Published Tuesday, March 2, 2010 @ 10:09 am

Developed to slow the rate of Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings, the Means Test helps determine whether or not someone qualifies to file Chapter 7, and in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, to what extent you might be able to pay back some of your creditors. It’s become a very frustrating part of the bankruptcy process because it implies, “Hey, you just don’t want to pay your bills.”  Not only that, it also subjects filers to additional frustration, confusion and widens the gap between citizens and the law in place to protect them.

However, there are ways to overcome the restrictions and complications of the Means Test.  Of course, this is where the insight of an experienced bankruptcy attorney is especially beneficial, as it can take some time and expert handling.

Called “special circumstances,” a judge may grant you permission to file Chapter 7 in spite of failing the Means Test. (Failing, in this context, indicates that you have some ability to pay and that you would have to file under Chapter 13 and pay your monthly disposable income to your unsecured creditors through a Chapter 13 plan.)  If you are a member of the Armed Forces and a call to duty dramatically alters your income and there is no reasonable alternative money source, the results of the Means Test can be rendered non-applicable.

You can also be granted a special circumstance for a sudden, serious illness that will take you out of your job or further damage the economic viability of your family.  Job loss, in some cases, can lead to ability to file under the “special circumstance” exception to means test applicability.  However, the job loss would have to be sudden, proven legitimate (you can’t be found to have provoked it) and the income from that particular job itself would most likely have to had been the reason you failed the test.

There are other ways the results of the Means Test can be put aside. However, it is very important for you to understand that these are actual, legal strategies, not encouraged methods by which to circumvent the court. That’s called fraud, and you’ll be nailed for it.

The means test uses an average of your income over the six months prior to filing your case.  That being said, you have the ability to time your bankruptcy filing according to a period in time when your income will be at its lowest. If you know bankruptcy is on the horizon but can sustain a few months without employment, you can file down the road to ensure your last six months of income fall below the state median, which is a major factor in the Means Test.

Additionally, expert bankruptcy attorneys can advise you on a number of ways that you can reduce the amount you will have to pay through a Chapter 13 plan.  This is what bankruptcy professionals call “means test planning.”  Need health insurance? Purchasing a plan for you and your family before your bankruptcy is a good way to add expenses and reduce income. The code allows you to deduct what you pay for health insurance. The same applies for disability insurance.  Been wanting to put away more for retirement?  You can increase your 401(k) or 403(b) contributions through your employer and take the contributions as a deduction against your six-month average income in the means test.

You may not realize it, and in fact, they may be a reason for your having to file, but your rising mortgage and car payment may contribute to your passing the means test. Or, if you are expecting an increase in any of the interest rates on those loans, considering waiting until they kick-in to file.

The term “household” does not mean family. It means, quite literally, how many your “house holds.”  This means relatives, children who have moved back in after the backpacking trip around Europe and even that weird guy that rents the storage loft in the garage. And since the reform act in 2005 bases the median incomes for the means test on “household” and not family, the size of your household can have a serious impact in your favor.  The more people who live in a house, the higher the threshold of income required to qualify for the means test.

It can be scary thing, the means test. It literally changed the benefits of bankruptcy for thousands and thousands of Americans. If you are worried about it or just have additional questions, don’t hesitate to contact us.  We have helped over 40,000 North Carolina families through the process of bankruptcy and our attorneys know the means test inside and out.  Call The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to schedule your FREE consultation at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, February 28, 2010 @ 9:26 pm

Bankruptcy is one of the most important decisions you may ever have to make. It’s not a decision to take lightly, and our office understands that you and your family have a lot of questions. While many of the same laws apply to many cases, rarely is your financial situation the same as another person’s. We all have different reasons for needing to rely on the bankruptcy code and just about every reason is as justifiable as the next.

To assist you in the most direct and non-invasive method possible, we have created three communication vehicles by which you can begin to explore why bankruptcy may be your best way out from under an impending financial crisis.

1. First, you can arrange a face-to-face meeting with us. Our practice serves North Carolina residents in 30 of our 100 counties and we have offices in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville.

We structure these meetings to be confidential and without obligation. That means you are not encouraged to file bankruptcy or beholden to us in any way. We feel that because financial stress can be such a difficult matter with which to cope, it is best for us to be there for people who have questions. Maybe you’re worried about a collection agency. Or your bank isn’t returning calls about a mortgage modification. Whatever the nature of your debt question, a one-on-one meeting in one of our four offices can help you get it answered.

And best of all, there is no charge for this meeting. The introduction of money to a meeting such as this would only apply undue pressure and in many cases, add to your debt load. That is not what we want.

if you feel a personal meeting is for you, call us at 1.800.899.1414.

2. Another way to get things started or to ask questions is over the phone. If you can’t make it to one of our offices or only have time on your lunch break, maybe a phone call is the best way.

We understand that those in serious debt often develop a mistrust of those who want to help, especially given the ubiquity of shady “credit doctors” and debt settlement programs. Too many people have lost a lot of money to these bogus outfits. Please understand, we’re here to help you get out of debt using the strength of federal bankruptcy law. If you don’t believe us, take a look at our client testimonials at http://www.billsbills.com/testimonials.php. Talk to us in person or over the phone. We’ve helped thousands of families get through the very same financial challenges you’re going through right now.

3. Lastly, you can reach us via the Web. Our site, www.billsbills.com, has an easy form, available here, that you can fill out for us to call you. If you choose too, you can add some basic information about your situation, which will help us get some questions answered before we speak and thus, help you make a decision quickly about the best way to proceed. It won’t take more than five minutes to complete.

Again, we know that making the decision to file for bankruptcy is a serious one that deserves a lot of research. Our goal is to help you clearly understand the nature of your debt and how it can best be settled. If you can think of some additional ways to engage us or have suggestions for us, please let us know.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, February 26, 2010 @ 7:15 am

For most bankruptcy bound individuals, a discharge of all individual debts is considered the Holy Grail of any bankruptcy filing, yielding a permanent injunction that prevents creditors from collecting on debts. However, any good discussion of debt dischargeability also tackles the primary exceptions to look out for when considering any bankruptcy filing.

Exceptions to the power of a bankruptcy discharge, include:

Certain Tax Obligations
Withholding taxes are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, although you may be able to use a Chapter 13 case to pay these over time (notwithstanding any accrued penalties and interest).  Similarly, sales taxes are not dischargeable, but again, Chapter 13 can establish a payment plan for lessening the load and paying this out over the long haul.

The question of whether your income tax can be discharged ultimately depends on how old the tax debt is and when you filed the tax return.  In order to be dischargeable, your tax debt for the tax year in question must meet the following conditions: the due date for filing your tax return is at least three years ago; your tax return was filed at least two years ago; the tax assessment is at least 240 days old; your tax return was not fraudulent; and you are not guilty of tax evasion.

For example, in a 2009 bankruptcy filing:

• Taxes from 2006-2008 are not dischargeable;
• Taxes from 2004 and before are eligible for review; and
• Taxes from 2005 are potentially dischargeable if the return was filed by the debtor on or before April 15, 2006. If the return was filed under an extension, then the 2005 taxes are not eligible for the following review unless the debtor files after October 15, 2009.

Fraud and Certain Credit Usages Before Filing
Fraud is a valid creditor objection to a bankruptcy discharge. To find fraud, a creditor must prove: (1) a statement made under false pretenses; (2) a material fact; (3) designed to deceive the creditor; (4) that does in fact deceive the creditor; (5) the creditor reasonably relies on the statement; and (6) the creditor suffers actual damages resulting from the reliance.

The general rule here is this: if you’re considering bankruptcy it’s best to avoid maxing out (or in some cases simply using) consumer credit, credit cards, or loans. Bankruptcy law now demands that bankruptcy bound debtors like you do not take cash advances or purchase luxury items on credit 90-days prior to your filing bankruptcy. If you do purchase large or luxury items through these means, creditors may challenge you (and these discharging these debts) in Court if they believe that you have acted in bad faith in using credit excessively.

Domestic Obligations
Alimony, child support and spousal maintenance debts are not dischargeable in either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Additionally, the first prong of bankruptcy, the automatic stay, does not act to stop most collection efforts for these claims. An exception to this exception comes in the second type of domestic asset splitting known as equitable distribution. While equitable distribution—a dividing of martial property as a result of dissolution of the marriage—is no longer dischargeable in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the same is not true in Chapter 13. Chapter 13 bankruptcy, in what is called as its “super discharge,” can aid a former spouse having trouble paying their bills to eliminate this type of burden. These issues are complex, and it is important that you speak with a bankruptcy expert if you have these types of issues.

Student Loans
In an effort to protect the education lending industry, and allow student loan money for almost anyone who wants it, Congress has made virtually every advance in connection with education non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. To that end, these loans are non-dischargeable “unless excepting such debt from discharge…would impose an undue hardship on the debtor.” While the definition of “undue hardship” is ultimately to the discretion of your bankruptcy judge, if precedent is any “judge,” this is a high hurdle to surmount. As a result, if you’re considering a bankruptcy filing simply to discharge a large student loan bill, don’t lose hope, it may just be best to wait: the tide appears to be turning in Congress to loosen this exemption as the costs of education skyrocket and more and more Americans face insurmountable educational tabs.

Because of the complexities of bankruptcy law, a qualified bankruptcy attorney is a necessary tool in your financial toolbox to help you conquer your creditors and face your fiscal  fears, yielding the right kinds of debt relief—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, February 25, 2010 @ 6:05 am

In an era of extreme economic downturns and rising unemployment, having a car at your disposal has never been more necessary for work, job interviews and providing other basic fiscal needs…even as you consider a personal bankruptcy.

Yet, if you’re on the road to bankruptcy, these same economic issues and employment woes can mean you may have fallen behind on your most recent car payments, leaving your precious vehicle as a prime target for repossession by your car’s creditors. And while your bankruptcy filing’s “automatic stay” suspends a creditor’s ability to repossess most assets, you may be wondering what happens when your car is taken prior to your filing.

As with most things in bankruptcy, whether you can get your car back from your creditors largely depends on your ability to act quickly, diligently and with a purpose.

Once your vehicle has been repossessed, it is absolutely vital that you immediately seek the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy attorney, informing the attorney of the status of your car and that you need to file bankruptcy right away. While the repossession was likely caused by an inability to afford your car payment, this first, best step to get your car back through bankruptcy will require that you have enough funds to pay your attorney, the bankruptcy court filing costs, as well as the requisite credit counseling fees.

Another potential challenge, comes in the form of one word: paperwork. As time is of the essence to save your car, you must be able to provide instant information about your current financial situation so that you can file quickly and without any hidden loopholes. Typically, you will have ten days between the date of your car’s repossession to the time that the creditor actually sells the car. As a result, you and your lawyer will need to move fast.

Once you file for bankruptcy, it’s important to note that any further creditor action is stopped by the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay.  While the automatic stay also means that the creditor cannot sell the car once you file, it does not assure the return of your vehicle. But take heart: for a pre-petition repossession, most bankruptcy courts have procedures by which a debtor whose car was repossessed may be allowed to get the vehicle back once the bankruptcy case is filed, including the potential that the debtor will be required to pay back possession and storage fees accrued in the interim, provide proof of car insurance, and have money on-hand to pay the various court and repossession fees.  In all cases, though, the process is neither cheap, nor easy: something the bankruptcy bound individual may always want to avoid.

So, to avoid any headaches, hassles or hardships the best rule of thumb is, if you are going to file bankruptcy, do so before your car gets repossessed.  In short, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you not only conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, but also keep a much-needed car, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— to keep you moving (literally and figuratively) in your fiscally-viable future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button and let these experts take the wheel to so you can start down the road to your next best financial steps.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 2, 2010 @ 2:30 pm

Many of our clients automatically assume they will lose their rental property if they file for bankruptcy. Isn’t that the whole idea of bankruptcy? That you give up everything you have, with a few exceptions, in exchange for getting the debt collectors off your back?

Well, no. Many factors come in to play in determining whether or not you will be forced to sell your rental property, including whether you file chapter 7 or chapter 13, how much money you owe on the property and how much income you receive from it.

Let’s start with chapter 7. If you file chapter 7, you get an exemption for the equity in your primary residence – how much depends on the state you live in – but rental property doesn’t qualify for the standard residence exemption. Therefore, you will only be able to protect the property from sale if you can cover it under your available wildcard exemption. The North Carolina wildcard exemption is $5,000.00 per filer- not much. However, your state may have additional protections if you own the property jointly with your spouse. In North Carolina, if you own the property jointly with your spouse, the property is only subject to claims of joint creditors. If all of your debt is in the name of one spouse or the other, the property may be protected- regardless of the amount of equity. Talk to a experienced bankruptcy attorney, who can examine how you hold title and if you have any joint debt.

But what if you don’t have any equity in the house, or minimal equity? What if, for example, the house is worth $100,000 and you owe $120,000, or even $99,000? The trustee’s job is to determine whether or not there is money for your creditors, not to take away everything that belongs to you. He will determine the property’s worth, then subtract the projected sales costs, selling it and paying taxes on the proceeds. If it’s not worth the trustee’s time and effort, it’s unlikely that he will try to sell it.

With Chapter 13, there are additional caveats and concerns. In general, you should be able to keep your rental property in a Chapter 13 filing. In fact, since the rental property is not your primary residence, you might be eligible for cramdown under chapter 13 – meaning that if you owe more than the property is worth, the bankruptcy judge is able to alter the terms of the mortgage to reflect the property’s current value rather than the amount you originally agreed to pay for it. This could lower your monthly mortgage payments, as well as the long term amount you have to pay to the bank for the property. Cramdown isn’t allowed on primary residences, but it is allowed on other secured debts, including rental property.

Do note, however, that rental property can, under certain circumstances, cost you money. The trustee in a Chapter 13 case will look at all the costs associated with the property – your mortgage payments, plus taxes, insurance, upkeep and repairs. If these costs outweigh the income the property brings in, the trustee may object to your plan on the basis that the money you’re spending on the property should be distributed to your unsecured creditors. In such a case, surrendering the property may be your best option. However, this is a very fact-sensitive issue and depends on how your jurisdiction interprets very complex provisions of the bankruptcy code. Only an experienced bankruptcy attorney can advise you on your specific situation. Bottom line- if you’re deeply in debt, talk to a bankruptcy attorney and get the real facts. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville. Call today: 1-800-899-1414 or visit www.billsbills.com for more information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 4:46 pm

You may have read on the blog, or elsewhere, that many are calling our current economy a “middle class recession.” This is because the numbers are way up on bankruptcies filed by those who make more than $60,000 per year, up 6.9 percent from 2008. Bankruptcies on the whole are up 36.5 percent from this time last year.

So why does it matter how much money a person makes when filing bankruptcy? Well, because bankruptcy is often considered an escape route for the financially unreliable or worse yet, “something poor people do.” It’s just not true.

Today, bankruptcies are increasing among people in the real estate profession, namely developers and agents. When the housing bubble dissolved, so did the incomes for a lot of American families.

There are different types, or “chapters” of bankruptcy for a reason. Basically, some versions are better suited to different situations. Chapter 7, for example, is typically filed by those who may have lost a job or for some reason may not have regular source of income. It wipes out all debts, but also mandates a person dispose of their “non-exempt assets” as a way to repay creditors to whatever extent possible. If you have equity in property beyond available exemption limitations, you may have a “non-exempt asset”.  Many states’ exemptions, as well as the federal exemptions, provide some measure of protection for everything from your home to retirement accounts. It is not often the case that a family has assets beyond what available exemptions can protect.  Even if available exemptions do not cover all of a person’s property, Chapter 13 provides a way to pay the equity above available exemptions to unsecured creditors, so that a person may keep his property, if he can afford to do so.

For those who are still earning a living or at least have a source of money, Chapter 13 creates a three- to five-year payment plan. Your plan payment will largely consist of secured debt, like your car and mortgage payments. Because the plan payment can include your attorney fees, Chapter 13 is an attractive option if you do not have enough up-front money for Chapter 7 attorney fees.

Maybe you’re giving some thought to a debt-settlement firm instead of bankruptcy. Sure, it’s natural for you to want to negotiate your way out of debt. Unfortunately, many of these companies position themselves as an alternative to bankruptcy that will save your credit. More often, however, these debt settlement companies end up doing far more damage to your credit than if you had simply filed for bankruptcy from the start. Remember, just because you’re in a “debt-settlement” program, your creditors will continue to report your missed payments to the credit bureaus. A bankruptcy, while causing an initial hit to your credit score, will stop the negative reporting and allow you to rebuild your credit score faster.

Bankruptcy is an organized, legal process with pre-defined results. Debt settlement firms function under very little regulation and ask for payments before all the debts are settled, therefore the incentive to settle the debt is not as strong as if they were paid based on results or after everything is taken care of.  Thus, your “debt settlement” is by no means guaranteed.

And one more point on debt settlement agencies: the IRS considers forgiven debt as taxable income. In contrast, debt erased as part of a bankruptcy is not taxable.

Another important point about bankruptcy has to do with timing. It’s key that you don’t file too early or wait too long. Start by simply adding up what you owe and making a simple estimate on what it would take to pay it off yourself. If the discrepancy seems impossible to make up, or would force you to sacrifice your family’s needs just to make a dent in your debt load, then consult an experienced consumer bankruptcy attorney.

On the other hand, don’t wait until the car has been repossessed or the foreclosure notices start arriving. Use your head, remain calm, and speak with an attorney. The bankruptcy concept itself is fairly straightforward.  The process however, requires a good deal of legal expertise.  Engage it wisely.  Take time to understand the basics of filing.

From the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.  Helping families through bankruptcy since 1995. Call today to set up a free initial debt consultation in one of our 4 convenient office locations. Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 2:14 pm

One thing you may already know about most court proceedings, is that parties usually have the option to represent themselves without the aid of an attorney. This is called appearing ‘Pro Se’, which, in Latin means “for oneself”. In a bankruptcy proceeding, when money is tight, the thought of saving money by cutting out attorneys and their fees can be pretty tempting. But there are many reasons this is a bad idea.

Bankruptcy can be complicated and bankruptcy judges are a picky bunch. They expect that the preparation of the voluntary petition, schedules, or other documents will be done accurately and on time. A bankruptcy attorney can usually prepare the documents in much less time than it would take for you to figure it out on your own. He or she knows what items of personal property should or should not be included on the petition to avoid a dismissal of your case, and how to apply the Means Test to your situation.

Some courts may give pro se applicants some minor concessions or leeway so that the case can be moved along, but they are careful to avoid crossing the threshold of what may arise to the level of the Court doing the job that a litigant – or his or her counsel – should be doing. Also, many different communications are exchanged between a party and the court, the trustees reviewing the petition, as well as the creditors. Your actions, or lack thereof, during this time, can seriously affect the outcome of your petition, and may even lead to the worst outcome- a dismissal of your case.

Normally, when you retain an attorney to handle a bankruptcy, the attorney will contact creditors on your behalf and attempt to stop any embarrassing, annoying, or even harassing debt-collecting activities. Usually this stops the behavior, even though legally, the creditor still has the right to contact you. He or she can also give you advice on seemingly innocuous activities that could negatively impact your case, such as drawing on retirement funds to pay bills.

