankruptcy on their record. Find out your credit scores in advance, and ask the apartment manager if your scores sound like they’re in the right range. If not, you’ve just saved yourself the $40-50 application fee. If the manager says, “well, they’re a little low,” offer to bring documentation showing your reliability: pay stubs from work, bank statements, savings accounts, rental history, letters of recommendation. Some apartment complexes will rent to people with lower credit for an additional deposit.

Remember, too, not every apartment owner will check credit. Many individual owners don’t do a credit check. Even those who do are likely to listen to your story about what happened, and why you declared bankruptcy. Be brief but honest; most importantly, explain how your situation has changed. Make sure they understand that the bankruptcy means you owe less (or no) money now, and are therefore better placed to make the rental payments. Again, bring documents to support your story. You can also point out that since a person can’t declare bankruptcy for another seven years, you are actually, in some ways, a better risk than someone who hasn’t declared bankruptcy – if you stop making payments, they could take you to court and you wouldn’t be able to discharge those debts. Be careful with this argument though: although it’s both true and valid, some landlords might consider the fact that you’re bringing up the possibility of not paying rent as a bad sign.

Another suggestion is to look for places to rent that are less strict. Some rentals will advertise: no credit check required. Check out apartments that are offering specials: one month free if you rent by June 1st, for example, or no deposit required. Generally, this indicates a place with low occupancy, and owners who can’t afford to be quite as picky.

Finally, once you get established in a new apartment, do everything you can to maintain the path to financial stability you started by declaring bankruptcy. Take steps to rebuild your credit. Begin to establish a nest egg so that you have some savings in case of emergencies. Most importantly, pay your rent on time every month. If you need to rent another place in the future, having a solid record of making monthly payments could be invaluable.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 5, 2010 @ 6:29 am

The New York Times recently published an insightful article detailing the struggles of homeowners facing foreclosure in the outer boroughs of New York City. At the New York State Supreme Court building in Jamaica, Queens, they come face-to-face with the lawyers representing the banks and the loan servicers that are pursuing foreclosure on their homes. These lawyers oversee large caseloads and don’t appear to the Times reporter have the time to delve into each individual matter.

New York state lawmakers have passed laws requiring lenders to negotiate with homeowners in court. That’s why the court’s docket is full of homeowners facing foreclosure. However, the banks in question, and the loan servicers that represent them, aren’t cutting deals to modify mortgages, despite the efforts of lawmakers to force the banks to do so. As a court referee says in the article, “I have yet to see an attorney for a servicer cut a deal.”

The evidence suggests there isn’t enough incentive for lenders and servicers to try to bargain with homeowners. The federal government has provided small financial incentives to services to allow loan modifications. But, because the servicers also make money from the foreclosure process, especially through fees charged to homeowners, the servicers don’t have as much of a reason to take the federal government’s money.

Even when modification is a possibility, the modification process often breaks down over logistics. For instance, homeowners often struggle to produce all of the paperwork lenders demand to see in order to process a modification. The Times also reports on an initiative to bring the documentation process online, allowing homeowners to store their documents in a database for safekeeping and to electronically track the progress of their modification efforts. A consultant quoted by the Times, however, remains pessimistic, stating bluntly, “[m]arginal improvements are not going to have a significant impact on increasing loan modifications.”

It should be good news for homeowners that the federal and state governments have stepped in to provide incentives for lenders and servicers to modify mortgages. However, an incentive is only an incentive, and sadly, evidence suggests that lenders and servicers generally choose to foreclose rather than modify. If you are a homeowner experiencing difficulty making your mortgage payments or facing foreclosure, relying on modification as a last resort may land you in a lot of trouble.

Filing for bankruptcy, on the other hand, can in many instances protect your home from creditors and keep foreclosure out of the picture. If you have a regular income, a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing offers the opportunity to catch up on your missed mortgage payments, and your home will be protected by the bankruptcy court’s automatic stay, which stays, or freezes, collections actions, including foreclosures. A Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing may also protect your property, depending on the circumstances and the extent of your other outstanding debt. If you are looking for bankruptcy advice you can trust, do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Law Firm of John C. Orcutt.

If you’re one of the many North Carolina homeowners facing foreclosure, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt today to discuss how Chapter 13 bankruptcy can save your family’s home. Call today: 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 4, 2010 @ 12:08 pm

In states like North Carolina—composed largely of rural areas dotted with farmland and abutting the ripe fishing grounds of the Atlantic—Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be exceptionally helpful to working farming and fishing families who might otherwise be bankruptcy bound.

In part one of the four-part series, entitled Chapter 12 Bankruptcy, we introduced the concept of Chapter 12, provided a brief overview of the special rights related to this protection, and shared who (or in some cases, “what”) qualifies as a family farm or family fisherman under the Bankruptcy Code. In this section, we’ll discuss how a Chapter 12 bankruptcy works, from initial petition filing to debt repayment planning.

If you qualify under the Bankruptcy Code’s broad definitions of a “family fisherman” or “family farmer,” a Chapter 12 case begins by filing a petition with the bankruptcy court where you live or the location of the “principal place of business” for your corporation or partnership. A qualifying husband and wife “family farmer” or “commercial family fisherman” may file. Unless the court orders otherwise, the petition includes a statement of your assets and liabilities; current income and expenditures; current business contracts and leases; and a general statement of your financial affairs.  In order to satisfy all of these petition requirements, you’ll need to gather a list of all creditors and the amounts and nature of their claims; the source, amount, and frequency of your income; a list of all of your property; and a detailed list of your monthly farming/fishing expenses, as well as living expenses, including food, shelter, utilities, transportation, feed, fertilizer, etc. In order to completely evaluate your household’s financial position, married individuals must gather this information for each spouse regardless of whether they are filing a joint petition, separate individual petitions, or even if only one spouse is filing.

Upon filing for Chapter 12, you must pay a filing fee and a miscellaneous administrative fee with the clerk of court. With the court’s permission, and with specific deadlines, these fees may be paid in installments. Failure to pay these fees may result in dismissal of your case.

Filing the petition under Chapter 12 provides an automatic stay that stops most collection actions against you or your property. Under the automatic stay protection (a protection that exists under all forms of bankruptcy), any creditors—public or private—are not allowed to call you or send you collection letters. During the proceeding, they cannot continue any legal action against you, foreclose on your home, or repossess your car and other assets. And–even if a garnishment order has been issued–the automatic stay stops garnishment of your wages. Additionally, a Chapter 12 filing has the added benefit of protecting co-debtors (those liable with the debtor) from eager creditors seeking collection of consumer debts incurred by a personal, family, or household purpose.

When you file for Chapter 12 bankruptcy, an impartial trustee is appointed to evaluate the case and serve as an agent, for collecting your payments and making distributions to your creditors. Following your filing, the Chapter 12 trustee will hold a “meeting of creditors” at which you will discuss your financial affairs and the proposed terms of your repayment plan. From this meeting, parties typically resolve problems and repayment schedules. Afterwards, you, your trustee, and interested creditors attend a hearing confirming your personal Chapter 12 repayment plan.

Whether your bankruptcy is simple or complex, you’ll need an expert attorney to navigate the waters. Contact the experienced attorneys at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Please note that while the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt does not file under Chapter 12, our office can evaluate your personal financial situation and refer your case to an experienced Chapter 12 practitioner if needed. Call us today: 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 4, 2010 @ 7:58 am

Did you find yourself standing around at the stroke of midnight on New Year’s night, hard pressed to think of something, anything, that, in the current economy, you could resolve to do when all you currently think about is money? Whether you were in Times Square or a tiny gathering, you probably weren’t alone. Millions of Americans facing foreclosure of their homes, looming unemployment, mounting consumer and health care debt, and other tenuous financial situations during this still unfolding financial downturn are also struggling to start anew despite facing insolvency. Well, in addition to shedding those pounds and quitting those unhealthy vices, get ready to start your latest (and greatest) resolution with four steps to get yourself on the road to financial fitness in 2010.

Act Now and Assess Your Finances
Figuring out your financial future is sometimes as easy as understanding where you stand today in your day-to-day fiscal life. Are you currently unemployed or feel as though you could lose your job soon? As such, do you have enough money for you debts and everyday expenses?  Are you a homeowner facing foreclosure? Do you have substantial healthcare bills or an ongoing medical condition? Do you have multiple credit card balances or mounting business expenses? Have you recently filed for bankruptcy? What other financial circumstances are you facing? The answers to these questions and others can supply the necessary starting points for charting your next solvent steps.

Put Together a Financial Plan
Financial planning doesn’t necessarily mean hiring someone else to assess your portfolio. It can start by simply tracking your personal spending for a month, while keeping in mind your desire to pay down any debt (consumer, mortgage, or otherwise), reduce expenses, increase your income or discharge debt in bankruptcy.  Once you establish a system you’re comfortable with, you can more closely keep track of your current financial situation, including how much money you may be wasting on unnecessary items and interest and how much savings you can accumulate under a new, leaner budget.

Save Up for the Unexpected
If you’re facing unemployment, increased interest on credit cards or mortgages, or high medical costs, personal savings can provide a much-needed security blanket for tough economic times. To avoid hefty hardships from expected bills, start with a target savings of at least three months of income.  This necessary nest egg can be a lifesaver in these uncertain economic times and provide much-needed peace of mind.

Consider a Clean Slate Through Bankruptcy
Once your plan is in place, you may come to the conclusion that that you don’t have enough money to cover your many monthly expenses, pay mounting debts or save for your financial future. At that point, you may want to consider bankruptcy. A bankruptcy filing can discharge debt and allow you to save for your next steps, including a new home, your child’s college fund, and a pleasant retirement.  In fact, every year bankruptcy attorneys meet with hundreds of people in financial distress.  Each time those who have encountered misfortune, bad judgment, or business failure walk into law offices feeling hopeless and at the end of their rope, perceiving no alternatives to their continuing fiscal problems.  Almost every time, however, it seems more and more when these same clients leave these offices, they feel hope, relief and even, resolved, often for the first time in months or years—resolved that the bankruptcy laws and system offers them the possibility of a new start— at a tolerable cost—and with it a financially viable and secure future. In short, on a personal level, bankruptcy relief ends worry and stress of living on the financial brink…a resolution we can all appreciate.

If you’re bankruptcy bound, learn more by visiting The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 1, 2010 @ 5:20 pm

When many people think about bankruptcy, what normally comes to mind is what is represented in Chapters 7 and 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. In Chapter 7, you can discharge all of your debts and, in return, may lose non-exempt assets. Under Chapter 13, you may hold on to your assets, such as their home, but devote income in the near future to repaying your outstanding debts. Under both forms of bankruptcy, there are limitations to what you can do to modify your debts.

However, in states like North Carolina—composed largely of rural areas dotted with thousands of acres of farmland and abutting the ripe fishing grounds of the Atlantic—the lesser known Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be exceptionally helpful to working families who might otherwise be bankruptcy bound. Under the Bankruptcy Code, these protected groups have special rights, not found in the more common areas of Bankruptcy law.

In the special four-part series, entitled “Chapter 12 Bankruptcy,” we’ll introduce the concept of Chapter 12 along with the special rights related to this protection, as well as examine specifically how this process works for farming and fishing families, what you can expect at a Chapter 12 hearing, and the results of this type of bankruptcy discharge.

As mentioned, family farmers and family fishermen have special rights within the safe harbors of the Bankruptcy Code. For instance, a Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be attractive to qualifying parties, because, under this type of protection, creditors cannot file an involuntary bankruptcy petition against a family farmer or fisherman to recover even some of their money.  Additionally, under a Chapter 12 case the debtor is allowed to modify the mortgage lien on a farmer’s home or fisherman’s residence, important to not only stop foreclosure but also modify the terms of the loan.

But, first and foremost, it’s important to understand who (or what) constitutes a family farmer or fisherman.

According to the Bankruptcy Code, a family farmer is:

• a person or married couple (or, in some cases a corporation owned or controlled by a single family) engaged in a farming operation with debts not more than $3,237,000;
• no less than half of these debts (except for the residence) come from the farming operation for either the current year or each of the past two years; and
• the family farmer must be involved in “farm operations” which is a rather broad term. To be eligible for chapter 12, the family farmer must have a regular income, sufficiently stable to be able to make regular monthly payments during the term of the Chapter 12 plan.

Similarly, a family fisherman is:

• a person or married couple (or in some cases) a corporation owned or controlled by a single family) engaged in a commercial fishing operation with debts not more than $1,642,500;
• at least 8% of these debts (except for the residence) stem from the fishing operation for either the current year or each of the past two years; and
• the commercial fisherman must be involved in “commercial fishing operations,” also a broad term. To be eligible for chapter 12, the family fisherman must have a regular income sufficiently stable to be able to make regular monthly payments during the term of the bankruptcy plan.

While North Carolina has many urban areas, plenty of family farms and fisheries still exist throughout the state.  If you are struggling with mounting debts, and believe that bankruptcy may be your lifeline, visit the experienced attorneys of The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt online.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, December 30, 2009 @ 10:49 am

You don’t have to be Chrysler or GM to consider bankruptcy. Maybe you are a small business owner with just a few employees and are struggling to keep everyone on the payroll while you fight off creditors, waiting for the next big contract to come through. You’re not alone. Here are the things you might consider as you look down the road.

This article assumes you’ve exhausted your credit and financial resources and are considering bankruptcy. Your best option when considering bankruptcy is to consult with a qualified bankruptcy attorney who can counsel you on your specific situation. You may find that bankruptcy is not the best move for you, but a qualified attorney will help you make that decision.

There are several different kinds of bankruptcy which may come in to play for you, as a small business owner. Here is a brief overview.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy:
This is sometimes called “straight bankruptcy,” as it is what most people associate with the term “bankruptcy” comes up. Depending on which set of exemptions are available to you under state or federal law, there is often a lengthy list of items of property which you can exempt from liquidation when you file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.  However, if there are any assets outside of your available exemptions, the Chapter 7 trustee will likely seize and sell that property and distribute the resulting proceeds amongst your unsecured creditors.

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy:
You may have heard of a company that goes into “reorganizational bankruptcy.”  Most often, this refers to Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Although this type of bankruptcy is often used by large corporations, small business may also file for protection under Chapter 11. As with the other forms of bankruptcy, certain rules and qualifications apply which may not make Chapter 11 a proper fit for your business’s needs.

Chapter 12 Bankruptcy:
If your business is a family farm, or a family fishing business, Chapter 12 bankruptcy may be your best option. Chapter 12 is tailored to the special conditions that come from individuals, families or small businesses which make their living from the land, streams or sea.

Chapter 13 Bankruptcy:
You may consider Chapter 13 bankruptcy if your business is just yourself, or if your business is unincorporated and operates as a sole proprietorship.  As with personal Chapter 13 bankruptcy, this process gives you a chance to reorganize and repay many of your debts under court protection, rather than wiping debts clear from your books.  Under some circumstances, you may not have to pay any of your unsecured debt.  Only an experienced bankruptcy attorney can properly advise you on your particular set of circumstances. Chapter 13 stops the clock on debt collection while you make progress to get back on your financial feet by paying a monthly amount as part of your Chapter 13 personal reorganization.

As with any major decision in your personal or professional life, you should consult with an attorney who is an expert in bankruptcy before moving ahead. A qualified bankruptcy attorney will give you sound advice on whether or not bankruptcy is the right choice for you, and under which of the various chapters of bankruptcy you should file for protection from your creditors.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 29, 2009 @ 6:52 pm

Have the credit card companies ‘jacked-up’ your rates, doubling your payments?

And really stuck it to you and your family?

Now, you’re screwed for sure…right?

Where is the money gonna come from to make double payments?

You can’t just ask your boss for a raise because you need more money…can you?. So, you have to try to pay with what you have.

The problem is that every dollar you pay is a dollar you steal from your family.

And…to make things worse…

Have they lowered your credit limits, putting you “over limit” for no fault of your own, so now they can soak you for outrageous “over the limit” fees?

And, these are on top of the already outrageous “late payment” fees.

All tactics designed to gouge out of you as much money as possible.

What’s fair or right about that?

And…adding insult to injury…have they changed your credit card from a “fixed rate” to an “adjustable rate”?

That’s not right.

What they did might be legal under the law, but just because something’s legal, don’t make it right or fair.

Just because you can…doesn’t mean you should.

But they did it anyway. It’s like the banks are telling you “Screw you. We want more money. So just pay it and shut up.”

Angry? You should be. Real angry?

The only good news is that you are not alone. They have done it to millions, if not tens of millions, of good, hard working Americans.

The only question is “What are you gonna do about it?”

Want to know why they did this to you?

The answer is simple.

Greed….to make as much money off the back of you and your family as they can…while they can.

Congress passed a new Credit Card Reform Bill of 2009. This bill was intended…so they say…to ‘rein in’ the credit card companies, that is, the big banks who issue credit cards to tens of millions of Americans.

For decades, the big banks had been suckering us Americans with the lure of easy credit, full well knowing that we would get in debt and stay there…good news for banks who live off of interest and fees, and all the more so as they more and more jacked up the interest rates, shortened the grace periods, and made a fortune charging higher and higher extortion-level “over limit” and “late payment” fees.

And, everything was working just fine…like the banks planned…until they completely screwed up the financial market and forced Congress to spend our money on huge “bailouts”.

All of a sudden, the banks were in trouble and some Congressmen saw this as a one-time opportunity to try to clamp down on the nasty credit card tactics, a chance to put a stop to some of the now well-known and abusive credit card company shenanigans. As a result, a credit card reform bill was passed and signed into law.

On its face, the credit card reform bill looked great. For example, there are provisions to make it illegal to change your interest rate on existing balances.

Sounds good…right? Wrong!

Long before the bill ever went to the President for signature, it was stuffed full of holes…err ‘loopholes’.

The biggest loophole lies in the fact that the bill does not even go into effect until 2/22/10. This delay provided the big banks more than enough time to do all sorts of things to sidestep the new bill, to protect themselves and to make even more money. In effect, the big banks have turned the credit card reform bill into nothing but a big joke.

One of the things they did was…across the board…to jack up everybody’s interest rates.

How did this happen?

What went wrong? What happened to the credit card reform bill? How did it get full of holes in favor of the big banks it was meant to rein in?

Easy. The banks were able to exert enough influence to get a number of key provisions taken out of the bill and others changed, including the date when the bill would go into effect…2/22/10.

Are you surprised? Don’t be.

The truth is that the big banks have been in control of this country since the Constitutional Convention, when America first became America. They were in control, they are still in control, and they will always be in control. And, being in control, they are, in effect, also in control of Congress.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of Congressmen need bank contributions (read “money”) to pay for election campaigns. But there’s a price to pay for this money. And, that’s where the golden rule comes in: The banks are the guys with the gold and the guys with the gold get to make the rules. The banks have the money the Congressmen need.

And, just to make sure they are heard, big banks spend a ton of money on lobbyists to try to bully some Congressmen, and brainwash others. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the influence that banks have over Congress.

The price to pay is that the banks get to help write the rules (read “new laws”)…or in this case…the credit card reform bill.

At the same time, this time around, the big banks knew they had screwed up the entire financial market, and so much so that it forced Congress to spend OUR money to bail them out. But, they also knew that the bailouts were not popular at all with the voting public. And they knew that most Congressmen would be feeling the heat from the bailouts and that, as a result, these Congressmen would be feeling the need to at least put up a showing that the banks were being punished. Not doing so, the big banks knew, these Congressmen would suffer the wrath of the public in the next election.

So…the big banks knew…something had to give, that there would be a price to pay for the bailouts, and part of the price came in terms of the new credit card reform bill.

Or so it would appear to the public. Unfortunately, appearances don’t necessarily reflect reality, and that is exactly what happened to the credit card reform bill.

Even with all the problems the banks had caused to our economy, the big banks still, in effect, had massive amounts of influence over Congress. And, controlling Congress meant that the big banks could get things changed in the proposed credit card reform bill. And, so it came to pass, and the banks got most, if not all, of what they wanted, a bill so watered down with loopholes that it was, in effect, turned into nothing but a joke on the public.

Basically, as it turns out, the new credit card reform bill is just another SCAM by the big banks.

In effect, a lot of the current credit card reform bill was written by the same big banks it was meant to rein in.

Congressmen and the banks both got what they wanted. Congress got to look like it did something to punish the banks, and the banks got a bill that they would work around.

Depressing? Disappointing? Frustrating? I agree.

With the major provisions of the bill delayed until 2/22/10, the big banks got busy changing things necessary to completely sidestep the bill.

And, that’s were the rate hikes, lower credit limits and adjustable rate credit cards come in.

The banks knew that, under the new law, they wouldn’t be allowed to so easily change things in the future regarding credit cards. But, nothing in the bill kept them from doing it now, before 2/22/10, and being the big banks they are, that is exactly what they did…to you and to me.

First, they jacked up your credit card interest rates. Then, they lowered your credit limits, and then, they did other things like changing your credit card contract from “fixed rate” to “adjustable rate”.

The net effect: Passage of the credit card reform bill, instead of helping you, actually hurt you…and hurt you bad.

The upshot was that millions of good, hard working Americans, just like you, quickly received notices jacking up their rates, lowering their credit limits and changing their credit card contracts from “fixed” to “adjustable rates”.

The real bottom line is that if you were just staying afloat before…and just making ends meet…now you were screwed.

Who can have their payments doubled and survive?

What always gets me though….is why so many Americans just sit there and take it?

I am always asking myself: “Why are people not more pissed off? Why isn’t everybody angry at the banks?”

Is it because people feel helpless against the giant bank? I can understand that. Most of us aren’t bankers and we don’t know what to do or if there is anything we can do.

Is it because what the banks are doing is allowed under the contract you signed with them? I don’t know if you have ever looked closely at a credit card agreement, but it you have, you know that it is long and complicated and full of good stuff to let the banks do just about anything it wants to pull the rug right out from under us.

Is it because the things the banks are doing to us aren’t illegal? I would hope not because where I come from, just because you can get away with it, don’t mean it’s right. And, there ain’t nothing ‘right’ about jacking up interest rates, doubling payments, and screwing families.

Or is it because, as Americans, we have gotten so far removed from having to fight for our rights, so tame and domesticated that we don’t even have any fight in us? Instead, like the tame and domesticated farm animals we have become, we depend on a Congress and our President to fix things and protect us. How is that working out for you and your family? As Americans, we hafe been like cows being lead to slaughter.

This has got to stop!

Whatever the reason is, what the banks have done is NOT RIGHT, and the bottom line is this:

What are you going to do about it?

If you answer is “nothing”, you can stop reading right here, right now.

But, if you are as pissed off as I am, and have had enough, and need to make sure your family survives no matter how bad things get (and things will get worse before they get better), and want to fight back,….read on.

The truth is that with hiked rates and doubled payments, many of us will either have to do something or see our families suffer and submerge.

Let’s face it. We only have so many dollars and every dollar we send to the credit card companies is a dollar we can’t spend on our families, and which comes right out of the mouth of our kids.

