Published Sunday, March 7, 2010 @ 8:10 am

Before you begin the bankruptcy process, it’s important to understand a few helpful hints to make it a more painless process:

(1) Remember: You are not Alone.
Maybe you think of bankruptcy as something for “other people.” But the days of bankruptcy as a means of financial respite for the perpetually poor are no more: everyone from the solidly middle class to formerly wealthy Americans are being forced into bankruptcy more than ever before. Because of steady declines in real estate values, and rises in health care costs, credit card interest and unemployment in all sectors, more than 8% of bankruptcy filings in 2009 came from people who made over $60,000. So, begin by dispensing with any preconceived ideas of bankruptcy in lieu of a successful strategy for setting off on a sound path to personal financial freedom.

(2) Personal Bankruptcy Puts You in Control
While people who drown in debt remain at the mercy of their creditors, bankruptcy can actually be a better way to take control of your financial future. If you file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you play an integral role in determining how you’ll pay off your debt, including a trusty payment plan that works for you. Even Chapter 7 bankruptcy can buy precious time to halt creditor harassment, save money and plan your next best fiscal moves.

(3) Bankruptcy Can Be a Key to Better Credit
As counter-intuitive as it may seem, bankruptcy could potentially improve your credit scores in the long run. Obviously, the immediate effect of bankruptcy is a lowering of your credit scores. However, filing can be the better option for your long-term credit than enduring late payments on credit cards for years in an attempt to stave off what is more than likely inevitable: default. Because some 35% of your credit score is based on your payment past, it is vital to your financial future to avoid missed payments and establish new credit as soon, and as much, as possible. Even though bankruptcy stays on your credit report for 7 to 10 years, it does not necessarily follow that your credit score will be low for that entire time. If you take steps to rebuild after your bankruptcy, your FICO score can quickly be restored to where it was prior to your filing.

(4) With Bankruptcy, Timing is, in Fact, Everything
When you’re facing insolvency, timing can be especially important. And that’s also the reason it’s the best time to talk to a qualified bankruptcy lawyer. But just because you’ve consulted a lawyer does not necessary mean that bankruptcy is the next step. While it’s hard to believe, it is sometimes your best move to hold off on your filing until the worst of your financial situation is over. For example, if you are facing impending medical costs, you may want to wait to file until you’ve recovered fully before filing for bankruptcy, simply to avoid accruing more medical expenses during the process. In the alternative, some situations demand that you file sooner than later, such as if your car’s been repossessed and you need it back immediately. As a result, consulting a bankruptcy expert is your best bet to making your bankruptcy work for you.

(5) With Bankruptcy, You Never Have to Go it on Your Own
Bankruptcy isn’t a cakewalk, but you never have to go it alone. In fact, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future. The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, March 6, 2010 @ 1:05 pm

While lack of confidence in the recent economic recovery led employers to shed an unanticipated 85,000 jobs in December 2009—even as many long-time unemployed Americans gave up looking for work to keep the unemployment rate held steady at 10 percent—the qualification dates for existing tiers of unemployment benefits were extended for an additional two months.

But that two-month bump in benefits will expire at the end of February 2010, leaving millions of average Americans bewildered and without any money coming in their coffers.  Now, without Congressional action to extend these benefits, this latest look at the state of unemployment means an unprecedented number of jobless workers will lose their benefits and be ineligible to get more by June 2010.

In fact, the National Employment Law Project (NELP) released a new report last week about this very long-term unemployment crisis, revealing that:

“1.2 million jobless workers will become ineligible for federal unemployment benefits in March unless Congress extends the unemployment safety net programs from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). By June, this number will swell to nearly 5 million unemployed workers nationally who will be left without any jobless benefits….Currently, 5.6 million people are accessing one of the federal extensions (34-53 weeks of Emergency Unemployment Compensation; 13-20 weeks of Extended Benefits, a program normally funded 50 percent by the states).”

Of the nearly 1.2 million workers facing a cut off of benefits in March alone: “380,000 workers will exhaust their 26 weeks of state benefits without accessing the temporary EUC extension program or the permanent federal program of Extended Benefits. Another 814,000 workers will not be eligible to continue receiving EUC past their current tier of benefits.”

“’Congress must swiftly act to maintain the lifeline for millions of jobless Americans caught in the
undertow of record long-term unemployment in this ongoing downturn,’ said Christine Owens, Executive Director of the National Employment Law Project. ‘At the end of last year, Congress wisely agreed that our hardest hit workers and our economy were not yet out of the woods, and reauthorized the jobless benefits and health care subsidies from the ARRA. It is critical for Congress to renew these unemployment provisions through the end of the year before its Presidents Day recess for the millions workers again facing the end of the line—and to avoid missing the boat on this timely and effective economic jolt.’”

Under intense pressure from the public, Congress is currently considering a qualifying unemployment benefits extension period of another three months.  But for many, remaining jobless, even with an added lineup of benefits, is no consolation. As one in 10 Americans remain unable to find work and President Obama has established job creation as his “number one focus” this year, according to some economists, the legislative proposals being seriously discussed in Washington don’t even come close to addressing the problem.