Then there is the significant issue of knowing the law. Since there are several sets of rules governing bankruptcy proceedings, trying to navigate all the rules at once can get very confusing. All parties to any bankruptcy proceeding must comply with the Local Bankruptcy Rules, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the case or other sanctions. Other important aspects of law can come into play at any time during this process as well, such as statutes of limitations, transfer of assets, or tax issues that can have a big impact on your proceedings as well.

Finally, many bankruptcy proceedings are entangled with other legal issues, such as divorce, civil court action, or foreclosure, which could affect the outcome of your bankruptcy proceeding, and vice versa.

Before deciding to gamble with your future, talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney about it. You will find the cost well worth it.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 10:48 am

The decision to file for bankruptcy is never an easy one, especially where married couples are involved. Spouses must settle issues of dishonesty, mistrust, and frustration–and that’s even before any of the complex steps of collecting necessary documents and filing papers.

But the story for insolvent couples does have a caveat: joint bankruptcy protection. Married debtors can file their cases jointly with one trustee, one filing fee, and one total case. Debtors can bring to the table their joint debts as well as debts they hold only in their name. To be a joint case, the debtors need only be legally married.  And they must be a man and a woman.

Sounds simple right?

Well, for thousands of individuals living in America today, the latter designation raises difficult questions—especially in the growing number of states that recognize same-sex marriage or its legal equivalent (“civil unions”). Yet, as the constitutionality of laws and amendments forbidding marriage equality continue to be litigated across the country, same-sex debtors seeking bankruptcy relief  face even tougher challenges.

Because it is generally accepted that the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) would preclude the filing of a joint bankruptcy petition by a same sex married couple, these folks face two very different options: (1) make two separate bankruptcy filings, or (2) pursue the right to seek bankruptcy relief as would an opposite-sex married couple. 

While the second option would be a precedent-setting endeavor, fulfilling the true meaning of marriage equality, in reality pursuing this groundbreaking goal is largely antithetical to the larger motivations of most bankruptcy bound individuals, gay or straight: getting out of debt.

In practice, a married same-sex couple will need, more than their heterosexual counterparts, the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy attorney to pull together all of their required financial information;  ensure that it is complete and their disclosures accurate; and research and prepare a case that anticipates a variety of motions attacking the joint filing. Regardless of what “party-in-interest” files the case (as defined by the Bankruptcy Code and common law), the filing will likely be challenged, even before a judge reaches such substantive issues as income, assets, liabilities, and creditors.

In this case, like others for same-sex couples seeking right-giving precedents, while the Bankruptcy Code provides one standard, constitutional arguments will inevitably reveal others that need to be briefed and raised.  Same-sex couples must expect that any decision in their favor will be appealed, perhaps more than once to a US District Court, a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, a Circuit Court of Appeals, or maybe even the Supreme Court of the United States.  For debtors, this type legal wrangling adds ,ore time, more fees and inevitably more stress to what is undoubtedly an already nerve-racking situation.

As a result, for a married same-sex couple facing the need to file bankruptcy, the next steps can mark a tough decision: file singly or fight the system; seek your family’s financial security or a denigrated group’s fundamental rights; moving forward for your family or moving your family forward.  In the end, changing the current state of the law will take either an act of Congress or one or more very brave and very patient married same-sex couples who find themselves drowning in debt and who–in spite of these debts—also feel empowered to fight the good fight.

The state of marriage equality is not yet where it should be in the United States, and this seriously affects the legal rights of same-sex families.  But until the law changes, same-sex couples need expertise in the handling of their cases.

If you live in North Carolina where same-sex marriage is not legal, but are still considering bankruptcy, the bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 6:33 pm

It’s tax season. Which means that for most people, it’s time to realize just how much we give to Uncle Sam every year. For some, the prospect of a refund provides a glimmer of hope that some new money is coming in soon to pay off debts.

Just a quick little note on your tax dollars before we get into the meat of this post: it is actually better to owe just a little bit of money after filing because that means that you have used more of our your own money throughout the year instead of giving it all to the government. Sure, a nice windfall come April is a nice thing. But keep in mind that it’s your money—you’re just getting it later. And, when it comes to investing, “money now” is always better than “money later.”

Because it’s tax season, we thought it important to discuss how taxes and personal bankruptcy can relate to one another. It is possible to use bankruptcy as a way to get rid of large, outstanding tax obligations but it’s not as easy as discharging a few grand in credit card debt.

Chapter 13 bankruptcy in most cases requires you to pay back what’s owed within your monthly payment plan and Chapter 7 rarely allows for the complete expulsion of your tax debts. (If you’re not sure of the differences between Chapters 13 and 7, simply do a search on our blog for each.)

There are, however, some precedents set for removing tax obligations as part of a bankruptcy. Although we encourage you to understand that it is a complicated process and the results are not always what you may be hoping for.

(Understand this post is only scratching the surface. Only in person can we provide a full breakdown of taxes and bankruptcy.)

One reason tax debt and bankruptcy tend to get tangled is that past due taxes can fall into all three categories of debt type: Dischargeable, Nondischargebale priority debts, and Nondischargeable priority debts.

Provided you filed your taxes on time, legally and provide no evidence of tax evasion other than legitimately being unable to pay, you can discharge tax debt in Chapter 7 and 13. Still, what’s owed must be more than three years late and assessed more than 240 days before you file. That means that you were officially declared late and in debt that many days before you filed. This ensures the IRS that you are not declaring just to get rid of a recent tax debt.

BUT (you knew there was one), that 240 day window starts only after the last extension expires, not when the original debt was assessed. Other impediments to that three year time-frame include a 90-day addition if a previous bankruptcy case of yours was still open while you were assessed the tax debt; the addition of any time the IRS was prevented from collecting as a result of a court ordered due process hearing plus an additional 90 days; and any time that a debt assistance professional formally asked the IRS to temporarily halt collection efforts.

Basically, any effort you make to delay the collection of tax debt, even if perfectly legal, counts against your ability to discharge tax debt in a bankruptcy.

The key to bankruptcy and taxes, like all things in life really, is to be completely honest and upfront. Any attempt to hide or even coyly plead ignorance will be considered an attempt to obscure or defraud the court and even worse, the IRS. Not being able to pay your taxes, especially after a mid-year job loss, is a common thing. Don’t make it worse.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 8:41 am

Part of understanding bankruptcy is knowing who the professionals are that you will meet and deal with along the way. From your attorney to even your creditors, it helps provide a solid foundation of comfort to actually understand the role of those who are playing a role in your financial future.

One of those individuals is the case Trustee, the most prominent member of the bankruptcy process. And, the involvement you have with the case trustee depends on which chapter of bankruptcy you are filing.

As you may know, the 2 main “chapters” are 7 and 13. Well over 95% of all bankruptcy cases filed are filed under Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.

Let’s start by talking about the Chapter 7 trustee.

In every district in the country, there are 1 or more attorneys who have been appointed to act as a Chapter 7 Trustee. These Trustees are also sometimes called panel Trustees. When you file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, one of these panel Trustees is assigned to your case.

The best way to think of this person is as an intermediary between you and the Court, an attorney whose job it is to make sure you have told the truth, the truth and nothing but the truth, to make sure that you have disclosed everything you are legally obligated to disclose, and to find and sell any ‘assets above exemptions’.

Fortunately, in our experience, in about 98% of Chapter 7 cases filed, there are no ‘assets above exemptions’ to sell. What does this mean for you? Just that if you file Chapter 7, there is very little chance you will lose any property you don’t want to lose.

As long as you have told the truth, disclosed everything, cooperate, and have no assets that cannot be protected by available ‘exemptions’, your contact with the Trustee should be a positive one.

However, the best approach is to assume that the Trustee assigned to your case is not your friend, so that you stay cautious and alert.

In most cases, you are first introduced to the trustee at your 341 meeting, also known as the “Meeting of Creditors”. Technically speaking, this meeting is held to provide your creditor an opportunity (in most cases, one last opportunity) to ask you questions. However, most of the time, none of the creditors show up, and then, it’s just you, your attorney and the Trustee. At this meeting the Trustee will ask you questions necessary to get to know you and your case better and necessary for the Trustee to carry out his or her duties. (There a number of posts here on the blog about this meeting. Take a look.)

Let’s say you are unlucky enough that your case falls in the approximately 2% of cases with more assets than can be protected. In this case, it is important that you understand that it is the Trustee’s duty to sell or dispose of those assets ‘above exemptions’, and to then distribute the proceeds to your creditors. Basically, anything not considered exempt property must be seized and sold by the trustee.

The type and amount of exemptions are, for the most part, set by the law of the State where you live. There are exceptions. Being set by State law, exemptions vary greatly. However, since in 98% of bankruptcy cases filed, there are no assets not covered by available exemptions, the exemptions statutes are, for the most part, fairly generous. However, make no assumptions in this regard. Always, always seek the help of an experienced, full time bankruptcy attorney. Such an attorney will be an expert in what exemptions are available in your State and how best to apply them. Such an attorney will also be able to tell you what is not protected.

The Chapter 7 Trustee is also responsible for tracking down any gifts you made just before filing, whether or not they were made in an attempt to hide assets or not. For example, if your nephew got a few thousand from you for his birthday the week before you filed bankruptcy, rest assured that your Trustee will be looking to get this money back. And, it’s not even safe to pay back relatives or friends prior to filing. These people are generally considered “insiders”, and, subject to certain exceptions, paying back insiders during the 12 months before filing bankruptcy is a “no no”, which will result in your Trustee being forced to try to get the money back.

Chapter 7 trustees are paid by a commission based on the amount of money they recover, so it stands to reason they’ll work hard to find and sell what property they can.

Now, let’s talk about Chapter 13.

The Chapter 13 Trustee, aka the Standing Trustee, is also first introduced to you at the 341 meeting. However, their role is more about ensuring your income is sufficient to pay your monthly Chapter 13 plan payment and that your proposed Chapter 13 plan is properly calculated. Assuming all goes well, it is then this Trustee’s job to collect from you your plan payment and to distribute it to your creditors.

Like the Panel Trustee, the Standing Trustee is paid a commission. However, unlike a Chapter 7 Trustee, the Chapter 13 Trustee gets his commission not from what he takes and sells, but rather out of the money you send in each month. Chapter 13 Trustees do not sell things. That’s just not his job.

The best way to think of your Chapter 13 Trustee is as the Chief Financial Officer in charge of your Chapter 13 plan. He runs the business of your Chapter 13 case. He figures out what is needed, and then accounts for and distributes the money you send in each month.

Your relationship with your Chapter 13 Trustee will be vastly different than the one you would have with a Chapter 7 Trustee. Chapter 7 Trustees live, for lack of a better way of saying it, for what they can “kill and eat”. Chapter 13 Trustee do not. Chapter 13 Trustees live off a percentage of what you send in each month. The Chapter 13 Trustee only succeeds in getting paid, if you succeed in making your payments. Therefore, as a general rule, Chapter 13 Trustees, at least those who recognize, so to speak, which “side their bread is buttered”, will go everything in their power to help you make a go of it in Chapter 13.

In most cases, as long as you make your required Chapter 13 plan payment, you can think of the Chapter 13 Trustee as more of a friend than adversary. He or she still has to do the job, but doing the job includes doing the best that can be done to make sure you do yours and that you get the full benefit of bankruptcy, all the way to the desired “discharge”.

If all of this is confusing and scary, we understand. Bankruptcy law is complicated and complex, to say the least. Need an expert? In North Carolina, there are many, good, experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

One is the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, serving 30 counties in middle and eastern North Carolina. John Orcutt offers a Free initial consultation at 4 different locations: Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson. Call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 or visit his website for tons of info on bankruptcy: www.billsbillsb.com .

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, January 24, 2010 @ 8:18 am

Brent T. White, a law professor at the University of Arizona, has a provocative new study out, “Underwater and Not Walking Away.” He points out that as many as 32 percent of all homeowners are ‘underwater’ on their mortgages – they owe more money than their houses are worth. The media has produced a series of articles decrying homeowners who simply stop paying on these ‘upside down’ mortgages as irresponsible and even obscene. In fact, White notes, less than three percent of people whose primary residences are foreclosed on are people who could have continued to pay their mortgages. There are no discernible difference in foreclosure rates in places where housing prices have dropped steeply. Rather, foreclosure rates closely track unemployment rates, suggesting that it’s generally people who lose their jobs and are no longer able to pay their mortgages who lose their homes to foreclosure.

This is true even when it would make more financial sense for people to walk away. Nationwide, housing prices have dropped 30 percent since their peak in 2006; in some cities, drops have been much steeper. Parts of California, for example, have seen drops of 65%. The result is that many people could pay rent on a new house at only a fraction of their monthly mortgage. Homeowners in this situation could save tens of thousands of dollars by walking away. So why don’t more of them do so?

Emotions of fear, guilt and shame come together to encourage people to act against their own self-interests, White argues. There’s a concerted message being put out not only by the banking industry, but also by the government, the media and even non profit consumer counseling agencies that ‘good people’ live up to their responsibilities and don’t walk away from their obligations. That message is allowing the banking industry to shift not only the responsibility, but also the consequences, of the housing crisis entirely onto the shoulders of homeowners.

Certainly there are some negative consequences to society of walking away – foreclosures tend to cluster in neighborhoods, and neighborhoods with a large number of foreclosed homes often become run down and dangerous. But what about the consequences to society of staying and struggling to pay these huge mortgages? Doesn’t that empower a banking industry that made poor decisions and led the economy into this trap?

White points out that in a stable housing market, a house should be about 15 to 16 times the price of a year’s worth of rent. In some markets, the average mortgage being written was 38 times the price of a year’s rent. Shouldn’t the bankers, experts in housing prices, be held to some account for writing these kinds of mortgages and letting housing prices get out of control?

The guilt, shame and fear that White writes about seems to apply only to consumers. We see this echoed in the way people think about credit card debt and bankruptcy. When consumers are unable to pay their debts, they are somehow shirking their responsibilities; when banks can’t pay what they owe, they find themselves ‘undercapitalized.’

This isn’t to say that financial irresponsibility should be more acceptable. However, maybe we need to rethink the way we hold consumers to a higher moral standard than lenders, and instead force the same financial accountability on all parties.

If you’re considering letting your house go, protect yourself from deficiency liability by filing for bankruptcy. For more information, visit our website www.billsbills.com and call to set up your free initial debt consultation. Serving North Carolina families since 1995, the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 21, 2010 @ 11:50 am

The latest chapter in the Obama administration’s attempts to make lenders modify mortgages is to send SWAT teams – no, I’m not kidding, really, SWAT teams – into the call centers of major lenders to try to ensure that they follow the proper procedures and actually modify loans. Seriously, wouldn’t it be a whole lot easier just to pass cramdown and allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages than to try to sweet talk, bribe or otherwise convince bankers to do it on their own?

Because they’re not. Making Homes Affordable, the program implemented by the government last May, is designed to encourage banks to modify the loans of homeowners who are having trouble making mortgage payments. Mortgage companies are reluctant to do that, however: they make more money in interest and fees when a mortgage goes into foreclosure, than they make from the government when they successfully modify it. The government had hoped to have 3-4 million mortgages modified by the end of last year. As of mid December, the count was at 750,000 – the vast majority of those were still in the trial stages.

The news reports of lenders dragging their feet are backed up with anecdotal evidence from homeowners, who report that they call the lenders over and over, file and refile the same documents, and then call back, only to be told that no one knows anything about their case. Lenders counter that people don’t send them the requested documents. Really? Desperate homeowner, one last shot at keeping their home, and they can’t be bothered to fax some papers? The lender argument is a little hard to believe.

Hence, the SWAT teams. These are teams of three people, sent into the call centers of the seven largest loan servicers to make sure that the bank representatives are giving accurate information, filing forms properly, etc. Experts are not impressed – many say the initiative is unlikely to work. Some have called for putting permanent government observers in the call centers. They note that private insurers already have their people inside the call center, to help prevent the loans they’ve insured from going into foreclosure.

Unfortunately, neither temporary nor permanent government observers in the call centers seems likely to work. This is another initiative – like the ‘foreclosure hall of shame’ that was supposed to embarrass the lenders into modifying loans – that the banks will evade and ignore until the administration acknowledges it isn’t working and moves on to something else. The fact is, lenders aren’t going to modify substantial numbers of mortgages until they are forced to. Unless an initiative like cramdown is passed, which takes the decision to modify or not and how much out of the bank’s hands and gives it to a neutral party, foreclosures will continue to rise.

Fortunately, homeowners finding it difficult to pay their mortgage may have another option to save their home: bankruptcy. Your bankruptcy attorney will return your phone calls, keep your files organized, and not make you fax documents four or five times. In addition, he or she will help you map out a plan that will lead you to financial freedom. The Obama administration may sincerely want to help homeowners. But as long as they expect bankers to do it out of the kindness of their hearts, you’re probable better off filing for bankruptcy.

Brought to you by the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Providing North Carolina homeowners real foreclosure relief since 1995. Is your lender not working with you? Call today and find out how a bankruptcy can save your home. 1-800-899-1414. Convenient offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville, and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 19, 2010 @ 2:48 am

The holidays are now officially over. The New Year has begun in earnest. And ‘tis the season for tax time. If you believe you’re bankruptcy bound in 2010, that definitely means it’s also time to get your 2009 returns in order.

Thinking About Chapter 13 Bankruptcy?

Chapter 13 bankruptcy helps restructure your debt into a more manageable payment plan—allowing you to pay back what you owe over time, often at a percentage of the cost. If you’re considering this type of bankruptcy, it’s important to remember that tax returns should be provided in Chapter 13 cases.  You must file all tax returns for all tax years – including returns for 2009.  Bankruptcy Code Section 1308 provides:

(a) Not later than the day before the date on which the meeting of the creditors is first scheduled to be held under section 341(a), if the debtor was required to file a tax return under applicable non-bankruptcy law, the debtor shall file with appropriate tax authorities all tax returns for all taxable periods ending during the 4-year period ending on the date of the filing of the petition.

(b) (1) Subject to paragraph (2), if the tax returns required by subsection (a) have not been filed by the date on which the meeting of creditors is first scheduled to be held under section 341(a), the trustee may hold open that meeting for a reasonable period of time to allow the debtor an additional period of time to file any unfiled returns, but such additional period of time shall not extend beyond–

(A) for any return that is past due as of the date of the filing of the petition, the date that is 120 days after the date of that meeting; or

(B) for any return that is not past due as of the date of the filing of the petition, the later of–

(i) the date that is 120 days after the date of that meeting; or

(ii) the date on which the return is due under the last automatic extension of time for filing that return to which the debtor is entitled, and for which request is timely made, in accordance with applicable nonbankruptcy law.

In plain English, this verbose section of the Bankruptcy Code means that if you’re a Chapter 13 filer, you must file your tax returns before the creditor’s meeting to assess your ability to repay your debts.  If you have yet to file, your bankruptcy trustee (appointed to evaluate the case and serve as an agent for collecting your payments and making distributions to your creditors), may continue the meeting until it is filed, up to 120 days.  After this 120-day window, your case can be dismissed.  As such, it’s best to be proactive, avoiding any reliance on an extension.

What About Chapter 7?