I don’t know about you, but that is not what I intend for my family…and it just pisses me off.

How about you?

As it is, our grandchildren’s, grandchildren will still be paying for the bank “bailouts” forced on us by Congress, and now… to make things worse… the banks are throwing salt in our wounds by jacking up rates and screwing with us.

I don’t now about you, but I sure as hell don’t intend to just sick back and take it in the face when the credit card companies treat me this way, whether what they are doing is legal or not.

And, to make it worse, the banks aren’t even honest with us. Instead of telling us the truth, they trump up this and that to justify screwing us. And even when we didn’t do anything wrong, they make up stuff, for example, referring to defaults or late payments that never happened.

It makes me sick and it makes me angry. Is it just me, or are you angry too?

Why don’t they just tell it like it is? If they did, it would likely sound a lot like this:

“We are in the business of making money. That’s why we exist. That’s what it’s all about. That’s all there is to it. Nothing personal, but we’re in it for the money and we always have been.

We don’t care about you. We never did. If, on occasion we come across like we do care, we’re only pretending, either because we know that being nice to you will keep you paying or because being nice to you is in our best interest, not yours.

In fact, you are so brainwashed by your moral upbringing that you go on expecting us to act differently. You just never get it. Being fair or just or helpful or honest or putting your best interest first is just not our nature as a bank.

On top of that, you signed a contract with us that lets us do whatever we want to you. In effect, the contract is only binding on you. The truth is that it’s a joke that it’s even called a contract. A true contract would assume that both sides had a hand in coming up with the terms. Instead, it should just be called “Our Rules”. Yeah, the golden rule: We have the gold, so we make the rules.

And, under that contract, we have the right to do anything we want, including raising your rates and screwing you in ways you can’t even imagine.

And, we do it because it makes us more money. Did we mention that it’s all about money, money and more money? It doesn’t matter. We can say it’s all about money and you still don’t get it. You still think our relationship is about honesty and fair dealing. It not. It’s about money, taking your money and giving it to us.

Furthermore, experience has shown us that we can treat you as badly as we want and get away with it every time. To us, you are not human beings or families. You are just numbers and profit. And, since you are just numbers and profit, we can screw you and still sleep at night, just fine. In fact, those of us who make the big decisions don’t even live in your communities, and even if we did, you don’t know who we are. And you think that just because we have people working in your community, that makes a difference. It doesn’t. They do what we tell them. Sure, part of what we tell them is to be nice to your face, but we don’t mean it. We just say it because we make money off of you, lots of it.

Oh, sure, a few of you will stomp and complain and maybe close your accounts with us when we treat you badly, but we have everybody so brainwashed that ‘credit is king’ that most of you will put up with just about anything we do to you if it means that your credit score will be ok..

What’s really wild is that most of you won’t even get mad at us and the few of you who do won’t be able to convince the others to get mad. In fact, you’re so brainwashed that most of you will blame yourselves for getting into debt in the first place. How cool is that? We have spend our careers figuring out how to legally trick you and cajole you deeper and deeper into debt, so much so that you are trapped forever, and still you don’t blame us. Instead, you blame yourselves, and feel so bad about not paying your bills that you will take food out of your own kids mouth and keep making your own families sacrifice on and on and on to keep paying us.

The truth is that we can screw you and we have screwed you, and you won’t do a thing about it.

So, nothing personal, but if we can skirt around the negative effects of the credit card reform bill, even if it screws you and your kids, that is what we are going to do. We’re bankers. It who we are. You’re just too stupid to see it.”

Angry yet?

I hope so because if you get angry enough, there are things you can do to fight back,

….things that speak to the big banks in the only language they understand,

….things that speak to the big banks in the only way that ever really gets their attention: MONEY.

You don’t have to just sit there and take it, and your family does not need to continue sacrificing and suffering.

Are you ready to take control? Are you ready to do something positive? Are you ready to do whatever it takes to make sure your family survives no matter how bad things get?

If so…good!

The first thing you need to do is to stop looking to Congress for help. That ship sailed long before you and I were ever born. You know it and I know it. Instead, we need to do what we can to help ourselves.

Second, stop thinking that big banks care, or will ever treat you fair. It ain’t gonna happen. To them, you are not a human being, much less a human being with kids and brothers and sisters and a mom and dad. You’re just a number to them, a statistic on a computer screen, and that will never change. So, stop wasting time calling them and asking them to be fair.

Next, find a small community bank that’s too small ‘not-to-care’ and move your bank accounts and all your banking business there. It may be that you still need the big bank for your credit card, but not for the rest of your banking business.

Next, if you are one of the lucky ones who can afford to do it, pay off your credit cards in full and stop using credit cards, except where you already have the cash or income to pay the thing off fully each and every month.

If you are not so lucky, and you can’t afford to pay off your credit cards in full, unfortunately, you only have 3 choices:

Choice 1: Go on paying, no matter what.

If you can even afford it, one option is to just go on paying your on your credit cards no matter how much they jack up your rates and no matter how high your payments get to be.

This is what the banks are counting on you to do, and if you do it, they win. The problem with this option is that every dollar you pay them is a dollar no longer available to take care of your family. In these tough economic times, continuing to pay on jacked up credit cards is risky business at best, and more likely, financial suicide for your family.

Choice 2: Stop paying.

In the short run, this will leave a lot of money in your pocket, and that good in terms of taking care of your family, but any credit you do have will be killed of completely, and ultimately, you will still owe all the money, plus interest. And…sooner or later…the credit card companies will sue you, and having gotten a judgement against you, will take from you whatever money or property they can legally get their hands on.

Choice 3: File bankruptcy.

What a surprise. A bankruptcy attorney hawking bankruptcy as a solution.

But the fact is that, if you can’t pay all your bills or, even if you can, but only by making your family suffer, bankruptcy does 2 things that nothing else in the world does:

First, it gets rid of debt and gets rid of it permanently. Results will vary depending upon your situation, but nothing gets rid of credit card debt, for instance, like filing bankruptcy.

And second, if you have no choice and need to file bankruptcy, it gives you a chance to give the banks a dose of their own medicine?

Let me explain. At its core, what bankruptcy does best is that it gets rid of debt. It just erases it, like, “today you owe it”, and “tomorrow you don’t”, like it never existed.

Well, you know who gets hurt when you don’t have to pay. The big banks…at least in terms of credit cards. The very same banks that the government forced you to help “bail out”. The very same banks that just jacked up your rates, doubling your payments. The very same banks that stuck it to you and screwed your family. The same banks that would let your family sink if it means making another buck.

Sick of having your back against the wall?

Need to get your family out of debt and back on track?

Need to put your family first again…instead of last?

And need to do it now before things get even worse?

Want to give the banks a dose of their own medicine for making you suffer and forcing your hand? Is it time to make them suffer the way they have made your family suffer?

If so…Think bankruptcy.

You have the power.

The power of bankruptcy.

Call today for a FREE Debt Consultation and at least find out how all this bankruptcy stuff works. You won’t be disappointed…I guarantee it.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, December 28, 2009 @ 7:10 am

The New Year is a few days away. And without doubt, millions of Americans will welcome 2010 with grand hope, desperate to put 2009 far behind them, the year the Great Recession took hold of our collars and shook us into submission. Unfortunately, many Americans will greet the end of the 2000’s first decade still in debt and financially directionless.

But that doesn’t have to be the case.

Bankruptcy, despite all you may think you know about it, can make 2010 the year you really start over, the year things become as you make them, the year you regain control.

The federal government is reporting that with 2009’s end, so goes the worst national economic era to strike the 50 states in decades. Much of this optimism, unfortunately, has failed to provide security. The talus is simply too loose, the slope too steep and the edge too precipitous for Americans to feel confident in the footholds being provided. Unemployment continues to shroud our workforce in a cloak of despair and frustration. All the positives can be too easily brushed off as temporary, government-designed band-aids that do nothing for long-term care and instead will soon peel off, exposing our credit card cuts and sub-prime avulsions to additional economic bacteria.

However, treatments are plentiful. And bankruptcy is one of them.

The bankruptcy process, when handled by a competent, established attorney, is a very respectable way to handle the stress and prevent the longstanding financial damage that un-attended-to debt can do to a family.

Most people who give thought to bankruptcy quickly brush it off as an escapist’s tool; something the irresponsible do to cover their mistakes. Well, if you were to start asking around, it would take little time for you to uncover that most of those who have filed for protection are professional, educated and careful with their money. You will also find that things like sudden unemployment, medical bills and emergency life expenses do not discriminate. They affect everyone and if we were universally prepared for those types of setbacks, we wouldn’t need the bankruptcy code.

Back in 1934, the U.S. Supreme Court established the need for a federal measure that could assist the honest debtor in repairing their economic wherewithal. That same year, an opinion was written on the matter that said:”(Bankruptcy) gives the honest but unfortunate debtor … a new opportunity in life and a clear field for future effort, unhampered by the pressure and discouragement of preexisting debt.”

A few years ago, the lending industry powered a major revision to the bankruptcy code called The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. Despite its title, it was designed to make filing bankruptcy more difficult. It was meant to perpetuate the stigmas and make people less tolerant of those who have to file.

The law changes included the “Means Test,” which was designed to qualify a person for Chapter 7. If you made too much money, suddenly you are not eligible to file under the same guidelines as others. The questionable constitutionality aside, the law served to make the bankruptcy code that much more tedious and frustrating for people. Without question, it prompted many people to avoid filing altogether and made the protection of our established laws that much more difficult to obtain. But don’t buy into the myths or the hype. For 99.9% of you, bankruptcy is still a valid option. And the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt know how to make the new bankruptcy laws work for you!

If you want 2010 to ring in on a positive note, don’t do what you did in 2009. Let facts drive your decisions, not misappropriated stigmas and half-truths. It’s your New Year, give yourself a reason to make it a happy one.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, December 23, 2009 @ 5:49 pm

Even in these tough economic times, everyone wants their family and friends to have a nice holiday—full of fun, frivolity and festive giving. And, even if you find yourself among the millions considering bankruptcy in the New Year, you may believe, now more than ever, that it’s open [holiday] season to shop for pricey presents using problem credit cards. In fact, many Americans do charge up expensive tabs in the months preceding the Christmas season when anticipating a bankruptcy—hoping to secure some great gifts prior to wiping away these same debts, along with many others, in January or February.

However, it’s never been more important to avoid a holiday spending binge when seeking this fresh financial start. While prudence alone should speak to some of the reasons to avoid abusing bankruptcy for seasonal gains, the Bankruptcy Code itself addresses the issue of this type of credit card debt as well. Section 523(a)(2) exempts from discharge, any debt that was obtained if an individual made material and false representations about his financial condition (i.e. lies on the credit application). Section 523(a)(2)(C) provides that:

1. consumer debts owed to a single creditor and aggregating more than $500 for luxury goods or services (luxury goods defined as goods or services reasonably not necessary for the support or maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor) incurred by an individual debtor on or within 90 days before the order for relief under this title are presumed to be nondischargeable; and

2. cash advances aggregating more than $750 that are extensions of consumer credit under an open end credit plan obtained by an individual debtor on or within 70 days before the order for relief under this title, are presumed to be nondischargeable;

Section 523(a)(2)(a) excepts from discharge money, property or services incurred by false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud (i.e. incurring debt that you knew or should have known that you would not be able to repay).

In layman’s terms, this translates into a stern warning against unnecessary, binge spending in the months leading up to your bankruptcy. As a result, if you do decide to charge up hundreds or thousands of dollars in charges in November or December and then try to discharge that debt in January or February, credit card lenders have three viable arguments they can use to object to discharging your debt in a bankruptcy case. This type of “discharge litigation” not only risks hefty exemptions from your debt relief, but it is also costly to defend, adding more expensive fuel to the insolvency fire.

What can be even more expensive is how these holiday spending sprees can create potential delays in your bankruptcy filing. Often, a bankruptcy attorney will advise clients in the New Year who reveal large Christmas credit card statements, to wait four to six months at a minimum before filing for bankruptcy—during which time you must continue to make regular payments on your new, larger holiday balances.

If you are already in debt, credit card or otherwise, or facing a loss of income, it’s essential to fight the urge to use plastic to purchase that big screen television, new game console, latest toy or anything else you can’t afford. And, if you’re bankruptcy bound, but must spend during this holiday season, as an alternative to credit, try carrying cash, checks or debit cards. As a result of using the money you actually have, you may make more thoughtful purchases and spend less this season, and, in the end, spend less time digging yourself out of post-holiday season debt and its inevitable barriers to bankruptcy.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, December 19, 2009 @ 10:10 am

Back in 2005, credit card companies were convinced – or at least tried hard to convince everyone else – that there was a bankruptcy crisis in the United States. Bankruptcy rates had doubled since 1980, they pointed out. ‘Shopaholics’ were charging everything under the sun and then declaring bankruptcy, forcing the credit card companies to eat their debt. They then had no choice but to pass these expenses on to consumers in the form of higher fees and interest rates.

In 2005, the major banks spent tens of millions of dollars lobbying Congress to make it harder for consumers to declare bankruptcy. Despite protests from lawyers, judges and law professors working in the system, Congress passed the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. Insiders pointed out that the law was essentially written by the credit card companies; a single law professor and four credit industry lobbyists actually wrote the legislation.

Nearly everyone agrees that the laws made filing for bankruptcy more burdensome for debtors. Perhaps the most pernicious element, and the one the credit card companies fought hardest for, is the means test. The means test looks at your prior six months of income to determine whether you qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. If your income is too high, you may need to increase certain expenses which qualify as deductions (much like tax deductions). If your income is still too high, you may need to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which offers the same relief as a Chapter 7, but requires a payment plan. The Chapter 13 payment plan can last anywhere from 15 months to 5 years, depending on your particular jurisdiction.

A boon for the credit card companies and consumers who pay their debts, right? Well, certainly the credit card companies did well for a while– their profits rose thirty percent between 2005 and 2007. However, the decline in interest rates and fees they promised would accompany this never happened – in fact, interest rates and fees increased over this period. Things got so bad that Congress finally passed another bill last May, this one regulating industry practices: they set limits on credit card fees and interest rates and will require lenders to be transparent in their communications, starting in July of 2010.

More importantly, recent studies suggest that the new bankruptcy law may have contributed to the rise in foreclosures – costing the banks billions of dollars – and to the housing crisis in general. Now that many consumers mistakenly believed that bankruptcy was not an option, in many cases they simply walked away from their homes instead of declaring bankruptcy and continuing to make their mortgage payments. Feeling that they couldn’t make both their mortgage and credit card payments, they may have opted to make neither. As foreclosure rates rose, slumping housing prices feel even further. Neighborhoods with a number of foreclosures went into deep decline. Banks lost money, the country slid into recession.

Does this mean that the bankruptcy law caused all of this? No, of course not. Many factors contributed to the recession, included the derivatives trading on Wall Street, the government trying to finance two wars without raising taxes, etc. However, it is clear that the idea that banks would pass on savings to consumers was unrealistic. It’s also clear that removing consumer options resulted in financial decisions that ultimately hurt the banks as well as consumers. (Other studies argue that stringent bankruptcy laws discourage risk and entrepreneurship; it’s no accident that many countries in the EU are loosening their bankruptcy laws during this recession.) The obvious conclusion is that Congress, and not the banks, should write laws. And that they should listen to the experts – in this case, the lawyers and judges involved in bankruptcy proceedings – instead of lobbyists with an agenda.

The good thing is that, in many jurisdictions, judges have construed the new law in favor of debtors. The means test is not bullet proof, and Chapter 7 is still a viable option for most consumers. And with the rising tide of delinquent mortgages, Chapter 13 bankruptcy remains the best way to save your family’s home. Contact a bankruptcy attorney today and get the truth about bankruptcy. And visit http://www.billsbills.com/truth_bankruptcy_book.php for more of the truth.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, December 18, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

Last Friday, the House of Representatives passed a wide-reaching swath of financial reforms, designed to reign in the worse excesses of the banking industry. Democratic lawmakers are hailing the bill as a huge victory for consumers. However, one important provision failed to pass: cramdown.

‘Cramdown’ would allow bankruptcy judges to reduce the principle balance of the mortgage on a primary residence in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, resulting in lower monthly payments for the filer. It’s important to note that bankruptcy judges are already allowed to practice cramdown for a variety of debt, including boats, cars, vacation homes and family farms. In fact, prior to changes in the bankruptcy laws in 1978, they were able to cramdown residential mortgages as well.

Support for cramdown began gaining strength last spring, when the drop in housing prices caused a rise in foreclosures and a spike of people ‘under water’ in their homes. As the recession got worse, more people became vulnerable. Many Democratic lawmakers argued that cramdown was a necessary provision that would allow more people to stay in their homes. The banking industry countered that it would raise costs for everyone and divert capital from the mortgage market at a time when it desperately needed more, not less funds. Observers pointed out that banker’s fears were unrealistic; banks already eat the loss in a foreclosure, so how would this law upset the whole system?

Meanwhile, the Obama industry introduced housing reforms, notably the Making Houses Affordable, a program designed to encourage mortgage companies to voluntarily modify loans and keep people in their homes. While the program does offer some financial incentives, industry observers note that mortgage companies make far more money from the fees involved when a homeowner goes foreclosure.

In April, the House passed cramdown, but it stalled – badly – in the Senate. Twelve Democrats joined with every Republican to defeat it.

This fall, nearly everyone agrees that the MHA program has been a failure. Far fewer loans have been modified than the administration hoped; foreclosure rates continue to rise across the country. It’s hard not to see the lack of cramdown as a pertinent factor. Cramdown would offer the homeowner some leverage. If mortgage companies refused to modify loans, the homeowner could have filed bankruptcy and the decision to modify or not would have rested with an independent party, the judge. As it is, judges are unable to modify the loans, which leaves the entire decision in the hands of the mortgage company.

That’s why Democrats in the House included cramdown again, in the package of regulatory reforms they voted on last Friday. However, this time – under some pressure from small banks and credit unions – the measure failed to pass even the House.

What’s the future for cramdown? It doesn’t look good. Without some radical change somewhere, it doesn’t look like cramdown will even come up for a vote again. This is too bad; this provision would not only be very helpful to many individual homeowners, it has the potential to send ripples through the housing market as well.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 15, 2009 @ 1:48 pm

In these painful financial times, the toughest bind facing many Americans is financing their well- being. While it’s vital to stay healthy and seek medical help when necessary, with health care costs on the rise and health care reform largely in limbo, the results of putting wellness over wealth can be financially devastating.

As the New York Times reported, (from the November 25, 2009, article “From the Hospital Room to the Bankruptcy Court” by Kevin Sack), many Americans are merely “one accident or illness away” from a “medical bankruptcy.” And while there is no medical bankruptcy per se—rather merely a standard filing that includes the wiping away of medical bills—more and more people are filing for bankruptcy because of these bills with the ubiquitous term “medically bankrupt” having become largely a sign of the economic times. “This has really become the insurance system for the country,” said Susan R. Limor to the New York Times in the same article. Limor is a bankruptcy trustee who calculated that 13 of the 48 Chapter 7 liquidation cases on her docket included medical debts of more than $1,000. Under Chapter 7, a debtor’s assets are liquidated and the proceeds are used to pay creditors; any remaining debts are discharged, and filers are left with a 10-year mark on their credit ratings.  “You can’t believe how many people discharge medical debts,” Limor said. “It’s a kind of trailing indicator of who’s suffering in this economy.”

And those suffering are not alone. According to a recent study from Harvard University, today medical bills make up well over half of all bankruptcy filings (62% in 2007), accounting for the bankruptcies of between 1.5 to 2 million Americans each year. Moreover, of those filing for bankruptcy, three-quarters have medical insurance.  In many cases, this crippling debt is the result of insurance co-pays and deductibles, which can run into the tens of thousands of dollars. Yet, some who file for “medical bankruptcy” do so even with relatively small medical bills because, left to their own devices, many hospitals and medical practices refuse to make arrangements for debt relief or installment plans.

As such, the alternatives to a medical bills-inspired bankruptcy can be worse. Medical debt—from hospitalization to medication—is unsecured with no guarantee available for creditors, like insurance companies, hospitals and doctors, to take back. As a result, without filing medical bankruptcy, health care debts can be tied to the collateral you do own. A hospital or insurance company can also garnish your wages, and even claim a portion of the equity in your home, business or other large assets.

As the New York Times article illustrated, if you’re plagued by medical debts and other related health care costs, Chapter 7 bankruptcy may be the only viable solution for you. Filing for Chapter 7 can eliminate most of your debts, including those arising out of medical expenses—whether they’re billed from your hospital or charged on your credit card.  An experienced attorney can evaluate your precise financial problems—medical or otherwise—and work out how the implications are likely to affect you. You’ll also learn the best ways to most effectively deal with creditors, along with possible solutions to improve your credit scores and credit ratings so that any effects of the bankruptcy might be minimized. The same lawyer can help you file for bankruptcy, as well as represent you in the bankruptcy court. For more information about the benefits of filing for bankruptcy, including alleviating medical debts, visit the experienced attorneys of The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt online.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, December 7, 2009 @ 7:41 pm

While mortgage companies continue to refuse lower payments to borrowers who can no longer afford their loans, millions are facing delinquency, foreclosure and the loss of their homes. But just because you’re facing tough odds doesn’t mean that you can’t plan ahead to minimize the possibility of foreclosure or mitigate the damage if you find yourself moving toward it. Homeowners just like you can take immediate action, armed with the tools necessary to make the best financial decisions for your future.

In this six-part series we’ll explore how you might stay in your home, the ins and outs of working with your mortgage lender, the pros and cons of a short sale, and various bankruptcy options and alternatives pending foreclosure.

Part I – How to Stay In Your Home

Don’t give up on your home without considering your options. Foreclosure can leave you homeless, hurt your credit rating and make it difficult, if not impossible, to buy another house anytime soon. Your best options if you’re having trouble making mortgage payments include:

Negotiating with your lender
When attempting to stay in your home by working with your lender, it’s important to act quickly. As soon as you realize you’re having trouble paying your home loan, and before you’ve missed any payments, contact your mortgage lender. Now, more than ever, lenders are willing to negotiate with their clients, if only to reduce the record numbers of foreclosures they’re dealing with during this lingering recession.

Filing for bankruptcy
What about if you’re already behind on your mortgage payments? Filing for bankruptcy may help you keep your home, or at least get you out from under looming mortgage debt. With a few exceptions, Chapter 13 or Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings force creditors to end their collection activities and delay impending foreclosure sales. Each of these bankruptcy options will be explored in part three and four of this series.

When you file for bankruptcy, the foreclosure process is legally stopped (called an “automatic stay”). Foreclosure proceedings cannot be reinstated until your bankruptcy case closes or the lender gets permission by the court to proceed, thereby “lifting the stay” on the foreclosure process. So, if your plan is to stay in your home payment-free, for as long as possible, bankruptcy can delay the foreclosure auction, and your ultimate move-out date, saving you time (and money) to figure out your next move.