As a result, many are taking things into their own hands to address their financial woes and take back their fiscal freedoms to make a fresh start through bankruptcy.

In fact, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help any unemployment person to conquer your creditors and face their financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, March 5, 2010 @ 4:30 pm

Life after bankruptcy is beautiful thing. Your stress levels go down and you become more confident with money. Now that things are back on track, maybe it is time to take a whole-life approach to changing the way you live. For some, it’s a new, but smaller, home; a more economical car; or a strict monthly budget. For others, re-starting your life may include relocating. Boy, that sounds like a big decision, huh?

So if you have a new financial outlook on life and think it’s time to move, where would you go? Thankfully, our friends at Forbes.com have researched a list of the best cities in America for “getting ahead.” Their research was based primarily on areas that have good job growth and income growth and a relatively affordable cost of living. Call U-Haul, because here are some of your options, in no particular order:

Like Winter? Well, if so, point the GPS toward Delaware County, Ohio. The home county of Columbus has a three-year income growth of 11 percent and is the fastest growing county of the state. Forbes tells us it has a wide variety of jobs and a number of grounded, family-oriented neighborhoods that help prop-up a stable workforce.

If you don’t mind the rooting for the Texans over the Cowboys, Fort Bend County, Texas, outside of Houston, realized 10 percent job growth between 2007 and 2008 and added just under 6,000 jobs since the middle of 2007. A large portion of employees can be found working in energy companies but it’s diverse enough for people to find opportunity in education and hospitality. Many members of Forbes’ 400 Best Big Companies reside in Fort Bend County.

Another relocation is near Frank Sinatra’s kind of town. No, not Vegas. Chicago. Outside of where the wind blows is Kendall County, an area that experienced a 90 percent population increase from 2000 to 2008 and as a result, a seven percent jump in income. You can find another attractive option near Chicago in Will County, Ill., which in 2007 and 2008 saw its residents’ income climb by seven percent.

A bit north, you can settle in balmy Carver County, Minnesota where income jumped by five percent for the same two years. Carver is close to Minneapolis, one of the Twin Cities along with St. Paul which are consistently present in many “Best Places to Live” lists.

If the Midwest or Lone Star State do not appeal to you, head just north of the Triangle to Hanover County in Virginia, an area which saw its per capita income also grow by five percent.

Drive by an ever-expanding government, other regions in Virginia that made the list include Loudon and Alexandria Counties. However, even with the income growth, these areas are very expensive in which to live. Thus, their presence on the list is somewhat questionable because for the most part, to get ahead in Alexandria County, you need to already be ahead.

Relocating can be an expensive endeavor. If you are lucky enough to have a new employer cover some costs, then terrific, you are already on your way. The key is to start planning early and do not rush. After all, it’s not like the real estate deals are going anywhere.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, March 3, 2010 @ 7:25 pm

If you’re reading this, odds are you’re considering bankruptcy. As such, you have a lot on your plate. Yet, what might make you feel a bit better about being bankruptcy bound is the knowledge that you’re not alone. Millions of average Americans just like you are facing desperate circumstances as they struggle to stay afloat in the wake of this decade’s Great Recession—facing foreclosure, job insecurity, rising costs and, of course, insolvency.

In the series, Our Great Recession 2.0, we’ll delve into some of the more unique stories of this decade’s unprecedented economic downturn, allowing you to see familiar faces and dire places people are going in order to handle the financial meltdown head-on.

In part one of this ongoing series, we meet GM autoworker Michael Hanley.

Hanley, who recently shared his plight with The Huffington Post’s Sharon Cohen, is known to commute 530 miles in a day, from his home in the rolling hills of Wisconsin to his job in Kansas—all to keep a paycheck rolling in. As Cohen reminds us, “It’s one heck of a haul:” more than 1,000 miles roundtrip, 16-plus hours of driving, every week. “I like to say I gave up an eight-minute commute for an eight-hour commute,” he tells Cohen wearily.

Hanley’s commute is representative of not only one man’s tough choices in a tougher job market, it reveals the near-death of the American auto industry as a whole.

After his GM plant shut down a little over a year ago, Hanley could’ve chosen to stay close to home, and his family and search for an autoworker’s salary ($28 an hour) in his Wisconsin county “where more than 40 percent of its manufacturing jobs disappeared from 2006 to 2009.”  Instead the 23-year veteran of the auto industry chose to hang on to a better GM paycheck and his family’s health insurance, following the job to Fairfax, Kansas.

Even before his factory went idle, Hanley took steps to make himself a stronger candidate in a shrinking employment market, getting the college credits he needed to complete his accounting degree. But when Kansas came calling, along with the health insurance to keep his wife on chemotherapy, Hanley “didn’t hesitate. Auto work these days is like playing musical chairs. You grab an opening where you can.”

“There’s no way I could possibly go through one treatment without him having insurance,” Hanley’s wife told HuffPost.