If you’re considering filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in order to dispense all of your unsecured debts, the tax implications are a bit different.  In this case (as in a Chapter 13 case), it is vital to alert your bankruptcy attorney if you expect that you will owe taxes pending the filing of your 2009 return.

On the other hand, if you expect a refund, like the majority of Americans, based on where you live and other considerations, this financial return (or a portion of it) may be considered an asset of the bankruptcy estate, and, as such, will only be protected to the extent you can protect it with state exemptions (up to $10,000.00 for a married couple in North Carolina).

If you’re considering bankruptcy in 2010 and are concerned about the tax implications, including when to file, whether you can keep your tax refund, and any other factors in your personal circumstances that might require consideration, it’s important to speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney who can competently guide you on the right path to the best result.

The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 18, 2010 @ 6:43 pm

Is there any way to lower your car payments in bankruptcy? The answer, which may surprise you, is maybe. While Congress recently rejected attempts to pass a law that would allow bankruptcy judges to ‘cramdown’ mortgages, there do exist some limited possibilities for revising auto loans.

Basically, debtors who owe more than their car is worth – and who doesn’t, especially if you bought it new? – may be eligible to eliminate the portion of the debt that exceeds the value. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the debt would be divided into ’secured’ debt (the value of the car) and ‘unsecured’ debt (the excess money on the loan), and the car loan would be revised to repay only the secured portion.

However, this option is generally only available for people whose car loans originated more than 910 days before they declared bankruptcy. Some courts have allowed, in limited form, for the portion of a car loan that was ‘rolled over’ from a previous car loan, to be treated as unsecured debt even in a more recently originated loan. However, note that a recent decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit – whose jurisdiction includes North Carolina – has determined that this portion of a car loan is included as secured.

On the other hand, some attorneys report that some lenders are willing to renegotiate the loan, even if it originated in the last 910 days. While the law doesn’t require them to renegotiate, it doesn’t prevent them from doing so either. It’s at least worth asking, before you take up your other options.

If your loan originated less than 910 days ago, and your lender refuses to renegotiate, what are your other options as you go through bankruptcy? You can simply surrender the car. Lenders don’t like this option, but if you’re filing bankruptcy, they have no choice. They will take back the car and then sell it at auction. The difference between what you owe and what they sell it for will be entered against you as a deficiency balance. However, even in a Chapter 13, there is little chance the creditor will receive any return on its deficiency balance.

You can also reaffirm the loan. In this case, you agree to continue making the payments on the car even after you file for bankruptcy. Note carefully, though, if you choose this option and then default on the loan, you will be responsible for the deficiency balance, and the lender can sue you for it. Reaffirming your car loan has some advantages though: you get to keep your car, which means you don’t have to look for a new car loan with a recent bankruptcy on your record. Making these payments on time is also a good way to rebuild your credit – just make sure the lender is reporting them to the credit agencies.

As always, remember that the best way to negotiate this maze is with the help of a good bankruptcy attorney.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 8, 2010 @ 8:34 am

Bankruptcy should not be an embarrassing process. It’s bad enough the credit industry has surrounded it with negative stereotypes to make people believe it’s a life-altering decision.

However, for a number of people in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, filing Chapter 13 has become a series of perpetual embarrassments and ceaseless frustration as a result of a healthcare provider making public the medical conditions of patients who have filed for protection when their bills became too much to manage.

A 53-year-old college admissions employee filed Chapter 13 in an effort to clean up a difficult financial period of her life. Susan Dandridge understood that a good deal of private financial information will become public record. However, she did not count on an extensive list of her personal medical conditions being included in the claims filed by Aurora Health Care, a regional medical center to which she became indebted.

When she found out her privacy had been violated, she pursued legal action. In turn, a class action lawsuit was filed as it was revealed that Aurora had done the same thing with other patients’ billing records when submitting bankruptcy information.

This very compelling case not only brings to light once more the role medical bills play in the nation’s personal bankruptcy rate but also introduces the question about what medical information, considered private under HIPPAA laws, can be revealed during the bankruptcy process.

HIPPAA, or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, requires strict public protection of an individual’s health history by the entities that handle it, such as insurance companies and hospitals. Essentially, it is in place to protect citizens when medical information is transferred between health care providers or when people switch insurance companies. It is a private entity’s responsibility to protect your medical past.

Unfortunately, in Ms. Dandridge’s case, medical information became very public. Although those specific records have since been sealed, her suit contends they were available for months prior to her realizing they had been exposed. The suit also claims Aurora intentionally disclosed the records because of her inability to pay. Thus, her medical privacy was egregiously violated and, according to the lawsuit, the organization’s actions left her open to medical identity theft.

The lawsuit contends that Aurora could have filed summary information as a way to protect the consumers’ medical background while still adhering to state and federal medical privacy laws. However, the Wisconsin Hospital Association has jumped into the mix, stating that Dandridge’s attorney misinterpreted the law and that such information can be revealed in matters of billing and collections.

The realization that the information was made public came after a separate trustee in a Chapter 7 case noticed the amount of detail in Aurora’s claims and initiated legal action that eventually ended in a settlement. From there, the issue spiraled throughout the community and to those who had financial issues with the organization.

It does not matter whether or not anyone found or used for ill will the medical information revealed in the claims. The mere exposure of them is enough to constitute harm, according to Dandrige’s attorney. He also argues that now that the information is “out there” it is subject to additional exposure by third party companies who scan and archive court records.

It is the hope of Ms. Dandridge and the other class members that the practice of including conditions and reason for treatment in the collections and bankruptcy process be halted on a national level.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, January 6, 2010 @ 8:20 pm

Throughout the Chapter 12 Bankruptcy series we’ve explored how bankruptcy bound family farmers and fishermen can reap the many rewards and special rights provided by a Chapter 12 filing. This series included an introduction to the concept of Chapter 12, along with additional benefits drifting from this protection; a detailed look at how this process works for farming and fishing families; and what you can expect at a Chapter 12 hearing—from the earliest bankruptcy petition to the negotiated repayment plan. In the conclusion of this four-part series, we share the specifics behind, and results of, this type of bankruptcy discharge, along with an understanding of Chapter 12 debt relief exemptions, and the ins and outs behind what is known as the Chapter 12 “hardship discharge.”

Under Chapter 12 bankruptcy laws, if you were initially defined under the Bankruptcy Code as a family farmer or fisherman at filing, you can receive a debt discharge after completing all necessary payments under your court-sanctioned Chapter 12 repayment plan. In some cases, in order to ensure this discharge, you must also certify that all domestic support obligations due prior to making this certification have been paid.

The effect of the Chapter 12 bankruptcy discharge involves releasing you from all debts provided for by the repayment plan, with a few exceptions. This means that your farm or fishery’s financial slate is clean, and any creditors  (whether priority, secured, or unsecured), who were provided for in full or in part under your repayment plan may no longer start or continue any legal action against you to collect any discharged debt obligations.

There are a few exceptions to the Chapter 12 bankruptcy discharge. According to the Bankruptcy Code, certain categories of debts not discharged in Chapter 12 proceedings include: “debts stemming from domestic support such as alimony and child support; money obtained through filing false financial statements; debts for willful and malicious injury to person or property; debts from fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, embezzlement or larceny, and any debts for death or personal injury caused by the debtor’s operation of a motor vehicle while the debtor was intoxicated.”

Your Chapter 12 plan usually lasts three to five years and normally provides for full repayment of all priority claims. Any debts that are not discharged will need to be paid in full under your individual repayment plan. Because an added benefit of Chapter 12 bankruptcy is that payments to secured creditors can sometimes continue longer than the three-to-five-year period plan, these debts are therefore not discharged until fully paid.

Another benefit of Chapter 12 bankruptcy is the “hardship discharge.” The court may grant you a “hardship discharge” even if you’ve failed to complete all of the payments under your repayment plan. This type of discharge is available when your failure to complete payments under your individual repayment plan is due to circumstances beyond the debtor’s control and through no fault of the debtor, such as injury or illness that prevents you from keeping an income. In some cases, the Chapter 12 hardship discharge falls under many of the rules and limitations applied in Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases.

During the complex Chapter 12 process, primarily used to bail out working families who are, in this savage economy, beleaguered and bankruptcy bound, it’s always helpful to seek the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy lawyer. While the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt do not file for Chapter 12 relief, we will evaluate your unique financial situation and refer you to a Chapter 12 bankruptcy expert if needed. Call today to set up your free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 4, 2010 @ 12:08 pm

In states like North Carolina—composed largely of rural areas dotted with farmland and abutting the ripe fishing grounds of the Atlantic—Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be exceptionally helpful to working farming and fishing families who might otherwise be bankruptcy bound.

In part one of the four-part series, entitled Chapter 12 Bankruptcy, we introduced the concept of Chapter 12, provided a brief overview of the special rights related to this protection, and shared who (or in some cases, “what”) qualifies as a family farm or family fisherman under the Bankruptcy Code. In this section, we’ll discuss how a Chapter 12 bankruptcy works, from initial petition filing to debt repayment planning.

If you qualify under the Bankruptcy Code’s broad definitions of a “family fisherman” or “family farmer,” a Chapter 12 case begins by filing a petition with the bankruptcy court where you live or the location of the “principal place of business” for your corporation or partnership. A qualifying husband and wife “family farmer” or “commercial family fisherman” may file. Unless the court orders otherwise, the petition includes a statement of your assets and liabilities; current income and expenditures; current business contracts and leases; and a general statement of your financial affairs.  In order to satisfy all of these petition requirements, you’ll need to gather a list of all creditors and the amounts and nature of their claims; the source, amount, and frequency of your income; a list of all of your property; and a detailed list of your monthly farming/fishing expenses, as well as living expenses, including food, shelter, utilities, transportation, feed, fertilizer, etc. In order to completely evaluate your household’s financial position, married individuals must gather this information for each spouse regardless of whether they are filing a joint petition, separate individual petitions, or even if only one spouse is filing.

Upon filing for Chapter 12, you must pay a filing fee and a miscellaneous administrative fee with the clerk of court. With the court’s permission, and with specific deadlines, these fees may be paid in installments. Failure to pay these fees may result in dismissal of your case.

Filing the petition under Chapter 12 provides an automatic stay that stops most collection actions against you or your property. Under the automatic stay protection (a protection that exists under all forms of bankruptcy), any creditors—public or private—are not allowed to call you or send you collection letters. During the proceeding, they cannot continue any legal action against you, foreclose on your home, or repossess your car and other assets. And–even if a garnishment order has been issued–the automatic stay stops garnishment of your wages. Additionally, a Chapter 12 filing has the added benefit of protecting co-debtors (those liable with the debtor) from eager creditors seeking collection of consumer debts incurred by a personal, family, or household purpose.

When you file for Chapter 12 bankruptcy, an impartial trustee is appointed to evaluate the case and serve as an agent, for collecting your payments and making distributions to your creditors. Following your filing, the Chapter 12 trustee will hold a “meeting of creditors” at which you will discuss your financial affairs and the proposed terms of your repayment plan. From this meeting, parties typically resolve problems and repayment schedules. Afterwards, you, your trustee, and interested creditors attend a hearing confirming your personal Chapter 12 repayment plan.

Whether your bankruptcy is simple or complex, you’ll need an expert attorney to navigate the waters. Contact the experienced attorneys at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Please note that while the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt does not file under Chapter 12, our office can evaluate your personal financial situation and refer your case to an experienced Chapter 12 practitioner if needed. Call us today: 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 1, 2010 @ 5:20 pm

When many people think about bankruptcy, what normally comes to mind is what is represented in Chapters 7 and 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. In Chapter 7, you can discharge all of your debts and, in return, may lose non-exempt assets. Under Chapter 13, you may hold on to your assets, such as their home, but devote income in the near future to repaying your outstanding debts. Under both forms of bankruptcy, there are limitations to what you can do to modify your debts.

However, in states like North Carolina—composed largely of rural areas dotted with thousands of acres of farmland and abutting the ripe fishing grounds of the Atlantic—the lesser known Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be exceptionally helpful to working families who might otherwise be bankruptcy bound. Under the Bankruptcy Code, these protected groups have special rights, not found in the more common areas of Bankruptcy law.

In the special four-part series, entitled “Chapter 12 Bankruptcy,” we’ll introduce the concept of Chapter 12 along with the special rights related to this protection, as well as examine specifically how this process works for farming and fishing families, what you can expect at a Chapter 12 hearing, and the results of this type of bankruptcy discharge.

As mentioned, family farmers and family fishermen have special rights within the safe harbors of the Bankruptcy Code. For instance, a Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be attractive to qualifying parties, because, under this type of protection, creditors cannot file an involuntary bankruptcy petition against a family farmer or fisherman to recover even some of their money.  Additionally, under a Chapter 12 case the debtor is allowed to modify the mortgage lien on a farmer’s home or fisherman’s residence, important to not only stop foreclosure but also modify the terms of the loan.

But, first and foremost, it’s important to understand who (or what) constitutes a family farmer or fisherman.

According to the Bankruptcy Code, a family farmer is:

• a person or married couple (or, in some cases a corporation owned or controlled by a single family) engaged in a farming operation with debts not more than $3,237,000;
• no less than half of these debts (except for the residence) come from the farming operation for either the current year or each of the past two years; and
• the family farmer must be involved in “farm operations” which is a rather broad term. To be eligible for chapter 12, the family farmer must have a regular income, sufficiently stable to be able to make regular monthly payments during the term of the Chapter 12 plan.

Similarly, a family fisherman is:

• a person or married couple (or in some cases) a corporation owned or controlled by a single family) engaged in a commercial fishing operation with debts not more than $1,642,500;
• at least 8% of these debts (except for the residence) stem from the fishing operation for either the current year or each of the past two years; and
• the commercial fisherman must be involved in “commercial fishing operations,” also a broad term. To be eligible for chapter 12, the family fisherman must have a regular income sufficiently stable to be able to make regular monthly payments during the term of the bankruptcy plan.

While North Carolina has many urban areas, plenty of family farms and fisheries still exist throughout the state.  If you are struggling with mounting debts, and believe that bankruptcy may be your lifeline, visit the experienced attorneys of The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt online.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 1, 2010 @ 3:07 pm

To supposedly keep bankruptcy filings from getting out of hand the federal government passed the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, more commonly known as the Bankruptcy Abuse Reform Act (or BARF). BARF was supposed to help keep people that truly do not need to, from filing?

Unfortunately, BARF was passed upon the assumption that a lot of people were abusing the bankruptcy system. It was only more unfortunate that this assumption was thereafter proved to be totally incorrect.

Fortunately, BARF, as written, although adding lots of ‘red tape’ to the system, did not, for the most part, make unobtainable the kind of help that only filing bankruptcy can provide…given proper planning “pre-filing”.

BARF did erect substantial obstacles to filing, and these must be dealt with.

The biggest obstacle arose from the implementation of what is known as the “Means Test”. The idea was to filter out those people who would want to file bankruptcy, but who could really afford to keep paying.

As it turns out, most of the people who need to file really can’t afford to keep paying. Still, however, the Means Test does remain a substantial obstacle to filing. And to make things worse, this test is extremely complicated to understand and absolutely full of landmines for the unaware.

For example, a high income in the last 6 months could make it too expensive to file, especially if you don’t even have that income anymore. In this case, waiting to file for a number of months could be critical.

And, that’s where a good bankruptcy attorney comes in.

There are many ways to work around this ill-conceived test, but only a seasoned bankruptcy will know what they are and how to successfully apply them.

If you are thinking of trying to circumvent the Means Test on your own, beware. Even mediocre bankruptcy attorneys screw this up, and tactics gone too far will either make it impossible to file or leave you with a bankruptcy plan payment you cannot afford, or worse, result in your case getting dismissed out of court.

If you believe you need to file bankruptcy, you most definitely want to be in the hands of a good bankruptcy attorney. A good bankruptcy attorney will know what to do, but also how far is too far.

If you want a bomb defused, you want an expert at defusing bombs. It’s exactly the same in terms of defusing the “Means Test”. You want an expert. Your financial life is riding on it.

The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt give you access to 7 good bankruptcy attorneys, with an 8th in training.

Need to make sure you get the help you need. Attorney John Orcutt offers a totally FREE initial consultation, and has offices located in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson, North Carolina.

Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 during normal business hours, or visit their website at www.billsbills.com

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 29, 2009 @ 6:52 pm

Have the credit card companies ‘jacked-up’ your rates, doubling your payments?

And really stuck it to you and your family?

Now, you’re screwed for sure…right?

Where is the money gonna come from to make double payments?

You can’t just ask your boss for a raise because you need more money…can you?. So, you have to try to pay with what you have.

The problem is that every dollar you pay is a dollar you steal from your family.

And…to make things worse…

Have they lowered your credit limits, putting you “over limit” for no fault of your own, so now they can soak you for outrageous “over the limit” fees?

And, these are on top of the already outrageous “late payment” fees.

All tactics designed to gouge out of you as much money as possible.

What’s fair or right about that?

And…adding insult to injury…have they changed your credit card from a “fixed rate” to an “adjustable rate”?

That’s not right.

What they did might be legal under the law, but just because something’s legal, don’t make it right or fair.

Just because you can…doesn’t mean you should.

But they did it anyway. It’s like the banks are telling you “Screw you. We want more money. So just pay it and shut up.”

Angry? You should be. Real angry?

The only good news is that you are not alone. They have done it to millions, if not tens of millions, of good, hard working Americans.

The only question is “What are you gonna do about it?”

Want to know why they did this to you?

The answer is simple.

Greed….to make as much money off the back of you and your family as they can…while they can.

Congress passed a new Credit Card Reform Bill of 2009. This bill was intended…so they say…to ‘rein in’ the credit card companies, that is, the big banks who issue credit cards to tens of millions of Americans.

For decades, the big banks had been suckering us Americans with the lure of easy credit, full well knowing that we would get in debt and stay there…good news for banks who live off of interest and fees, and all the more so as they more and more jacked up the interest rates, shortened the grace periods, and made a fortune charging higher and higher extortion-level “over limit” and “late payment” fees.

And, everything was working just fine…like the banks planned…until they completely screwed up the financial market and forced Congress to spend our money on huge “bailouts”.

All of a sudden, the banks were in trouble and some Congressmen saw this as a one-time opportunity to try to clamp down on the nasty credit card tactics, a chance to put a stop to some of the now well-known and abusive credit card company shenanigans. As a result, a credit card reform bill was passed and signed into law.

On its face, the credit card reform bill looked great. For example, there are provisions to make it illegal to change your interest rate on existing balances.

Sounds good…right? Wrong!

Long before the bill ever went to the President for signature, it was stuffed full of holes…err ‘loopholes’.

The biggest loophole lies in the fact that the bill does not even go into effect until 2/22/10. This delay provided the big banks more than enough time to do all sorts of things to sidestep the new bill, to protect themselves and to make even more money. In effect, the big banks have turned the credit card reform bill into nothing but a big joke.

One of the things they did was…across the board…to jack up everybody’s interest rates.

How did this happen?

What went wrong? What happened to the credit card reform bill? How did it get full of holes in favor of the big banks it was meant to rein in?

Easy. The banks were able to exert enough influence to get a number of key provisions taken out of the bill and others changed, including the date when the bill would go into effect…2/22/10.

Are you surprised? Don’t be.