Other options include:

Selling your home yourself
If you simply can’t afford the home you own, you still have power to take control of your financial destiny. If your home has appreciated in value since you bought it, you may be able to sell it yourself. Again, contact your lender, who may let you stop making payments, and stay in your home, until the house is sold. If the proceeds from the sale don’t cover your mortgage and related costs, you might be in a short sale situation. A short sale can be a good option in certain circumstances, but in most cases, it’s best to simply surrender your home in a bankruptcy. The short sale option will be discussed a length later in the series.

Giving your deed to the lender
What happens if no one buys your house? Don’t lose hope. Your lender may agree to a “deed in lieu of foreclosure,” taking on the deed and canceling your debt. Like a foreclosure, the bank can then sell your home. A deed in lieu, like a short sale, is unlikely to erase your personal liability. In this regard, bankruptcy is usually a better option.

For more detailed information on how to stay put in your home pending foreclosure or bankruptcy contact The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, December 5, 2009 @ 3:10 pm

For far too many people in North Carolina, and the country, job loss has been the primary driver of excessive debt. Even those who spend wisely and are conservative with credit can quickly feel the impact of being laid off. Three months of savings may help. But only for three months.

If you are one of the millions of Americans reluctantly contributing to the unemployment rate, it may seem like things are never going to get better. Looking for a job can be a mentally tiring and frustrating endeavor. And if you are facing the additional pressure of mounting debt from credit cards, a mortgage and maybe a couple of car payments, it can be hard to sleep at night. Well hopefully, recent news about positive job growth will help you get some rest. Or not.

According to reports, the number of jobs lost in the month of November has decreased. Payroll processing company ADP stated that companies only cut 169,000 jobs, which signifies the eight consecutive month in which cuts have been less than the previous 30 days.

Employment experts are hopeful that the coming months will continue the trend, but the overall drag on the economy caused by cumulative job losses will continue until 2014. The benchmark for “full employment” is an unemployment rate of 5 percent or less. Given our current conditions, achieving that number looks like a tall order.

We at “Bankruptcy & Your Passage into and out of Debt” do not pretend to be experts on the macro-economic conditions that impact employment, gross domestic product or the price of barley in Argentina. What we are experts on is how bankruptcy can help you. And, for a lot of readers who are out of work, in debt and frozen in financial stress, we understand how reports like this can be frustrating. Minimal positive blips on the job growth radar screen don’t help you navigate a way out of the financial abyss. Without sugar-coating it, we believe this remains a difficult economy in which to make a living.

Compounding the loss of a paycheck for someone out of work is the loss of medical insurance, or at least your ability to afford it. Medical debt is a very large cause of bankruptcy in our country and today’s work conditions are only making it ever more prominent.

In total, companies let go of 1.24 million jobs in 2009, which is almost 18 percent more than in 2008. So what kind of positive should you take from that? We’re not sure, to be honest. That’s what makes employment figures so darn frustrating. While the rate at which jobs are being cut has diminished, the rate of hiring has not increased, suggesting that many jobs simply will not be replaced. This should not be a surprise to anyone, really, given the beyond reasonable rate at which many companies expanded in the last five years.

Truthfully, job reports are becoming ineffective in their ability to communicate any real data to the economic growth equation. In the end, the preservation of one’s economic well-being needs to become insular, self-focused. If bankruptcy is your best option, then ignore the stats and stigmas and screwy metrics. Do what is right for yourself and your family. There is no better barometer for health of the job market than your own situation. You need to act when the time is right for you.

If you’re struggling to keep your head above water, bankruptcy can be just the lifeline you need. Contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt today to discuss your options. Call 1-800-899-1414 to discuss your options.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, December 4, 2009 @ 12:15 pm

We’ve all heard that money problems are the leading cause of marital problems. If you’re reading this article, chances are you’re experiencing both problems. In this economy, with unemployment, foreclosures, and debt at record highs, you’d be hard-pressed to find couples who don’t fight about money!

Financial problems can wreak havoc on your marriage, leading to constant arguing, blame-laying, and even divorce. In fact, when the economy suffers, couples are far more likely to consider divorce as a solution to their problems.

Some couples might think this solution sounds reasonable, even tempting. No more fighting about—you guessed it—money. No more seething tension fueled by bills, debt, and money worries. No more arguments and accusations over who spends more, who earns less, or who should pay the bills.

But is divorce necessarily the solution when it’s your debt that’s to blame?

What if you could eliminate your debts and save the personal property you and your spouse have worked so hard to accumulate? What if you could stop fighting about money?

What if you filed bankruptcy?

Would the fighting end if you and your spouse got a clean slate? A fresh start? What if you got the chance to re-establish your financial goals, make new plans, and move forward with your life together? Imagine the marital peace that could result from financial peace of mind!

You do have options other than divorce. An experienced bankruptcy attorney can help you salvage your marriage and rebuild your life by reducing, restructuring, or eliminating the debt that’s at the center of your marriage problems. For those who qualify, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing can erase your credit card debt, your personal loans, and your medical bills. It can erase the cause of most of your marital problems!

Whether your financial problems are due to job loss, the downturn in the stock market, an increase in your adjustable rate mortgage, medical bills, or rising credit card rates and fees, you don’t have to let your financial problems ruin your marriage! Financial stress can quickly build to the breaking point. But if you could save your marriage, wouldn’t you?

Save your marriage. Save your home, your car, your property, your family. Call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 or visit www.billsbills.com.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, December 3, 2009 @ 6:11 am

The American Bankruptcy Institute, relying on data from the National Bankruptcy Research Center, reports that more than 135,000 consumers filed for bankruptcy in October 2009. The industry group estimates that this represents a nearly 9% increase in filings from the previous month. ABI Executive Director Samuel J. Gerdano commented that the increase in consumer bankruptcy filings in October, together with a reported 7 percent increase in business cases, “demonstrates the sustained stress on the U.S. Economy.”

The American Bankruptcy Institute further predicts that by year’s end, total bankruptcy filings will be up 30% over 2008. In fact, as of October, bankruptcy filings were up 22% over the same period in the previous year, with roughly 950,000 filings, as compared to roughly 700,000 in the same period in 2008.

Of October’s filings, the American Bankruptcy Institute estimates that roughly one-third of consumer bankruptcy filings were Chapter 13 filings. As discussed before on our blog, a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing, also known as a “wage earner’s plan,” provides a flexible means for individuals to work out a payment plan with creditors, in particular when those individuals do not have incomes low enough to qualify for a Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy filing, or where the individuals wish to retain particular property after filing for bankruptcy.

A Chapter 13 filing allows an individual with a regular income to create a plan with the bankruptcy court’s approval to pay on outstanding debts. After the payment period established under the plan, the remaining balance of the debts is often discharged. The duration of the repayment plan varies. For wage earners with monthly incomes below a particular median income (determined on a state-by-state basis), the standard period for a repayment plan under Chapter 13 is three years. For those with incomes above the applicable median income, the standard period for a repayment plan under Chapter 13 is five years. Depending on your locale, however, the time you spend in your bankruptcy plan can be less than 3 years. Talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney about this issue.

Please note that as of May 2009, the amount of debt that may be discharged under a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing is limited to $336,900 or less of unsecured debt and $1,010,650 of secured debt. These amounts are recalculated periodically to account for changes in the consumer price index.

If you are considering filing for bankruptcy, the evidence is abundantly clear that you are not alone. Many American consumers are concluding that filing for bankruptcy is an effective way to resolve outstanding debt issues and move on with their lives.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, December 2, 2009 @ 4:07 pm

Are medical bills and health care costs making you sick? Join the crowd.

A recent study from the Commonwealth Fund found nearly two-thirds of American adults—an estimated 116 million people—are buckling under the weight of medical bills, going without much-needed care because of cost, are uninsured for a time, or remain underinsured.

As a result, more adults are not only experiencing cost-related delays in getting needed care, but are also struggling to pay unexpected or accumulating medical bills. Currently, forty-one percent of working-age adults, or 72 million people, reported a problem paying their medical bills or had accrued medical debt, up from 34 percent (58 million) in 2005.

Medical debt can take the wind out of anyone’s financial sails. And unfortunately, horror stories are common. Take for example a recent story regaled from the Austin-American Statesman of woman who reconnected with an old high school flame in middle age only to lose him to liver disease a short time later. Struggling to pay his medical bills, she eventually filed for bankruptcy, but not before she lost her home.

Medical bills are a leading cause of financial stress in this country; exacerbated by the fact that most people wait too long before they get help taking a serious inventory of their financial picture. In some cases you can restructure or even settle medical debt before it means losing your savings, your home and a hefty chunk of your financial viability; but you should move fast.

Once your medical bills go to a debt collection agency its much more difficult to negotiate a settlement. If you see that your medical bills are causing you to fall behind on payments for essentials like housing, food and emergency savings, it’s time to seek help from a professional debt counselor.

However, sometimes restructuring or settling medical debt can have a deleterious effect on debtor credit scores, also affecting your ability to obtain home loans or credit cards. An article in the Dallas Morning News shared the story of a man who suffered a heart attack during a lapse in his health insurance. Because of a gap in his insurance, the 59-year-old was hit with medical bills totaling more than $140,000—all of which went to collections when the man could not afford to pay. Eventually, the man was able to pay off his medical debt when the hospital reduced the bill; however, the medical debt’s impact on his credit remained. He paid his debt and his credit score still dropped significantly. Today, he’s having difficulty refinancing his home and is still on the hook for his surgery.

Might bankruptcy have been the better option? Possibly. With millions of Americans suffering from medical debt, much of that debt has gone to collections. Collections action on medical debt remains on a consumer’s credit report for 7 years and many lenders consider the medical debt when determining the consumer’s creditworthiness. And unlike the man from the previous story, most consumers are simply unable to repay medical debt as well as their other mounting financial obligations.

Bankruptcy has the effect of wiping out the obligations to repay unsecured debt, including medical debt, giving the debtor an opportunity for a stress-free financial fresh start. As an added bonus, a creditor might be more willing to lend to a debtor who have discharged his debt obligations in bankruptcy than to a debtor who is still obligated to pay thousands towards medical debt obligations.

For more information regarding the benefits of bankruptcy, visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt online.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 1, 2009 @ 11:34 pm

In an era of extreme homeowner hardship and surging unemployment, most people worry that debt-free living through bankruptcy will leave them without a credit card in an uncertain world where plastic is widely-accepted. Fortunately, filing for bankruptcy doesn’t have to mean losing your credit cards—or the opportunity to access new ones.

While you’re required to list all outstanding debts owed when filing for bankruptcy, including credit card debt, accounts with no balance can be omitted and kept. Additionally, for those cards with balances, a majority of credit card providers allow you to hold on to their credit card for use after bankruptcy if you agree to reaffirm the card balance and enter into a new agreement after filing. This “Reaffirmation Agreement” documents your willingness to continue to be responsible for this debt after the bankruptcy is discharged—allowing for a little extra insurance for unexpected expenses in the years to come. While reaffirmation may be an option, you should really take full advantage of your bankruptcy discharge by getting rid of all of your debts. What sense does it make to file for bankruptcy, but remain on the hook for some of the debt?

Even if your credit cards don’t follow you after your bankruptcy filing, it doesn’t mean you remain credit-less. While you may not qualify for certain loans following a bankruptcy, secured credit cards (otherwise known as “second chance cards”) are still available to reestablish and rebuild your credit by continually proving, and improving, your credit score even before your bankruptcy falls from your credit report.

Even better, secured credits cards are low risk. When you receive a secured card, an upfront deposit is required creating a sort of savings account for that card. The credit limit of your card is often very low— typically $500 or less to start—constituting the amount of money in your card’s account. As a result, this type of card promotes healthy spending practices and prevents missed payments, an inability to easily pay off the card’s balance, and many of the other financial woes sometimes associated with unsecured cards. As such, a secured card’s limit can actually rise with your credit score or after several months of on time payments—thereby rebuilding your credit, and your credit confidence, after bankruptcy.

To begin making a secured credit card work for you following bankruptcy, it’s always a good idea to read the fine print. Look for a card with no application charges. Also, seek a reasonable annual fee as these automatic expenses don’t count toward your credit score and might otherwise easily eat away at a small credit limit. Similarly, verify that your secured credit card reports to the three major credit bureaus, assuring that there’s a clear record of your positive credit usage—even if it is credit created with your own money.

Finally, depending on the programs available at your bank, credit union or other secured credit provider, you are able to inquire as to whether your card can be converted to a more familiar, higher limit unsecured card after you’ve been on time with your secured payments for a year or more. The result is a new credit-rich card in your wallet and, this time around, months of healthy spending habits under your belt.

For more information on “The Truth About Bankruptcy,” click here to visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt online.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 1, 2009 @ 7:35 am

Exacerbated by the recent recession, self-employed or small business owners everywhere are facing fewer credit options, high health care costs, and lagging consumer spending. Those struggling to stay afloat in these tough financial times must ask themselves even tougher questions. Do I have the motivation to continue my business? Could the business prosper if it wasn’t keeping up with old debts? Could my business persevere if it shed equipment, employees or space? Could I sell my business? Could I start another business if I did sell?

If after answering these questions you find you are no longer able to sustain or expand your business in your current financial situation, filing for bankruptcy may be your best bet.

For those business people who no longer have the time, energy or drive to continue their business interests in their current capacity, Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidates business assets to repay looming debts. A court-appointed agent will sell these assets and pay the proceeds to creditors; beginning with secured creditors first, followed by any unsecured creditors. While this type of bankruptcy normally leads to the demise of the business, it, in turn, provides a quick resolution for individuals and a dependable dissolution for partnerships and corporations.

In the alternative, for business owners seeking solutions to the very problems that led to bankruptcy, Chapter 11 allows for a much-needed financial reorganization. Following a Chapter 11 filing, the court appoints a conservator who, like the agent in the previous example, oversees the business assets to best pay off creditors, while still keeping the business afloat. In short, Chapter 11 stops creditors, allowing the court-appointed conservator to reorganize and optimize business finances for a better future.

The best part for self-employed and small business owners filing Chapter 11 is that they can legally continue operating their business and earning an income as a “debtor in possession,” receiving the benefits of “automatic stay” protection. Debtors in possession are protected from creditor actions such as lawsuits and asset seizures, even if a creditor obtained a judgment before the bankruptcy filing. An added benefit of filing bankruptcy as a debtor in possession is that bankruptcy law allows you to take out more loans that take precedence over all other creditors.

Conversely, like businesspeople filing for Chapter 7, Chapter 11 debtors in possession are bound by specific bankruptcy rules and restrictions, including prohibitions on using encumbered assets as collateral and selling assets without the approval of interested creditors. As a result, the best move a bankruptcy bound small business owner can make is to consult an experienced bankruptcy attorney who specializes in representing small business owners.

While a bankruptcy for your business is sometimes advisable, many small business owners don’t have any assets left and don’t intend to continue the business, or intend to continue under a different name. If so, it may make more sense to simply let the corporation die on its own without a bankruptcy. However, if you’re like most small business owners, you have probably personally guaranteed most, if not all, of your business debt. While a business bankruptcy will effectively hold off creditors from getting to your business, those same creditors can choose to pursue you personally. Whether you are dissolving the business or continuing on, its important to pull your credit report to determine how much of your debt has been personally guaranteed. Your attorney can then advise you how a personal bankruptcy can save you and your family from your business creditors.

Skilled bankruptcy attorneys like those at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt can get to work early, navigate any uncertain waters of bankruptcy court and work in your best interests during the duration of your business and/or personal bankruptcy. In North Carolina, call 1-800-899-1414 to discuss your situation today. Always a free initial consultation.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:03 am

The USA Today recently published an article about the changing face of bankruptcy. In other posts, we have noted that we are going through a “middle class recession.” Well, the evidence for both concepts continues to pile up, as the number of people who either currently, or before bankruptcy, brought home well over six figures in salary before filing continues to increase.

A woman interviewed in the USA Today was making $275,000 a year before investing savings into a new business just before the recession really tipped. Credit card bills suddenly went from manageable to frightening and as sales slowed, so did her confidence that things were going to get better. Eventually, she filed for court protection from her creditors.

This was not a woman who took advantage of a bank’s leniency to run up material goods charges she had no intention of repaying. This was an entrepreneur who didn’t see the recession coming, just as surprised as the thousands of highly paid, well-educated financial experts who worked in the heart of Wall Street every day.

A new study recently published proves bankruptcy is ultimately the domain of the middle-class. The study, completed by two Harvard professors and one from Ohio University, states that even before the current downturn, those who have had to file bankruptcy are largely college educated and own homes.

A book to be published based on the report cites that in every month in 2007, 100,000 middle-class families filed bankruptcy. And, those families were financially more troubled than those who filed in 2001.

Washington is just now recognizing the trend, as the head of the TARP program (which administered and manages bailout money), Elizabeth Warren (one of the Harvard professors behind the report) stated. “The bankruptcy filings are a warning about the risks now facing middle-class Americans. No longer can they count on a college education, a good job and home ownership to protect them from financial collapse.”Warren also pointed out that time honored strategies for wealth-building are no longer holding up. Home ownership, steady investing and the support of a college degree are not enough to guarantee financial stability.

Now that the real estate market has demonstrated volatility few realized was possible, a once relied-upon nest egg is often crushed under the weight of a falling market. Add in something like a sudden medical emergency–even if insured–and few people would be able to handle the economic burden.

A couple in Long Island, for example, used equity in a home they owned for 29 years to take care of some mounting financial issues. Health problems soon emerged and work hours were cut back. Diane Spano had to have a kidney transplant and soon after lost her job because the drug treatment center where she worked closed. Her husband, with a back problem, was down to minimal hours at a local post office. Soon after taking out a home equity loan to keep them afloat, they realized the additional monthly expense was just too much. They filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy to find the help they needed. Both of them were 66-years-old.

We discuss the stigmas of bankruptcy because all too often, we realize that they become primary reasons why people hesitate to file. “What will our friends and family think? Are we failures?” No, your not. And chances are, they’re in the same boat. But you’re smart enough to not let it sink.

If you are in North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt today for a free initial debt consultation. We know every client’s situation is unique and we will take the time to carefully address all of your bankruptcy concerns. Call today. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, November 29, 2009 @ 2:48 pm

Americans young and old, hit hard by the recent economic meltdown, are turning to any available income, accounts, or other resources to pay down today’s mounting mortgage debt, crushing credit card rates and high health care costs. One such resource—liquidating a registered retirement account like a 401(k)—might appear to be a quick and easy fix to pay down looming expenses or even to avoid filing for bankruptcy.

In reality however, it’s better to “stay away” from 401(k)s, leaving these and other retirement accounts untouched and intact in times of financial distress—even for those bankruptcy bound.

Why, you ask?

Retirement Accounts Like Your 401(k) Are Exempt From Bankruptcy
First and foremost, it’s important to understand that your 401k is safe—even in bankruptcy. Assuming your registered retirement accounts, such as IRAs, 401(k)s, and pension plans, have not been used to secure loans, they’re considered protected assets. And recent amendments to the Bankruptcy Code have made these exemptions available in all states. In the alternative, cashing out a 401(k) automatically means losing your hard-earned savings, higher taxes, and potential delays in any bankruptcy filing.

Cashing Out a 401(k) Means Paying [More] Out In the Long Run
Using retirement savings to pay creditors can create new debt in the form of income taxes and early withdrawal penalties. In fact, considerably higher taxes are the norm if you cash in valuable retirement assets like your 401(k). This heavily taxed income also cannot be discharged in bankruptcy for years and may prevent other qualifying deductions. As a result, this expensive option creates even more economic troubles for families struggling with already weighty debts and considering the benefits of bankruptcy.

401(k) Liquidation May Provide a Substantial Burden to a Productive Bankruptcy
In terms of burdening your bankruptcy proceedings, liquidating your 401k to pay creditors could mean significant delays in productive bankruptcy results. Any cashed out 401(k) funds will be counted as income and considered when evaluating your economic status pending bankruptcy. Therefore, any withdrawals from 401(k)s should be disclosed to your bankruptcy attorney immediately.

401(k)s Fund Your Future
Just as bankruptcy provides a much-needed stopping point for those drowning in debt, maintaining registered retirement accounts, such as IRAs, 401(k)s, and pension plans—even in tough times—provides a comparable and essential starting point for your family’s viable financial future.

So, before you consider liquidating any retirement accounts, such as IRAs, 401(k)s, and pension plans, talk to the skilled bankruptcy attorneys at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, November 25, 2009 @ 12:12 pm

Should you try to modify your mortgage before filing for bankruptcy? Bankruptcy will stop foreclosure proceedings; a Chapter 13 bankruptcy will allow you to keep your home, and to develop a payment plan to meet your back payment obligations. But it won’t necessarily lower your monthly mortgage payments. Is it worth it to try to modify your mortgage and secure lower payments first?

The evidence is mounting that it’s probably not worth your effort. A recent report shows that although 362,348 loans have been approved for “trial” modifications, only 1,711 of those trial modifications have been made permanent. Assuming you can even get over the first hurdle of being approved for a trial modification, you’re likely to get stuck in “trial mod limbo”. Depending on your lender’s mood on any given day, you could at any point be dropped from your trial modification, worse off than where you started.

But isn’t the program backed by the government It’s true, the government had high hopes for the Making Home Affordable program, designed to help homeowners who are having trouble making their payments. However, mortgage companies have dragged their feet over it; they make more money off fees when a house goes into foreclosure than they do modifying a mortgage. The government may well say you qualify for MHA, and your lender simply refuses to go along.

Faced with a recalcitrant lender, you might turn to foreclosure consultants. While there are legitimate consultants, be wary of scams. Many consultants will simply charge you a fee and never even bother to contact your lender!

You also have to consider whether or not changing the terms of your loan is in your best interest. For example, you may be qualified to refinance under the Hope for Homeowners program (H4H). However, H4H requires upfront fees and additional mortgage insurance; later, when you sell or refinance your house, you will be required to share between 50 and 100 % of the proceeds with the government.

Some lenders might agree to roll your loan into a 40-year fixed mortgage. In this case, you’d pay less per month, but for a much longer period of time. Depending on your loan amount, the additional money could be tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. Plus, of course, you will have payments for an extra 10 years, and less equity in the home if you sell before that. Will the difference in monthly payments make that additional debt worth it? It depends on your circumstances, of course, but possibly not. Remember, once you file for Chapter 13, much or all of your unsecured debt may be erased, freeing up more of your income for your mortgage payment.

The earlier you file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the more likely you are to save your home. If foreclosure proceedings have advanced enough prior to your filing, you may not be able to afford the Chapter 13 payment that is required to catch you up. If you’re starting to get behind, call a bankruptcy attorney today.