Balancing his family’s financial security at his coveted job and the lonely existence of being away from home is hopefully a temporary sacrifice for Hanley. He plans to commute for an additional 18 months, at which point he turns 50 and hopes there will be a retirement package waiting.

“There are those people who worked there who have lost something they thought would be around forever and provided them with a real good lifestyle,” he adds.

For Hanley, it’s all about riding out his own Great Recession.

If you’ve been driven out of your job and are in serious debt, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you to conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future beyond our own “Great Recession.”  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, March 3, 2010 @ 12:24 pm

Are you angry at banks that are supposedly too big to fail? But you haven’t withdrawn your money because you think your account is too small to matter?

Well, one media matriarch has some alternative advice. 

Started by Arianna Huffington, The Huffington Post is an American news website and aggregator for a host of blogs, columns, stories and moderated comments. The site, through its founder, is now taking a stand against America’s oversized financial institutions—from JP Morgan to Bank of America—and urging you to do the same.

HuffPost’s “Move Your Money” campaign urges you—the bank customer—to withdraw your money out of the big banks and into smaller community-oriented ones.  The reason is simple: a post-recessionary payback of another color. Huffington argues that following their bailout these same big banks have done nothing to help small business or to drive lending to the average American. As a result, the economy can’t thrive nor begin producing the much-needed jobs so many taxpayers—who footed the bill for said bailout—so desperately need. And she’s hoping we’re not going to take it anymore.

And she’s not alone in her gripes with the banking industry.

Robert Johnson of the progressive think tank the Roosevelt Institute helped craft the “Move Your Money” campaign. “All of us collectively do have money and when we move our money, we’re voting with a different currency, and one that businesses pay attention to,” he said to CBS News’s Jim Axelrod.

By entering your zip code into the Move Your Money website, a list of nearby small banks pops up all of which have received a rating of ‘B” or better by independent reviewers.

According to the Independent Community Bankers of America, community banks “focus attention on the needs of local families, businesses, and farmers” and “channel most of their loans to the neighborhoods where their depositors live and work, helping to keep local communities vibrant and growing.”

While many of these smaller banks provide a more personal touch to your banking experience, they too have fallen victim to this decade’s Great Recession, with hundreds closing in the past several years. As such, any movement of money should come with some research that your new, smaller bank has some staying power.

Move Your Money recommends that you stop in and see what they’re about. Talk to an employee to see what services they offer and how they treat you. For some tips and questions to ask visit Solari or see this article from the Dallas Morning News. You can also use FindABetterBank to calculate annual fees based on how you bank (note: their list of banks is incomplete).

If you truly are without any money to move—and your assets, in the bank or otherwise, are less than your debts—your gripe may be with your creditors, which, in many cases, are the same bailed-out banks targeted in the Move Your Money campaign.

Well, you too have the power to take back your money.

In fact, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can help you conquer these creditors and wipe away your debts, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, March 3, 2010 @ 8:10 am

As all American’s attempt to make their way out of their own Great Recessions, there is an old joke about the difference between a recession and a depression that goes something like this: “A recession is when your neighbor is out of work. A depression is when you are out of work.”

Well, the unemployed just got a whole new reason to feel depressed post-national recession.

Now, potential employers throughout the country are beginning to hold credit histories against already underworked and overwrought applicants. In fact, according to a recent survey by the Society for Human Resources Management, some sixty percent of employers said they run credit checks on at least some job applicants, compared with fewer than 42 percent in 2006.

While employers say these types of credit checks provide invaluable information about a job applicant’s “honesty and sense of responsibility,” according to The Huffington Post, lawmakers in at least 16 states—from South Carolina to Oregon—have proposed “outlawing most credit checks, saying the practice traps people in debt because their past financial problems prevent them from finding work.”

One such anti-credit check lawmaker is Wisconsin Rep. Kim Hixson. He drafted a bill in his state shortly after hearing from constituents who have continually struggled to find work. “If somebody is trying to get a job as a truck driver or a trainer in a gym, what does your credit history have to do with your ability to do that job?” Hixson told HuffPost.

Under federal law, these same prospective employers must actually get written permission from applicants in order to run their credit check. Unfortunately, even with these protections in place, many desperate job seekers don’t feel they are in any position to refuse a potential employer’s requests.

Most of the state bills being proposed in 2010 prevent employers from using credit reports when hiring for most positions. According to The Huffington Post’s Kathleen Miller, “The laws contain exceptions in cases where such information could be relevant to the job – for example, if the person is applying to work in a bank or an accounts-payable office.”

Based on a 2008 survey by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), employers and other credit check advocates argue that the two most common red flags for employees who commit workplace fraud are “living beyond their means and having difficulty meeting financial obligations.” The ACFE report also estimated that U.S. employers lost $994 billion to workplace fraud in 2008.

But in these tough financial times, many believe the economy can’t afford the credit checks.