The truth is that the big banks have been in control of this country since the Constitutional Convention, when America first became America. They were in control, they are still in control, and they will always be in control. And, being in control, they are, in effect, also in control of Congress.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of Congressmen need bank contributions (read “money”) to pay for election campaigns. But there’s a price to pay for this money. And, that’s where the golden rule comes in: The banks are the guys with the gold and the guys with the gold get to make the rules. The banks have the money the Congressmen need.

And, just to make sure they are heard, big banks spend a ton of money on lobbyists to try to bully some Congressmen, and brainwash others. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the influence that banks have over Congress.

The price to pay is that the banks get to help write the rules (read “new laws”)…or in this case…the credit card reform bill.

At the same time, this time around, the big banks knew they had screwed up the entire financial market, and so much so that it forced Congress to spend OUR money to bail them out. But, they also knew that the bailouts were not popular at all with the voting public. And they knew that most Congressmen would be feeling the heat from the bailouts and that, as a result, these Congressmen would be feeling the need to at least put up a showing that the banks were being punished. Not doing so, the big banks knew, these Congressmen would suffer the wrath of the public in the next election.

So…the big banks knew…something had to give, that there would be a price to pay for the bailouts, and part of the price came in terms of the new credit card reform bill.

Or so it would appear to the public. Unfortunately, appearances don’t necessarily reflect reality, and that is exactly what happened to the credit card reform bill.

Even with all the problems the banks had caused to our economy, the big banks still, in effect, had massive amounts of influence over Congress. And, controlling Congress meant that the big banks could get things changed in the proposed credit card reform bill. And, so it came to pass, and the banks got most, if not all, of what they wanted, a bill so watered down with loopholes that it was, in effect, turned into nothing but a joke on the public.

Basically, as it turns out, the new credit card reform bill is just another SCAM by the big banks.

In effect, a lot of the current credit card reform bill was written by the same big banks it was meant to rein in.

Congressmen and the banks both got what they wanted. Congress got to look like it did something to punish the banks, and the banks got a bill that they would work around.

Depressing? Disappointing? Frustrating? I agree.

With the major provisions of the bill delayed until 2/22/10, the big banks got busy changing things necessary to completely sidestep the bill.

And, that’s were the rate hikes, lower credit limits and adjustable rate credit cards come in.

The banks knew that, under the new law, they wouldn’t be allowed to so easily change things in the future regarding credit cards. But, nothing in the bill kept them from doing it now, before 2/22/10, and being the big banks they are, that is exactly what they did…to you and to me.

First, they jacked up your credit card interest rates. Then, they lowered your credit limits, and then, they did other things like changing your credit card contract from “fixed rate” to “adjustable rate”.

The net effect: Passage of the credit card reform bill, instead of helping you, actually hurt you…and hurt you bad.

The upshot was that millions of good, hard working Americans, just like you, quickly received notices jacking up their rates, lowering their credit limits and changing their credit card contracts from “fixed” to “adjustable rates”.

The real bottom line is that if you were just staying afloat before…and just making ends meet…now you were screwed.

Who can have their payments doubled and survive?

What always gets me though….is why so many Americans just sit there and take it?

I am always asking myself: “Why are people not more pissed off? Why isn’t everybody angry at the banks?”

Is it because people feel helpless against the giant bank? I can understand that. Most of us aren’t bankers and we don’t know what to do or if there is anything we can do.

Is it because what the banks are doing is allowed under the contract you signed with them? I don’t know if you have ever looked closely at a credit card agreement, but it you have, you know that it is long and complicated and full of good stuff to let the banks do just about anything it wants to pull the rug right out from under us.

Is it because the things the banks are doing to us aren’t illegal? I would hope not because where I come from, just because you can get away with it, don’t mean it’s right. And, there ain’t nothing ‘right’ about jacking up interest rates, doubling payments, and screwing families.

Or is it because, as Americans, we have gotten so far removed from having to fight for our rights, so tame and domesticated that we don’t even have any fight in us? Instead, like the tame and domesticated farm animals we have become, we depend on a Congress and our President to fix things and protect us. How is that working out for you and your family? As Americans, we hafe been like cows being lead to slaughter.

This has got to stop!

Whatever the reason is, what the banks have done is NOT RIGHT, and the bottom line is this:

What are you going to do about it?

If you answer is “nothing”, you can stop reading right here, right now.

But, if you are as pissed off as I am, and have had enough, and need to make sure your family survives no matter how bad things get (and things will get worse before they get better), and want to fight back,….read on.

The truth is that with hiked rates and doubled payments, many of us will either have to do something or see our families suffer and submerge.

Let’s face it. We only have so many dollars and every dollar we send to the credit card companies is a dollar we can’t spend on our families, and which comes right out of the mouth of our kids.

I don’t know about you, but that is not what I intend for my family…and it just pisses me off.

How about you?

As it is, our grandchildren’s, grandchildren will still be paying for the bank “bailouts” forced on us by Congress, and now… to make things worse… the banks are throwing salt in our wounds by jacking up rates and screwing with us.

I don’t now about you, but I sure as hell don’t intend to just sick back and take it in the face when the credit card companies treat me this way, whether what they are doing is legal or not.

And, to make it worse, the banks aren’t even honest with us. Instead of telling us the truth, they trump up this and that to justify screwing us. And even when we didn’t do anything wrong, they make up stuff, for example, referring to defaults or late payments that never happened.

It makes me sick and it makes me angry. Is it just me, or are you angry too?

Why don’t they just tell it like it is? If they did, it would likely sound a lot like this:

“We are in the business of making money. That’s why we exist. That’s what it’s all about. That’s all there is to it. Nothing personal, but we’re in it for the money and we always have been.

We don’t care about you. We never did. If, on occasion we come across like we do care, we’re only pretending, either because we know that being nice to you will keep you paying or because being nice to you is in our best interest, not yours.

In fact, you are so brainwashed by your moral upbringing that you go on expecting us to act differently. You just never get it. Being fair or just or helpful or honest or putting your best interest first is just not our nature as a bank.

On top of that, you signed a contract with us that lets us do whatever we want to you. In effect, the contract is only binding on you. The truth is that it’s a joke that it’s even called a contract. A true contract would assume that both sides had a hand in coming up with the terms. Instead, it should just be called “Our Rules”. Yeah, the golden rule: We have the gold, so we make the rules.

And, under that contract, we have the right to do anything we want, including raising your rates and screwing you in ways you can’t even imagine.

And, we do it because it makes us more money. Did we mention that it’s all about money, money and more money? It doesn’t matter. We can say it’s all about money and you still don’t get it. You still think our relationship is about honesty and fair dealing. It not. It’s about money, taking your money and giving it to us.

Furthermore, experience has shown us that we can treat you as badly as we want and get away with it every time. To us, you are not human beings or families. You are just numbers and profit. And, since you are just numbers and profit, we can screw you and still sleep at night, just fine. In fact, those of us who make the big decisions don’t even live in your communities, and even if we did, you don’t know who we are. And you think that just because we have people working in your community, that makes a difference. It doesn’t. They do what we tell them. Sure, part of what we tell them is to be nice to your face, but we don’t mean it. We just say it because we make money off of you, lots of it.

Oh, sure, a few of you will stomp and complain and maybe close your accounts with us when we treat you badly, but we have everybody so brainwashed that ‘credit is king’ that most of you will put up with just about anything we do to you if it means that your credit score will be ok..

What’s really wild is that most of you won’t even get mad at us and the few of you who do won’t be able to convince the others to get mad. In fact, you’re so brainwashed that most of you will blame yourselves for getting into debt in the first place. How cool is that? We have spend our careers figuring out how to legally trick you and cajole you deeper and deeper into debt, so much so that you are trapped forever, and still you don’t blame us. Instead, you blame yourselves, and feel so bad about not paying your bills that you will take food out of your own kids mouth and keep making your own families sacrifice on and on and on to keep paying us.

The truth is that we can screw you and we have screwed you, and you won’t do a thing about it.

So, nothing personal, but if we can skirt around the negative effects of the credit card reform bill, even if it screws you and your kids, that is what we are going to do. We’re bankers. It who we are. You’re just too stupid to see it.”

Angry yet?

I hope so because if you get angry enough, there are things you can do to fight back,

….things that speak to the big banks in the only language they understand,

….things that speak to the big banks in the only way that ever really gets their attention: MONEY.

You don’t have to just sit there and take it, and your family does not need to continue sacrificing and suffering.

Are you ready to take control? Are you ready to do something positive? Are you ready to do whatever it takes to make sure your family survives no matter how bad things get?

If so…good!

The first thing you need to do is to stop looking to Congress for help. That ship sailed long before you and I were ever born. You know it and I know it. Instead, we need to do what we can to help ourselves.

Second, stop thinking that big banks care, or will ever treat you fair. It ain’t gonna happen. To them, you are not a human being, much less a human being with kids and brothers and sisters and a mom and dad. You’re just a number to them, a statistic on a computer screen, and that will never change. So, stop wasting time calling them and asking them to be fair.

Next, find a small community bank that’s too small ‘not-to-care’ and move your bank accounts and all your banking business there. It may be that you still need the big bank for your credit card, but not for the rest of your banking business.

Next, if you are one of the lucky ones who can afford to do it, pay off your credit cards in full and stop using credit cards, except where you already have the cash or income to pay the thing off fully each and every month.

If you are not so lucky, and you can’t afford to pay off your credit cards in full, unfortunately, you only have 3 choices:

Choice 1: Go on paying, no matter what.

If you can even afford it, one option is to just go on paying your on your credit cards no matter how much they jack up your rates and no matter how high your payments get to be.

This is what the banks are counting on you to do, and if you do it, they win. The problem with this option is that every dollar you pay them is a dollar no longer available to take care of your family. In these tough economic times, continuing to pay on jacked up credit cards is risky business at best, and more likely, financial suicide for your family.

Choice 2: Stop paying.

In the short run, this will leave a lot of money in your pocket, and that good in terms of taking care of your family, but any credit you do have will be killed of completely, and ultimately, you will still owe all the money, plus interest. And…sooner or later…the credit card companies will sue you, and having gotten a judgement against you, will take from you whatever money or property they can legally get their hands on.

Choice 3: File bankruptcy.

What a surprise. A bankruptcy attorney hawking bankruptcy as a solution.

But the fact is that, if you can’t pay all your bills or, even if you can, but only by making your family suffer, bankruptcy does 2 things that nothing else in the world does:

First, it gets rid of debt and gets rid of it permanently. Results will vary depending upon your situation, but nothing gets rid of credit card debt, for instance, like filing bankruptcy.

And second, if you have no choice and need to file bankruptcy, it gives you a chance to give the banks a dose of their own medicine?

Let me explain. At its core, what bankruptcy does best is that it gets rid of debt. It just erases it, like, “today you owe it”, and “tomorrow you don’t”, like it never existed.

Well, you know who gets hurt when you don’t have to pay. The big banks…at least in terms of credit cards. The very same banks that the government forced you to help “bail out”. The very same banks that just jacked up your rates, doubling your payments. The very same banks that stuck it to you and screwed your family. The same banks that would let your family sink if it means making another buck.

Sick of having your back against the wall?

Need to get your family out of debt and back on track?

Need to put your family first again…instead of last?

And need to do it now before things get even worse?

Want to give the banks a dose of their own medicine for making you suffer and forcing your hand? Is it time to make them suffer the way they have made your family suffer?

If so…Think bankruptcy.

You have the power.

The power of bankruptcy.

Call today for a FREE Debt Consultation and at least find out how all this bankruptcy stuff works. You won’t be disappointed…I guarantee it.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, December 28, 2009 @ 7:10 am

The New Year is a few days away. And without doubt, millions of Americans will welcome 2010 with grand hope, desperate to put 2009 far behind them, the year the Great Recession took hold of our collars and shook us into submission. Unfortunately, many Americans will greet the end of the 2000’s first decade still in debt and financially directionless.

But that doesn’t have to be the case.

Bankruptcy, despite all you may think you know about it, can make 2010 the year you really start over, the year things become as you make them, the year you regain control.

The federal government is reporting that with 2009’s end, so goes the worst national economic era to strike the 50 states in decades. Much of this optimism, unfortunately, has failed to provide security. The talus is simply too loose, the slope too steep and the edge too precipitous for Americans to feel confident in the footholds being provided. Unemployment continues to shroud our workforce in a cloak of despair and frustration. All the positives can be too easily brushed off as temporary, government-designed band-aids that do nothing for long-term care and instead will soon peel off, exposing our credit card cuts and sub-prime avulsions to additional economic bacteria.

However, treatments are plentiful. And bankruptcy is one of them.

The bankruptcy process, when handled by a competent, established attorney, is a very respectable way to handle the stress and prevent the longstanding financial damage that un-attended-to debt can do to a family.

Most people who give thought to bankruptcy quickly brush it off as an escapist’s tool; something the irresponsible do to cover their mistakes. Well, if you were to start asking around, it would take little time for you to uncover that most of those who have filed for protection are professional, educated and careful with their money. You will also find that things like sudden unemployment, medical bills and emergency life expenses do not discriminate. They affect everyone and if we were universally prepared for those types of setbacks, we wouldn’t need the bankruptcy code.

Back in 1934, the U.S. Supreme Court established the need for a federal measure that could assist the honest debtor in repairing their economic wherewithal. That same year, an opinion was written on the matter that said:”(Bankruptcy) gives the honest but unfortunate debtor … a new opportunity in life and a clear field for future effort, unhampered by the pressure and discouragement of preexisting debt.”

A few years ago, the lending industry powered a major revision to the bankruptcy code called The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. Despite its title, it was designed to make filing bankruptcy more difficult. It was meant to perpetuate the stigmas and make people less tolerant of those who have to file.

The law changes included the “Means Test,” which was designed to qualify a person for Chapter 7. If you made too much money, suddenly you are not eligible to file under the same guidelines as others. The questionable constitutionality aside, the law served to make the bankruptcy code that much more tedious and frustrating for people. Without question, it prompted many people to avoid filing altogether and made the protection of our established laws that much more difficult to obtain. But don’t buy into the myths or the hype. For 99.9% of you, bankruptcy is still a valid option. And the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt know how to make the new bankruptcy laws work for you!

If you want 2010 to ring in on a positive note, don’t do what you did in 2009. Let facts drive your decisions, not misappropriated stigmas and half-truths. It’s your New Year, give yourself a reason to make it a happy one.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, December 23, 2009 @ 5:49 pm

Even in these tough economic times, everyone wants their family and friends to have a nice holiday—full of fun, frivolity and festive giving. And, even if you find yourself among the millions considering bankruptcy in the New Year, you may believe, now more than ever, that it’s open [holiday] season to shop for pricey presents using problem credit cards. In fact, many Americans do charge up expensive tabs in the months preceding the Christmas season when anticipating a bankruptcy—hoping to secure some great gifts prior to wiping away these same debts, along with many others, in January or February.

However, it’s never been more important to avoid a holiday spending binge when seeking this fresh financial start. While prudence alone should speak to some of the reasons to avoid abusing bankruptcy for seasonal gains, the Bankruptcy Code itself addresses the issue of this type of credit card debt as well. Section 523(a)(2) exempts from discharge, any debt that was obtained if an individual made material and false representations about his financial condition (i.e. lies on the credit application). Section 523(a)(2)(C) provides that:

1. consumer debts owed to a single creditor and aggregating more than $500 for luxury goods or services (luxury goods defined as goods or services reasonably not necessary for the support or maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor) incurred by an individual debtor on or within 90 days before the order for relief under this title are presumed to be nondischargeable; and

2. cash advances aggregating more than $750 that are extensions of consumer credit under an open end credit plan obtained by an individual debtor on or within 70 days before the order for relief under this title, are presumed to be nondischargeable;

Section 523(a)(2)(a) excepts from discharge money, property or services incurred by false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud (i.e. incurring debt that you knew or should have known that you would not be able to repay).

In layman’s terms, this translates into a stern warning against unnecessary, binge spending in the months leading up to your bankruptcy. As a result, if you do decide to charge up hundreds or thousands of dollars in charges in November or December and then try to discharge that debt in January or February, credit card lenders have three viable arguments they can use to object to discharging your debt in a bankruptcy case. This type of “discharge litigation” not only risks hefty exemptions from your debt relief, but it is also costly to defend, adding more expensive fuel to the insolvency fire.

What can be even more expensive is how these holiday spending sprees can create potential delays in your bankruptcy filing. Often, a bankruptcy attorney will advise clients in the New Year who reveal large Christmas credit card statements, to wait four to six months at a minimum before filing for bankruptcy—during which time you must continue to make regular payments on your new, larger holiday balances.

If you are already in debt, credit card or otherwise, or facing a loss of income, it’s essential to fight the urge to use plastic to purchase that big screen television, new game console, latest toy or anything else you can’t afford. And, if you’re bankruptcy bound, but must spend during this holiday season, as an alternative to credit, try carrying cash, checks or debit cards. As a result of using the money you actually have, you may make more thoughtful purchases and spend less this season, and, in the end, spend less time digging yourself out of post-holiday season debt and its inevitable barriers to bankruptcy.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, December 19, 2009 @ 4:18 pm

One would think that with the country going through the worst economic downturn since the Depression years that the government would be a bit more concerned with people trying to commit fraud when they file for bankruptcy. Yet in the last fiscal year (ending September 30) the government had conducted the fewest number of fraud investigations since 1986.

In the last fiscal year the number of people filing for bankruptcy has increased by approximately 30 to 35%; nearly 1.4 million people filed in fiscal 2008. This increase comes on the heels of two years (2006 and 2007) in which there was a decrease in filings. That was due to laws being passed in 2005 making it more difficult for people to file and be approved for bankruptcy (with the aim of decreasing the number of people trying to file). As economic times worsened that number was bound to come up like it did.

With such a dramatic increase it would seem logical that the government would increase the number of agents involved in investigating bankruptcy fraud cases. Instead that number has seen a reduction. Ever since the terrorist attacks on 9/11 the government has been dedicating more resources to national security. This has inevitably led to fewer agents available to investigate white collar crimes. Since there are fewer agents, they have been forced to prioritize their efforts.

White collar investigations have been geared towards larger criminals than potential fraudulent bankruptcy filers. The focus has been more towards stopping securities and mortgage fraud and the next Bernie Madoff from getting away with $65 billion of honest peoples’ money. Whenever the FBI has been able to assign more agents to white collar crimes it is typically for securities or mortgage cases. Bankruptcy fraud does not even register in the top five as far as investigation priorities go according to the section chief for financial crimes in the Washington FBI office, Sharon Ormsby.

For the fiscal year ending September 30, the government had investigated 82 cases which they looked upon as bankruptcy fraud. There could possibly be other cases involving bankruptcy fraud, but that would be where the bankruptcy fraud would be secondary to a larger crime, i.e. securities fraud. Numbers from 2003 estimated that a potential 10% of cases filed were fraudulent to some extent. It would be hard to tell right now with such limited resources whether or not that number is any better or worse.

Some judges have found it a little frustrating. Whenever they are suspicious that fraud may have been committed in a case they can recommend that the FBI investigage, but clearly there are not enough resources directed toward the problem.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, December 19, 2009 @ 10:10 am

Back in 2005, credit card companies were convinced – or at least tried hard to convince everyone else – that there was a bankruptcy crisis in the United States. Bankruptcy rates had doubled since 1980, they pointed out. ‘Shopaholics’ were charging everything under the sun and then declaring bankruptcy, forcing the credit card companies to eat their debt. They then had no choice but to pass these expenses on to consumers in the form of higher fees and interest rates.