While modification is still receiving a lot of hype in the press, it’s becoming clear that it’s all just hype. . The best way to sort through these options is with the help of a professional bankruptcy attorney. It doesn’t make sense to spend weeks trying to modify your loan, only to find out it resulted in filing for bankruptcy too late.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, November 24, 2009 @ 8:40 am

Most people believe that their credit rating will be ruined for the next 8-10 years if they file for bankruptcy. This could not be further from the truth.
Bankruptcy is not a shiny gold star on your credit report, that is for sure, but it is far from a death toll on your credit. In reality, your credit rating is already pretty darn low from all the missed and/ or late payments you have been piling up prior to filing. While I highly doubt any creditors will actually see things this way, filing is actually you showing that you do want to improve and do better for the near and foreseeable future.

Yes, your credit rating will take a hit. Yes, your interest rates will be a bit higher than the norm for a few years, but you are not in a credit purgatory. Once you have filed, you will find that there will be ample opportunity for you to rebuild your credit rating. Do not be surprised if you are flooded with credit card companies offering to help you rebuild your credit. Car dealerships will jump on this bandwagon as well wanting to give you a loan regardless of the fact that you just went through bankruptcy proceedings.

They do so not out of the kindness of their hearts, but out of the greed in them instead. Car dealerships and credit card companies know full well that you have no other option than to take the outrage offer they give you in order to rebuild. You need them; they do not need you. They take advantage of this by hiking up the interest rates and killing you with annual fees.

It can be tempting here to fall back into old habits. If you have yet to get back on solid financial ground than you would probably be better off doing nothing. It takes activity to rebuild your credit rating, but at least you are not doing anymore damage. If you have student loans that are as yet unpaid either start or continue making those payments once your case is discharged. Making installment payments like with a student loan can help rebuild your credit as well.

Bankruptcy is a scary option to consider when you have already been undergoing some tough financial times. The stigma that it carries is enough to keep some people from filing. For others it is the perceived damage that will be incurred on their credit rating. What they fail to realize is that the damage has already been done. Filing bankruptcy cannot do much more than the last year or years of lackluster financial mismanagement have already done.

In fact, bankruptcy will actually be the first step in getting your credit rating back where it needs to be.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, November 23, 2009 @ 6:49 pm

The Associated Press is reporting that the foreclosure crisis will persist well into next year as high unemployment “pushes more people out of homes, pulls down housing prices and raises concerns about the broader economic recovery.”

The latest evidence comes this week in a report from the Mortgage Bankers Association identifying that a rising tide of fixed-rate home loans made to people with good credit are now facing foreclosure, marking a surprising shift from assumptions that only riskier subprime loans are driving the current housing crisis. The report also stated that 14 percent of homeowners with a mortgage were either late on payments or in foreclosure at the end of September 2009, marking another record-high for the ninth straight quarter.

These findings speak to an even more beleaguered housing market than previously thought, bearing the weight of even more home-loan defaults. The main culprit, industry experts say, is rising unemployment, forcing even the most responsible homeowners to fall behind on their mortgages.

As the AP found, many laid-off homeowners might be able to survive on their savings for a while, but “the longer the economic situation stays in place, the less likely they are to hold on,” said Jay Brinkmann, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

As Robert L. Borosage, Co-Director of the Campaign for America’s Future, blogged this week, “[o]ne in six workers is unemployed, has given up looking or is forced to work part-time. For young workers aged 16 to 24, unemployment is 19%. For young African Americans, unemployment is at 30%. And as Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke testified yesterday, we’re likely to see — at best — a slow recovery with no new job growth. That exacts a devastating toll in hopes crushed, families stressed, young people stalled, and poverty and hunger spreading.And even if we avoid another downturn, the job picture will get worse. Crippling state deficits — over $260 billion over 2 years — will force layoffs that cost an estimated 900,000 jobs next year if nothing is done.”

As a direct result of this explosion of job losses, this year, more than 3 million foreclosures are predicted, as homeowners are increasingly incapable of paying the mortgage during a brutal recession. As the financial meltdown continues and unemployment surges, the millions that have now slipped into delinquency and foreclosure with only one conceivable way out: bankruptcy.

Homeowners with prime and sub-prime mortgages alike are taking immediate action, arming themselves with basic bankruptcy tools. So, if you’re interested in staying in your home, looking for permanent solutions to foreclosure threats, and ready to quit spending and start saving, there’s never been a better time to consult with a bankruptcy expert. For more information regarding homeowner benefits of bankruptcy filing, visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

While recent reports of the nation’s financial future are nothing short of bleak, the good news remains that through bankruptcy laws, homeowners facing foreclosure can take their future into their own hands, stop drowning in mortgage debt, and begin on the road to a more viable financial future.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, November 15, 2009 @ 12:37 pm

Are you a married couple, but only one of you earns income and holds assets? Or maybe only one of you has acquired debt during your marriage? If you’re married and considering a bankruptcy, you might be wondering whether you and your spouse both have to file bankruptcy.

The answer: while you and your spouse do not both have to file bankruptcy, usually, if a bankruptcy is necessary for one spouse, both spouses will end up filing.

If, for instance, both you and your spouse are liable for a debt and only one of you files under Chapter 7, the creditor may later attempt to collect the debt from the non-filing spouse, even if he or she has no income or assets! In other words, the creditor will simply demand payment for the entire debt from the spouse who didn’t file. So in this case it makes sense for you both to file.

If, however, only one of you has incurred debt during your marriage, only the spouse with the debt needs to file bankruptcy. In states like North Carolina, which is not a “community” property” state, even if you are married—if you did not sign for the debt, you do not owe the debt, and you do not necessarily need to file bankruptcy.

What if you just got married and most of the debt belongs to just one of you? As long as you didn’t sign for your spouse’s premarital debt, only the spouse with the debt has to file bankruptcy.

And what about a Chapter 13? If you both qualify for a Chapter 13 and if you are both liable for any significant debts then you should file jointly under Chapter 13, even if only one of you has income!

Whether you’re considering Chapter 7 or Chapter 13—if you’re married and considering bankruptcy then both of you should consult with one of the attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to ensure that both of your best interests are carried out. Visit us at www.billsbills.com or call us at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, November 11, 2009 @ 8:49 am

You’ve seen the ads: a circus act of food court commodities are passed around by a mash-up of merchants to the frenetic marching music of patrons efficiently paying for their delicious delicacies with their handy-dandy Visa cards. Like a well-oiled, money-sharing machine, these well-choreographed consumers pay conveniently with a single swipe of credit, serving up little wait in their collective go-go-gadget gaits and emphasizing, with every single swipe, the efficiency and speed of making everyday purchases with a Visa check card over cash or checks. This plastic parade ends abruptly when a lone cash-carrier has the audacity to pull out his greenbacks for one show (and music) stopping dark ages transaction. The record scratches. The cashier looks cranky. And the message is clear: in a world where plastic rules, only a party pooper pays with cash.

More and more, life does take Visa. And Mastercard. And Discovery. And a whole host of other plastic pinch hitters ready to step up to bat when your bank account can’t. This point is not lost on more and more savvy small purchase institutions and organizations. From cabbies to Salvation Army kettles, more and more businesses are getting into the single swipe game, and whether it’s because of convenience or economic circumstances, Americans are taking the bait, at the expense of low credit card balances.

And for those Salvation Army kettles at least, these results are certainly panning out: national Salvation Army surveys show that people give more when they are allowed to donate with credit, sharing 750 percent more when paying with a card.

The science of our single swipe economy supports this trend. Following an examination of the brain and how people feel when they spend, Carnegie Mellon University professor George Loewenstein hypothesized that credit cards take away the pain of spending. From an article summing up Loewenstein’s work in Carnegie Mellon Today it was found that:

“[T]here’s a battle in the brain between immediate pleasure and immediate pain when we’re deciding what to buy. … The subjects in the MRI study weren’t thinking about what benefits they would gain at some later date if they chose not to purchase The Family Guy DVD set now. Rather, they were deciding based on how painful (or not) they thought paying for it would be right now.”

Combining the “feel-good” factor of plastic, the financially-strapped consumer population, and wide-acceptance of credit for cash, this looks like a recipe ripe for a consumer crisis that plays right into the hands of the credit card companies. So what should you do?

Try carrying cash-only.
Foregoing your credit cards for cash and carry—even for a few days—can make a huge impact in the psychology of your spending—bringing back the pain (and the gain) of using only what you have. While we remain disconnected from our spending with plastic, cash-only provides the necessary perspective that leads to healthy budgeting and better buying judgment.

Make room for fewer cards with lower limits.
When you do carry credit, only keep what you need for well-thought-out purchases and emergencies. With fewer cards and lower limits, you’ll rely more on cash, which could help head off budget-breaking impulse buys.

Plan through the pain
If the pain of past spending on plastic is getting you down, Chapter 7 bankruptcy is an option designed to quickly clear credit card debt. Click here for more information about how the bankruptcy experts at The Law Office of John T. Orcutt can help you out of your own personal credit crisis.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, November 10, 2009 @ 11:16 am

The number of people filing bankruptcy due to medical bills has been rising every year. A recent study in the American Journal of Medicine shows that more than 62% of people filing for bankruptcy do so at least partly because of medical bills they can’t pay. Many filers have insurance – often they’ve ‘capped out’ their insurance and the insurance company refuses to pay any more bills, leaving them tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. In other cases, illness has forced people to lose or leave their jobs, meaning that not only do they have no money coming in to pay their bills, but their insurance coverage has often lapsed as well.

A bill recently introduced in Congress – by Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH) in the House and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) in the Senate – hopes to make filing bankruptcy easier for people in this situation. People who owed either 10% of their income or $10,000, or who had been out of work for more than 4 weeks in the last year due to illness, would qualify as medical debtors. The bill would exempt these filers from the requirement to take credit counseling. More importantly, they would no longer be subject to the means test – all medical debtors would be allowed to file Chapter 7. And the homestead exemption – the amount of equity they could keep in their home after filing bankruptcy – would rise to $250,000 for medical debtors.

Will the Medical Fairness Act pass? It’s hard to say. To some extent, the debate seems to be falling along the same lines as the general health care debate: democrats for, republicans against. At a recent hearing in the Senate, Whitehouse brought in a number of debtors to make the emotional point that they lost everything, including in many cases their homes, due to unavoidable medical bills. Kerry Burns told the tragic story of her son, who died at the age of 4 after a long struggle with cystic fibrosis. She and her husband both took leaves from their jobs. They cashed in their 401K accounts, spent every penny in their bank accounts and had insurance– and all that wasn’t enough to pay their son’s medical bills, which came to over five million dollars.

Republican opponents, particularly Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), seemed unmoved. Sessions seemed more concerned with the plight of the credit card companies, who will likely lose money if more people file Chapter 7. Sessions worried that people would qualify as medical debtors when the ‘real’ reason for their bankruptcy was due to overspending on their credit cards. He called experts who claimed that the study was flawed and the real role of medical bills in bankruptcy is much smaller. Others rebutted both arguments, pointing out that the number of medical debtors may be greater than the study shows, as many people put medical bills on their credit cards.

The Democrats have the votes in both the House and the Senate to pass this bill. But the credit card companies and the medical industrial complex spend an enormous amount of money on lobbyists to protect their interests. The Medical Bankruptcy Fairness Act is a common sense relief for people who’ve incurred enormous bills simply due to their medical problems. Whether or not it passes says more about politics than policy.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 6:15 am

Making it harder for overburdened debtors to file bankruptcy in the middle of our biggest financial crisis in living memory may not be the best policy idea to come down the beltway, but it is exactly what Congress set in motion in 2005. Here is why:

If you have been looking into filing bankruptcy, then you have heard about the ‘Means Test’. The Means Test was created by Congress to determine eligibility for consumer bankruptcy in 2005 when it reformed the Bankruptcy Law. The idea was that a debtor should only get as much bankruptcy relief as he or she really needed. So Congress developed a formula to determine which bankruptcy filers would qualify for Chapter 7, which offers an immediate discharge of debt, and who should file Chapter 13, which requires a lengthier payment plan.

Along with its creation of the means test in 2005, Congress provided for automatic updates of state median incomes, upon which the means test is based. The state median income figures are periodically updated by the U.S. Census and the Executive Office for U.S. Trustees (EOUST) publishes a table that is used in the bankruptcy courts.

As more workers lose their jobs, the median income, unsurprising, can drop as well. If the median income figures for a state drops, it lowers the bar for debtors who will be subjected to the means test and the possibility of being denied help in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. In North Carolina, the unemployment rate rose to 10.8% according to the US Dept of Labor figures reported for August 2009. Similarly, the post-November 1 EOUST table, cites the median annual income in North Carolina for a family of three fell by several thousand dollars. The irony is that even though the number of people needing bankruptcy has risen, the means test makes it more difficult for them to qualify for Chapter 7.

None of this news should discourage you from seeking bankruptcy relief. Even if you are one of the small percentage of people who don’t qualify for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Chapter 13 has essentially the same effect of a Chapter 7- a discharge of your unsecured debt. Additionally, some means test deductions which are not available in a Chapter 7 are available as disposable monthly income deductions in Chapter 13. The Chapter 13 disposable monthly income test measures how much disposable monthly income you must devote to your Chapter 13 payment plan. Even if you are deemed to have substantial disposable monthly income, some pre-petition planning will help bring the number down. As always, talk to an experienced bankruptcy about your options, you’ll be amazed at how beneficial a a properly planned bankruptcy can be.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Call 1-800-899-1414 for a free initial debt consultation. Or visit www.billsbills.com to fill out a free and confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, October 26, 2009 @ 10:38 pm

In discussing the issues surrounding the current economy, the term “mortgage meltdown” is now officially as tired a wordplay as assemblages like “From Wall Street to Main Street,” “Where’s my bailout?” and “It’s a crisis of confidence.” Beyond these catchphrases, you might still be wondering: What is really behind this recession?

In a nutshell, big banks created a huge demand for mortgage backed securities. Mortgage securities are basically your mortgage, packaged with a bunch of other people’s mortgages, which are then sold on the open market to investment banks who pay for the package based on the quality of loans included. Good borrowers with good loan applications made up the “Prime” packages, and different variations of the packages existed for other qualities of debt, such as “Alt-A” and “Sub-Prime”, the latter being defined by weak credit scores and little documentation. The packaging allowed investors to pick and choose, depending on how much risk they wanted to take on. This worked well as long as everyone in the game stayed honest.

It turns out, everyone involved was not being honest. As more and more consumers qualified for loans, the securities became watered down. It got to the point that literally anyone with a pulse was being qualified for a home loan. The prime packages were increasingly including “low-doc” and “no-doc” consumers, who had little prospect of being able to afford their mortgages over the long term. However, the investment banks kept buying and selling, re-packaging bad loans for investment banks who were hungry for more securities.

This giant tinder box eventually exploded when all parties realized that what they owned was worth far less than they thought. Adding to the devastation was the trillions of dollars in side bets on the market, termed “credit default swaps”. When the whole thing blew up, everyone needed to be paid. The only problem- the banks simply didn’t have enough money to go around. Lending froze as everyone clung tightly to the dollars that remained. Despite hundreds of billions in government money, banks still aren’t completely out of the woods.

Now that the dust has somewhat settled, many entities who purchased the bad debt are discovering that they can’t even prove ownership. In a New York bankruptcy court earlier this month, a mortgage servicer was unable to prove it serviced the loan or that the parent bank was the legal note holder. Upon formal request to prove their ownership of the note, the servicer, PHH Mortgage alerted the court that US Bank actually owned the loan. The only “proof” which PHH could provide was some vague paperwork by PHH officials, multiple signatures by the same executive (although with different titles each time), documents post-dated from the date of bankruptcy filing and eventually, an admittance of improper fees levied and even less proof they had a right to what was owed. The judge, unable to ascertain whether the debtor’s proposed Chapter 13 plan would be paying the right bank, completely disallowed the bank’s claim. You heard that right–the judge completely eliminated well over $450,000 in mortgage debt! Not only will this person continue to sleep in her house, she’ll be doing so knowing her mortgage payment isn’t due any time soon. Or ever.

Not every case involving a confused lender will result in such a favorable outcome. A lot will depend on the supporting documentation behind the loan, but if you bought or refinanced a home during the boom years, the chances are higher that your note holder might not be able to prove that it owns the debt. In a bankruptcy setting, this is a huge problem for the lender, and a potential windfall for the consumer.

The recent New York case is being looked at as a serious wake-up call for lending institutions: the days of free passes and assembly-line foreclosures are over. If you’re a consumer with a bad loan and bad terms you can’t afford, at the very least a bankruptcy may be an option to catch you up on the missed mortgage payments. Call an experienced bankruptcy attorney today to discuss how bankruptcy can help you save your family home. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, October 25, 2009 @ 11:26 pm

In the past 24 months, the American suburban landscape has been ravaged by personal bankruptcies. Expanded credit limits, inflated home prices and a false sense of security in everything material contributed to one of the worst financial landslides since the 1930s. Needless for some to say, a lot can be learned from the way so many of us treated our credit reports in the last few years.

To that end, the Institute for Financial Literacy (IFL) recently shared their thoughts on what our society can take from the thousands of bankruptcy petitions filed in 2008.Surprising the IFL was that this time around, people in higher education brackets were greatly affected by the downturn, as were those in higher income brackets. Self employed individuals have also taken a disproportionate hit. Thus, many are starting to deem this a “middle-class” recession.

From a demographic perspective, more white people have filed for bankruptcy than blacks, as have more people of Asian descent. The most alarming metric occurred in the Asian population, as their rate of filing increased by an entire percentage point within one year. Given their presence within the entire U.S. population, one percent is considered a significant jump. One theory states that the Asian increase may be related to the number of small business owners hit particularly hard by this recession.

An interesting trend arose relative to home ownership. It seems that the desire to keep the family own in lieu of financial stability proved that having a house in America has become a seriously emotional issue. People have been pushed into believing that owning a home is the best sign of one’s financial wherewithal. In turn, it has created an unreasonable connection to a material asset that is now more unaffordable than ever.

The IFL made a note about the role a dependable bankruptcy attorney can have in separating a client from the material mindset, showing them that in the long run, sometimes the loss of an asset can be beneficial. Sure, the family home holds great intrinsic value. However, is it really worth the tight budget it requires? Are you cutting back on the necessities such as food and medical, just so you can hold on to a home you can’t afford?

The report also discusses the hazards of those trying to file on their own, given that one can only file for bankruptcy once every eight years. If things do not go right the first time, a person can face a very long-term financial struggle until they are eligible to file again.

It seems that almost any discussion about bankruptcy today involves the 2005 legal reform and the means test it spawned. Creditors are simply not seeing the return from that effort, given the personal credit bedlam that this current economic maelstrom has washed ashore. Unemployment numbers of this magnitude could not have been predicted. It’s not like the majority of those filing bankruptcy are choosing to not pay what they owe–with unemployment remaining near 10%, paying the bills is simply not possible.

The IFL also used their findings to reveal a few misconceptions about bankruptcy. Specifically, many people believe it is grounds for termination from your job. Even though credit reports are reviewed in some job application processes, the federal bankruptcy code prohibits employment discrimination based on a bankruptcy filing Also, the stigmas that those who file are “irresponsible” people is relaxing. These are difficult times and people from walks of life are being impacted.

Bankruptcy is a real option for many people. If you’re facing financial difficulty, don’t think of it as a last resort. A properly planned bankruptcy can help you keep the family home or car, and can get rid of all of your credit report. There’s not a better time- call today. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414. Or visit www.billsbills.com to take our free debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, October 21, 2009 @ 6:45 am

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 has made some people wary of even considering bankruptcy. This was undoubtedly the intention of the credit industry, who went to great lengths to make sure the “reform” passed. The passage of the law and subsequent misinformation from the credit industry lobby has led to a general perception that bankruptcy is now a difficult, if not impossible, undertaking. But for many people it may not be the legal changes that keep them from filing for bankruptcy–it may just be fear and misunderstanding.

Before you decide that the 2005 reforms make  bankruptcy impossible for you, you should get a handle on the major changes in the law that affect bankruptcy filings. But hey, before you do even that, remember that there’s no need to play the guessing game; many bankruptcy attorneys, including the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, offer a free initial consultation to help you better understand the new bankruptcy laws. Here are some of the main changes that are likely to affect your situation as an individual filer:

• Bankruptcy filers are now required to receive credit counseling before filing. The role of the credit counselor is to help filers decide if they are eligible for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and to educate the filer about credit decisions.

• Filers who have income higher than the median income for their county of residence may be required to file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, instead of Chapter 7. The intent of this provision is to force more middle to high income filers to repay some of their unsecured debt. However, in many cases, even if you are above median, you will still qualify for Chapter 7. Even if you don’t qualify for a Chapter 7, chances are you are still eligible for a very reasonable Chapter 13 payment plan– in some cases for as little as $99 per month. Talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney to discuss your unique situation.

• If you bought your car less than two and a half years ago, you will be required to pay the full payoff amount of the lien in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. However, if your car was bought more than two and a half years ago, you will only be required to pay the fair market value of the vehicle. This can be very beneficial if the car is severely upside down, and can cut your car payment significantly.
• In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, if you want to keep your car, your lender may require you to sign a reaffirmation agreement, the effect of which puts you back on the hook personally for the full amount of the loan. The requirements vary by jurisdiction, and courts are increasingly holding lenders to a very high standard for these agreements. The bottom line is, if surrendering your car is not an option, talk to your attorney about a Chapter 13. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy will allow you to keep your car, often on much better terms than you currently have with your lender.
• Repeat filers may not immediately be entitled to the automatic stay. If this is your second or third filing in the past year, discuss with your attorney whether the automatic stay will go into effect automatically, or if there is some further action needed by your attorney. Court interpretations vary, so if this is a second or third filing, make sure your attorney knows the local judge’s position on this important issue.
• A Chapter 13 discharge can’t be obtained within 2 years of the filing of a Chapter 13 case in which you have received a discharge, or within 4 years of a Chapter 7 discharge. If you have previously filed for Chapter 7 and received a discharge, you will not be eligible for another Chapter 7 discharge for 8 years
• More paperwork. Naturally! Bureaucrats love it. You now have to provide more documents than in the past, but the end result is well worth the effort.
• Past due support obligations, such as child support payments, get first priority over everything else. You must remain current on your ongoing support payments
• Certain kinds of debts may be more difficult to discharge after completion of the Chapter 13 repayment plan; debts which are now impossible to discharge are trust fund taxes (such as employee withholding taxes, and excise taxes), debts from fraudulent activities, debts relating to a drunk driving accident, and criminal restitution.

These changes are not the only ones made by the law, which is why you definitely should consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney before filing. As you can see, help is still available to those who need the protection of the bankruptcy laws.

If you’re suffering with debt, don’t even consider a debt consolidation scam. Bankruptcy offers real relief. Contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to discuss your options. Call 1-800-899-1414 for a free initial debt consultations, or visit www.billsbills.com to fill out a free and confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, October 15, 2009 @ 6:06 am

Getting a pay day loan can be ever so tempting. You think to yourself, I only need a “bridge” until my next paycheck; this is a “short term” solution for a “short term” problem; this is an easy “fix”; I can get help without going through the humiliation of a credit check I’m bound to fail. These are the kinds of messages pay day loan companies relay in their advertising, which also goes a long way to generate the impression in you that these companies–unlike the large, impersonal banks who don’t seem to want your business–are run by people who just want to help you. Don’t fall for it–sometimes nostalgia is for the birds!