“We are in the great recession and this creates a vicious cycle,” said Maryland Delegate Kirill Reznik, who drafted a similar bill being considered in his state.  “People lose their jobs, that naturally precipitates them getting behind on bills, their credit scores go down, they are trying to find a job to pay off the bills, and employers won’t hire them because of their credit score.”

In the meantime, consumer advocacy groups are showing their support for legislative bans on these types of credit checks, pointing out that credit reports can also contain inaccurate information.

A qualified bankruptcy attorney can assist jobless citizens with even the worst credit histories to conquer their fears of losing it all.  Specifically, the bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, March 2, 2010 @ 11:52 am

As we’re all aware, this decade’s Great Recession has dealt, and continues to deal, a significant blow to the budgets of many American families, leaving millions in debt, underwater in their mortgages, and looking for any means necessary to get back on a financially-healthy course.  Now, we’re finding that tax time is also yielding it’s own set of challenges for some cash-strapped citizens.

In his recent New York Times article, “Paying the Price for Survival Tactics,” Charles Delafuente reports on how the I.R.S. treats many kinds of written-off debts, some distressed home sales, and many emergency withdrawals from retirement accounts as taxable income.

Debt Forgiven By A Lender
In his timely piece, Delafuente introduces the concept of “phantom income:” an amount a lender forgives but for which the debtor still owes tax. In your case, this taxable amount becomes essentially the difference between what the lender would have received from you and what it will receive under your new agreement. As Delafuente explains, “These taxes are imposed even if only the interest rate, not the amount of principal, is reduced. That happens, for example, to consumers who renegotiate credit card debt. A lender is supposed to issue a 1099-C form reporting forgiven debt, but that doesn’t always happen if the principal is not reduced.”

As is normally true in the tax world, there are exceptions to the forgiven-debt rule. Keep in mind, forgiven debt is not taxable income if it is discharged by bankruptcy, or if you are considered insolvent—whereby your liabilities exceed the fair market value of your assets—when the debt is forgiven.

Mortgage Debt
While recent bailout measures enacted to help homeowners generally won’t trigger the forgiven-debt tax on a principal home, “foreclosures, short sales and other loss-of-home scenarios could bring on capital gains tax.” For example, if your home is worth significantly more than a mortgage and is repossessed and sold by the lender, you are entitled to the difference. As Delafuente explains, “The difference is a taxable profit, which will cause a capital gain. Fortunately for the masses, the first $500,000 on gains on a main home for couples ($250,000 for single taxpayers) may be covered by a tax exclusion. Further, nonrecourse mortgages, in which the lender can’t touch any assets other than the property, generally don’t cause such a gain.”

Retirement Withdrawals
Aside from your mortgage, if you withdraw money prematurely from their retirement accounts because of a job loss or a reduction in hours, you will also face extra taxes.  Holders of traditional I.R.A.’s and I.R.A. rollover accounts must pay 10 percent of any amount withdrawn before they reach 59 1/2 as a penalty on top of the traditional taxes on money taken out, which must be paid regardless of your age.

If you have a Roth I.R.A., you’ll face different rules. Your contributions—but not the account earnings—can be withdrawn without penalty after five years.

If you have an employer-sponsored plan, like 401(k)s and 403(b)s, you face yet another set of rules. For you, withdrawals are penalty-free if you left the employer that set up your plan after you turned 55. However, money rolled over to an I.R.A. from a former employer’s plan is subject to the 59 1/2-age rule.

Most 401(k) and 403(b) plans do not allow current employees to make withdrawals; instead they often have loan provisions. But another tax nightmare occurs if you have an outstanding loan and lose your job. In that case, you must repay the loan quickly or have the balance treated as a withdrawal, making it subject to tax and to the 10 percent penalty if you’re under 55, unless an equal-payment plan is used.

But remember, before borrowing from your retirement accounts, one of the best debt forgiveness plans comes from a personal bankruptcy. In these taxing times, a qualified bankruptcy attorney can help you conquer your fears before losing it all.  Specifically, the bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, March 2, 2010 @ 10:48 am

While many economists say this decade’s Great Recession ended in the middle of 2009, millions of struggling Americans who are still working hard to find meaningful employment would definitely disagree. And as we are all now well aware, the once thriving middle class is being hit especially hard—with a determination of whether you’re in a recession or recovery based largely on where you live and if you still have a job.

In the new year, the unemployment rate has, in fact, dropped incrementally from its staggering 10 percent highs in December 2009 to 9.7 percent, a small diminishment in the stats that some say exists because the long-term unemployed—the men and women out of work more than six months—have simply stopped looking for work. For these “long-termers,” making up some 40 percent of those collecting unemployment, these tiny changes in stats are far from comforting.

“These people, when you look at their unemployment rate, it’s just off the charts,” Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute told CBS News Correspondent John Blackstone. “It’s very different from earlier patterns that we’ve seen in recessions.”

“For those who once worked in the auto industry, housing and manufacturing, new jobs could be a long time coming,” Achuthan adds, pointing out that, “Ten years ago, we had 18 million or so people in manufacturing; now, it’s a little over 10 million. So you have 8 million jobs gone and there not coming back, ever.”