In 2005, the major banks spent tens of millions of dollars lobbying Congress to make it harder for consumers to declare bankruptcy. Despite protests from lawyers, judges and law professors working in the system, Congress passed the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. Insiders pointed out that the law was essentially written by the credit card companies; a single law professor and four credit industry lobbyists actually wrote the legislation.

Nearly everyone agrees that the laws made filing for bankruptcy more burdensome for debtors. Perhaps the most pernicious element, and the one the credit card companies fought hardest for, is the means test. The means test looks at your prior six months of income to determine whether you qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. If your income is too high, you may need to increase certain expenses which qualify as deductions (much like tax deductions). If your income is still too high, you may need to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which offers the same relief as a Chapter 7, but requires a payment plan. The Chapter 13 payment plan can last anywhere from 15 months to 5 years, depending on your particular jurisdiction.

A boon for the credit card companies and consumers who pay their debts, right? Well, certainly the credit card companies did well for a while– their profits rose thirty percent between 2005 and 2007. However, the decline in interest rates and fees they promised would accompany this never happened – in fact, interest rates and fees increased over this period. Things got so bad that Congress finally passed another bill last May, this one regulating industry practices: they set limits on credit card fees and interest rates and will require lenders to be transparent in their communications, starting in July of 2010.

More importantly, recent studies suggest that the new bankruptcy law may have contributed to the rise in foreclosures – costing the banks billions of dollars – and to the housing crisis in general. Now that many consumers mistakenly believed that bankruptcy was not an option, in many cases they simply walked away from their homes instead of declaring bankruptcy and continuing to make their mortgage payments. Feeling that they couldn’t make both their mortgage and credit card payments, they may have opted to make neither. As foreclosure rates rose, slumping housing prices feel even further. Neighborhoods with a number of foreclosures went into deep decline. Banks lost money, the country slid into recession.

Does this mean that the bankruptcy law caused all of this? No, of course not. Many factors contributed to the recession, included the derivatives trading on Wall Street, the government trying to finance two wars without raising taxes, etc. However, it is clear that the idea that banks would pass on savings to consumers was unrealistic. It’s also clear that removing consumer options resulted in financial decisions that ultimately hurt the banks as well as consumers. (Other studies argue that stringent bankruptcy laws discourage risk and entrepreneurship; it’s no accident that many countries in the EU are loosening their bankruptcy laws during this recession.) The obvious conclusion is that Congress, and not the banks, should write laws. And that they should listen to the experts – in this case, the lawyers and judges involved in bankruptcy proceedings – instead of lobbyists with an agenda.

The good thing is that, in many jurisdictions, judges have construed the new law in favor of debtors. The means test is not bullet proof, and Chapter 7 is still a viable option for most consumers. And with the rising tide of delinquent mortgages, Chapter 13 bankruptcy remains the best way to save your family’s home. Contact a bankruptcy attorney today and get the truth about bankruptcy. And visit http://www.billsbills.com/truth_bankruptcy_book.php for more of the truth.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, December 18, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

Last Friday, the House of Representatives passed a wide-reaching swath of financial reforms, designed to reign in the worse excesses of the banking industry. Democratic lawmakers are hailing the bill as a huge victory for consumers. However, one important provision failed to pass: cramdown.

‘Cramdown’ would allow bankruptcy judges to reduce the principle balance of the mortgage on a primary residence in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, resulting in lower monthly payments for the filer. It’s important to note that bankruptcy judges are already allowed to practice cramdown for a variety of debt, including boats, cars, vacation homes and family farms. In fact, prior to changes in the bankruptcy laws in 1978, they were able to cramdown residential mortgages as well.

Support for cramdown began gaining strength last spring, when the drop in housing prices caused a rise in foreclosures and a spike of people ‘under water’ in their homes. As the recession got worse, more people became vulnerable. Many Democratic lawmakers argued that cramdown was a necessary provision that would allow more people to stay in their homes. The banking industry countered that it would raise costs for everyone and divert capital from the mortgage market at a time when it desperately needed more, not less funds. Observers pointed out that banker’s fears were unrealistic; banks already eat the loss in a foreclosure, so how would this law upset the whole system?

Meanwhile, the Obama industry introduced housing reforms, notably the Making Houses Affordable, a program designed to encourage mortgage companies to voluntarily modify loans and keep people in their homes. While the program does offer some financial incentives, industry observers note that mortgage companies make far more money from the fees involved when a homeowner goes foreclosure.

In April, the House passed cramdown, but it stalled – badly – in the Senate. Twelve Democrats joined with every Republican to defeat it.

This fall, nearly everyone agrees that the MHA program has been a failure. Far fewer loans have been modified than the administration hoped; foreclosure rates continue to rise across the country. It’s hard not to see the lack of cramdown as a pertinent factor. Cramdown would offer the homeowner some leverage. If mortgage companies refused to modify loans, the homeowner could have filed bankruptcy and the decision to modify or not would have rested with an independent party, the judge. As it is, judges are unable to modify the loans, which leaves the entire decision in the hands of the mortgage company.

That’s why Democrats in the House included cramdown again, in the package of regulatory reforms they voted on last Friday. However, this time – under some pressure from small banks and credit unions – the measure failed to pass even the House.

What’s the future for cramdown? It doesn’t look good. Without some radical change somewhere, it doesn’t look like cramdown will even come up for a vote again. This is too bad; this provision would not only be very helpful to many individual homeowners, it has the potential to send ripples through the housing market as well.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, December 13, 2009 @ 8:01 am

If you’re considering a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, chances are you’ve already heard about the Means Test—the test that determines whether or not you qualify for a Chapter 7.

If you make less than the median income for your state, you don’t even have to worry about the means test!  (To find out what your state’s median income is, you can go to http://www.justice.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/20091101/bci_data/median_income_table.htm).

If you make more than your state’s median income you may still be able to pass the means test by deducting certain expenses from your gross income.  You’re going to want to talk to a qualified bankruptcy attorney about this one, though—the means test is notoriously complicated!  Your attorney has the knowledge and experience to determine what amounts of your income have to be applied to the means test as well as what expenses may be deducted.

Like a tax return, the means test involves calculating your income and from that income, deducting your qualified expenses.  Like a good accountant, a good bankruptcy attorney can help you maximize your deductions!  With your attorney’s help, you’ll be able to deduct the allowable amounts for living expenses like groceries, clothing, housekeeping supplies and housing expenses to include rent, property tax, home maintenance, HOA dues, and utilities.  You’ll also be able to deduct certain amounts for transportation expenses like your car note, vehicle insurance, gas, and registration fees and other necessary expenses like taxes, health care and health insurance, childcare, and court-ordered payments like child support.  Finally, you’ll be able to deduct some of your debt payments: your mortgage, your home equity loan, and past due amounts on your mortgage or car note.

If your surplus income—the amount that’s left over after you subtract your deductions from your income—is not enough to repay a significant amount of your debts over the course of five years, you’ll probably qualify for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

See if you will pass the Means Test and qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy by contacting one of the qualified, experienced bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.  You can even schedule your appointment online at www.billsbills.com or you can call us at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, December 5, 2009 @ 6:14 pm

On December 1, the United States Supreme Court was in session to listen to a couple of arguments about bankruptcy.

The first case concerned student loans, specifically in reference to their ability to be discharged under the confines of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The other case, however, had larger implications on the industry as a whole, as it challenged the bankruptcy code itself.

Bankruptcy attorneys are not allowed to encourage clients to take on more debt if they have communicated to the attorney that they are considering filing for bankruptcy. To no surprise, the provision was put in place in 2005 as part of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. The problem with this provision is that essentially, it prevents an attorney from providing a full scope of legal advice. A law firm from Minnesota is challenging that the provision violates the first amendment.

The firm is also challenging the act’s provision that states law firms must identify themselves as “debt-relief agencies.” Justices Scalia and Roberts both seemed to agree that the provisions were problematic, leaving the challengers quite optimistic after the hearing.

The other case on the docket involved the bankruptcy of an airline ramp agent from Phoenix and his subsequent discharge of more than $13,000 in student loans he was unable to pay. Francisco Espinosa took out the loan to pay for a trade school he wanted to attend but never finished the program and remained employed with the airline.

Currently, federal law does not treat student loans quite like other types of debt. The debtor must prove an undue hardship in court as reason for non-payment. For a number of debt types, the bankruptcy becomes that proof of hardship and is then subject to discharge. Not so with student loans, they require additional evidence of a person’s inability to pay.

Those arguing on behalf Espinosa’s creditors cite the fact that undue hardship was not proven and that like child support, student loans need to be held to a higher standard because without those added protections, secondary education funding would become increasingly difficult to obtain.

Lawyers working on behalf of Espinosa are citing the fact that once a bankruptcy ruling is decided, it cannot be undone on the grounds of a judge’s error.

In a previous ruling from a lower U.S. appeals court favored Espinosa’s argument, stating that when the bankruptcy petition was submitted and the creditor’s notified, they did not object. It was this decision that the student loan industry and the lawyers present in the Supreme Court yesterday are worried about, as it may pave the way for student loans to be easier to discharge.

If yesterday’s hearings are any indication, the court may come down on Espinosa’s side when a ruling is issued, as a couple of judges, Kennedy and Ginsburg specifically, voiced concern that perhaps a new balance can be found between the need for a hardship hearing and some leniency in regard to discharging student loan debt.

Both cases heard in court this week could have impact on the bankruptcy code, one in favor of debtors and the other in favor of the attorneys who help debtors. All in all, it wasn’t a bad day in court.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, December 4, 2009 @ 12:15 pm

We’ve all heard that money problems are the leading cause of marital problems. If you’re reading this article, chances are you’re experiencing both problems. In this economy, with unemployment, foreclosures, and debt at record highs, you’d be hard-pressed to find couples who don’t fight about money!

Financial problems can wreak havoc on your marriage, leading to constant arguing, blame-laying, and even divorce. In fact, when the economy suffers, couples are far more likely to consider divorce as a solution to their problems.

Some couples might think this solution sounds reasonable, even tempting. No more fighting about—you guessed it—money. No more seething tension fueled by bills, debt, and money worries. No more arguments and accusations over who spends more, who earns less, or who should pay the bills.

But is divorce necessarily the solution when it’s your debt that’s to blame?

What if you could eliminate your debts and save the personal property you and your spouse have worked so hard to accumulate? What if you could stop fighting about money?

What if you filed bankruptcy?

Would the fighting end if you and your spouse got a clean slate? A fresh start? What if you got the chance to re-establish your financial goals, make new plans, and move forward with your life together? Imagine the marital peace that could result from financial peace of mind!

You do have options other than divorce. An experienced bankruptcy attorney can help you salvage your marriage and rebuild your life by reducing, restructuring, or eliminating the debt that’s at the center of your marriage problems. For those who qualify, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing can erase your credit card debt, your personal loans, and your medical bills. It can erase the cause of most of your marital problems!

Whether your financial problems are due to job loss, the downturn in the stock market, an increase in your adjustable rate mortgage, medical bills, or rising credit card rates and fees, you don’t have to let your financial problems ruin your marriage! Financial stress can quickly build to the breaking point. But if you could save your marriage, wouldn’t you?

Save your marriage. Save your home, your car, your property, your family. Call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 or visit www.billsbills.com.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 1, 2009 @ 7:35 am

Exacerbated by the recent recession, self-employed or small business owners everywhere are facing fewer credit options, high health care costs, and lagging consumer spending. Those struggling to stay afloat in these tough financial times must ask themselves even tougher questions. Do I have the motivation to continue my business? Could the business prosper if it wasn’t keeping up with old debts? Could my business persevere if it shed equipment, employees or space? Could I sell my business? Could I start another business if I did sell?

If after answering these questions you find you are no longer able to sustain or expand your business in your current financial situation, filing for bankruptcy may be your best bet.

For those business people who no longer have the time, energy or drive to continue their business interests in their current capacity, Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidates business assets to repay looming debts. A court-appointed agent will sell these assets and pay the proceeds to creditors; beginning with secured creditors first, followed by any unsecured creditors. While this type of bankruptcy normally leads to the demise of the business, it, in turn, provides a quick resolution for individuals and a dependable dissolution for partnerships and corporations.

In the alternative, for business owners seeking solutions to the very problems that led to bankruptcy, Chapter 11 allows for a much-needed financial reorganization. Following a Chapter 11 filing, the court appoints a conservator who, like the agent in the previous example, oversees the business assets to best pay off creditors, while still keeping the business afloat. In short, Chapter 11 stops creditors, allowing the court-appointed conservator to reorganize and optimize business finances for a better future.

The best part for self-employed and small business owners filing Chapter 11 is that they can legally continue operating their business and earning an income as a “debtor in possession,” receiving the benefits of “automatic stay” protection. Debtors in possession are protected from creditor actions such as lawsuits and asset seizures, even if a creditor obtained a judgment before the bankruptcy filing. An added benefit of filing bankruptcy as a debtor in possession is that bankruptcy law allows you to take out more loans that take precedence over all other creditors.

Conversely, like businesspeople filing for Chapter 7, Chapter 11 debtors in possession are bound by specific bankruptcy rules and restrictions, including prohibitions on using encumbered assets as collateral and selling assets without the approval of interested creditors. As a result, the best move a bankruptcy bound small business owner can make is to consult an experienced bankruptcy attorney who specializes in representing small business owners.

While a bankruptcy for your business is sometimes advisable, many small business owners don’t have any assets left and don’t intend to continue the business, or intend to continue under a different name. If so, it may make more sense to simply let the corporation die on its own without a bankruptcy. However, if you’re like most small business owners, you have probably personally guaranteed most, if not all, of your business debt. While a business bankruptcy will effectively hold off creditors from getting to your business, those same creditors can choose to pursue you personally. Whether you are dissolving the business or continuing on, its important to pull your credit report to determine how much of your debt has been personally guaranteed. Your attorney can then advise you how a personal bankruptcy can save you and your family from your business creditors.

Skilled bankruptcy attorneys like those at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt can get to work early, navigate any uncertain waters of bankruptcy court and work in your best interests during the duration of your business and/or personal bankruptcy. In North Carolina, call 1-800-899-1414 to discuss your situation today. Always a free initial consultation.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, November 29, 2009 @ 2:48 pm

Americans young and old, hit hard by the recent economic meltdown, are turning to any available income, accounts, or other resources to pay down today’s mounting mortgage debt, crushing credit card rates and high health care costs. One such resource—liquidating a registered retirement account like a 401(k)—might appear to be a quick and easy fix to pay down looming expenses or even to avoid filing for bankruptcy.

In reality however, it’s better to “stay away” from 401(k)s, leaving these and other retirement accounts untouched and intact in times of financial distress—even for those bankruptcy bound.

Why, you ask?

Retirement Accounts Like Your 401(k) Are Exempt From Bankruptcy
First and foremost, it’s important to understand that your 401k is safe—even in bankruptcy. Assuming your registered retirement accounts, such as IRAs, 401(k)s, and pension plans, have not been used to secure loans, they’re considered protected assets. And recent amendments to the Bankruptcy Code have made these exemptions available in all states. In the alternative, cashing out a 401(k) automatically means losing your hard-earned savings, higher taxes, and potential delays in any bankruptcy filing.

Cashing Out a 401(k) Means Paying [More] Out In the Long Run
Using retirement savings to pay creditors can create new debt in the form of income taxes and early withdrawal penalties. In fact, considerably higher taxes are the norm if you cash in valuable retirement assets like your 401(k). This heavily taxed income also cannot be discharged in bankruptcy for years and may prevent other qualifying deductions. As a result, this expensive option creates even more economic troubles for families struggling with already weighty debts and considering the benefits of bankruptcy.

401(k) Liquidation May Provide a Substantial Burden to a Productive Bankruptcy
In terms of burdening your bankruptcy proceedings, liquidating your 401k to pay creditors could mean significant delays in productive bankruptcy results. Any cashed out 401(k) funds will be counted as income and considered when evaluating your economic status pending bankruptcy. Therefore, any withdrawals from 401(k)s should be disclosed to your bankruptcy attorney immediately.

401(k)s Fund Your Future
Just as bankruptcy provides a much-needed stopping point for those drowning in debt, maintaining registered retirement accounts, such as IRAs, 401(k)s, and pension plans—even in tough times—provides a comparable and essential starting point for your family’s viable financial future.

So, before you consider liquidating any retirement accounts, such as IRAs, 401(k)s, and pension plans, talk to the skilled bankruptcy attorneys at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, November 23, 2009 @ 6:49 pm

The Associated Press is reporting that the foreclosure crisis will persist well into next year as high unemployment “pushes more people out of homes, pulls down housing prices and raises concerns about the broader economic recovery.”

The latest evidence comes this week in a report from the Mortgage Bankers Association identifying that a rising tide of fixed-rate home loans made to people with good credit are now facing foreclosure, marking a surprising shift from assumptions that only riskier subprime loans are driving the current housing crisis. The report also stated that 14 percent of homeowners with a mortgage were either late on payments or in foreclosure at the end of September 2009, marking another record-high for the ninth straight quarter.

These findings speak to an even more beleaguered housing market than previously thought, bearing the weight of even more home-loan defaults. The main culprit, industry experts say, is rising unemployment, forcing even the most responsible homeowners to fall behind on their mortgages.

As the AP found, many laid-off homeowners might be able to survive on their savings for a while, but “the longer the economic situation stays in place, the less likely they are to hold on,” said Jay Brinkmann, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association.

As Robert L. Borosage, Co-Director of the Campaign for America’s Future, blogged this week, “[o]ne in six workers is unemployed, has given up looking or is forced to work part-time. For young workers aged 16 to 24, unemployment is 19%. For young African Americans, unemployment is at 30%. And as Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke testified yesterday, we’re likely to see — at best — a slow recovery with no new job growth. That exacts a devastating toll in hopes crushed, families stressed, young people stalled, and poverty and hunger spreading.And even if we avoid another downturn, the job picture will get worse. Crippling state deficits — over $260 billion over 2 years — will force layoffs that cost an estimated 900,000 jobs next year if nothing is done.”

As a direct result of this explosion of job losses, this year, more than 3 million foreclosures are predicted, as homeowners are increasingly incapable of paying the mortgage during a brutal recession. As the financial meltdown continues and unemployment surges, the millions that have now slipped into delinquency and foreclosure with only one conceivable way out: bankruptcy.

Homeowners with prime and sub-prime mortgages alike are taking immediate action, arming themselves with basic bankruptcy tools. So, if you’re interested in staying in your home, looking for permanent solutions to foreclosure threats, and ready to quit spending and start saving, there’s never been a better time to consult with a bankruptcy expert. For more information regarding homeowner benefits of bankruptcy filing, visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

While recent reports of the nation’s financial future are nothing short of bleak, the good news remains that through bankruptcy laws, homeowners facing foreclosure can take their future into their own hands, stop drowning in mortgage debt, and begin on the road to a more viable financial future.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, November 15, 2009 @ 12:37 pm

Are you a married couple, but only one of you earns income and holds assets? Or maybe only one of you has acquired debt during your marriage? If you’re married and considering a bankruptcy, you might be wondering whether you and your spouse both have to file bankruptcy.