If you find yourself constantly relying on payday loans, your financial strategies need a drastic makeover―fast. There is no better example of throwing good money after bad; the first loan transaction with a payday loan company is a huge rip off, and every subsequent one is more of the same.

Payday loans rake in a lot of money even though they are lending to high risk customers. So how do payday loan companies make their money anyway? By counting on you to roll over that loan. The company knows, perhaps better than you, what is likely to happen. You are in financial trouble, obviously. You are short on cash, or you wouldn’t have requested the loan in the first place. So what’s going to change in your financial circumstances between now and your next paycheck? Probably nothing. The only difference will be that part of that paycheck will be gone before you get it. Chances are all too good that soon–even as soon as the very next paycheck–you will need to rely once more on a payday loan. Where does it end?

Let’s look at the math. Say something comes up and you unexpectedly need about $500. You can usually spare about $200 out of your paycheck for incidental expenses, so that leaves you with $300 to make up. So you decide you will borrow the $300. You go to a payday loan store and they ask you for a check, postdated for the date of your next paycheck, for $345. This means you are paying 15% interest for a loan that lasts two weeks, or in other words, the equivalent of a 391% APR! This is bad enough, but you’re probably thinking it’s a one time deal. The problem is that your next paycheck arrives, your expenses are the same as they ever where, only now you have a shortfall of $345. Remember in the original example you only had $200 to spare, so where does that extra $145 come from? Most probably another pay day loan.

Luckily for residents of North Carolina, pay day loan companies formerly operating in the state were shut down thanks to the efforts of the state’s Department of Justice. Now “alternative” lenders must operate under state rules, or look to other states for vulnerable customers. However, the danger is still present. Online payday lenders are increasingly available, and can suck your finances dry before you know it. If you are even considering a payday loan or payday advance, filing for bankruptcy protection may be a better option–a lasting, transformative step that can truly form that bridge between the problems of today and the financial security of your future.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt and get debt free today. Call 1-800-899-1414 today or visit www.billsbills.com for more information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, October 11, 2009 @ 10:09 pm

We can’t stress enough the value of bankruptcy for those who truly need it. Hey, it’s no secret that our business is to help people correctly file and emerge from bankruptcy with a more positive approach to their finances. The truth is that without dependable legal assistance, many Americans would face a very difficult and extremely creditor-centric bankruptcy process.

Need evidence? Just look at 2005’s Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act, which was conceptualized and heavily backed by the lending industry to ensure they re-gained an upper hand in bankruptcy court. Despite the prevalence of consumer debt problems, compounded by a faltering economy, many Americans operate under several misconceptions about bankruptcy that can often prevent or at least delay the decision to file. So let’s clear up a few things.

First off, bankruptcy is by no means a haven for unmotivated, blameless folks who simply don’t want to pay their bills anymore. Please.

No one hopes to lose their job. No one plans on having their multi-billion global employer (which provides a healthy, well-deserved salary) make shoddy investments and lay-off thousands of employees within weeks. Today’s bankruptcy cases span all levels of income and “social status” and often stem from factors beyond the control of those who need to exercise its benefits.

More over, medical debt has driven a large portion of today’s bankruptcies. How is being suddenly injured or stricken with a hard-to-fight disease an attempt to escape financial responsibilities? Many people who file for protection today are older than 65 and do so as a result of inescapable hospital bills.

In February 2005 a report was released in Health Affairs, a medical policy journal, that stated bankruptcies related to medical bills increased by 2,200 percent between 1981 and 2001. The majority of the cases in the study involved those who had insurance. Scary.

Truthfully, the idea that a person who files bankruptcy is irresponsible has been perpetuated by many of the same entities responsible for pushing anti-consumer legislature. There are simply too many unknown factors behind bankruptcy to ever assume a person is filing simply to get a free ride.

One would think, especially after the push and passage of the 2005 act, that the lending industry would be quite wary about to whom it extended credit. In other words, if they were so concerned with the number of those not paying them back, why did so many industry players provide avenues of credit, such as subprime mortgages, credit cards or lines of credit, to individuals who clearly demonstrated no ability to pay them back?

There is no hiding the fact that the lending world, as it is doing currently, saw an opportunity to quickly increase profits by providing money to those who did not have any. With steep late charges, interest rate spikes and hidden fees backed by exceptionally aggressive, tobacco industry-like marketing, financial industry leaders knew full well that money brought in from these tactics would far surpass that which would be lost in America’s bankruptcy courts. As evidence, note that since 1997, bankruptcy filings have increased by 17 percent at the same time credit card companies have experienced a more than 160 percent rise in profit.

You tell us who’s winning the credit wars.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, October 9, 2009 @ 5:23 pm

Even though we are in the business of helping people through bankruptcy, legally and sometimes even emotionally, we understand that filing is not always the best option for you. However, our greatest fear is for those who should file but decide not to for the wrong reasons, whether it be because of the stigma of bankruptcy, an inability to face financial reality, or opting for a “less than legitimate” credit counselor.

To help in your decision, consider some of the consequences of not filing bankruptcy:

Losing your car
More than likely, you have a car loan. Should that payment be one of the debts that goes unpaid, your car can be repossessed by the lender and sold to pay the loan. But here’s the real pain in losing your car: it rarely covers the amount you owe. So, you could end up losing your car and getting sued for the difference. Bankruptcy stops the repo man, and in many instances, will allow you to repay the loan with much better terms.

Foreclosure
This can be the biggest pain of them all. While the bank can’t simply take your home like a car, they can foreclose on it. The process typically takes a few months. However, this does not mean you should wait until the foreclosure hearing to seek help. If you are behind on your mortgage, a Chapter 13 bankruptcy will allow you to catch up the missed payments over a repayment period of 3 to 5 years. Contact your bankruptcy attorney today, even if you’re only behind a couple of payments.

Student loan collection
In-state tuition for the University of North Carolina system schools is going up every year. Some of the private schools in our state are well over $50,000 per year just for the privilege of attending. Without question, college is getting expensive. And so is the cost of not filing bankruptcy if you have student loans. While many loans start out as federal in nature, a large majority of them are bought by third-party lenders who do not look kindly on your inability to pay them. However, these groups are more than happy to grant you a deferral or forbearance in order to drag out the payment periods to 25 years or more. If you don’t pay your loan, they can garnish your wages and even sue you. While bankruptcy can not get rid of student loans, it will get rid of your other unsecured debt, putting you in a better position to get back on track with your student loan repayment.

You could get sued
You might think that if you simply don’t pay your creditors, they will eventually go away. Not true. Debt buyers, the lowest of all life forms, will eventually purchase the debt for pennies on the dollar. These aggressive hounds will not stop until they have pressured you to cough up a reduced settlement amount. If you still refuse to pay, they can sue you and obtain a judgment lien on your property. Depending on the laws of your state, the debt buyer can then attempt to sell your home, car or other belongings in a sheriff’s auction. Bankruptcy will stop a lawsuit immediately, and stop the creditor from forcing a sale of your property.

If you are falling behind on your monthly payments, talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney to discuss how bankruptcy can protect you and your family. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to set up your free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, October 7, 2009 @ 8:40 am

With the government’s new credit card legislation possibly reaching its stride two months early on December 1, a lot of frustrated credit card users may be breathing a collective sigh of relief. Given the tighter restrictions on credit card issuers, you might want to take the opportunity to be a little more choosy in selecting your new card, as industry players are going to push hard to win customers from competitors, using reward plans and low introductory rates as incentives. However, unknown to many credit card users is how reward plans are handled when payments are missed.

What far too few consumers understand is that not only do credit reports get the news when a payment is missed, so do the third party companies that handle the reward plans. Understandably, most people find themselves worried more about the late fees and interest rate bumps that occur when a balance goes unpaid. However, if you’re counting on the reward points to finance your next vacation, you may be in for a big surprise when they are told that as a result of missed payments, a big chunk of those rewards have been taken away.

A research effort at www.cardhub.com showed that each of the major credit card companies employ rules which revoke reward points when a payment is missed. That list includes American Express, Bank of America, Capital One, Chase, Citibank and Discover.

Discover seems to be a bit more brazen than their competitors. For example, miss your due date for two months and all of your points go away. All of them. (Don’t forget, Discover is “the card that pays you back.” Maybe.) American Express examines situations individually but will seemingly not hesitate to take away what you have earned. With all the other penalties for missing payments, like late fees, interest rate spikes, credit report dings and dinner time phone calls, this is just one more slap in the face to consumers.

Also, remember that the credit card companies can change the terms of a reward program at any time, without notice. Essentially, the lending industry allows points to be accumulated but not necessarily returned. Thus, a consumer may be using a card for a specific rewards program only to find that program is suddenly no longer available. Furthermore, reward programs are marketed as perks, gifts for simply doing business with a specific bank. Yet, that gift can be revoked without notice. Thanks for nothing.

Consumer advocates preach that those looking for a card with a rewards program should choose only those that offer cash back, because it can’t be devalued. Plus, you are more apt to take the cash reward earlier than if it was simply a pile of points accumulating in cyberspace over time for you to “eventually” use for a new mountain bike, kayak or trip to Yosemite.

Remember, if a card’s rewards plan is the main reason you choose to open the account, as it is for more card users today, make sure you understand all of the fine print before you make a decision.

From: The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, with 4 convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson. Call us today to set up your free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, October 1, 2009 @ 10:15 am

Dealing with debt collectors is no picnic. Despite increased efforts by the government to protect Americans from some of the more questionable debt collection practices, hapless consumers continue to face the rude, callous pestering of debt collectors as they struggle to stay on top of their finances. While the mental distress caused by debt collectors may be no surprise, this case may well present an issue of first impression: Dianne McLeod, a widow residing in Florida, is suing her mortgage company, Green Tree Servicing, for her husband’s wrongful death. In the suit, McLeod alleges that the illegal practices of Green Tree’s collectors led to her husband’s untimely death of heart failure at the age of 57.

Stanley McLeod worked at Sears until he suffered a heart attack while at the job in 1997. During his recovery, Stanley was unable to hold down a full time job. The McLeods began to fall behind on monthly payments for their mortgaged home in Keystone Heights, close to Gainesville, Florida.

Soon, debt collectors representing the mortgage company began to call incessantly. According to Dianne McLeod, the debt collectors called as many as nine times a day, often leaving rude and harassing messages on the family answering machine. The McLeod’s attorney, William Howard of Tampa, Florida, says he is looking forward to playing the tapes for a jury. Howard considers the tapes pretty damning evidence of the debt collector’s operating procedure and is willing to bet that a jury will be sympathetic to Dianne McLeod’s suit.

Green Tree Servicing executives, meanwhile, have called McLeod’s claim “outrageous and meritless.” Speaking on behalf of the company, Brian Corey, Green Tree’s senior vice president and acting counsel, has denied the charges that wrongdoing on the part of his company was the cause of Stanley’s death. But according to his widow, Stanley’s health, already weakened from his first heart attack, visibly suffered as calls and collection efforts from Green Tree intensified starting in August 2005. Dianne says that after Stanley would receive a call from Green Tree Servicing, or listen to a message left on their machine, his face would redden and his breathing would grow labored. Dianne believes that Stanley’s health was progressively worn down by harassment from their mortgage company, culminating in her husband’s death of heart failure in December 4, 2005.

The McLeods already had a pending suit against Green Tree for unfair debt collection practices. The suit alleged that Green Tree broke Florida collection laws by calling too often, using harassing tactics, and contacting people outside the household in an attempt to collect on the debt. Following Stanley’s death at the end of 2005, Howard added the wrongful death claim. The attorney says debt collector harassment claims like the McLeod’s are not uncommon; he personally is handling about 500 claims from other people unduly harassed by debt collectors. He believes the McLeod’s case is the first wrongful death claim to have resulted from the illegal practices of debt collectors.

As you read this amazing story, did you find yourself sympathetic to the McLeods because of first-hand experience? Do you feel like debt collectors are hounding you to death? If you are tired of dealing with the threats and rough treatment from debt collectors, contact a bankruptcy and consumer rights attorney today. In addition to the protections of the Bankruptcy laws, you may have a claim for unfair debt collection practices. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. 1-800-899-1414, or visit www.billsbills.com to set up an appointment online. Your first appointment is free. Don’t wait another day.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, September 29, 2009 @ 9:44 am

It has been a number of months since new laws were passed to address the aggressive marketing tactics of credit card companies and their downright crooked methods of making money through penalty fees and interest rate hikes. To date, even with some facets of the law intact, few consumers are realizing a positive impact. This is because credit card companies have used the government intervention as an excuse to increase rates and invent new fees before the real teeth of the law come into effect in February of 2010.

Thankfully, it sounds like lawmakers behind the effort have caught wind of the ongoing tactics and are now pushing to enact the laws sooner than expected, as early as December of this year.

Representative Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee and by no means a novice at how to get under the skin of big business, is leading the measure to get the law into action sooner. He is joined by fellow Democrat Carolyn Maloney of New York. The act also prevents credit card companies from raising interest rates unless a customer is more than 60 days late and requires the original rate to be restored after six months of on-time payments.

Aspects of the legislation considered for the proposed December 1 deadline include the requirement that credit card companies apply payments to the cardholder’s highest balance accounts first. The legislation would also put an end to the practice of “universal default” interest rate hikes. This practice allows individual lenders to increase interest rates if their customer defaults on an account with a completely different lender. When this happens, multiple credit accounts set to the default rate simultaneously, greatly increasing the chance for additional defaults and added fees.

Industry card issuers have been primarily pushing fees to address tactics consumers use to avoid higher payments, such as when a customer transfers balances from a high interest card to one that may be offering a much lower introductory rate. Discover Financial Services, which issues the Discover Card, announced an increase in balance transfer fees from three percent to five percent of the balance. On a $5,000 balance, the cost would go from $150.00 to $250.00.

In recent months, American Express, Chase, and Bank of America have all raised interest rates across the board, and have changed many account holders’ interest rates from fixed to variable. A representative from www.lowcards.com stated that their company has tracked more than 50 interest rate, fee and terms changes by eight card companies since January, which is when the bill was starting to take shape in Washington.

Rep. Frank and others in Congress are not pleased with the credit industry’s reaction to the Act, and are looking to put a stop to abusive lending practices as soon as possible. However, even with the changed effective date, consumer advocates fear that credit card issuers will simply raise the interest rates before December 1st, leaving many consumers to deal with unmanageable interest rates at a time when account balances are often at the highest– right after Christmas.

If you’re sick of the interest rate hikes, sick of the penalty fees, and want an opportunity to start fresh, call a bankruptcy attorney today. In North Carolina, call 1-800-899-1414 to set up a free initial debt consultation. Or visit www.billsbills.com, where you can fill out our confidential debt questionnaire and set up an appointment at one of our 4 convenient office locations.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, September 26, 2009 @ 6:17 pm

One of the greatest benefits of filing for bankruptcy protection is that it allows struggling homeowners a second chance to catch up on missed mortgage payments. For many people, the fear of losing a beloved family home is one of the most stressful parts of their struggle with debt. But is your house really worth saving?

If you find yourself living in an “upside down house,”  it may be worthwhile to consider simply letting the house go. “Upside down” refers to a property where you owe more money than the house is worth. Back when the housing  market was still booming, this situation was almost unthinkable, but now that the bubble has burst, short selling―selling a home for less than what is owed―is all too common. Unfortunately, a short sale leads to all kinds of nasty repercussions: Unless your mortgage lender agrees otherwise, you will still be responsible for the difference between the sale price and amount owed. Second, even if your lender agrees to forgive the debt, you’ll still be hit with the tax consequences.

If you’re a homeowner and considering bankruptcy, now is the time to take an objective look at the big financial picture and make some tough choices. Your equity situation is a great place to start this assessment. If you don’t have any equity in the home, holding on to that upside down house can’t even be justified on the basis that home ownership is a good investment. Just a few years ago a house was a sterling investment―but if you’re continuing to sink in negative equity, you don’t own a good investment, just a bunch of debt. And if you are living in an upside down house, how bad is your situation? In other words, how much more money do you owe the bank than the house is worth? If the difference is only a few thousand dollars, it may be OK to hold on to the house if you can really afford the payments. But if the difference is huge, you may want to consider the idea of surrendering the property in bankruptcy.

Second, take a look at your budget. Why did you get behind on your payments? Were you always struggling to make the payments, always one emergency away from getting behind? If getting rid of your credit card debt doesn’t free up enough money to comfortably make the mortgage payment, bankruptcy won’t help you save the home in the long term. If, on the other hand, you got behind because of a temporary drop in income that has since rebounded, bankruptcy can get you back on track with your mortgage and put your in a better financial position by dumping your unsecured debt.

The costs associated with home ownership go beyond the monthly mortgage payments. Can you afford property taxes? Your homeowner’s insurance? Does the house require a lot of maintenance? What are your utility payments like? These are all good questions to consider as you assess whether it makes sense to hold on to your home. Another thing to keep in mind is the structure of the loan. If you were one of the many unfortunate borrowers who signed on to an adjustable rate or interest only loan, your loan terms will never allow you to get ahead.

The good news is that the depressed housing market means that a lot of places that can’t sell are being offered for rent. Renting can be a good solution for someone seeking to rebuild their financial health, especially in the short term. If you are trying to keep your kids at the same school or are reluctant to leave the comforts of a familiar neighborhood, you may be able to find a good rental in the same area as your house.

Make sure to ask your bankruptcy attorney for advice on this issue. Letting a foreclosure proceed unchecked is not a good way of dealing with the situation. If the property sells for less than the outstanding loan balance, you will still owe the difference.. Surrendering the home in bankruptcy shields you by eliminating any personal liability after the foreclosure sale. If you are facing foreclosure now, contact a bankruptcy attorney immediately to ensure that you remain in control. Your attorney can help you assess your financial outlook rationally and help you make the right decision.

From: The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. We always offer a free initial one on one consultation. Call today to set up your appointment. If you are in North Carolina, call 1-800-899-1414, or visit www.billsbills.com to fill out our free and confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, September 23, 2009 @ 10:41 pm

Say you find yourself struggling with a mountain of debt. Your paycheck seems to be spent before you even get it, as soon as you pay a bill another one arrives, and you’re starting to wonder how much longer you can deal with the stress of unmanageable debt. To make matters worse, you fall behind on your housing payment and your bank threatens you with foreclosure.

So when your phone rings and a professional sounding individual on the other end promises to stop your foreclosure or even modify your mortgage, you see it as a godsend! After all, the government has been promising to help Americans hold on to their homes. A foreclosure assistance agency may even be part of a government effort to help people just like you. As a matter of fact, nothing the “foreclosure assistance agency” says leads you to believe otherwise. Should you take the leap?

Unfortunately, as all too many have learned the hard way, there are no miracle cures when you have serious debt problems. With so many people struggling to hold on to their homes, it comes as little surprise that scammers are taking advantage of vulnerable homeowners at the worst possible time.

So how do these schemes work? In most of these scams, a company will call a homeowner and offer help in stopping a foreclosure. Some companies are little more than a call center, with no attorneys, accountants or loan specialists employed.. The companies demand a fee upfront, sometimes as much as $3000.00. Desperate homeowners will pay the fee, only to discover–often when it is too late–that the company did nothing at all to help them.  Because of this all too common model, one measure the FTC is considering is a ban on up-front fees for mortgage assistance.

Since April, the government has promised to crack down on “foreclosure assistance” outfits posing as government agencies. Now, a recent meeting of the multi-agency taskforce created by the Obama administration to address the problem of mortgage fraud updated the public on the government’s efforts.The FTC brought civil charges against two companies this week that were running foreclosure assistance scams. This brings the number of such cases this year to 22.

One of the worst aspects of this situation is that many of the companies work to create the impression in homeowners that they represent a government agency. The two companies charged this week were doing precisely that, and the government is working hard to crack down on these wrongdoers in particular. It’s your responsibility as an informed consumer to protect yourself. If you are being asked to pay a hefty upfront fee, it’s a good sign that the modification program is a scam. And remember, bankruptcy is always an option if you are behind on your mortgage. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy will catch up your missed payments over a 5 year plan, and eliminate your unsecured debts. Contact a bankruptcy attorney today to find out more. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414. Or visit www.billsbills.com to complete our confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, September 21, 2009 @ 1:49 pm

Many of us now come into marriage with some debts in tow. Some of us also arrive owning some of our own property. Once married, we incur new debts, jointly or separately; for example, one spouse may finance a car under his name, while both spouses may need to list their income together when they borrow for a new home. In addition, you may have credit cards and checking accounts in your own name, and some held jointly.  Sometimes one spouse will have the legal responsibility for credit card debt, but the other spouse, as an authorized user of the account, has the ability to add to it. A spouse may not have the responsibility for a debt, but may contribute to payment from her income. And then there are the difference in state law, which also adds layers: in the nine community property states, both partners own all property equally, while in the non-community property states (or “equitable distribution” states, such as North Carolina), each spouse owns all of his own property and one half of the property held jointly.

As you can see, marriage can definitely complicate matters when it comes to property and debt! For many couples facing an unmanageable amount of debt together, these different factors may complicate the decision to file for bankruptcy However, there’s no need for alarm. If your marriage is suffering from the pressures of debt, bankruptcy can offer the relief to allow your family to focus on the things that really matter. An experienced bankruptcy attorney will be able to assess your situation and advice you on the best strategy for taking care of your debts while saving your property. Based on the kinds of debt and property your couple has, he will be able to help you choose whether to file separately or jointly. And in some situations, he may advise one partner to file and the other partner not to. Let’s look at some of the factors he’ll weigh in making his determination:

If you file together, all of your separately held debts, as well as all of the jointly held debts acquired during the marriage will be discharged. Filing together is also cheaper than filing two separate bankruptcies, and often times the financial troubles of one spouse are tied to those of the other. If only one spouse files, jointly held debts will be discharged only for the spouse who files; the other spouse will still be responsible for the debt.

However, if one spouse holds most of the troublesome debt in her own name, it may make sense for her to file alone. This is especially true if the non-filing spouse has better credit. Preserving one party’s credit can help the filing spouse recover from bankruptcy faster. The non-filing spouse can co-sign on future accounts, allowing the filing spouse a better chance to rebuild post-bankruptcy.

Don’t let these nuances deter you from the most important point: no matter what kind of debt you have and what kind of property you hold, bankruptcy can offer a life-changing opportunity for you and your spouse to put unmanageable debt behind you. Because you want to approach your filing strategically, it’s an excellent idea to contact an experienced bankruptcy attorney to help you and your spouse make the right choice.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414, or visit www.billsbills.com to complete our free and confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, September 19, 2009 @ 10:11 am

A thoughtful, measured strategy for your bankruptcy can help you in a number of ways when a divorce seems inevitable or is already underway. A good plan can help ease tension between yourself and your spouse, for example, by reducing fights about who is responsible for this or that bill. Not only is this expensive, aggravating, and likely to sour an already acrimonious process, it may be completely unnecessary. You may find that bankruptcy can get rid of those bills altogether! Thus, there will be no need to assign a bad guy.