In this case, the proof is largely in the pudding, as average Americans struggle to transition from job to job in this era of perpetual unemployment. Hammering this point home, CBS’s Blackstone also spoke with Kelley Novak, who used to own a restaurant in Napa, California, called the No Bad Day Café. In the months since Novak was forced from the restaurant business by falling revenues, she has been trying what is becoming a recession-worthy recipe: cooking up new ways to keep money flowing in at a time when finding a job seems impossible. Now she’s trying to feed folks on a diminished scale via a small catering business. “It’ hard,” she says, “because there’s nothing available and, you know, you just have to get creative.”

As is the case for many small businesses, the economic downturn hit her homegrown eatery especially hard. “We were down 30 percent like everybody else,” Novak told CBS. Not only did she have to close her California restaurant, but Novak was forced to lay off all of her employees. “It was sad. It was really sad,” Novak recalls.

With California’s unemployment pushing over 12 percent, Novak understands it may be a long time before the six people who used to work at the No Bad Day Café can, as Blackstone put it: have “ a good day.” Blackstone found, “Many more may have to follow Novak’s lead and find something they can do themselves – even though launching her catering business has been daunting, especially since she’s doing it on her own. ‘It’s just really frightening,’ says Novak. “But giving up is no answer.”

Novak is right. And another key to rebounding in a recession is knowing who can help. Extended unemployment is not only frightening, but can be fiscally devastating: draining savings, busting budgets, and leaving many bankruptcy bound.

A qualified bankruptcy attorney can assist proud, but jobless, citizens just like you to conquer your fears of losing it all.  Specifically, the bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, March 2, 2010 @ 10:09 am

Developed to slow the rate of Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings, the Means Test helps determine whether or not someone qualifies to file Chapter 7, and in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, to what extent you might be able to pay back some of your creditors. It’s become a very frustrating part of the bankruptcy process because it implies, “Hey, you just don’t want to pay your bills.”  Not only that, it also subjects filers to additional frustration, confusion and widens the gap between citizens and the law in place to protect them.

However, there are ways to overcome the restrictions and complications of the Means Test.  Of course, this is where the insight of an experienced bankruptcy attorney is especially beneficial, as it can take some time and expert handling.

Called “special circumstances,” a judge may grant you permission to file Chapter 7 in spite of failing the Means Test. (Failing, in this context, indicates that you have some ability to pay and that you would have to file under Chapter 13 and pay your monthly disposable income to your unsecured creditors through a Chapter 13 plan.)  If you are a member of the Armed Forces and a call to duty dramatically alters your income and there is no reasonable alternative money source, the results of the Means Test can be rendered non-applicable.

You can also be granted a special circumstance for a sudden, serious illness that will take you out of your job or further damage the economic viability of your family.  Job loss, in some cases, can lead to ability to file under the “special circumstance” exception to means test applicability.  However, the job loss would have to be sudden, proven legitimate (you can’t be found to have provoked it) and the income from that particular job itself would most likely have to had been the reason you failed the test.

There are other ways the results of the Means Test can be put aside. However, it is very important for you to understand that these are actual, legal strategies, not encouraged methods by which to circumvent the court. That’s called fraud, and you’ll be nailed for it.

The means test uses an average of your income over the six months prior to filing your case.  That being said, you have the ability to time your bankruptcy filing according to a period in time when your income will be at its lowest. If you know bankruptcy is on the horizon but can sustain a few months without employment, you can file down the road to ensure your last six months of income fall below the state median, which is a major factor in the Means Test.

Additionally, expert bankruptcy attorneys can advise you on a number of ways that you can reduce the amount you will have to pay through a Chapter 13 plan.  This is what bankruptcy professionals call “means test planning.”  Need health insurance? Purchasing a plan for you and your family before your bankruptcy is a good way to add expenses and reduce income. The code allows you to deduct what you pay for health insurance. The same applies for disability insurance.  Been wanting to put away more for retirement?  You can increase your 401(k) or 403(b) contributions through your employer and take the contributions as a deduction against your six-month average income in the means test.

You may not realize it, and in fact, they may be a reason for your having to file, but your rising mortgage and car payment may contribute to your passing the means test. Or, if you are expecting an increase in any of the interest rates on those loans, considering waiting until they kick-in to file.

The term “household” does not mean family. It means, quite literally, how many your “house holds.”  This means relatives, children who have moved back in after the backpacking trip around Europe and even that weird guy that rents the storage loft in the garage. And since the reform act in 2005 bases the median incomes for the means test on “household” and not family, the size of your household can have a serious impact in your favor.  The more people who live in a house, the higher the threshold of income required to qualify for the means test.

It can be scary thing, the means test. It literally changed the benefits of bankruptcy for thousands and thousands of Americans. If you are worried about it or just have additional questions, don’t hesitate to contact us.  We have helped over 40,000 North Carolina families through the process of bankruptcy and our attorneys know the means test inside and out.  Call The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt to schedule your FREE consultation at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, March 1, 2010 @ 7:27 am

No one needs to tell you times are tough.