The answer: while you and your spouse do not both have to file bankruptcy, usually, if a bankruptcy is necessary for one spouse, both spouses will end up filing.

If, for instance, both you and your spouse are liable for a debt and only one of you files under Chapter 7, the creditor may later attempt to collect the debt from the non-filing spouse, even if he or she has no income or assets! In other words, the creditor will simply demand payment for the entire debt from the spouse who didn’t file. So in this case it makes sense for you both to file.

If, however, only one of you has incurred debt during your marriage, only the spouse with the debt needs to file bankruptcy. In states like North Carolina, which is not a “community” property” state, even if you are married—if you did not sign for the debt, you do not owe the debt, and you do not necessarily need to file bankruptcy.

What if you just got married and most of the debt belongs to just one of you? As long as you didn’t sign for your spouse’s premarital debt, only the spouse with the debt has to file bankruptcy.

And what about a Chapter 13? If you both qualify for a Chapter 13 and if you are both liable for any significant debts then you should file jointly under Chapter 13, even if only one of you has income!

Whether you’re considering Chapter 7 or Chapter 13—if you’re married and considering bankruptcy then both of you should consult with one of the attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to ensure that both of your best interests are carried out. Visit us at www.billsbills.com or call us at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 6:15 am

Making it harder for overburdened debtors to file bankruptcy in the middle of our biggest financial crisis in living memory may not be the best policy idea to come down the beltway, but it is exactly what Congress set in motion in 2005. Here is why:

If you have been looking into filing bankruptcy, then you have heard about the ‘Means Test’. The Means Test was created by Congress to determine eligibility for consumer bankruptcy in 2005 when it reformed the Bankruptcy Law. The idea was that a debtor should only get as much bankruptcy relief as he or she really needed. So Congress developed a formula to determine which bankruptcy filers would qualify for Chapter 7, which offers an immediate discharge of debt, and who should file Chapter 13, which requires a lengthier payment plan.

Along with its creation of the means test in 2005, Congress provided for automatic updates of state median incomes, upon which the means test is based. The state median income figures are periodically updated by the U.S. Census and the Executive Office for U.S. Trustees (EOUST) publishes a table that is used in the bankruptcy courts.

As more workers lose their jobs, the median income, unsurprising, can drop as well. If the median income figures for a state drops, it lowers the bar for debtors who will be subjected to the means test and the possibility of being denied help in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. In North Carolina, the unemployment rate rose to 10.8% according to the US Dept of Labor figures reported for August 2009. Similarly, the post-November 1 EOUST table, cites the median annual income in North Carolina for a family of three fell by several thousand dollars. The irony is that even though the number of people needing bankruptcy has risen, the means test makes it more difficult for them to qualify for Chapter 7.

None of this news should discourage you from seeking bankruptcy relief. Even if you are one of the small percentage of people who don’t qualify for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Chapter 13 has essentially the same effect of a Chapter 7- a discharge of your unsecured debt. Additionally, some means test deductions which are not available in a Chapter 7 are available as disposable monthly income deductions in Chapter 13. The Chapter 13 disposable monthly income test measures how much disposable monthly income you must devote to your Chapter 13 payment plan. Even if you are deemed to have substantial disposable monthly income, some pre-petition planning will help bring the number down. As always, talk to an experienced bankruptcy about your options, you’ll be amazed at how beneficial a a properly planned bankruptcy can be.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Call 1-800-899-1414 for a free initial debt consultation. Or visit www.billsbills.com to fill out a free and confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, October 24, 2009 @ 11:16 am

If you are considering filing for bankruptcy protection but are reluctant to hire an attorney to help you with the process, there might be a couple of explanations. Maybe you are feeling a little bit embarrassed about your situation and are none too eager to spill your troubles to a stranger. This is understandable but it shouldn’t hold you back; a bankruptcy attorney is like a doctor for your financial health, and there is no need to be embarrassed when you talk to a doctor.  If it’s not embarrassment or even sheer inertia holding you back, it’s easy to hazard a guess about another source of worry: attorney’s fees.

When people are ready to file for bankruptcy protection, they are thinking that the last thing they need is to spend more money. Understandable, but you should not let this stop you from seeking the help you need. Remember that the first consultation with most attorneys is often free (always free with the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt), so make sure to look for a reputable firm that offers this opportunity in your area. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the up-front attorney fees are minimal, often less than $200.00. The remainder of the fees are paid through your Chapter 13 plan. If Chapter 7 is advisable, the up-front money will be higher, but your bankruptcy attorney can suggest some ways to come up with the money.

You may have heard about some the more extraordinary bankruptcies, such as the 2008 Lehman Chapter 11 filing. According to filings in a Manhattan bankruptcy court, the once prestigious investment bank, which collapsed in September 2008, paid out $402 million+ to attorneys and advisers in one year as the company struggled through a very complicated Chapter 11 reorganization. As Lehman struggles to pay back creditors, they have had to sell or auction the assets that were once the hallmarks of a prominent (and prominently excessive) bastion of the investment world. Take for example the funds they have raised through the sale of their multiple jets. Lehman’s art collection, comprising more than 280 works, is reported to be next on the chopping block as Lehman grinds through its ultra-complicated bankruptcy.

If you are worried about how much your bankruptcy attorney will charge you to help you unload assets like your old Gulfstream IV jet, who can blame you? That sounds like a pretty complicated filing. If, however, you are one of the millions of Main Street Americans whose personal lives were slammed by the credit crisis, your bankruptcy is likely to be much simpler–and cheaper. Whatever you do, don’t even consider filing without an attorney. The bankruptcy process became infinitely more complex after the 2005 law change, and only an experienced bankruptcy attorney can successfully navigate the many unforeseen obstacles.

In North Carolina, the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt always offer a free initial consultation. Call 1-800-899-1414 today to schedule a free initial consultation today. Or visit www.billsbills.com for more information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, October 21, 2009 @ 6:45 am

The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 has made some people wary of even considering bankruptcy. This was undoubtedly the intention of the credit industry, who went to great lengths to make sure the “reform” passed. The passage of the law and subsequent misinformation from the credit industry lobby has led to a general perception that bankruptcy is now a difficult, if not impossible, undertaking. But for many people it may not be the legal changes that keep them from filing for bankruptcy–it may just be fear and misunderstanding.

Before you decide that the 2005 reforms make  bankruptcy impossible for you, you should get a handle on the major changes in the law that affect bankruptcy filings. But hey, before you do even that, remember that there’s no need to play the guessing game; many bankruptcy attorneys, including the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, offer a free initial consultation to help you better understand the new bankruptcy laws. Here are some of the main changes that are likely to affect your situation as an individual filer:

• Bankruptcy filers are now required to receive credit counseling before filing. The role of the credit counselor is to help filers decide if they are eligible for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and to educate the filer about credit decisions.

• Filers who have income higher than the median income for their county of residence may be required to file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, instead of Chapter 7. The intent of this provision is to force more middle to high income filers to repay some of their unsecured debt. However, in many cases, even if you are above median, you will still qualify for Chapter 7. Even if you don’t qualify for a Chapter 7, chances are you are still eligible for a very reasonable Chapter 13 payment plan– in some cases for as little as $99 per month. Talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney to discuss your unique situation.

• If you bought your car less than two and a half years ago, you will be required to pay the full payoff amount of the lien in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. However, if your car was bought more than two and a half years ago, you will only be required to pay the fair market value of the vehicle. This can be very beneficial if the car is severely upside down, and can cut your car payment significantly.
• In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, if you want to keep your car, your lender may require you to sign a reaffirmation agreement, the effect of which puts you back on the hook personally for the full amount of the loan. The requirements vary by jurisdiction, and courts are increasingly holding lenders to a very high standard for these agreements. The bottom line is, if surrendering your car is not an option, talk to your attorney about a Chapter 13. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy will allow you to keep your car, often on much better terms than you currently have with your lender.
• Repeat filers may not immediately be entitled to the automatic stay. If this is your second or third filing in the past year, discuss with your attorney whether the automatic stay will go into effect automatically, or if there is some further action needed by your attorney. Court interpretations vary, so if this is a second or third filing, make sure your attorney knows the local judge’s position on this important issue.
• A Chapter 13 discharge can’t be obtained within 2 years of the filing of a Chapter 13 case in which you have received a discharge, or within 4 years of a Chapter 7 discharge. If you have previously filed for Chapter 7 and received a discharge, you will not be eligible for another Chapter 7 discharge for 8 years
• More paperwork. Naturally! Bureaucrats love it. You now have to provide more documents than in the past, but the end result is well worth the effort.
• Past due support obligations, such as child support payments, get first priority over everything else. You must remain current on your ongoing support payments
• Certain kinds of debts may be more difficult to discharge after completion of the Chapter 13 repayment plan; debts which are now impossible to discharge are trust fund taxes (such as employee withholding taxes, and excise taxes), debts from fraudulent activities, debts relating to a drunk driving accident, and criminal restitution.

These changes are not the only ones made by the law, which is why you definitely should consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney before filing. As you can see, help is still available to those who need the protection of the bankruptcy laws.

If you’re suffering with debt, don’t even consider a debt consolidation scam. Bankruptcy offers real relief. Contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to discuss your options. Call 1-800-899-1414 for a free initial debt consultations, or visit www.billsbills.com to fill out a free and confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, October 9, 2009 @ 5:23 pm

Even though we are in the business of helping people through bankruptcy, legally and sometimes even emotionally, we understand that filing is not always the best option for you. However, our greatest fear is for those who should file but decide not to for the wrong reasons, whether it be because of the stigma of bankruptcy, an inability to face financial reality, or opting for a “less than legitimate” credit counselor.

To help in your decision, consider some of the consequences of not filing bankruptcy:

Losing your car
More than likely, you have a car loan. Should that payment be one of the debts that goes unpaid, your car can be repossessed by the lender and sold to pay the loan. But here’s the real pain in losing your car: it rarely covers the amount you owe. So, you could end up losing your car and getting sued for the difference. Bankruptcy stops the repo man, and in many instances, will allow you to repay the loan with much better terms.

Foreclosure
This can be the biggest pain of them all. While the bank can’t simply take your home like a car, they can foreclose on it. The process typically takes a few months. However, this does not mean you should wait until the foreclosure hearing to seek help. If you are behind on your mortgage, a Chapter 13 bankruptcy will allow you to catch up the missed payments over a repayment period of 3 to 5 years. Contact your bankruptcy attorney today, even if you’re only behind a couple of payments.

Student loan collection
In-state tuition for the University of North Carolina system schools is going up every year. Some of the private schools in our state are well over $50,000 per year just for the privilege of attending. Without question, college is getting expensive. And so is the cost of not filing bankruptcy if you have student loans. While many loans start out as federal in nature, a large majority of them are bought by third-party lenders who do not look kindly on your inability to pay them. However, these groups are more than happy to grant you a deferral or forbearance in order to drag out the payment periods to 25 years or more. If you don’t pay your loan, they can garnish your wages and even sue you. While bankruptcy can not get rid of student loans, it will get rid of your other unsecured debt, putting you in a better position to get back on track with your student loan repayment.

You could get sued
You might think that if you simply don’t pay your creditors, they will eventually go away. Not true. Debt buyers, the lowest of all life forms, will eventually purchase the debt for pennies on the dollar. These aggressive hounds will not stop until they have pressured you to cough up a reduced settlement amount. If you still refuse to pay, they can sue you and obtain a judgment lien on your property. Depending on the laws of your state, the debt buyer can then attempt to sell your home, car or other belongings in a sheriff’s auction. Bankruptcy will stop a lawsuit immediately, and stop the creditor from forcing a sale of your property.

If you are falling behind on your monthly payments, talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney to discuss how bankruptcy can protect you and your family. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to set up your free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, September 21, 2009 @ 1:49 pm

Many of us now come into marriage with some debts in tow. Some of us also arrive owning some of our own property. Once married, we incur new debts, jointly or separately; for example, one spouse may finance a car under his name, while both spouses may need to list their income together when they borrow for a new home. In addition, you may have credit cards and checking accounts in your own name, and some held jointly.  Sometimes one spouse will have the legal responsibility for credit card debt, but the other spouse, as an authorized user of the account, has the ability to add to it. A spouse may not have the responsibility for a debt, but may contribute to payment from her income. And then there are the difference in state law, which also adds layers: in the nine community property states, both partners own all property equally, while in the non-community property states (or “equitable distribution” states, such as North Carolina), each spouse owns all of his own property and one half of the property held jointly.

As you can see, marriage can definitely complicate matters when it comes to property and debt! For many couples facing an unmanageable amount of debt together, these different factors may complicate the decision to file for bankruptcy However, there’s no need for alarm. If your marriage is suffering from the pressures of debt, bankruptcy can offer the relief to allow your family to focus on the things that really matter. An experienced bankruptcy attorney will be able to assess your situation and advice you on the best strategy for taking care of your debts while saving your property. Based on the kinds of debt and property your couple has, he will be able to help you choose whether to file separately or jointly. And in some situations, he may advise one partner to file and the other partner not to. Let’s look at some of the factors he’ll weigh in making his determination:

If you file together, all of your separately held debts, as well as all of the jointly held debts acquired during the marriage will be discharged. Filing together is also cheaper than filing two separate bankruptcies, and often times the financial troubles of one spouse are tied to those of the other. If only one spouse files, jointly held debts will be discharged only for the spouse who files; the other spouse will still be responsible for the debt.

However, if one spouse holds most of the troublesome debt in her own name, it may make sense for her to file alone. This is especially true if the non-filing spouse has better credit. Preserving one party’s credit can help the filing spouse recover from bankruptcy faster. The non-filing spouse can co-sign on future accounts, allowing the filing spouse a better chance to rebuild post-bankruptcy.

Don’t let these nuances deter you from the most important point: no matter what kind of debt you have and what kind of property you hold, bankruptcy can offer a life-changing opportunity for you and your spouse to put unmanageable debt behind you. Because you want to approach your filing strategically, it’s an excellent idea to contact an experienced bankruptcy attorney to help you and your spouse make the right choice.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414, or visit www.billsbills.com to complete our free and confidential debt questionnaire.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, September 19, 2009 @ 10:11 am

A thoughtful, measured strategy for your bankruptcy can help you in a number of ways when a divorce seems inevitable or is already underway. A good plan can help ease tension between yourself and your spouse, for example, by reducing fights about who is responsible for this or that bill. Not only is this expensive, aggravating, and likely to sour an already acrimonious process, it may be completely unnecessary. You may find that bankruptcy can get rid of those bills altogether! Thus, there will be no need to assign a bad guy.

If you have already finalized the divorce, bankruptcy is often the best way of getting back on track financially. Chances are, you will emerge from your divorce with a significant amount of secured and unsecured debt. Bankruptcy allows you to let go of those items you can no longer afford with one income. If you simply allow the car to be repossessed, or the mortgage to be foreclosed, you will still be responsible for the deficiency balances after the car or home is sold. This is the worst possible scenario- not only have you lost the car or home, but you’re still on the hook for the underlying debt. Surrendering the home or car in a bankruptcy shields you from any remaining personal liability, and frees you to transition to a new lifestyle.

If you’re still in the preliminary stages of your separation, it may be tempting to postpone thinking about bankruptcy until after the divorce is totally settled; why deal with two stressful legal procedures at once? The answer is that with a good bankruptcy attorney and a good strategy in place, you can make a bankruptcy work for you and your future ex. Even if you and your soon to be ex-spouse disagree on every other issue, try to agree on bankruptcy as the best way to wrap up and dissolve the marital debt. If you are legally separated but not divorced, you can file a joint Chapter 7 petition, receiving your discharge in a matter of months. This can free you to focus on the truly important issues of your divorce, such as custody and visitation. Of course, in some instances, filing and completing the divorce before filing for bankruptcy is the best option, and this is why consulting with an experienced bankruptcy attorney early in the divorce process is important. Only an attorney can assess your unique situation to determine the best strategy.

Both bankruptcy and divorce can be stressful processes, so you should always exercise your power to save yourself aggravation where you can. Don’t make these life events more difficult than they have to be, and remember that only you can take control of your financial future.

The attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt have years of experience helping families deal with the financial challenges of a divorce. Call us today for a free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, September 16, 2009 @ 10:06 pm

The four-year anniversary of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) is right around the corner. You might recall all the hype in the months leading up to the enactment of BAPCPA. This was the banking and credit industry’s seventh attempt to get the legislation on the books. They pitched BAPCPA as necessary to curb “rampant abuse” and to restore “personal responsibility and integrity” in the bankruptcy process. With the Bush Administration at the helm of a Congress chock full of conservative lawmakers, the banks and credit card companies finally clinched a large enough sympathetic audience to bring its agenda to life.

BAPCPA called for sweeping changes to the Bankruptcy Code – undoubtedly the most significant overhaul of the Code since it was enacted in 1978. The depth and complexity of the changes caused much confusion, uncertainty, and speculation about what protections would be left for consumers in the new world of consumer bankruptcy practice. This sparked a mad dash to file bankruptcy before the new laws went into effect on October 17, 2005. So what does this new world of bankruptcy practice look like four years after BAPCPA took effect? Did the banking and credit industry get its money’s worth for the billions it spent marketing the legislation?

Well, one thing’s for sure: the new laws did make it more expensive and difficult for consumers to take advantage of the protections that bankruptcy has historically provided. But one of the primary things BAPCPA’s backers hoped to achieve was to force more debtors out of Chapter 7 liquidation and into repayment plans under Chapter 13. The primary mechanism to achieve this goal was a set of eligibility thresholds for Chapter 7 based upon a person’s income – particularly BAPCPA’s now-infamous “means test.” Generally, if your income exceeds the median income for a family of your size in your state, or if your monthly disposable income is more than $100, you’re presumed ineligible for Chapter 7.

BAPCPA’s backers were betting these new rules would sharply reduce the number of Chapter 7 cases, so debtors would ultimately have to pay back more of their debt. But despite the sweeping “reform,” the numbers have remained pretty much the same. Between 1999 and 2004, before BAPCPA was enacted, the average percentage of cases filed under Chapter 13 was 29 percent. Initially, in the first year after BAPCPA, the percentage of Chapter 13 filings rose. But, by this year, the numbers had returned to pre-BAPCPA levels: in fact, during the first seven months of 2009, the average percentage of Chapter 13 cases was actually lower – 27.6 percent.

Here’s another interesting fact: The United States Trustee’s Office reviewed the Chapter 7 filings between October 17, 2005, and June 30, 2006, and determined that 94 percent of the debtors automatically qualified for Chapter 7 under the means test – based upon their income alone. Another 5.4 percent qualified when their expenses were taken into account. That is, 99.4 percent qualified for Chapter 7; only 0.6 percent were presumed abusive filers under BAPCPA’s new rules. This likely explains why the percentages of Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases have remained fairly consistent: the vast majority of those who file for Chapter 7 meet the new strict income requirements.