If you have already finalized the divorce, bankruptcy is often the best way of getting back on track financially. Chances are, you will emerge from your divorce with a significant amount of secured and unsecured debt. Bankruptcy allows you to let go of those items you can no longer afford with one income. If you simply allow the car to be repossessed, or the mortgage to be foreclosed, you will still be responsible for the deficiency balances after the car or home is sold. This is the worst possible scenario- not only have you lost the car or home, but you’re still on the hook for the underlying debt. Surrendering the home or car in a bankruptcy shields you from any remaining personal liability, and frees you to transition to a new lifestyle.

If you’re still in the preliminary stages of your separation, it may be tempting to postpone thinking about bankruptcy until after the divorce is totally settled; why deal with two stressful legal procedures at once? The answer is that with a good bankruptcy attorney and a good strategy in place, you can make a bankruptcy work for you and your future ex. Even if you and your soon to be ex-spouse disagree on every other issue, try to agree on bankruptcy as the best way to wrap up and dissolve the marital debt. If you are legally separated but not divorced, you can file a joint Chapter 7 petition, receiving your discharge in a matter of months. This can free you to focus on the truly important issues of your divorce, such as custody and visitation. Of course, in some instances, filing and completing the divorce before filing for bankruptcy is the best option, and this is why consulting with an experienced bankruptcy attorney early in the divorce process is important. Only an attorney can assess your unique situation to determine the best strategy.

Both bankruptcy and divorce can be stressful processes, so you should always exercise your power to save yourself aggravation where you can. Don’t make these life events more difficult than they have to be, and remember that only you can take control of your financial future.

The attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt have years of experience helping families deal with the financial challenges of a divorce. Call us today for a free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, September 16, 2009 @ 10:06 pm

The four-year anniversary of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) is right around the corner. You might recall all the hype in the months leading up to the enactment of BAPCPA. This was the banking and credit industry’s seventh attempt to get the legislation on the books. They pitched BAPCPA as necessary to curb “rampant abuse” and to restore “personal responsibility and integrity” in the bankruptcy process. With the Bush Administration at the helm of a Congress chock full of conservative lawmakers, the banks and credit card companies finally clinched a large enough sympathetic audience to bring its agenda to life.

BAPCPA called for sweeping changes to the Bankruptcy Code – undoubtedly the most significant overhaul of the Code since it was enacted in 1978. The depth and complexity of the changes caused much confusion, uncertainty, and speculation about what protections would be left for consumers in the new world of consumer bankruptcy practice. This sparked a mad dash to file bankruptcy before the new laws went into effect on October 17, 2005. So what does this new world of bankruptcy practice look like four years after BAPCPA took effect? Did the banking and credit industry get its money’s worth for the billions it spent marketing the legislation?

Well, one thing’s for sure: the new laws did make it more expensive and difficult for consumers to take advantage of the protections that bankruptcy has historically provided. But one of the primary things BAPCPA’s backers hoped to achieve was to force more debtors out of Chapter 7 liquidation and into repayment plans under Chapter 13. The primary mechanism to achieve this goal was a set of eligibility thresholds for Chapter 7 based upon a person’s income – particularly BAPCPA’s now-infamous “means test.” Generally, if your income exceeds the median income for a family of your size in your state, or if your monthly disposable income is more than $100, you’re presumed ineligible for Chapter 7.

BAPCPA’s backers were betting these new rules would sharply reduce the number of Chapter 7 cases, so debtors would ultimately have to pay back more of their debt. But despite the sweeping “reform,” the numbers have remained pretty much the same. Between 1999 and 2004, before BAPCPA was enacted, the average percentage of cases filed under Chapter 13 was 29 percent. Initially, in the first year after BAPCPA, the percentage of Chapter 13 filings rose. But, by this year, the numbers had returned to pre-BAPCPA levels: in fact, during the first seven months of 2009, the average percentage of Chapter 13 cases was actually lower – 27.6 percent.

Here’s another interesting fact: The United States Trustee’s Office reviewed the Chapter 7 filings between October 17, 2005, and June 30, 2006, and determined that 94 percent of the debtors automatically qualified for Chapter 7 under the means test – based upon their income alone. Another 5.4 percent qualified when their expenses were taken into account. That is, 99.4 percent qualified for Chapter 7; only 0.6 percent were presumed abusive filers under BAPCPA’s new rules. This likely explains why the percentages of Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases have remained fairly consistent: the vast majority of those who file for Chapter 7 meet the new strict income requirements.

It also appears that BAPCPA credit counseling requirements have had little impact on the number of filings, other than to make the process more expensive and time-consuming. The Government Accounting Office issued a report finding that “by the time most consumers receive credit counseling, their financial situations are dire, leaving them with no viable alternative to bankruptcy.” In addition, the National Federation of Credit Counseling has found that less than four percent of potential filers choose not to file bankruptcy after attending the required counseling.

As far as the overall number of consumer bankruptcy filings, while the total number of filings dropped in the first year after BAPCPA was enacted, they have steadily climbed back to their historic levels. In fact, with the current economic downturn – which kicked in less than two years after BAPCPA came on line – so many people are seeking bankruptcy protection that the filings are beginning to rival the figures we saw during the mad dash to file before BAPCPA was enacted.

Much to the chagrin of those who footed the massive bill to push BAPCPA through Congress, the numbers show that the vast majority of those who need the protection of Chapter 7 will still seek that protection – and qualify for it. The numbers also suggest the backers’ central platform for marketing BAPCPA – that people were routinely abusing Chapter 7 – was groundless, or at least greatly exaggerated.

Bankruptcy is back! – despite the efforts of the banking and credit industry to stifle filings through BAPCPA. With the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney, you too can use the power of bankruptcy to eliminate debts that have made your life unmanageable.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, with convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson, and Fayetteville. The firm offers a free debt consultation, as well as affordable payment plans for both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases. Call (toll free) 1-800-899-1414 or visit www.billsbills.com for more information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, September 13, 2009 @ 10:44 am

In July, the number of people who defaulted on their credit cards dropped for the first time in several months, leaving many financial experts to wonder about the cause.

In the midst of speculation that the recession may be turning around, bankruptcy filings continue to climb and many debt management and bankruptcy attorneys cite a rise in the number of people leveraging retirement funds to stay afloat. Additionally, running contrary to the default reports is evidence supplied by some credit card issuers that in July, there was an increase in those who fell behind on payments, but have yet to reach default status.

Most of the major players in the industry, Bank of America, American Express, Capital One Financial and JPMorgan Chase, are in agreement that the number of accounts that ended up in default in July fell. Thus, there was an increase in the number of payments made on time. For some, that can be a sure sign that some aspects of the economy have improved. However, looking closer at the statistics, the correlation between the numbers and the status of the economy is not so clear.

With an estimated 6 million people living on unemployment benefits, many of the aforementioned lenders have eliminated accounts held by those in the highest risk pool. With that demographic completely out of the picture, the number of defaults will obviously decrease. In many instances, lenders are accepting less than the standard monthly minimums, which leads to more on-time payments but puts the consumer deeper in the hole. Perhaps most troubling, many cash-strapped consumers are pulling money from retirement accounts to keep from getting behind.

Overall, few experts will go on record saying that the decrease in credit card defaults is a sign of America’s improving financial health. Basically, it all comes back to unemployment. If jobs are scarce, credit card payments will be too.

There been signs of an improving home sales market. However, that can be attributed to a brief run on low-priced homes, foreclosure investing and wholesalers absorbing large tracts of unfinished or bargain homes at a discount.

Unfortunately, banking experts can cite mountains of data to suggest that in lean times, people use credit cards as cash draws. If unemployment remains a challenge, the country will continue to look to their credit lines for money to bridge months of dwindling paychecks. As summer winds down and the holiday seasons emerge from earlier-than-ever marketing campaigns designed to encourage economic stimulation, consumers are expected to once again overspend and thus tilt the growth in default numbers back to positive early in the New Year.

If the wave of holiday over-spending joins the unemployment headwinds, credit card defaults, credit bureau reporting and most likely, bankruptcies, will once again spike. Currently, bankruptcy filings are at their highest levels since before 2005, when legislation was enacted to cut back on the number of bankruptcies.

If you are behind on your credit card payments, don’t eait another day to speak with a bankruptcy attorney. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 to set up a free debt consultation.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, September 11, 2009 @ 12:30 pm

In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, a court appointed trustee receives payments from the person who has filed the bankruptcy and then distributes those payments among the filer’s creditors. Sometimes funds are taken as an automatic payroll deduction, kind of like the deductions your employer makes for social security taxes. A Chapter 13 repayment plan can last from three to five years, so it’s natural to worry about what might happen in the meantime. For example, what happens if you can’t make all of your payments and you start to fall behind? Or what if you can’t finish the plan in 60 months? This could happen if a claim comes in for a higher amount than expected; for example, if you are charged higher taxes than the plan allotted for.

If you fall behind on your Chapter 13 payments, the trustee will file a “Motion to Dismiss.” If your case’s trustee files a Motion to Dismiss, there’s no need to panic. Remember you have an important ally―your bankruptcy attorney―who can help you work out kinks in your journey to financial freedom. Call you attorney and explain the situation, and he can help you work with your trustee to fix the problem. The good news is that trustees are often willing to work with you to get you back on track with your payments.

Your trustee may request that you pay some portion of the amount due from late payments up front, but then he may allow you to distribute the rest of the payments over time, allowing you to catch up gradually. Say for example that you fall behind by $3000, with 36 months remaining in your plan. Your attorney can help you craft a potential cure for your delinquency. In this case, he may recommend that you propose to spread out the payments over the remaining months left in your plan. In this case, you would only have to add about $83 each month to work out the delinquency. Of course, if you fall behind again your trustee may not be so understanding, and in fact he may have the ability to dismiss the case without filing the Motion first. If you have fallen seriously behind on your payments due to some unexpected trouble such as illness, but your trustee won’t accept a proposed plan to cure the delinquency, your attorney may recommend converting your case for a Chapter 7 discharge. Another possible alternative is to voluntarily dismiss your case and refile at a later date. Your attorney’s decision will depend on your specific facts, and so you should constantly keep your attorney’s office informed of your situation.

As you can see, a good attorney is an essential team member for a successful bankruptcy. If you need to file for bankruptcy protection, there is no need to get bogged down in the what-ifs. Your attorney can answer any questions you have about your situation, and she will also be instrumental later on should you encounter any bumps along the road. A lot of the potential hiccups you may be worrying about actually have very workable solutions. You are entitled to be treated fairly as you recover from financial troubles, and dealing with an attorney, a trustee and the bankruptcy courts, all of whom are part of a system designed to help people in trouble, will be much more agreeable than talking to pushy bill collectors.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, September 6, 2009 @ 1:18 pm

Now that every bit of information about you is digitized, it is easier than ever to use your own data against you.  Scammers know that flashing a little bit of knowledge can disarm an otherwise savvy consumer, so don’t be fooled into falling for the latest scam just because someone knows your address, details from your purchasing history, or even your social security number.

One new scam to be on the lookout for involves fake rebate checks. Basically, scammers send you a check in the mail for a rebate on an item you may have purchased. It’s possible they may actually know that you purchased the item, but it’s also possible that scammers will stick with popular or “hot” items, the kind of stuff you see advertised on TV and magazines, and snag consumers by counting on coincidence; either that you bought the item or that you were planning to buy it. One such program looks like an official check from the manufacturer, complete with a trademark logo, but it’s actually a ploy to obtain your signature…and therefore your consent to sign up for junk you don’t want at prices you don’t care to spend. If you get a rebate check in the mail, be very careful to read all of the teeny tiny print―annoying, but not more so than having to fight a company to recoup money you’ve been tricked into spending.

And here’s another scam, this one involving fake bill collectors―as if the real thing weren’t bad enough! This particular set of bad guys will call you and pretend to be collecting on a bill, making threats and demanding payments for debts you never owed or don’t owe on any more. Reports about this scam are especially unsettling because the scammers seem to have a lot of information at their disposal on the people they are calling.

So how can you tell if the bill collector is the real thing or another scammer on the take? Scammers will often report that they’re employed for agencies that don’t exist, so if you’re unsure about why someone is calling, request information about the company and the caller, explain that you want to look into the situation and hang up. Afterward, do a little research; if you’re satisfied it’s a real company you can always call the number back. Another warning sign are the kinds of threats scammers make; for example, threatening to send people to jail if they don’t make payments. You can’t be sent to jail over debt, so this particular threat is a dead giveaway. Finally, remember not to be fooled just because the person appears to have information about you; don’t confirm that any of the information is correct, since that may be the objective of the call in the first place. Remember that you have the right to demand written proof of your debt, and you should do so at the first sign of trouble.

You don’t have to take abuse from fake bill collectors, but the real thing are no joke either. Unlike the scammers, legit agencies won’t stop calling you until you do something to end your debt problems for good. If you can barely keep your debts straight, making it easy for scammers to take advantage of your vulnerable state, bankruptcy could be the answer for you.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, September 3, 2009 @ 9:43 am

The economy is so grim right now it’s hard to see the silver lining, but the good news about markets is that they rarely stand still forever. Even now, economists are slowly and cautiously becoming more optimistic about the situation, and consumers are gradually gaining back confidence. The housing market, for example, posted a quarterly rise in prices for the first time in three years, which may indicate a stirring of recovery. Still, there are a lot of homes out there not worth half what they were recently, and new construction has ground to a halt for the time being. Is there a silver lining in this one for you?

Well, there may be if you are not a homeowner and not looking to become one immediately. With so many properties sitting empty while the market waits for buyers to return, people who are not homeowners can enjoy a renter’s market. Suddenly there are many options for housing–nicer places at must lower prices. In some areas of the country, it is actually cheaper to rent than to buy at the moment.

If you are considering or already preparing to file for bankruptcy protection, you may be worried about your ability to rent a home, since so many landlord applications now require a credit check and/or ask about past bankruptcies. Don’t let such questions dissuade you from pursuing a rental you really like. Because this is a renter’s market, landlords may soften some of these requirements. Most landlords will be more concerned with your payment history with past landlords than whatever happened with your credit cards. If you have a good history with someone, ask him if you can use his name for a reference and offer to provide it for the new landlord when you apply. Other times you may be able to bargain with the landlord by offering to pay a slightly larger security deposit or providing other assurances of payment. Remember that as much as you need a place to live, landlords need tenants to make money from their real estate investments―or in this market, just to minimize losses!

Home ownership has some real advantages, and many people feel that it’s a waste of money to pay rent that will never translate to equity. However, home ownership comes with its own host of troubles, and renting can be a good solution, even if just in the short term. Home ownership is a big step, and you may want to allow yourself some breathing room (and an opportunity to rebuild your credit) before taking the plunge. If so, you might as well take advantage of a renter’s market!

If you already own a home, but are having trouble with the monthly payments, bankruptcy is a great option to get caught up on the missed payments. Unfortunately, some people wait until it’s too late to take advantage of these protections, and by the time they accept that bankruptcy is their best option, it may be too late for bankruptcy to help. That’s why it’s important to contact a bankruptcy attorney early in the process, before your finances are beyond repair. If you have conceded that it not financially feasible to keep your home, bankruptcy acts as a shelter from the after effects of a foreclosure, such as tax liability and deficiency judgments. Further, if foreclosure is imminent, a bankruptcy will stop the foreclosure from proceeding, even if you intend to surrender the property in the foreclosure. This strategy can buy your family some time to transition to a new living arrangement.

These are strange days for homeowners and those considering home ownership. If you have doubts about your future financial viability, it may be best to wait out the recession before plunging into the real estate market. If your income is already stretched to the max by debt payments, consider speaking with a bankruptcy attorney. A properly planned bankruptcy can put you in the best possible position to rebuild your damaged credit and pursue home ownership in the future.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, September 1, 2009 @ 1:30 pm

When your debt problems get to be more than you can handle, an experienced bankruptcy attorney can be a real life-saver. Financial problems can split up spouses, fracture families, and generate a vicious cycle of stress that leads to greater financial problems that in turn lead to more stress–and so on, and so on. It’s important to know about bankruptcy and how the process can help you recover your life, but how will it work exactly? Every case is different, but the role of the attorney will be similar in each case, and understanding what a good bankruptcy attorney can do for you may help you understand how powerful bankruptcy law can be.

The role of the attorney as expert is more nuanced than you may realize. Some people hear about friends or relatives who attempt to file or actually complete a bankruptcy filing on their own, but understanding what a good bankruptcy attorney’s expertise is all about reveals why this isn’t a good idea. First of all, every state in the United States has different laws. This means that buying yourself a generalized “How To” guide won’t be enough. Not only does a good bankruptcy attorney know and understand the local laws as they appear on the books, he will also understand how they function in practice. Who are the trustees? What is the local bankruptcy judge like? A bankruptcy attorney with experience will know the answers to these questions. Make sure to seek out an attorney who is a personal bankruptcy specialist, who has handled many cases in your area, and who is actually licensed to practice in your state.

In addition, keep in mind that bankruptcy laws, which were already complicated, became even more so with the system reforms Congress passed in 2005. In the United States, laws are made both by the legislative body that enacts them and by the judges who interpret them. Because these reforms are recent, there are many areas of the bankruptcy law that are still being settled, your attorney’s practice should be limited to bankruptcy. This is the only way to ensure that your attorney has a finger on the pulse of this constantly changing area of law.

A bankruptcy attorney with experience will know how to be supportive to his clients. He will be able to anticipate problems and propose solutions before filing your case. The attorney you choose should have an accessible support staff that responds to you before and after the filing of your case. At your initial consultation, ask lots of questions and make sure you feel comfortable working with the attorney and his staff.

Don’t be afraid to ask how much the attorney will charge you for his services. Remember that you get what you pay for. With so much at risk, it’s certainly worth the extra money to make sure your bankruptcy goes smoothly. Remember that the attorney knows you are in financial trouble–that’s why you’re calling him! Law offices that handle lots of personal bankruptcy cases are more attuned to the concerns of individuals filing for bankruptcy protection and will be better prepared to work with you to fit legal services into your budget. Don’t forget, in a Chapter 13, the majority of your legal fees will be paid through your plan, minimizing the up-front costs.

In order to pick a good attorney, it’s a good idea not to wait until the last minute. Making life altering decisions on the fly is risky for obvious reasons, so it’s a good idea to get in touch with a bankruptcy attorney sooner rather than later. If you can’t keep up with your debts, the time to call is now.

The attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt know bankruptcy inside and out. With over 50 years of combined bankruptcy experience, we are the preeminent North Carolina bankruptcy firm. But don’t take our word for it, see what our clients have to say at www.billsbills.com.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, August 28, 2009 @ 8:36 am

What if you have money on deposit with a bank, and you owe the bank money for something totally unrelated―what can they do about it? Let’s say a bank had given you a loan at one branch and you’d fallen a bit behind on your payments. Then let’s also say you had money on deposit in a savings account, at another branch, but with the same bank? Can the bank just go into your account and take out what you owe them?

This scenario seems to prompt dueling intuitions; on the one hand, banks seem to be able to do whatever they want, and since they generally draft the contracts they sign with their clients, they definitely command the lion’s share of bargaining power.  On the other hand, something about this power seems wrong, intrusive. Shouldn’t the law protect us by giving us ultimate agency over our funds? Not paying a debt may be wrong, but it should still remain your choice to make, right?

Wrong or not, the bank would be acting legally in going into your accounts to take what you owe them because they have what is called a right of setoff. The bank has the right to “setoff” the debt owed to them with the funds held on deposit. The source for this right can usually be located in two places: first, in the contract you signed when you opened the deposit account; and second, under principles of common law. Essentially, the bank assumes the role of secured creditor when you make the deposit, even if the loan they originally extended to you was unsecured!

Thus, if you have money in any number of accounts, the bank can go rooting in there for a debt they claim you owe them. This includes checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificated of deposit (CDs). Generally speaking, the bank will do this for a debt owed them that is delinquent, where they have made a demand for payment from the debtor. However, the bank is not even required to give you advance notice that they are planning to setoff by deducting from your accounts. This can cause major trouble for you if you have outstanding checks, as the bank can take every penny in your account and then charge you overdraft fees when those outstanding checks finally clear.

Other complications can follow: Imagine that you’ve been waiting for your employer to direct deposit your paycheck, as with every pay period so you can pay your rent or make a payment on your car. If your bank decides to setoff, that money you were expecting will be gone before you even see it.

What if you unwittingly owe money to a bank who also happens to hold some of your money in deposit? Many people don’t realize that the stores that extend them credit for purchases are actually a middleman; the real lender is a bank. In this case, the bank is allowed to seize your funds, even though you were unaware of the peril.

As you can see, setoff gives banks a powerful tool to use against you…as if they needed another one! So what can you do to fight back when your money is at risk?

Unfortunately, even declaring bankruptcy won’t eliminate the bank’s power in this situation. The bank’s right of setoff supersedes the bankruptcy. That’s why it’s very important to change banks prior to filing bankruptcy, if you owe your bank money. Any money owed will then be discharged as a general unsecured debt through your bankruptcy. Speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney to find out more. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 to set up a free initial debt consultation. Or fill out our online debt questionnaire at www.billsbills.com.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, August 24, 2009 @ 11:52 am

Think that only credit card companies and gym memberships get passed off to collection agents? Think again.

In recent years, and now more than ever given the economy, local governments are selling overdue property tax accounts to private companies to gain immediate access to the money needed to supply public services. The downside is that these firms, called tax lien investors, can charge very high penalties and double the normal interest rates.

Housing and consumer advocates across the country are beginning to get wind of the tactics and have started calling for regulation. Although, municipalities have a strong argument for the raising of money this way because, like property taxes, it gets used to build roads, schools and supply public services. Not only that, tax lien investing has become big business, with many Wall Street brand names directly involved.

The demise of the real estate market in the last two years has left hundreds of thousands of unfinished houses on quiet cul-de-sacs in half-built neighborhoods across the country. It has also left in its wake millions of struggling homeowners. Should an overdue tax bill become property of a tax lien investor, suddenly the mortgage bill is not the only envelope instilling fear in the checkbook of its recipients.

Normally, governments do charge interest and late fees. Although, they do so at very reasonable rates. Why? Because they have no interest in seeing their communities becoming foreclosed ghost towns. Under the thumb of a private tax lien company, people are very likely to end up in foreclosure much faster. And, based on recent stats, a much more likely candidate for bankruptcy.

Tax lien investors have minimal concern for the preservation of towns and villages in which they have no role. Their stance is focused on collecting debts they purchased, not the building of schools or a playground. The underlying intention of their efforts, in essence, does not serve the community.