Too often, Americans just like you, already suffering under the intense strain of rising mortgage costs, consistent credit card debt, mounting medical bills, employment woes, and other blights on your bank accounts, are also looking for ways to further trim shrinking household budgets.

And since the lingering financial downturn has affected all socio-economic sectors of the country—even the upper-middle class and wealthiest Americans—dealing with sudden bills or a loss of income can be even more difficult for people used to a certain lifestyle.

So, whether you’re facing extended unemployment, are bankruptcy bound or just trying to salvage your savings, taking a long, hard look at your family’s budget can make a big difference. And even if you haven’t lost your job, in this uncertain economic era it’s important to explore the financial cutbacks you could make in case you were suddenly land unexpectedly aid off.

The good news is, by cutting a few corners, small changes can save you hundreds per month.

Television.
I know, I know. TV is tough to cut. Especially if you rationalize that by watching television you’re staying home and saving money you would normally spend finding entertainment elsewhere. But, if you currently get a lot of channels, you could conceivably drop to a package with fewer bells and whistles (possibly dropping those 50 plus channels that you didn’t watch anyway?). And if you already have a relatively small television setup, consider contacting your provider for negotiations. You’d be amazed at what a satellite or cable company will offer in terms of lower rates when consumers like you threaten to quit them.

Phone and Internet.
Again, negotiating with your provider (or trying to) is always an option. Plus, downgrading your service or eliminating a landline could be all it takes to save you dough for other basic essentials.

Subscriptions.
You can stay informed and save money. If you keep your Internet, why spend more on newspapers, magazines or a book of the month club? The good news is that most reading materials are, at least for now, available for free online.

Fast Food.
That morning latte, breakfast burrito or fast food lunch may seem inexpensive once a day, but those days quickly add up and can become the fastest way to deplete a monthly budget. Consider taking a brown bag and a brewed coffee with you on the go and enjoy the benefits of a better food choices and a fuller wallet.

Groceries.
Not only cut out eating out, but take in the grocery stores many comparable generic brand. Many store-brands are actually produced at the same factories as the name brands—and come at a significant discount.

Clothing.
As a lot of professionals know, dry cleaning can be incredibly expensive. Try to avoid it. But just because your clothes have a little more wear and tear doesn’t meant you can run out and shop for new ones. Resist the prevalent sales permeating the malls in this tough economy—just because it’s a sale doesn’t mean its less expensive than shopping at one.

Not only does planning ahead like this give you an idea of what steps you’ll need to take in case of a financial emergency, it also provides ways to start saving money quickly.

Yet, if cutting corners just isn’t enough to keep you afloat, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, February 28, 2010 @ 9:26 pm

Bankruptcy is one of the most important decisions you may ever have to make. It’s not a decision to take lightly, and our office understands that you and your family have a lot of questions. While many of the same laws apply to many cases, rarely is your financial situation the same as another person’s. We all have different reasons for needing to rely on the bankruptcy code and just about every reason is as justifiable as the next.

To assist you in the most direct and non-invasive method possible, we have created three communication vehicles by which you can begin to explore why bankruptcy may be your best way out from under an impending financial crisis.

1. First, you can arrange a face-to-face meeting with us. Our practice serves North Carolina residents in 30 of our 100 counties and we have offices in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville.

We structure these meetings to be confidential and without obligation. That means you are not encouraged to file bankruptcy or beholden to us in any way. We feel that because financial stress can be such a difficult matter with which to cope, it is best for us to be there for people who have questions. Maybe you’re worried about a collection agency. Or your bank isn’t returning calls about a mortgage modification. Whatever the nature of your debt question, a one-on-one meeting in one of our four offices can help you get it answered.

And best of all, there is no charge for this meeting. The introduction of money to a meeting such as this would only apply undue pressure and in many cases, add to your debt load. That is not what we want.

if you feel a personal meeting is for you, call us at 1.800.899.1414.

2. Another way to get things started or to ask questions is over the phone. If you can’t make it to one of our offices or only have time on your lunch break, maybe a phone call is the best way.

We understand that those in serious debt often develop a mistrust of those who want to help, especially given the ubiquity of shady “credit doctors” and debt settlement programs. Too many people have lost a lot of money to these bogus outfits. Please understand, we’re here to help you get out of debt using the strength of federal bankruptcy law. If you don’t believe us, take a look at our client testimonials at http://www.billsbills.com/testimonials.php. Talk to us in person or over the phone. We’ve helped thousands of families get through the very same financial challenges you’re going through right now.

3. Lastly, you can reach us via the Web. Our site, www.billsbills.com, has an easy form, available here, that you can fill out for us to call you. If you choose too, you can add some basic information about your situation, which will help us get some questions answered before we speak and thus, help you make a decision quickly about the best way to proceed. It won’t take more than five minutes to complete.