It also appears that BAPCPA credit counseling requirements have had little impact on the number of filings, other than to make the process more expensive and time-consuming. The Government Accounting Office issued a report finding that “by the time most consumers receive credit counseling, their financial situations are dire, leaving them with no viable alternative to bankruptcy.” In addition, the National Federation of Credit Counseling has found that less than four percent of potential filers choose not to file bankruptcy after attending the required counseling.

As far as the overall number of consumer bankruptcy filings, while the total number of filings dropped in the first year after BAPCPA was enacted, they have steadily climbed back to their historic levels. In fact, with the current economic downturn – which kicked in less than two years after BAPCPA came on line – so many people are seeking bankruptcy protection that the filings are beginning to rival the figures we saw during the mad dash to file before BAPCPA was enacted.

Much to the chagrin of those who footed the massive bill to push BAPCPA through Congress, the numbers show that the vast majority of those who need the protection of Chapter 7 will still seek that protection – and qualify for it. The numbers also suggest the backers’ central platform for marketing BAPCPA – that people were routinely abusing Chapter 7 – was groundless, or at least greatly exaggerated.

Bankruptcy is back! – despite the efforts of the banking and credit industry to stifle filings through BAPCPA. With the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney, you too can use the power of bankruptcy to eliminate debts that have made your life unmanageable.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, with convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson, and Fayetteville. The firm offers a free debt consultation, as well as affordable payment plans for both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases. Call (toll free) 1-800-899-1414 or visit www.billsbills.com for more information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, September 11, 2009 @ 12:30 pm

In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, a court appointed trustee receives payments from the person who has filed the bankruptcy and then distributes those payments among the filer’s creditors. Sometimes funds are taken as an automatic payroll deduction, kind of like the deductions your employer makes for social security taxes. A Chapter 13 repayment plan can last from three to five years, so it’s natural to worry about what might happen in the meantime. For example, what happens if you can’t make all of your payments and you start to fall behind? Or what if you can’t finish the plan in 60 months? This could happen if a claim comes in for a higher amount than expected; for example, if you are charged higher taxes than the plan allotted for.

If you fall behind on your Chapter 13 payments, the trustee will file a “Motion to Dismiss.” If your case’s trustee files a Motion to Dismiss, there’s no need to panic. Remember you have an important ally―your bankruptcy attorney―who can help you work out kinks in your journey to financial freedom. Call you attorney and explain the situation, and he can help you work with your trustee to fix the problem. The good news is that trustees are often willing to work with you to get you back on track with your payments.

Your trustee may request that you pay some portion of the amount due from late payments up front, but then he may allow you to distribute the rest of the payments over time, allowing you to catch up gradually. Say for example that you fall behind by $3000, with 36 months remaining in your plan. Your attorney can help you craft a potential cure for your delinquency. In this case, he may recommend that you propose to spread out the payments over the remaining months left in your plan. In this case, you would only have to add about $83 each month to work out the delinquency. Of course, if you fall behind again your trustee may not be so understanding, and in fact he may have the ability to dismiss the case without filing the Motion first. If you have fallen seriously behind on your payments due to some unexpected trouble such as illness, but your trustee won’t accept a proposed plan to cure the delinquency, your attorney may recommend converting your case for a Chapter 7 discharge. Another possible alternative is to voluntarily dismiss your case and refile at a later date. Your attorney’s decision will depend on your specific facts, and so you should constantly keep your attorney’s office informed of your situation.

As you can see, a good attorney is an essential team member for a successful bankruptcy. If you need to file for bankruptcy protection, there is no need to get bogged down in the what-ifs. Your attorney can answer any questions you have about your situation, and she will also be instrumental later on should you encounter any bumps along the road. A lot of the potential hiccups you may be worrying about actually have very workable solutions. You are entitled to be treated fairly as you recover from financial troubles, and dealing with an attorney, a trustee and the bankruptcy courts, all of whom are part of a system designed to help people in trouble, will be much more agreeable than talking to pushy bill collectors.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, September 8, 2009 @ 8:50 am

As you are getting ready to file for bankruptcy protection, one piece of information your attorney will request from you is a value of every item of property you own. Your attorney will want you to make a list of all the property you own and give an estimate of the fair market value. There’s no need to worry about this part of the process; the request for valuation does not mean any of your property will actually be sold, most families don’t own property worth more than the state exemption limits. Even if you have substantial property, it is still possible to protect the value above exemptions by filing for Chapter 13. To properly advise you on this issue, it is essential that your attorney know the fair market value of all of your property

The fair market value of a possession is the amount of money you would probably receive if you were to sell the item “as is” and relatively quickly. This means you don’t factor in what it could cost with some repairs or touch-ups, what it cost when it was new or what it would cost to replace the item. This also does not mean the insured value of an item; again, remember that replacing an item and selling it at market value are two different undertakings. Instead of thinking about what you would pay to replace the identical item, or what you’d get from your insurance company, imagine a quick sale to the general public. How much money do you think you’d get for your item if you sold it at a garage sale or over Craig’s List? This is a good way to estimate the fair market value of an item.

The fair market value of real estate can be estimated by thinking about how much you would be able to get for the real property–for example, your home–if you had to guarantee a sale in the next couple of months. Naturally, if you were really going to sell your place you would probably allow more time or invest in repairs to make the home more attractive to buyers, but that’s not what fair market value means. Don’t just provide the figure from a property tax assessor who may never have seen your home. If you’re not sure about how to value your home, you may want to consult an experienced real estate agent familiar with your neighborhood, and one who will take into account a distressed sale scenario.

While you are making these calculations, use common sense to arrive at the likeliest amount for the market value. The garage sale method will work for a valuation of your Ikea furniture, but may not work for very pricey antiques more likely sold to professional dealers or major auction houses. Of course, it’s not really usual for people filing for bankruptcy to have many such items, so you probably don’t need to worry too much about this anyway.

As you can see, property valuation is nothing to worry about. Chances are you can get this part of your filing done easily, without too big of a headache. Keeping your attorney fully informed of the value and extent of your property is key to a successful bankruptcy.

From: The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, with offices in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville. Call 1-800-899-1414 to set up your free debt consultation.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, September 3, 2009 @ 9:43 am

The economy is so grim right now it’s hard to see the silver lining, but the good news about markets is that they rarely stand still forever. Even now, economists are slowly and cautiously becoming more optimistic about the situation, and consumers are gradually gaining back confidence. The housing market, for example, posted a quarterly rise in prices for the first time in three years, which may indicate a stirring of recovery. Still, there are a lot of homes out there not worth half what they were recently, and new construction has ground to a halt for the time being. Is there a silver lining in this one for you?

Well, there may be if you are not a homeowner and not looking to become one immediately. With so many properties sitting empty while the market waits for buyers to return, people who are not homeowners can enjoy a renter’s market. Suddenly there are many options for housing–nicer places at must lower prices. In some areas of the country, it is actually cheaper to rent than to buy at the moment.

If you are considering or already preparing to file for bankruptcy protection, you may be worried about your ability to rent a home, since so many landlord applications now require a credit check and/or ask about past bankruptcies. Don’t let such questions dissuade you from pursuing a rental you really like. Because this is a renter’s market, landlords may soften some of these requirements. Most landlords will be more concerned with your payment history with past landlords than whatever happened with your credit cards. If you have a good history with someone, ask him if you can use his name for a reference and offer to provide it for the new landlord when you apply. Other times you may be able to bargain with the landlord by offering to pay a slightly larger security deposit or providing other assurances of payment. Remember that as much as you need a place to live, landlords need tenants to make money from their real estate investments―or in this market, just to minimize losses!

Home ownership has some real advantages, and many people feel that it’s a waste of money to pay rent that will never translate to equity. However, home ownership comes with its own host of troubles, and renting can be a good solution, even if just in the short term. Home ownership is a big step, and you may want to allow yourself some breathing room (and an opportunity to rebuild your credit) before taking the plunge. If so, you might as well take advantage of a renter’s market!

If you already own a home, but are having trouble with the monthly payments, bankruptcy is a great option to get caught up on the missed payments. Unfortunately, some people wait until it’s too late to take advantage of these protections, and by the time they accept that bankruptcy is their best option, it may be too late for bankruptcy to help. That’s why it’s important to contact a bankruptcy attorney early in the process, before your finances are beyond repair. If you have conceded that it not financially feasible to keep your home, bankruptcy acts as a shelter from the after effects of a foreclosure, such as tax liability and deficiency judgments. Further, if foreclosure is imminent, a bankruptcy will stop the foreclosure from proceeding, even if you intend to surrender the property in the foreclosure. This strategy can buy your family some time to transition to a new living arrangement.

These are strange days for homeowners and those considering home ownership. If you have doubts about your future financial viability, it may be best to wait out the recession before plunging into the real estate market. If your income is already stretched to the max by debt payments, consider speaking with a bankruptcy attorney. A properly planned bankruptcy can put you in the best possible position to rebuild your damaged credit and pursue home ownership in the future.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, September 1, 2009 @ 1:30 pm

When your debt problems get to be more than you can handle, an experienced bankruptcy attorney can be a real life-saver. Financial problems can split up spouses, fracture families, and generate a vicious cycle of stress that leads to greater financial problems that in turn lead to more stress–and so on, and so on. It’s important to know about bankruptcy and how the process can help you recover your life, but how will it work exactly? Every case is different, but the role of the attorney will be similar in each case, and understanding what a good bankruptcy attorney can do for you may help you understand how powerful bankruptcy law can be.

The role of the attorney as expert is more nuanced than you may realize. Some people hear about friends or relatives who attempt to file or actually complete a bankruptcy filing on their own, but understanding what a good bankruptcy attorney’s expertise is all about reveals why this isn’t a good idea. First of all, every state in the United States has different laws. This means that buying yourself a generalized “How To” guide won’t be enough. Not only does a good bankruptcy attorney know and understand the local laws as they appear on the books, he will also understand how they function in practice. Who are the trustees? What is the local bankruptcy judge like? A bankruptcy attorney with experience will know the answers to these questions. Make sure to seek out an attorney who is a personal bankruptcy specialist, who has handled many cases in your area, and who is actually licensed to practice in your state.

In addition, keep in mind that bankruptcy laws, which were already complicated, became even more so with the system reforms Congress passed in 2005. In the United States, laws are made both by the legislative body that enacts them and by the judges who interpret them. Because these reforms are recent, there are many areas of the bankruptcy law that are still being settled, your attorney’s practice should be limited to bankruptcy. This is the only way to ensure that your attorney has a finger on the pulse of this constantly changing area of law.

A bankruptcy attorney with experience will know how to be supportive to his clients. He will be able to anticipate problems and propose solutions before filing your case. The attorney you choose should have an accessible support staff that responds to you before and after the filing of your case. At your initial consultation, ask lots of questions and make sure you feel comfortable working with the attorney and his staff.

Don’t be afraid to ask how much the attorney will charge you for his services. Remember that you get what you pay for. With so much at risk, it’s certainly worth the extra money to make sure your bankruptcy goes smoothly. Remember that the attorney knows you are in financial trouble–that’s why you’re calling him! Law offices that handle lots of personal bankruptcy cases are more attuned to the concerns of individuals filing for bankruptcy protection and will be better prepared to work with you to fit legal services into your budget. Don’t forget, in a Chapter 13, the majority of your legal fees will be paid through your plan, minimizing the up-front costs.

In order to pick a good attorney, it’s a good idea not to wait until the last minute. Making life altering decisions on the fly is risky for obvious reasons, so it’s a good idea to get in touch with a bankruptcy attorney sooner rather than later. If you can’t keep up with your debts, the time to call is now.

The attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt know bankruptcy inside and out. With over 50 years of combined bankruptcy experience, we are the preeminent North Carolina bankruptcy firm. But don’t take our word for it, see what our clients have to say at www.billsbills.com.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, August 28, 2009 @ 8:36 am

What if you have money on deposit with a bank, and you owe the bank money for something totally unrelated―what can they do about it? Let’s say a bank had given you a loan at one branch and you’d fallen a bit behind on your payments. Then let’s also say you had money on deposit in a savings account, at another branch, but with the same bank? Can the bank just go into your account and take out what you owe them?

This scenario seems to prompt dueling intuitions; on the one hand, banks seem to be able to do whatever they want, and since they generally draft the contracts they sign with their clients, they definitely command the lion’s share of bargaining power.  On the other hand, something about this power seems wrong, intrusive. Shouldn’t the law protect us by giving us ultimate agency over our funds? Not paying a debt may be wrong, but it should still remain your choice to make, right?

Wrong or not, the bank would be acting legally in going into your accounts to take what you owe them because they have what is called a right of setoff. The bank has the right to “setoff” the debt owed to them with the funds held on deposit. The source for this right can usually be located in two places: first, in the contract you signed when you opened the deposit account; and second, under principles of common law. Essentially, the bank assumes the role of secured creditor when you make the deposit, even if the loan they originally extended to you was unsecured!

Thus, if you have money in any number of accounts, the bank can go rooting in there for a debt they claim you owe them. This includes checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificated of deposit (CDs). Generally speaking, the bank will do this for a debt owed them that is delinquent, where they have made a demand for payment from the debtor. However, the bank is not even required to give you advance notice that they are planning to setoff by deducting from your accounts. This can cause major trouble for you if you have outstanding checks, as the bank can take every penny in your account and then charge you overdraft fees when those outstanding checks finally clear.

Other complications can follow: Imagine that you’ve been waiting for your employer to direct deposit your paycheck, as with every pay period so you can pay your rent or make a payment on your car. If your bank decides to setoff, that money you were expecting will be gone before you even see it.

What if you unwittingly owe money to a bank who also happens to hold some of your money in deposit? Many people don’t realize that the stores that extend them credit for purchases are actually a middleman; the real lender is a bank. In this case, the bank is allowed to seize your funds, even though you were unaware of the peril.

As you can see, setoff gives banks a powerful tool to use against you…as if they needed another one! So what can you do to fight back when your money is at risk?

Unfortunately, even declaring bankruptcy won’t eliminate the bank’s power in this situation. The bank’s right of setoff supersedes the bankruptcy. That’s why it’s very important to change banks prior to filing bankruptcy, if you owe your bank money. Any money owed will then be discharged as a general unsecured debt through your bankruptcy. Speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney to find out more. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 to set up a free initial debt consultation. Or fill out our online debt questionnaire at www.billsbills.com.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, August 17, 2009 @ 1:52 pm

It’s generally not good practice to pay unsecured creditors just before filing bankruptcy. This is especially true if you plan on paying back a friend or relative. This means that if you’re considering a bankruptcy, you shouldn’t repay your Cousin Ted that $1,000 you owe him from vacation last year. A repayment constitutes preferential treatment of an unsecured creditor, and if you then file for bankruptcy, the Trustee will sue Cousin Ted to recover the $1,000.00

If this happened to you, don’t beat yourself up about it, it’s one of the more common pre-filing mistakes. It’s completely understandable that a good portion of your financial guilt stems from not being able to get square with friends and relatives. However, you need to make sure you don’t do it again, because it can make things quite a bit worse, especially for your favored insider.

Wait, what’s an “insider?” That sounds underhanded…

Basically, an insider is a person who is close enough to you for the court to be swayed into believing they have a strong enough influence over you to impact payment decisions. Insiders are not automatic and are determined on a case-by-case basis. If a person is found to be an insider, the trustee can retrieve preferential transfers from them as far back as a year before bankruptcy.

Ex-spouses can sometimes be considered insiders, provided you two are still on speaking terms. But if things are bad enough between you, he or she may be begging to be labeled an insider. As you can see, this is one component of preferential transfers than can get pretty sticky.

Here is a quick breakdown of the type of payments that are not preferential:

• Small payments: Payments less than $600 to a single creditor within the defining time period, typically 90 days or up to a year if involving an insider.
• Payments on secured debts: Car and house payments are not preferential, because you are obligated to pay them as secured debts.
• Current expenses: You are not going to get in trouble for paying your current bills and other monthly obligations. Be somewhat careful here, though, as back rent could be considered preferential. Talk to your attorney about this and all payments you have made prior to filing.
• Overdue alimony or child support: These payments also need to be made and can’t be recollected by a trustee.

Every post here is to help educate and inform you about the world of bankruptcy. If you are considering bankruptcy, but feel a moral obligation to repay a friend or relative first, speak with a bankruptcy attorney before you make a costly mistake. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 for a free debt consultation.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 5:51 pm

Liens can certainly throw a wrench in bankruptcy plans, especially for the unsuspecting. Unlike unsecured debts, which are simply discharged through a normal Chapter 7 bankruptcy, liens won’t be so efficiently eliminated with your filing. So what options do you have to at least address liens you can’t eliminate entirely?

One solution is to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy rather than Chapter 7 and take advantage of some of the special privileges unique to that chapter. When you file for Chapter 13, you propose a repayment plan. Chapter 13 allows you to stretch out payments to creditors for the life of the plan, usually three to five years, and when it comes to a secured debt―that is, one where the lender holds lien on property that is acting as collateral to secure the interest― someone filing for Chapter 13 may be able to pay for only the value of the collateral rather than the total amount owed. This will occur if certain conditions are met, and it is definitely a huge advantage, because the value of personal belongings will almost certainly depreciate significantly below what is owed on the item. Thus, if you meet conditions, you get to keep your item and pay a lot less for it.

Take the example of a car. You will be entitled to pay for the value of the vehicle rather than what you owe on the loan if : 1) the loan you used to buy the car wasn’t a purchase-money security interest (i.e., what you put up for collateral wasn’t the car itself); or 2) if you bought the car for something other than personal use (say, for a business use); or 3) even if you did get the car for personal use and used a purchase-money security interest to pay for it, if the purchase occurred more than 910 prior to your filing for bankruptcy.

For an item other than a car, such as a household appliance you bought with  department store charge account, you will only be required to pay the fair market value of the item if the purchase was made more than 1 year ago. In North Carolina, if the seller or third party finance company issued a credit card in conjunction with the purchase, and that credit card has more than a 15% interest rate, the seller has no security interest whatsoever. This means the debt will be discharged as a general unsecured debt.

Thus it’s important to keep in mind that bankruptcy offers many ways to approach financial difficulties, even for those situations when it seems like the lender is holding all the cards.  Call an experienced bankruptcy attorney today to discuss your unique financial situation. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt today for your free initial debt consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, August 6, 2009 @ 6:56 am

In a recent post, we talked a little about the “Meeting of Creditors.” That got us to thinking, are there other terms and steps along the way that we could help you better understand if you are still considering filing bankruptcy? And, does the blog mention or gloss over some terms that leave you with questions? So, we decided to put together a brief glossary of bankruptcy terms and jargon that might help get a better idea of how this whole thing works.