Private investors can move to foreclosure quickly, often taking priority over the mortgage holder because they “own the taxes,” (taxes are required to be paid first in the event of a foreclosure) and also stack on 18 percent interest rates on what is owed. People subject to tax lien investment companies across the country are reporting immense increases in fines and interest that often end up pushing them over the edge.

The head of the National Tax Lien Association, Howard Liggett, was rather bold in a recent statement, saying that his industry’s investing practices, ” … beats the heck out of any certificate of deposit.”

In other words, tax lien investing makes a lot of companies a lot of money.

Overdue taxes are indeed a form of debt. And they need to be dealt with, just like your car payment and student loans. However, you enter into the agreement with your local government under the auspices of being treated as part of the community. Thus, it’s easy to understand how the practices of tax lien investment firms could make an already financially challenged family feel even more abandoned by their community. And as a result, less likely to pay what’s owed.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 9:19 pm

Back in May, President Obama pushed for new legislation to prohibit some of the business tactics of credit card companies. Namely, the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 will require lenders to notify card holders of rate and fee increases 45 days before they take affect. Until August 20, they only need 15 days of notification.

The small timelines credit card companies use to alert consumers of rate hikes is considered a primary driver of high personal debt because they are timed with a person’s spending habits. In other words, if a new television or other large expense was put on a card, a consumer would have about two weeks to pay it before the rate jumped, substantially increasing the overall cost of the item.

The 45-day window will allow consumers to be more proactive in alleviating their balance, whether through balance transfers to cards with lower interest rates or by simply putting more money toward the balance. Washington economists believe that a more lenient credit card industry will contribute to lower personal debt and hopefully, fewer bankruptcies.

The best part of the new legislation? A cardholder can refuse the rate increase or late fee and agree to close the account and pay off the remaining balance within five years. This component of the bill was a big win for consumer advocates, as it provides consumers with a solid opportunity to assess their spending and make changes before allowing it to spiral out of control.

It also creates competition within the industry because consumers will have additional time to shop for a new credit card. This will eventually force the industry to be more consumer-centric.

When the law hits tomorrow, credit card users who have suffered from late fees will also feel some relief. The act states that statements must be mailed 21 days before a due date to allow the lender to charge a late fee. And, that fee can only be applied after an additional 14-day notice period.

More provisions will take effect at different times over the next year. For example, the law states that any credit card applicant under 21 must have an adult co-signer. It also disallows any retroactive rate increases, which had previously been a tremendous money maker for card lenders. This allowed them to apply higher fees to expenses incurred by the cardholder months prior to the notice of an increase being sent out, resulting in exponentially larger balances.

Unfortunately, credit card companies are still actively implementing new strategies to increase revenue streams before the full brunt of the act takes effect in 2010. Annual fees, balance-transfer fees and assorted other monetary upticks are being assessed to cardholders nationwide. People are seeing interest rates double without notice.

If you are consistently carrying a balance on your credit cards and can’t seem to get a handle on your debt, speak with a bankruptcy attorney today to discuss your options under bankruptcy law. A properly planned bankruptcy can eliminate your credit card debt and give you the fresh start you deserve.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, August 17, 2009 @ 1:52 pm

It’s generally not good practice to pay unsecured creditors just before filing bankruptcy. This is especially true if you plan on paying back a friend or relative. This means that if you’re considering a bankruptcy, you shouldn’t repay your Cousin Ted that $1,000 you owe him from vacation last year. A repayment constitutes preferential treatment of an unsecured creditor, and if you then file for bankruptcy, the Trustee will sue Cousin Ted to recover the $1,000.00

If this happened to you, don’t beat yourself up about it, it’s one of the more common pre-filing mistakes. It’s completely understandable that a good portion of your financial guilt stems from not being able to get square with friends and relatives. However, you need to make sure you don’t do it again, because it can make things quite a bit worse, especially for your favored insider.

Wait, what’s an “insider?” That sounds underhanded…

Basically, an insider is a person who is close enough to you for the court to be swayed into believing they have a strong enough influence over you to impact payment decisions. Insiders are not automatic and are determined on a case-by-case basis. If a person is found to be an insider, the trustee can retrieve preferential transfers from them as far back as a year before bankruptcy.

Ex-spouses can sometimes be considered insiders, provided you two are still on speaking terms. But if things are bad enough between you, he or she may be begging to be labeled an insider. As you can see, this is one component of preferential transfers than can get pretty sticky.

Here is a quick breakdown of the type of payments that are not preferential:

• Small payments: Payments less than $600 to a single creditor within the defining time period, typically 90 days or up to a year if involving an insider.
• Payments on secured debts: Car and house payments are not preferential, because you are obligated to pay them as secured debts.
• Current expenses: You are not going to get in trouble for paying your current bills and other monthly obligations. Be somewhat careful here, though, as back rent could be considered preferential. Talk to your attorney about this and all payments you have made prior to filing.
• Overdue alimony or child support: These payments also need to be made and can’t be recollected by a trustee.

Every post here is to help educate and inform you about the world of bankruptcy. If you are considering bankruptcy, but feel a moral obligation to repay a friend or relative first, speak with a bankruptcy attorney before you make a costly mistake. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 for a free debt consultation.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, August 16, 2009 @ 6:41 pm

Fear of foreclosure is certainly pushing many families into bankruptcy. Although there are now many programs, both at the state and federal level, to help homeowners avoid foreclosure, if your lender is unwilling to work with you, bankruptcy may be the only way you can stay in your home.

Unfortunately, if you don’t choose to seek help through a bankruptcy attorney or your lender, there are plenty of criminal actors out there that would be more than happy to assist in escaping your financial woes.

With the rise in bankruptcies and foreclosures across America, thieves are growing more bold in their effort to take whatever belongings, and dignity, from those facing the most challenging of economic circumstances. Perhaps the most rampant perpetrators are fraudulent mortgage modification companies, who take thousands upfront from unsuspecting homeowners, only to disappear into thin air. Don’t ever agree to an upfront fee for a mortgage modification, and don’t ever agree to make your mortgage payments to a third party who promises to forward your payments directly to your lender. If you are working with a legitimate mortgage modification company, stay involved in the process. It’s important to maintain constant contact with your mortgage lender and your loan modification company.

Bogus loan mod companies aren’t the only criminals taking advantage of desperate homeowners. Grifters are moving into what appears to be a more legitimate method of theft: buying houses.

Targeting those in high-foreclosure zip codes, representatives from shell companies are offering to buy houses from those in dire straights. They sell the fear of foreclosure and bankruptcy and offer to make them a clean, easy deal and a quick sale. Heck, they even hand people money for the house. Real money! So it can’t be a scam, right?

First off, they only give you a very small amount of money, regardless of the equity in the home or its market value. Since you’re desperate, it’s a fair number, right? The plan calls for the company to buy the home and rent it, allowing you to move on with your life. However, the rent payments they collect never make it to the mortgage company. In fact, the sale never gets recorded, there’s no legal closing and you are still responsible for the mortgage. By the time it’s all sorted out, they’ve collected months of rent, from most likely planted tenants, and moved on. The hand-written signs on freeway exits and the local Craigslist’s posts that offer to buy and close fast are nine times out of ten the mark of illegal activity.

State regulators believe that there are close to 50 “fast home buy” operations currently working in North Carolina, some of which are perfectly legal with solid reputations. But those companies are easy to recognize. They have sound records with the Better Business Bureau, prominent advertising and established offices. Keep in mind though, in the majority of cases, a fast sale is a bad idea and a short sale even worse. A short sale requires your lender to accept less than the outstanding loan amount. Many times the lender won’t really forgive the deficiency, requiring you to sign a promissory note covering the difference. The tax implications of a short sale can be substantial as well. Any time a creditor agrees to accept less than what is owed, they will report the deficiency as taxable income to the IRS. Not only did you lose your home, but now you owe taxes.

Don’t fall prey to a foreclosure rescue scam just because you were afraid to consider bankruptcy. If you’re facing a foreclosure and your lender is not working with you, a bankruptcy attorney is your best ally. Bankruptcy can keep your family in your home, and if you truly can’t afford the home, surrendering it in a bankruptcy shields you from any remaining personal liability on the loan. Don’t wait another day to call. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt for a free consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 2:55 pm

The news sure sounds exciting, especially for those rebuilding after a bankruptcy or perhaps teetering on its edge. Economic statisticians, those in colorful bold boxes on morning stock report shows and even the country’s newspapers, long considered a haven for everything depressing, are reporting that the worst of the recession is over. Many are going so far as to say that we’re on our way up again.

Honestly, the numbers don’t lie. But they don’t tell the whole truth, either.

The last couple of months have seen the fewest number of jobs shed, according to those in Washington. National savings rates are holding steady and business productivity has climbed to its highest level in six years. Impressive.

Still, the impact of those numbers, where the results really count, has yet to be felt in the cul-de-sacs, unemployment offices and youth soccer field sidelines across the country. People are still struggling and bankruptcy filings are still on their way up. If you were to probe a bit deeper into the primetime diatribes or stumble upon the e-mail trains chugging back and forth between Wall Street and Washington, you would find a good deal of evidence that most of America remains quite scared about their financial future and that the recovery will take another year or so to materialize at home.

The last thing we want to do is give people a reason to be pessimistic. Our job, day-to-day, involves helping people put things into perspective by showing them a route out of economic uncertainty. However, in order to do that, we need to be honest with clients and others we advise. No one benefits from a skewed truth. We still see people cashing in retirement savings to pay bills. College funds are being depleted and houses being sold at deep discounts because of foreclosure fears. All of these things continue to go on in the midst of statistics that indicate we don’t have to do those things anymore. The sun is rising, they say. The new dawn is coming.

We just want to advise you to remain cautious and to continue to do what is responsible. If you have made the decision to file bankruptcy but now harbor indecision because of things you heard on the news, stay honest with yourself. Trust in your decision and compare what you read and hear with reality. Is your situation really changing?

The July jobs report showed the unemployment rate dropped slightly. The numbers don’t show, however, the fact that 400,000 people have dropped out of the labor force and were not counted as unemployed. Compounding that skewed stat is the fact that the number of people out of work 27 weeks or longer–a key benchmark in determining the rate at which people find new jobs–reached 5 million, a record.

The last 18 months, hopefully, have taught people how to save better and conserve more. Still, more saving means less spending, which translates to weaker retail, slower shipping channels and minimal economic growth. That’s a tough concept for the country to balance. Unfortunately, tilting things in the favor of saving is rising unemployment and bankruptcy figures. With those numbers on the rise, the longer consumer spending will take to rebound–dates and numbers that the statisticians don’t put in blogs and press releases.

If you’re staring a pile of bills with the hopes that the economy is going to turn around tomorrow, you may be in for a rude awakening. Creditors across the nation are stepping up their collection efforts and turning up the heat on delinquent consumers. Consider bankruptcy as a real option to survive these tough times. Make the call today. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, August 11, 2009 @ 6:00 pm

Believe it or not, there are some situations when credit cards can be a benefit. They are often the only option when making travel reservations, and can come in handy in the event of genuine emergencies. A credit card can also help you build good credit, or rebuild credit after bankruptcy.

Yep, so that’s about four reasons. The reasons NOT to use credit can fill a book, but here are just a few situations in which using plastic seems like a good idea, but you’re much better off just saying no!

Department store credit accounts: notoriously high interest rates are just one great reason to avoid department store credit accounts. But did you know that sometimes proprietary credit accounts from merchandisers allow the seller to take an interest in the things you buy on credit? This means that should you find yourself in a financial emergency down the line and unable to repay them, they could be entitled to take your stove or washing machine back. North Carolina law offers some protection against these disguised secured debts, but it’s best to just to avoid them altogether

Paying your taxes with your credit card: Taxes are not necessarily dischargeable in bankruptcy the way unsecured debt is…and your credit card debt won’t be either if you used the card for non-dischargeable debt! This will apply to other non-dischargeable debt as well, so be careful about putting payments to , for example, student loans, on your charge accounts. But note that only the part of the credit card debt you use to pay non-dischargeable debt will itself be non-dischargeable.

Balance transfers: A classic  marketing strategy of the credit card industry is offering lower interest rates on balance transfers. They way they sell this nonsense is to make you believe that it will be cheaper for you in the long run. But the situation isn’t as simple as they’d like you to believe. If you do a balance transfer, you’re taking on new debt. Unless you’re committed to shutting down the first account for good, you’re exposing yourself to the temptation of more debt. Many people believe they will be able to play this game successfully, and the credit card industry has made billions by playing on this belief.

A balance transfer could also force you to delay filing for bankruptcy, because if you do one just prior to filing, it may be viewed as a preferential transfer.

Big purchases right before bankruptcy: Speaking of charging up just prior to bankruptcy, you definitely want to avoid anything that could look like fraud. If the credit card company can convince the court that you made purchases on the card with the intention of filing for bankruptcy, the debt may become non-dischargeable, and you may be putting your whole filing at risk.

Living off credit to avoid filing for bankruptcy: This is an absolutely TERRIBLE idea. All you’re doing is creating bigger and bigger problems for yourself. If your situation cannot be managed without credit–if you find yourself taking out credit to pay for prior credit, it’s past time for you to consider bankruptcy as a lasting solution to your financial problems.

In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to set up a free initial debt consultation. Convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 5:51 pm

Liens can certainly throw a wrench in bankruptcy plans, especially for the unsuspecting. Unlike unsecured debts, which are simply discharged through a normal Chapter 7 bankruptcy, liens won’t be so efficiently eliminated with your filing. So what options do you have to at least address liens you can’t eliminate entirely?

One solution is to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy rather than Chapter 7 and take advantage of some of the special privileges unique to that chapter. When you file for Chapter 13, you propose a repayment plan. Chapter 13 allows you to stretch out payments to creditors for the life of the plan, usually three to five years, and when it comes to a secured debt―that is, one where the lender holds lien on property that is acting as collateral to secure the interest― someone filing for Chapter 13 may be able to pay for only the value of the collateral rather than the total amount owed. This will occur if certain conditions are met, and it is definitely a huge advantage, because the value of personal belongings will almost certainly depreciate significantly below what is owed on the item. Thus, if you meet conditions, you get to keep your item and pay a lot less for it.

Take the example of a car. You will be entitled to pay for the value of the vehicle rather than what you owe on the loan if : 1) the loan you used to buy the car wasn’t a purchase-money security interest (i.e., what you put up for collateral wasn’t the car itself); or 2) if you bought the car for something other than personal use (say, for a business use); or 3) even if you did get the car for personal use and used a purchase-money security interest to pay for it, if the purchase occurred more than 910 prior to your filing for bankruptcy.

For an item other than a car, such as a household appliance you bought with  department store charge account, you will only be required to pay the fair market value of the item if the purchase was made more than 1 year ago. In North Carolina, if the seller or third party finance company issued a credit card in conjunction with the purchase, and that credit card has more than a 15% interest rate, the seller has no security interest whatsoever. This means the debt will be discharged as a general unsecured debt.

Thus it’s important to keep in mind that bankruptcy offers many ways to approach financial difficulties, even for those situations when it seems like the lender is holding all the cards.  Call an experienced bankruptcy attorney today to discuss your unique financial situation. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt today for your free initial debt consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, August 8, 2009 @ 8:47 am

We hear plenty about the dangers of gambling addictions. Perhaps this is because the compulsion to gamble doesn’t make sense to a lot of people, and it is always easier to vilify from a distance.  Or maybe it’s that gambling addictions seem dangerous because a gambler could lose everything in an instant.

By comparison, indulging in little purchases here and there seems rather tame. But even little purchases add up, and when you get a rush from spending, chances are you’ll spend more money and spend more frequently to continue to experience that comfort. Just like someone addicted to gambling, you could lose everything; it may not happen in an instant, but little warning signs ignored for years will add up and catch up eventually.

Compulsive spending and shopping addiction are very serious problems that don’t get as much attention as they ought to. As a result, there are likely many out there suffering in silence. If you suspect you are a compulsive spender, that bad news is that you may be right–but at least you’ve recognized that there is a problem that you want out of your life. Admitting you have a problem is, as they say, the first step. If you think you may have a problem with your spending, take a moment to run through some of the items that frequently appear on compulsive spending checklists:

Is pressure from debt affecting your home life? Is it affecting you on the job?

If you are constantly having fights with your loved ones over your spending, or if you find yourself unable to work because of worrying over your debts, these are classic warning signs of trouble.

Is debt changing how you perceive yourself? How others perceive you?

If you are constantly getting down on yourself over your debt, or if you are afraid for people to find out about your spending, these too are warning signs of trouble. Sometimes people with spending problems justify their behavior by telling themselves that they deserve the things they are acquiring because they are better than other people. If you catch yourself in this kind of rationalization, take it as a warning sign.

Do you play fast and loose when it comes to creditors?

If you’ve ever provided false information in order to obtain credit, or made totally unrealistic promises to your creditors, these may indicate a problem with compulsive spending.

Does spending or taking on debt feel better than it ought to?

Sure, everyone enjoys getting something new, and if you really need a loan and it comes through, it’s natural to experience relief. However, if you live for the thrill of spending, or if getting a loan makes you feel like everything is guaranteed to work out no matter what, your relationship to debt may be a poor one.

Does debt affect your health?

If you can’t sleep, if you drink or use drugs to avoid thinking about debt, your spending could have serious, lasting effects on your health, and that’s nothing to gamble with.

Luckily, more and more awareness of this problem is starting to reach the public. Organizations like Debtor’s Anonymous (www.debtorsanonymous.org) are out there to help people dealing with spending addiction.

If you have been struggling with spending addiction problems for years, you may find yourself drowning in credit card debt. If this is the case, keep in mind that bankruptcy can help you take care of your debts for good. Second chances are rare in life, but bankruptcy can provide that for you. If you have a problem, it’s time to take decisive action, and to get your life back on track.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, August 7, 2009 @ 8:44 am

This may come as a surprise to some, and huge relief to others: bankruptcy can be filed by one spouse without the other. The big question is: SHOULD you file without your spouse? Like most aspects of bankruptcy, the answer will depend on your particular situation.

Resorting to declaring bankruptcy can be a source of nervousness, fear, and you may be genuinely concerned about keeping your filing private. Many people contemplating filing want to be reassured that their bankruptcy won’t be published in the newspaper, that their employer won’t have to know, that in-laws won’t be informed, their kids don’t have to know, their kids’ teachers, their pet groomer, their neighbors … etc. But once a person finds out that it is possible to file without joining his or her spouse, what if they wish to keep even their spouse completely in the dark?

While, theoretically it might be possible to completely hide a bankruptcy from your non-filing spouse, it probably isn’t a good idea ethically, or even as a practical matter. What will the spouse think when mail starts arriving at the house from the United States Bankruptcy Court? Or when you have to ask for his or her past pay stubs? Or when you are wandering around with a pad and pen listing the contents of the house?

And then there are the financial concerns. While a bankruptcy filing by one spouse does not automatically bring the other spouse into bankruptcy, neither does the bankruptcy of a spouse give the non filing spouse the full protection of the automatic stay or the bankruptcy discharge for debts on which they may be joint debtors. In that case, the bankruptcy of one spouse does not relieve the other of paying the debt. Upon a bankruptcy, the creditor may look to the other spouse for payment.

Generally, marriage alone doesn’t make both spouses personally liable for a debt. Only those who signed loan documents or credit applications are liable for the debt. But if you have any joint debts, your bankruptcy will likely be noted in some way on your spouse’s credit report even though they weren’t made a party to the bankruptcy. Filing a joint tax return makes both spouses liable for the total of the tax due. And if you and your spouse own property together, that property may be included in the bankruptcy estate and be made available to pay creditors to whom you owe a joint debt.

If you still think it would be better to exclude your spouse from a bankruptcy filing, know that your bankruptcy filing will have some effect on the credit worthiness of your spouse in the future if they apply jointly with you for a loan someday. The lender will often consider both of your credit ratings in making a lending decision.

Financial implications aside, the circumstances leading to the bankruptcy are often indicative of far more serious issues happening within the relationship such as loss of employment, illnesses, emotional problems, or addiction. Failing to talk about the real issues and hiding a bankruptcy doesn’t help the bigger issue–whatever caused the financial difficulties is better worked on out in the open, together with your spouse. If the problems in your marriage have become so large that you have or are considering divorce, it is still wise to reveal your bankruptcy intentions to your spouse and your respective family attorneys, since it can have implications on how property and debts will be allocated in divorce proceedings.

A bankruptcy attorney can point you towards a path of financial stability but ultimately you are the one who must walk on that path….and it is usually better to have the full support of your loved ones. Before taking on the entire burden of filing bankruptcy alone, talk with your attorney, and, more importantly, your spouse.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, August 6, 2009 @ 1:21 pm

The month of July 2009 saw yet another increase in the number of consumer bankruptcies filed in the U.S., as low employment and high consumer debt continues to be a toxic combination throughout most of the country with only little signs that an antidote can be found. The number of filings, 126,434, was a 34.3 percent increase from the same month in 2009 and 8.7 percent increase from June, 2009.

Most experts agree that the rapidly decreasing number of jobs is in direct correlation with the consistent increases in bankruptcies every month. Also contributing to the increase is the so-far ineffective Home Affordable Modification Program. According to a recent report released by the Treasury Department, the modification program has only benefited 9% of eligible homeowners. When loan modification efforts fail, many homeowners turn to Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which can immediately stop a foreclosure and allows the homeowner the opportunity to catch up on missed payments over a 5 year plan.

In each of the last three months, more than 20 percent of those who have filed cited they did so to avoid foreclosure. The data was compiled by the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Atlanta. The organization, a nonprofit credit counseling service, collected data from individuals from April to June and determined that counseling was not going to be enough to assist them in preventing foreclosure.

Even with banks being pressured by federal government (and the national court of public opinion) to work with mortgage holders, the majority of home owners are frightened by the chance they could lose the roof over their heads. This alarming trend also demonstrates, once again, that the White House is not doing nearly enough to promote or educate America on its Making Home Affordable program, which provides financial incentives for banks and mortgage lenders to alleviate the rate at which they foreclose on homes.

The report is also further evidence that a Bankruptcy Cramdown Bill is more critical than ever. A proposed legislative action that has recently shown renewed signs of life, the bill would allow bankruptcy judges to alter, or cramdown, a homeowner’s mortgage in conjunction with their approved bankruptcy plan.

As we discussed on the blog previously, Senator Dick Durbin from Illinois is fighting to keep the bill breathing, going so far as to recently issue many in the lending industry a three-month ultimatum to do more in stemming the tide of foreclosures or see renewed vigor in Congress to revive cramdown legislature. Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank from Massachusetts, a lightening rod for all things controversial in government, is also pushing hard to bring the bill back to life.

Oddly enough, the cramdown battle is being waged between powerful Senate Democrats and President Obama. Meanwhile, Americans’ home loans flap helplessly in the wind of the recession.