Again, we know that making the decision to file for bankruptcy is a serious one that deserves a lot of research. Our goal is to help you clearly understand the nature of your debt and how it can best be settled. If you can think of some additional ways to engage us or have suggestions for us, please let us know.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, February 26, 2010 @ 4:19 pm

Everyone—from the halls of Congress to the many channels of media—is paying a ton of attention to those Americans who have lost their homes in the seemingly endless mortgage meltdown. Virtually ignored have been the millions who continue to pay their mortgage every month, even when they really can’t afford to. As a result, most homeowners are losing big on what used to be their biggest investment.

Which begs the question: Is the best solution to stop paying your mortgage?

For homeowners around the country who haven’t skipped their mortgage payments—but are seriously struggling—there are several reasons why homeownership is going less than swimmingly:

You’re Trying to Staying Afloat While You’re Underwater
Many of you are struggling to pay off a mortgage balance that is significantly higher than the value of your home. As a result, selling your home is simply not an option, since you would ultimately have to come up with the difference to settle with your lender.

You’re Drowning in the Deep End of Debt
Many homeowners just like you are spending down their savings, taking cash advances and/or relying on credit cards to buy bare necessities. Why? Because you’re using every actual dime that’s coming in to keep up with your mortgage payments. The result is millions of Americans who are not only underwater on the their mortgages, but who are also drowning in debt.

While staying current on your home commitment is admirable, and very much the American way, it’s also a quick and easy way to drain your savings, retirement, or nest egg, while also accumulating enormous debt, simply to avoid the dreaded “F-word.”

Consider Foreclosure
While it can be scary, this particular “F-word” can be your first, best step to a pair of “F” positives: financial freedom. If you are now hundreds of thousands of dollars underwater and go into foreclosure, your losses are essentially erased. In most cases, your lender can take the house, but not your future earnings with the only real financial consequence being trouble getting a loan for almost a decade (in an era when getting a loan isn’t easy even for those with stellar credit).

Unfortunately, most foreclosure alternatives are simply bad ideas. Let’s take, for example, the short sale. In a short sale, the lender is agreeing to accept less than what is owed to satisfy your loan. Assuming you find a buyer, you will then have run the offer by your lender. Even if they decide to go along with it, you could still be stuck with the deficiency if you’re not careful. That’s not to mention the tax implications of the forgiven debt. Why go through the hassle of a short sale, if it’s just as likely to hurt your credit, and may lead to even more debt.

Another foreclosure alternative, the loan modification, would be an option if lenders were granting permanent modifications. The problem is, most lenders are understaffed, behind on applications, and you’re likely to get lost in the shuffle. As of 9/1/09, over 362,000 loans have been granted a trial modification. Of those trial modifications, only 1,711 have been approved for permanent modifications.

And Then There’s Bankruptcy
If your credit score is going to suffer anyway, why not create a completely clean slate? As a hurting homeowner, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, February 26, 2010 @ 7:15 am

For most bankruptcy bound individuals, a discharge of all individual debts is considered the Holy Grail of any bankruptcy filing, yielding a permanent injunction that prevents creditors from collecting on debts. However, any good discussion of debt dischargeability also tackles the primary exceptions to look out for when considering any bankruptcy filing.

Exceptions to the power of a bankruptcy discharge, include:

Certain Tax Obligations
Withholding taxes are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, although you may be able to use a Chapter 13 case to pay these over time (notwithstanding any accrued penalties and interest).  Similarly, sales taxes are not dischargeable, but again, Chapter 13 can establish a payment plan for lessening the load and paying this out over the long haul.

The question of whether your income tax can be discharged ultimately depends on how old the tax debt is and when you filed the tax return.  In order to be dischargeable, your tax debt for the tax year in question must meet the following conditions: the due date for filing your tax return is at least three years ago; your tax return was filed at least two years ago; the tax assessment is at least 240 days old; your tax return was not fraudulent; and you are not guilty of tax evasion.

For example, in a 2009 bankruptcy filing:

• Taxes from 2006-2008 are not dischargeable;
• Taxes from 2004 and before are eligible for review; and
• Taxes from 2005 are potentially dischargeable if the return was filed by the debtor on or before April 15, 2006. If the return was filed under an extension, then the 2005 taxes are not eligible for the following review unless the debtor files after October 15, 2009.

Fraud and Certain Credit Usages Before Filing
Fraud is a valid creditor objection to a bankruptcy discharge. To find fraud, a creditor must prove: (1) a statement made under false pretenses; (2) a material fact; (3) designed to deceive the creditor; (4) that does in fact deceive the creditor; (5) the creditor reasonably relies on the statement; and (6) the creditor suffers actual damages resulting from the reliance.

The general rule here is this: if you’re considering bankruptcy it’s best to avoid maxing out (or in some cases simply using) consumer credit, credit cards, or loans. Bankruptcy law now demands that bankruptcy bound debtors like you do not take cash advances or purchase luxury items on credit 90-days prior to your filing bankruptcy. If you do purchase large or luxury items through these means, creditors may challenge you (and these discharging these debts) in Court if they believe that you have acted in bad faith in using credit excessively.