• Automatic stay: A court action that holds your creditors at bay upon filing bankruptcy.
• Collateral:An asset that backs up a specific debt.For example, in the most fundamental sense, your house backs up a mortgage loan. Think of it as something that you agree to wager as value in exchange for a loan.
• Confirmation:When the bankruptcy court makes your Chapter 13 plan binding, meaning that the plan has been accepted by everyone involved and it’s legally authorized.
• Discharge: What happens to your debt at the end of your case when the judge wipes clean your debt slate.
• Exempt property: Property that is not subject to the grasp of the creditors. They are “exempt” from the bankruptcy.
• Foreclosure: The legal process by which the bank takes back your home when the mortgage can longer be paid. On a more technical note, foreclosure is basically the method by which a creditor, namely a bank, turns an asset into cash. Everything needs to be disclosed to the public through announcements and an auction. Bankruptcy can stop a foreclosure and keep your family in your home.
• Joint bankruptcy: When you and your spouse file bankruptcy together, as a couple.
• Lien: Very similar to collateral. A lien is an obligation that must be met before you gain full ownership of an asset. You have to satisfy, or pay, the lien on your home before it’s actually yours. The same with a car loan. The loan itself is considered a lien.
• Means Test: A list of qualifications that a person must “meet” in order to file for bankruptcy under the legal reform of 2005 that determines whether you are entitled to an outright discharge of your debts under Chapter 7 or whether you must file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. A good bankruptcy attorney knows the ins and outs of the means test and can help you maneuver the many hurdles.
• No asset case: Pretty straight-forward really. This is when a person filing Chapter 7 does not have any assets valued above state exemption limits. This means you don’t have enough value to your property that would make it worthwhile for a Trustee to sell the assets for the benefit of unsecured creditors. The majority of Chapter 7 cases are no asset cases.
• Personal property: While this seems like an easy concept, it’s actually a legal term. It means anything you own, outright, that is not attached to land. Car. Retirement funds. Furniture. That sort of thing. Most personal property is subject to specific rules within a bankruptcy.
• Petition date: The date on which you filed your bankruptcy petition.
• Property of the estate: An overarching term to include everything you own and that may be at risk on your petition date.
• Reaffirmation: A promise to pay back certain debts even in the face of being able to discharge them.
• Redemption: The ability to only pay the value of personal property despite still owing more on it. So, let’s say your flat screen is worth $750 but you owe $1,100. This allows you to just pay the $750 and be done with it.
• Repossession: The taking of your collateral. (See above.)
• 341 meeting: The U.S. Bankruptcy code provision for the meeting of the creditors, a chance for your creditors to appear and object to your bankruptcy. Although creditors have the right to appear at the meeting, in the majority of cases, none do.

Okay, now that you have a good breakdown of bankruptcy terms, bookmark this post and refer to it if something gets by you as your bankruptcy gets underway. And of course, talk to your bankruptcy attorney if you have any questions.

From the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Call today to set up a free consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, August 5, 2009 @ 10:24 am

You might already know about the problems associated with fraudulent transfers. These are claims brought before the bankruptcy court by the trustee or by creditors which allege that you purposefully transferred property to someone with the intention of keeping it out of the hands of your creditors. If it is determined that you transferred the property with the intent to hinder or defraud a creditor, you could seriously jeopardize your bankruptcy, or worse, face some prison time. Hopefully if you’ve heard about fraudulent transfers, you know enough not to attempt them.

To complicate matters, the law will also look upon a transfer that wasn’t “actually” fraudulent as “constructively” fraudulent if you make a transfer, receive something in exchange, but the something you receive is not reasonably equivalent in value to the item you transfer. You see, sometimes people are really not trying to protect assets for themselves; they simply make a gift that is too generous in the eyes of the bankruptcy court, inappropriate in light of your obligations to your creditors. Making such a transfer will leave you with a diminished estate, meaning unsecured creditors will receive less in your bankruptcy than if the transfer had never occurred. In such a situation, it is the trustee’s obligation to recover the value of the transfer, and distribute this value to your unsecured creditors.

Here are a few examples of potentially innocent or well-intentioned actions that could be regarded as constructively fraudulent by a bankruptcy court. Maybe you want to help a loved one out, so you sell something you own which is worth $10,000.00 for far less, say $5,000.00. While it’s understandable that you want to give your family member a good deal, you could be leaving your loved one exposed. The court might decide that because of your insolvency, your sale was really intended to shield your assets from creditors.
The Trustee could then sue your relative for the difference in value. This is definitely not a situation you want to be in.

Another example is making a large donation or contribution to, for example, a political candidate, in the form of a large purchase of gift, on the eve of the bankruptcy. Here, too, the court will probably go after the beneficiary of your purchase to recover the value of the contribution. In all these examples, you weren’t attempting to save the asset for yourself, or attempting to get something in return in an immediately tangible fashion. However, your action will be frowned upon by the court because it will appear irresponsible given your probable intention to declare bankruptcy in order to rescue yourself from financial peril you were surely aware of.

One possible exception to this rule are good faith donations made to a church. A number of religious organizations worked together to promote the Religious Liberty and Charitable Donation Protection Act, and it was passed in 1998. Under the act, donations you make to your church will not trigger action against the church so long as the contribution was equal to no more than 15 percent of your income during the year preceding bankruptcy. If you consistently contributed in amounts exceeding that 15 percent ceiling, the court may allow those to pass as well. Warning! Don’t take this to mean that you have carte blanche to give away money on the eve of the bankruptcy on the theory that it’s better to give it to anyone just to keep it from your creditors. If the court figures out that such was your intention, your church could get sued.

To avoid these problems in your bankruptcy, it’s very important that you speak with an experienced attorney early in the process. If you have significant assets, chances are they are at least somewhat protected by your state’s exemption laws. This means there’s no chance you’d lose the asset in a bankruptcy. However, once you’ve made the transfer of the asset, you lose your right to claim the exemption.

If you’re thinking about bankruptcy but are worried about losing your possessions, talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney today. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. No charge for your initial consultation, and we have 4 convenient offices to choose from. Call 1-800-899-1414 today.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, August 5, 2009 @ 7:14 am

One aspect of bankruptcy you don’t hear much about is what happens after you file. One of the steps that tends to be a little disconcerting for those who have just filed Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 is the “Meeting of Creditors.” It just sounds so intimidating, doesn’t it?

Truthfully, it isn’t.

Meetings of creditors take place a few weeks after your attorney has filed your case and you have provided him or her with your most recent income information and list of debts. The meeting is essentially an opportunity for every one with an interest to hear your case and accept or challenge its terms.

The meeting of the creditors rarely even justifies its namesake because it is highly unusual that a creditor actually attends. What does happen usually takes only a few minutes and sometimes less. At the meeting, you will be sworn in by the trustee and have your identity verified. You will then be asked, under oath, whether the petition you have filed is a true and correct statement of your financial affairs.

The questions you might face are pretty easy to handle and should not cause you to be nervous. For example, “Why are you filing bankruptcy?” is pretty common. Your reason for filing will probably need to be flushed out in some detail but obviously, that’s not anything you need to study for because anyone who has gone through the financial stress and frustration prior to bankruptcy knows full well the reasons why. You will also probably hear some questions about employment and real estate, too. But again, nothing overly complicated.

There are rare occasions when a creditor might appear at a Meeting of Creditors. This often happens when there is a domestic support obligation involved, or some other obligation between you and another individual party. If a creditor does appear, they will be given a limited time to ask questions. If it appears that the creditor will need more time to ask questions, the Trustee may ask the creditor to make a formal request for a separate hearing to continue the inquiry. Don’t let this scare you. These extra hearings are extremely rare, and, as long as you have been honest throughout the process, you shouldn’t have any problems answering the questions.

You may also see a creditor if you ran your own business. This is because there is typically a great deal more money involved with a business than an individual. And, business creditors are more bankruptcy-savvy and thus feel comfortable being involved with every step of the process. Again, your honesty with schedules and asset listings will determine how easy a time you have at the meeting.

This post should give you a decent overview of the Meeting of Creditors but be sure to discuss it with one of our attorneys as you begin the bankruptcy process. Again, the more you know about the process, the more comfortable you will be throughout your journey into & out of bankruptcy.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, August 4, 2009 @ 6:20 am

Sometimes life throws you the unexpected. If you’re living paycheck to paycheck, all it takes is one unanticipated expense to put you on the path to a truly disastrous financial scenario. It’s often the unforeseen emergency expense which starts the ball rolling. Soon you’re 2 or 3 months behind on the car payment, and repossession of your car or foreclosure becomes a very real possibility. That’s why it’s so important to talk to a bankruptcy attorney the moment things start to get out of control.

But even if your debt problems have sneaked up on you and now you’re facing an imminent repossession, a quick bankruptcy filing can put the brakes on the repo man. If your situation is critical, you can file what’s called a bare-bones or skeletal filing with a court to prevent imminent action against you; for example, if your vehicle is being repossessed or you are facing foreclosure, the court will allow you to file an emergency bankruptcy petition.

In a bare-bones filing, the court allows you to file your bankruptcy petition with only a minimum of the required set of documents. After this minimal filing, you will be given a set amount of time to gather the remaining documents. The amount of time can differ, but generally you will have up to 15 days to complete your petition. Once your petition is filed, you enjoy the benefit of the automatic stay, which stops creditors’ collection efforts in their tracks. This allows you to keep the car, stay in your home, and put the creditors back in their place.

The emergency petition should be filed only if absolutely necessary. If you can avoid doing so, it’s probably a good idea to give yourself and your attorney time to carefully file your case. This approach allows you to develop the best bankruptcy plan to help you out of your financial trap and into a fresh start. If you’re facing foreclosure, for example, you will have ample time to contact an attorney before the foreclosure sale. In these cases, don’t wait until the last minute! Car repossessions, on the other hand, can develop much more quickly and often necessitate quick action to prevent irreversible consequences.

If an emergency situation has caused you to get behind on your car or home, talk to an attorney early. An experienced bankruptcy attorney knows how the repossession process works and can best advise you on how to best protect your interests. Don’t wait another second, call today.

Durham bankruptcy. Raleigh bankruptcy. Fayetteville bankruptcy. Wilson bankruptcy.

5g6teri2yp

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, July 29, 2009 @ 9:06 am

Multi level marketing, also called “direct selling” “affiliate marketing” or “home-based business franchising”, has become popular in the past few years as a way for those with an entrepreneurial streak to build their own businesses with minimum investment. It has been especially appealing to, and vigorously directed towards parents (usually mothers) who wish to stay at home with their children but want or need to earn income at the same time.

The structure is designed to create a marketing and sales force by recruiting promoters of company products, or “distributers”, and compensating them not only for their own personal sales, but also for the sales generated by others they introduced to the company, creating a “downline” of distributors and a hierarchy of multiple levels of compensation.

The companies and products are generally marketed and promoted via word of mouth, often in a ‘club-like’ atmosphere. There are hundreds of companies that operate under this structure, selling everything from vitamins to long distance service. A motivated distributor with an active down line can earn a nice living with long term residuals. On the downside, it does take a lot of time and work to make an MLM business successful. Some distributors can end up spending a lot of time and money, incurring thousands of dollars of credit card debt for travel, advertising and conventions, while earning little or no money.

Balancing large credit cards debts to fund their operation can put them in a very precarious position. Additional problems can arise for previously successful Multi Level Marketers when the sponsoring company suddenly changes the terms of the distribution commission structure, or there is a switch from one MLM program to another, or because sales have dropped off due to the economy or an unexpected increase in competition in the marketplace. Once the problem gets large enough and the owner finally realizes he is on a sinking ship, grabbing onto the bankruptcy lifesaver will require unique strategy and a great amount of skilled counsel from a qualified attorney.

Because of the nature of the MLM business, the process for filing bankruptcy isn’t as clear-cut as it might be for other debtors. It could give rise to additional objections by the Trustee or an increased risk of lengthy and expensive litigation.

For example, the first hurdle in the process of filing bankruptcy under Bankruptcy Code is that all consumer debtors must submit to a median income, or means test, to determine their eligibility for Chapter 7 and/or their unsecured creditor payment obligations for Chapter 13. The means test looks at the six month period immediately prior to the month of filing. It is a formula designed to keep filers with higher incomes from filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Only bankruptcy filers with primarily consumer debts, not business debts, need to take the means test. Filers with higher incomes who fail the means test may use Chapter 13 bankruptcy to repay a portion of their debts, but may not use Chapter 7 bankruptcy to wipe out their debts altogether.

MLM distributors contemplating bankruptcy may or may not be subject to the means test, because, arguably, their debt may be considered primarily business debt as opposed to consumer debt. Depending on the state of residence and filing, the question of whether personal credit card debt used to finance a home based business yields “consumer debt” or “business debt” is likely a threshold question.

There may also be questions of what actually constitutes “income” in the MLM scenario. Trustees could argue that payments submitted by downline distributors for advertising or marketing constitutes income that should be included in the means test calculation.

Assuming that the means test is required, the MLM debtor may encounter a problem with the presumption of abuse arising from recent prior months of high income. This is especially true if the distributor’s income was suddenly reduced due to a change in the compensation schedule or a termination of a particular program. Or, in the case of MLM debtors with a history of starting and growing multiple successful organizations, the Trustee may presume a high income will be generated in the near future.

These are just a few of the issues that could crop up when Multi Level Marketing is a factor in a personal bankruptcy. Others include issues of income suppression and asset diminution.

If you are involved with an MLM organization and are beginning to experience financial problems and pressure, consulting with an experienced attorney before the problems escalate can help you avoid the pitfalls discussed here.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, July 28, 2009 @ 6:21 am

Before the deservedly unpopular 2005 reforms to the Bankruptcy Code, it was rare that an innocent mistake could cause your discharge to be denied or revoked. It used to be that trustees and the courts reserved this harsh measure for those situations where it was clear that a person filing for bankruptcy had engaged in serious, persistent and intentional misbehavior. Now, in the aftermath of the reforms, it is even more important than ever to hire a competent bankruptcy attorney to help you navigate a bankruptcy filing, not just because the reforms made declaring bankruptcy much more complicated, but also because a mistake could cause your discharge to be revoked or denied. And what’s the point of declaring bankruptcy if you don’t get your debts discharged? That bankruptcy isn’t going to help you at all, probably, and it will almost certainly hurt you.

There are several situations you must be on the lookout for to avoid having your discharge denied or revoked. First of all, under the reforms, a prerequisite for receiving the discharge is the completion of a financial management course. This course is one hosted locally in your area and approved by your bankruptcy case trustee. You will only be exempted from completing this course if a good one isn’t available nearby. Although the educational value of these courses is questionable, all debtors must fulfill the requirement or forfeit their discharge.

The bankruptcy trustee can demand a great deal of information from you over the course of your bankruptcy. One of the more onerous demands is the production of your last four years of tax returns. If the Trustee demands the returns and you fail to produce them, your discharge could get dismissed outright. If you’re bothered by this requirement, well, who can blame you? It seems like your tax returns are private financial information that should remain so, even during bankruptcy. There is a little bit of latitude for protecting your privacy: you can opt to send transcripts of the returns (also known as summaries) instead of the full filings; these contain less personal information. Avail yourself of this option by requesting summaries from the IRS.

And we’re not done yet! If you’re filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 and you owe child support or alimony, it’s time to get caught up. In order for your debts to be discharged at the end of the process, you must be completely up to date on your support payments. The good news is that if you are behind, the arrears can be caught up in your Chapter 13 plan. Your ongoing payments must continue to be paid over the course of your bankruptcy. It would be a real shame to get to the end of the process, having made all of the required plan payments, only to have a problem because you missed a few support payments along the way. Protect your discharge by paying these on time.

Finally, it should hardly need to be stated that you must tell the truth and avoid fraudulent activity during your filing. Remember that even if your intention isn’t to commit fraud, an innocent mistake could be interpreted as such if the effect is to obscure some part of the process or misrepresent your position in any way.

With all of these potential quagmires, it’s imperative that you consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt- helping families since 1985. 1-800-899-1414.

Durham bankruptcy attorney. Raleigh bankruptcy attorney. Wilson bankruptcy attorney. Fayetteville bankruptcy attorney.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, July 25, 2009 @ 5:35 pm

It shouldn’t take more than a few visits to our blog for you to find a slew of posts about how to prepare for your bankruptcy and manage all the relationships along the way, like those with your attorney and bankruptcy trustee.

Like any relationship, the ones that are forged during a bankruptcy should be built on trust. That is, you need to be upfront with everyone and every entity involved, even your creditors, to ensure that in the end you wind up where you need to be. A large part of building that trust has to do with how you handle the disclosure of your assets. The following point almost deserves to be in all caps, but no one likes to be yelled at, so: never try to hide or transfer assets with the intention of shielding them from creditors.

Okay, now that the lecture is over, it should be noted that sometimes people transfer assets with good intentions. A constructively fraudulent transfer is not an deliberate attempt to hide an asset but is looked down upon by creditors because quite often, the gift or item in question is transferred at a value less than its actual worth. For a simple example, imagine you sold a $25,000 SUV for $15,000 out of simple desperation to raise cash for the bankruptcy. Sure, you now have cash, which is still an asset, but the creditor would have preferred the $25,000 SUV. And you can rest assured, they’ll make a case out of it.

Consider these additional examples of constructively fraudulent transfers:

• Ty Webb gives Lacy Underall $10,000 to help her move from dreary old Manhattan to a high-end suburban country club. His creditors will end up pretty unhappy with Ty’s attempt to secure his girlfriend a spot at the club pool because that money could have been used to pay his debt. Worse yet, he received no real asset in return. As a result, the bankruptcy trustee handling Ty’s case will most likely try to sue Ms. Underall for the money. Since Ty’s asset transfer wasn’t an attempt to hide anything, his bankruptcy will probably go through as planned. But now his girlfriend is involved, and that doesn’t bode well for Ty’s post-bankruptcy dinner plans.
• Al Gore, on the cusp of bankruptcy and in a last-ditch effort to remain relevant, decides to switch political parties and attend an expensive fundraising dinner for the Green Party candidate in the 2012 election. He pays $50,000 to attend. Once he officially files for bankruptcy, the court immediately rules that the party candidate’s election committee needs to relinquish Mr. Gore’s donation to the trustee because it was ruled that the dinner was not equal to $50,000 cash that could be used to pay creditors.

As you can see by the example above, even donations are subject to becoming constructively fraudulent transfers in the eyes of the court. Large donations to churches, schools and other non-profits can all be retrieved by the trustee if they result in the reduction of an asset’s value or are considered an attempt to quickly move money and thus, diminish the trustee’s ability to obtain proper restitution for your debts. There has been some action against this practice, however. In 1998, a contingent of religious organizations successfully lobbied for the Religious Liberty and Charitable Donation Protection Act, which was formulated to protect good-faith monetary gifts of up to 15 percent of a person’s gross income based on the year before filing bankruptcy.

If you’re considering filing for bankruptcy, it’s important to talk to a bankruptcy attorney early to avoid an innocent mistake like the ones described in this post. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt for a free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, July 22, 2009 @ 8:08 am

Liens―a kind of property interest that secures payment on a loan, or the performance of some obligation―are a thorny little issue in bankruptcy cases. Unlike many kind of debts, liens generally (with only a few exceptions) will not be discharged automatically in a bankruptcy the way unsecured debt is. Liens come in many flavors―how about tax liens, mortgage liens, and mechanic’s liens, to name a few― but they generally fall into one of two categories: consensual liens and nonconsensual liens. Consensual liens are themselves split into two categories; one category of consensual liens is generally referred to as a “purchase-money interest,” while the other is known as a “nonpurchase-money security interest.”
************************************************************
1) Consensual Liens
purchase-money security interests, nonpurchase-money security interest

2) Nonconsensual Liens
Judgment liens, statutory liens, tax liens.

***************************************************
Ok, there you have it, your daily dose of jargon. Now what does it all mean?!