If you are behind on your mortgage, bankruptcy can help you stay in your home. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt for a free initial debt consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, August 5, 2009 @ 10:24 am

You might already know about the problems associated with fraudulent transfers. These are claims brought before the bankruptcy court by the trustee or by creditors which allege that you purposefully transferred property to someone with the intention of keeping it out of the hands of your creditors. If it is determined that you transferred the property with the intent to hinder or defraud a creditor, you could seriously jeopardize your bankruptcy, or worse, face some prison time. Hopefully if you’ve heard about fraudulent transfers, you know enough not to attempt them.

To complicate matters, the law will also look upon a transfer that wasn’t “actually” fraudulent as “constructively” fraudulent if you make a transfer, receive something in exchange, but the something you receive is not reasonably equivalent in value to the item you transfer. You see, sometimes people are really not trying to protect assets for themselves; they simply make a gift that is too generous in the eyes of the bankruptcy court, inappropriate in light of your obligations to your creditors. Making such a transfer will leave you with a diminished estate, meaning unsecured creditors will receive less in your bankruptcy than if the transfer had never occurred. In such a situation, it is the trustee’s obligation to recover the value of the transfer, and distribute this value to your unsecured creditors.

Here are a few examples of potentially innocent or well-intentioned actions that could be regarded as constructively fraudulent by a bankruptcy court. Maybe you want to help a loved one out, so you sell something you own which is worth $10,000.00 for far less, say $5,000.00. While it’s understandable that you want to give your family member a good deal, you could be leaving your loved one exposed. The court might decide that because of your insolvency, your sale was really intended to shield your assets from creditors.
The Trustee could then sue your relative for the difference in value. This is definitely not a situation you want to be in.

Another example is making a large donation or contribution to, for example, a political candidate, in the form of a large purchase of gift, on the eve of the bankruptcy. Here, too, the court will probably go after the beneficiary of your purchase to recover the value of the contribution. In all these examples, you weren’t attempting to save the asset for yourself, or attempting to get something in return in an immediately tangible fashion. However, your action will be frowned upon by the court because it will appear irresponsible given your probable intention to declare bankruptcy in order to rescue yourself from financial peril you were surely aware of.

One possible exception to this rule are good faith donations made to a church. A number of religious organizations worked together to promote the Religious Liberty and Charitable Donation Protection Act, and it was passed in 1998. Under the act, donations you make to your church will not trigger action against the church so long as the contribution was equal to no more than 15 percent of your income during the year preceding bankruptcy. If you consistently contributed in amounts exceeding that 15 percent ceiling, the court may allow those to pass as well. Warning! Don’t take this to mean that you have carte blanche to give away money on the eve of the bankruptcy on the theory that it’s better to give it to anyone just to keep it from your creditors. If the court figures out that such was your intention, your church could get sued.

To avoid these problems in your bankruptcy, it’s very important that you speak with an experienced attorney early in the process. If you have significant assets, chances are they are at least somewhat protected by your state’s exemption laws. This means there’s no chance you’d lose the asset in a bankruptcy. However, once you’ve made the transfer of the asset, you lose your right to claim the exemption.

If you’re thinking about bankruptcy but are worried about losing your possessions, talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney today. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. No charge for your initial consultation, and we have 4 convenient offices to choose from. Call 1-800-899-1414 today.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, August 5, 2009 @ 7:14 am

One aspect of bankruptcy you don’t hear much about is what happens after you file. One of the steps that tends to be a little disconcerting for those who have just filed Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 is the “Meeting of Creditors.” It just sounds so intimidating, doesn’t it?

Truthfully, it isn’t.

Meetings of creditors take place a few weeks after your attorney has filed your case and you have provided him or her with your most recent income information and list of debts. The meeting is essentially an opportunity for every one with an interest to hear your case and accept or challenge its terms.

The meeting of the creditors rarely even justifies its namesake because it is highly unusual that a creditor actually attends. What does happen usually takes only a few minutes and sometimes less. At the meeting, you will be sworn in by the trustee and have your identity verified. You will then be asked, under oath, whether the petition you have filed is a true and correct statement of your financial affairs.

The questions you might face are pretty easy to handle and should not cause you to be nervous. For example, “Why are you filing bankruptcy?” is pretty common. Your reason for filing will probably need to be flushed out in some detail but obviously, that’s not anything you need to study for because anyone who has gone through the financial stress and frustration prior to bankruptcy knows full well the reasons why. You will also probably hear some questions about employment and real estate, too. But again, nothing overly complicated.

There are rare occasions when a creditor might appear at a Meeting of Creditors. This often happens when there is a domestic support obligation involved, or some other obligation between you and another individual party. If a creditor does appear, they will be given a limited time to ask questions. If it appears that the creditor will need more time to ask questions, the Trustee may ask the creditor to make a formal request for a separate hearing to continue the inquiry. Don’t let this scare you. These extra hearings are extremely rare, and, as long as you have been honest throughout the process, you shouldn’t have any problems answering the questions.

You may also see a creditor if you ran your own business. This is because there is typically a great deal more money involved with a business than an individual. And, business creditors are more bankruptcy-savvy and thus feel comfortable being involved with every step of the process. Again, your honesty with schedules and asset listings will determine how easy a time you have at the meeting.

This post should give you a decent overview of the Meeting of Creditors but be sure to discuss it with one of our attorneys as you begin the bankruptcy process. Again, the more you know about the process, the more comfortable you will be throughout your journey into & out of bankruptcy.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, August 4, 2009 @ 9:53 am

In 2005, Congress passed the most dramatic reforms the laws of bankruptcy had seen for 20 years. You may have heard of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 already because it’s a sore topic with bankruptcy lawyers and other consumer and debtor advocates. Though the name of the law suggests that Congress also intended to protect consumers, the fact that “abuse prevention” appears first in the title is telling.

Unfortunately, Congress gave in to lobbying efforts by credit card companies and other large stake holders which fueled the belief that folks in America were out to game the system. The reality is that most people who file for bankruptcy do so following a serious, life-altering change in circumstances. Thanks to the law, people who lose their jobs, go through painful divorces or survive cancer are sometimes forced to face obstacles to the protections the bankruptcy law rightly affords to every member of our society. So how did this happen?

On one side of the battle, creditors argued that there was wide spread abuse of bankruptcy law that permitted people with the ability to meet their liabilities walk away scot-free. This, they argued, made credit more expensive for everyone, forcing consumers who didn’t declare bankruptcy to pay for those who did. There were also many who were neutral to the issue, because they felt that the law wouldn’t significantly affect the people who most needed help.  Most filers, they believed, would be able to pass the Median Test anyway, which means you never have to do the Means Test at all. Consumer advocates argued that lenders had alternative means of controlling the cost of credit, and that the continued growth of the credit card and lending industries demonstrated that the credit game had clearly remained profitable. Unfortunately, it looks like the credit lobby prevailed.

If you’re starting to feel like this all sounds pretty grim, cheer up! There is a bright side. People are still declaring bankruptcy in record numbers; not that this is something to celebrate, but it does demonstrate that it is not at all impossible for you to benefit from bankruptcy protection. The Means Test makes bankruptcy a little more burdensome, but it doesn’t act as a true barrier to those who really need the protection of bankruptcy law.
It’s also true that the law created uncertainties that are still being played out in the courts. For example, the Means Test is only supposed to apply to people who have “primarily consumer” debts, but there is some disagreement about both terms. Does “primarily” mean that the dollar amount of your consumer debt is higher? Or does it mean that more of your debts are consumer debts than not? Are mortgages consumer debts? Are taxes? What about student loans?

Here again, there is plenty of reason to keep a positive outlook. The courts are settling these questions gradually and there is general consensus over many of the questions.  What’s more, an experienced bankruptcy attorney will be keeping up with changes to the law as soon as they happen, and will also have knowledge of local jurisdiction practices. With the help of a good attorney, bankruptcy will remain navigable, even if you may come across a few more obstacles on the road to financial freedom. Bankruptcy law remains one of the most important safety nets provided by the American government, and the bankruptcy law in America is still among the best for debtors in any industrialized nation. If you need help, don’t hesitate to take advantage of this privilege.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt by calling toll free 1-800-899-1414. Attorney John Orcutt offers a totally FREE consultation out of 4 offices conveniently located in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville & Wilson. If you need to file bankruptcy, you want John Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, August 4, 2009 @ 6:20 am

Sometimes life throws you the unexpected. If you’re living paycheck to paycheck, all it takes is one unanticipated expense to put you on the path to a truly disastrous financial scenario. It’s often the unforeseen emergency expense which starts the ball rolling. Soon you’re 2 or 3 months behind on the car payment, and repossession of your car or foreclosure becomes a very real possibility. That’s why it’s so important to talk to a bankruptcy attorney the moment things start to get out of control.

But even if your debt problems have sneaked up on you and now you’re facing an imminent repossession, a quick bankruptcy filing can put the brakes on the repo man. If your situation is critical, you can file what’s called a bare-bones or skeletal filing with a court to prevent imminent action against you; for example, if your vehicle is being repossessed or you are facing foreclosure, the court will allow you to file an emergency bankruptcy petition.

In a bare-bones filing, the court allows you to file your bankruptcy petition with only a minimum of the required set of documents. After this minimal filing, you will be given a set amount of time to gather the remaining documents. The amount of time can differ, but generally you will have up to 15 days to complete your petition. Once your petition is filed, you enjoy the benefit of the automatic stay, which stops creditors’ collection efforts in their tracks. This allows you to keep the car, stay in your home, and put the creditors back in their place.

The emergency petition should be filed only if absolutely necessary. If you can avoid doing so, it’s probably a good idea to give yourself and your attorney time to carefully file your case. This approach allows you to develop the best bankruptcy plan to help you out of your financial trap and into a fresh start. If you’re facing foreclosure, for example, you will have ample time to contact an attorney before the foreclosure sale. In these cases, don’t wait until the last minute! Car repossessions, on the other hand, can develop much more quickly and often necessitate quick action to prevent irreversible consequences.

If an emergency situation has caused you to get behind on your car or home, talk to an attorney early. An experienced bankruptcy attorney knows how the repossession process works and can best advise you on how to best protect your interests. Don’t wait another second, call today.

Durham bankruptcy. Raleigh bankruptcy. Fayetteville bankruptcy. Wilson bankruptcy.

5g6teri2yp

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, August 3, 2009 @ 10:45 pm

Marriage is a partnership, and it works much better with each partner pulling his or her own weight. To avoid problems down the line, it’s a good idea for each partner to establish and maintain a separate credit identity. As a matter of fact, that is how the law will see it in all but the nine community property states (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin.) This means that if your spouse takes on a financial responsibility without you, you will not be legally liable for it, and vice versa. But it also means that good financial behavior on the part of your spouse won’t necessarily reflect on your credit report, even if you share in the actual payments. Here are a few tips to help you create and maintain your personal credit identity, apart from your spouse’s.

• Keep separate checking accounts. When people get married, they often choose to combine their checking accounts into one account both can access. This is certainly easier, logistically speaking, for maintaining a household. However, this exposes you to trouble if your spouse should turn out to have less than great habits with ATM withdrawals and checks. A better idea is to keep separate accounts, and also open a joint account for household use.

• Don’t take out joint credit card accounts or personal loans. This is another step many people take when they get married, but it’s a bad idea for some of the same reasons separate checking accounts are a bad idea. Besides, remember that in a bankruptcy filing, credit card debt can be fully discharged, and with separate credit card accounts, one spouse can file for bankruptcy without involving the other. In states which recognize tenancy by the entirety or similar forms of marital ownership, a judgment obtained by a creditor against one spouse will not become a lien against jointly owned property. However, if the credit card is a joint one, a judgment will attach to the property, possibly enabling the creditor to sell your home by sheriff’s execution sale! Talk to your bankruptcy attorney to determine how your spouse’s assets will be affected during bankruptcy.

• Understand how creditors are permitted to consider your spouse’s credit. When applying for credit in the non-community property states, a lender is not allowed to make a determination based on your marital status. Thus, he cannot ask to see your spouse’s information, unless her income will be  a basis for repayment of the debt.

• Make sure joint accounts with good records are reported on both credit reports. If you’ve been building good credit together on joint accounts like your mortgage or car loan, you want to make sure that the information is being reported under both names. If you find out it isn’t, you can write to the creditor and request that they report to the credit bureaus about both of you.

With tightening credit markets, having a separate credit identity is crucial to maintaining your family’s financial viability. If you or your spouse are overwhelmed with debt, talk to a bankruptcy attorney today to find out how a properly planned bankruptcy can help your marriage and your finances.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, August 2, 2009 @ 10:02 am

You know it and we know it: There’s a lot of stigma behind the word bankruptcy. We’re here to tell you: If you’re considering bankruptcy, there is nothing to be ashamed of and don’t let anyone tell you differently. Bankruptcy has helped millions of families and businesses emerge stronger, especially in tough economic times.

The federal bankruptcy code has long been a carefully negotiated, well-thought out safety net to catch the financial pratfalls so many Americans take on occasion. It’s an outstanding testament to the state of cooperation, foresight and spirit of assistance that characterizes our country. Despite the pervasive stigmas, there is very little collective impact to the nation’s economic well-being as a result of individual bankruptcy filings outside of a number of Americans becoming once again financially stable and viable contributors to society. The collective impact of bankruptcy is a positive.

There is no doubt that America has poor communities. There are people struggling today–and there always will be. But the bankruptcy code helps to significantly prevent more Americans from ending up on the street. And no, that comment is not a stretch. With careful planning, you can emerge from bankruptcy in relatively good shape emotionally and financially.

Think about it for a moment: bankruptcy allows you to keep the things you really need: your home, retirement accounts, life insurance assets, college funds, and even your car. If you have those items intact after a bankruptcy, you remain in far better financial condition than the large population of indebted Americans who never file for bankruptcy. Why keep taking the hits on your credit when bankruptcy can immediately stop the hemorrhaging?

A quick search of the blog will produce a number of posts about life after bankruptcy. There is a reason for that: studies show that, without careful guidance, those who file for bankruptcy can end up in the same situation again in the future. Our goal is to help you before, during and after your bankruptcy so that you emerge from your bankruptcy with a solid financial footing.

It is interesting that people still feel a certain amount of discomfort about the idea of bankruptcy. One should wonder if that sort of stigma wasn’t fostered, or at least perpetuated, by the credit industry. Given the practices of collection agencies and credit card phone reps, it’s easy to understand how miserable they can make a person feel about missing a payment. Despite all of the misinformation you’ve heard from the credit industry about bankruptcy, it is still the best financial safety net for you and your family. If you’re struggling to pay the monthly minimums or getting behind on your mortgage payments, don’t wait another day. Call an experienced bankruptcy attorney and learn about your options. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 to set up your free initial debt consultation. Offices conveniently located in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville & Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, July 31, 2009 @ 9:38 am

Bankruptcy is a terrific way to take care of many kinds of debts. But you may have heard that not all debts will be discharged in a bankruptcy. As a result, and depending on the kind of debt you have, you may be worried that declaring bankruptcy would not really help you. What you may not know is how bankruptcy can help you with your debts, even the ones you can’t discharge outright.

Support obligations fall in this category of debt.  They include things like alimony and child support payments. Because these are priority debts, you will not be able to discharge them outright with a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and, in addition, the automatic stay will not prevent collection efforts on past due support obligation payments.

Nevertheless, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy will help you get caught up and stay caught up on your support payments. First of all, when your unsecured debt is discharged, all the money you were spending on things like credit card payments will be freed for use toward your support obligations.

The protected status of support payments can be a good thing in the event that your case is a Chapter 7 asset case. In this rare kind of case, some of your assets will be liquidated to pay creditors. You probably would rather see the proceeds of your liquidated assets go to something like child support, rather than sending it all to unsecured creditors. In that case, your attorney should file a proof of claim on behalf of the support recipient, and this will ensure that most of the proceeds from the liquidated assets will be put to use toward your support payments.

A Chapter 13 bankruptcy will be even more helpful to you when it comes to past due support payments. Say you are really behind on your alimony payments. Your ex is pestering you all the time about the past due amount and you need some relief.  A Chapter 13 filing will allow you to work these payments into your repayment plan and allow you to catch up over the course of a 3 to 5 year repayment plan. Note that you must be careful to keep up with your ongoing post-petition payments; failing to make the new payments as they become due can put your case in jeopardy. However, with the help the repayment plan, you buy yourself time to manage old debts and therefore keep up with the new ones.

If you’ve been struggling to catch up on your child support payments and alimony, bankruptcy can help you get back on track. Even debts that won’t disappear in a bankruptcy can at least become manageable after a successful bankruptcy. You are probably aware already that unpaid support obligations can have very serious consequences; you could face hefty fines, problems with professional licenses, or even jail time, in addition to some very aggressive collection efforts. Besides all that, many people really want to make good on their support obligations, but their financial circumstances simply don’t allow for it. Because of this, it’s important not to wait until it’s too late to be pro-active about solving your debt problems. Talk to a bankruptcy attorney today before the situation gets out of control.

From the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Helping families with real debt solutions since 1995. Call today to set up a free initial debt consultation at one of our convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville or Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, July 29, 2009 @ 9:06 am

Multi level marketing, also called “direct selling” “affiliate marketing” or “home-based business franchising”, has become popular in the past few years as a way for those with an entrepreneurial streak to build their own businesses with minimum investment. It has been especially appealing to, and vigorously directed towards parents (usually mothers) who wish to stay at home with their children but want or need to earn income at the same time.

The structure is designed to create a marketing and sales force by recruiting promoters of company products, or “distributers”, and compensating them not only for their own personal sales, but also for the sales generated by others they introduced to the company, creating a “downline” of distributors and a hierarchy of multiple levels of compensation.

The companies and products are generally marketed and promoted via word of mouth, often in a ‘club-like’ atmosphere. There are hundreds of companies that operate under this structure, selling everything from vitamins to long distance service. A motivated distributor with an active down line can earn a nice living with long term residuals. On the downside, it does take a lot of time and work to make an MLM business successful. Some distributors can end up spending a lot of time and money, incurring thousands of dollars of credit card debt for travel, advertising and conventions, while earning little or no money.

Balancing large credit cards debts to fund their operation can put them in a very precarious position. Additional problems can arise for previously successful Multi Level Marketers when the sponsoring company suddenly changes the terms of the distribution commission structure, or there is a switch from one MLM program to another, or because sales have dropped off due to the economy or an unexpected increase in competition in the marketplace. Once the problem gets large enough and the owner finally realizes he is on a sinking ship, grabbing onto the bankruptcy lifesaver will require unique strategy and a great amount of skilled counsel from a qualified attorney.

Because of the nature of the MLM business, the process for filing bankruptcy isn’t as clear-cut as it might be for other debtors. It could give rise to additional objections by the Trustee or an increased risk of lengthy and expensive litigation.

For example, the first hurdle in the process of filing bankruptcy under Bankruptcy Code is that all consumer debtors must submit to a median income, or means test, to determine their eligibility for Chapter 7 and/or their unsecured creditor payment obligations for Chapter 13. The means test looks at the six month period immediately prior to the month of filing. It is a formula designed to keep filers with higher incomes from filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Only bankruptcy filers with primarily consumer debts, not business debts, need to take the means test. Filers with higher incomes who fail the means test may use Chapter 13 bankruptcy to repay a portion of their debts, but may not use Chapter 7 bankruptcy to wipe out their debts altogether.

MLM distributors contemplating bankruptcy may or may not be subject to the means test, because, arguably, their debt may be considered primarily business debt as opposed to consumer debt. Depending on the state of residence and filing, the question of whether personal credit card debt used to finance a home based business yields “consumer debt” or “business debt” is likely a threshold question.

There may also be questions of what actually constitutes “income” in the MLM scenario. Trustees could argue that payments submitted by downline distributors for advertising or marketing constitutes income that should be included in the means test calculation.

Assuming that the means test is required, the MLM debtor may encounter a problem with the presumption of abuse arising from recent prior months of high income. This is especially true if the distributor’s income was suddenly reduced due to a change in the compensation schedule or a termination of a particular program. Or, in the case of MLM debtors with a history of starting and growing multiple successful organizations, the Trustee may presume a high income will be generated in the near future.

These are just a few of the issues that could crop up when Multi Level Marketing is a factor in a personal bankruptcy. Others include issues of income suppression and asset diminution.

If you are involved with an MLM organization and are beginning to experience financial problems and pressure, consulting with an experienced attorney before the problems escalate can help you avoid the pitfalls discussed here.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, July 28, 2009 @ 6:21 am

Before the deservedly unpopular 2005 reforms to the Bankruptcy Code, it was rare that an innocent mistake could cause your discharge to be denied or revoked. It used to be that trustees and the courts reserved this harsh measure for those situations where it was clear that a person filing for bankruptcy had engaged in serious, persistent and intentional misbehavior. Now, in the aftermath of the reforms, it is even more important than ever to hire a competent bankruptcy attorney to help you navigate a bankruptcy filing, not just because the reforms made declaring bankruptcy much more complicated, but also because a mistake could cause your discharge to be revoked or denied. And what’s the point of declaring bankruptcy if you don’t get your debts discharged? That bankruptcy isn’t going to help you at all, probably, and it will almost certainly hurt you.

There are several situations you must be on the lookout for to avoid having your discharge denied or revoked. First of all, under the reforms, a prerequisite for receiving the discharge is the completion of a financial management course. This course is one hosted locally in your area and approved by your bankruptcy case trustee. You will only be exempted from completing this course if a good one isn’t available nearby. Although the educational value of these courses is questionable, all debtors must fulfill the requirement or forfeit their discharge.

The bankruptcy trustee can demand a great deal of information from you over the course of your bankruptcy. One of the more onerous demands is the production of your last four years of tax returns. If the Trustee demands the returns and you fail to produce them, your discharge could get dismissed outright. If you’re bothered by this requirement, well, who can blame you? It seems like your tax returns are private financial information that should remain so, even during bankruptcy. There is a little bit of latitude for protecting your privacy: you can opt to send transcripts of the returns (also known as summaries) instead of the full filings; these contain less personal information. Avail yourself of this option by requesting summaries from the IRS.

And we’re not done yet! If you’re filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 and you owe child support or alimony, it’s time to get caught up. In order for your debts to be discharged at the end of the process, you must be completely up to date on your support payments. The good news is that if you are behind, the arrears can be caught up in your Chapter 13 plan. Your ongoing payments must continue to be paid over the course of your bankruptcy. It would be a real shame to get to the end of the process, having made all of the required plan payments, only to have a problem because you missed a few support payments along the way. Protect your discharge by paying these on time.

Finally, it should hardly need to be stated that you must tell the truth and avoid fraudulent activity during your filing. Remember that even if your intention isn’t to commit fraud, an innocent mistake could be interpreted as such if the effect is to obscure some part of the process or misrepresent your position in any way.

With all of these potential quagmires, it’s imperative that you consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt- helping families since 1985. 1-800-899-1414.

Durham bankruptcy attorney. Raleigh bankruptcy attorney. Wilson bankruptcy attorney. Fayetteville bankruptcy attorney.

+ Continue reading this article