Domestic Obligations
Alimony, child support and spousal maintenance debts are not dischargeable in either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Additionally, the first prong of bankruptcy, the automatic stay, does not act to stop most collection efforts for these claims. An exception to this exception comes in the second type of domestic asset splitting known as equitable distribution. While equitable distribution—a dividing of martial property as a result of dissolution of the marriage—is no longer dischargeable in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the same is not true in Chapter 13. Chapter 13 bankruptcy, in what is called as its “super discharge,” can aid a former spouse having trouble paying their bills to eliminate this type of burden. These issues are complex, and it is important that you speak with a bankruptcy expert if you have these types of issues.

Student Loans
In an effort to protect the education lending industry, and allow student loan money for almost anyone who wants it, Congress has made virtually every advance in connection with education non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. To that end, these loans are non-dischargeable “unless excepting such debt from discharge…would impose an undue hardship on the debtor.” While the definition of “undue hardship” is ultimately to the discretion of your bankruptcy judge, if precedent is any “judge,” this is a high hurdle to surmount. As a result, if you’re considering a bankruptcy filing simply to discharge a large student loan bill, don’t lose hope, it may just be best to wait: the tide appears to be turning in Congress to loosen this exemption as the costs of education skyrocket and more and more Americans face insurmountable educational tabs.

Because of the complexities of bankruptcy law, a qualified bankruptcy attorney is a necessary tool in your financial toolbox to help you conquer your creditors and face your fiscal  fears, yielding the right kinds of debt relief—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, February 25, 2010 @ 3:09 pm

While many economists argue that the economy is steadily rebounding, whether you’re in a recession or recovery seems to largely depend on where you live, if you have a job, if you can pay your bills, or if you still have your home.

The Huffington Post reported this week that facing an economic meltdown in their personal lives, many formerly middle-class families have had to find “creative ways to cope with the sudden loss of their jobs and homes.” In her article, “Rattlesnake for Breakfast, Wedding rings on Craigslist: Families Cope With Falling Out of the Middle Class,” Laura Bassett describes how the American dream, for many, has turned into a surreal nightmare.

Take Arkansas’s Jeff Falk, 51, for example. After losing his family business selling auto parts, and finding himself no longer able to afford the house he had built for his family, his wife Jill, and their two boys, ages 3 and 8, packed their 40-foot camper and headed to Arizona for the winter.

“Jill found a part-time job waiting tables, and Jeff found occasional work repairing old boats, but they struggled to feed and home-school their young boys. Occasionally, Falk says, he feeds his children rattlesnake that he caught near his camper. While Falk, his wife and his children have managed to stay positive throughout their financial hardships, he says the hardest part of falling out of the middle class is losing the respect of those around him. ‘There are two kinds of people,’ he said. ‘Those that turn and look the other way and don’t even wanna look at you, and those that reach out and help you, and it seems like there’s no in-between.’”

The Falk family isn’t alone. Bassett also found Illinois’s Stephen Mooney.  Laid off in 2008 from a job he had held for 10 years, his severance pay ran out a few, short months later, leaving he and his wife Marianne unable to pay their bills.

“’Our gas was shut off,’” Mooney told HuffPost. ‘We were taking showers with water that we would heat up in the rice cooker and microwave. It was very depressing. Going to a job interview, you may be wearing a shirt and suit, but you don’t feel clean. I looked unkempt all the time, and corporate America’s not an easy place. There were some places where I knew I didn’t have a job as soon as they saw me sitting in the lobby.’ To make matters worse, the Mooneys’ house was recently foreclosed, and they have been asked to leave by March 1. ‘I don’t know how we put all the pieces back together,’ Mooney said. ‘Where do we live? Where does all our stuff go? It’s going to be very strange.’”

As Bassett reports, many families are making similarly difficult decisions just to stay afloat.

Kimberly Rios of Maryland sold her wedding ring on Craigslist last weekend just to cover utility bills.  “‘This is no joke, please be a serious buyer,’ Rios wrote in her ad. ‘It is too cold for us to be without electric and heat so if you have been looking consider my deal.’ She told HuffPost that she sold the ring on Valentine’s Day. She is trying to decide whether to use the money to pay for a few weeks of electricity or to buy a cheap car so that she and her family of six will have a place to go when the foreclosure happens.”

In spite of it all, Rios remains positive about her family’s future: “At least we have each other.”

Unfortunately, in this new era of financial insecurityy, stories like these are common in articles, reports and blogs all across the World Wide Web. Fortunately, no matter how dire your financial situation and how extreme your sacrifice, you can find strength in the numbers of families—all across the country—facing the same tough choices.

Yet, even if major sacrifices just aren’t enough to keep you afloat, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, February 25, 2010 @ 6:05 am

In an era of extreme economic downturns and rising unemployment, having a car at your disposal has never been more necessary for work, job interviews and providing other basic fiscal needs…even as you consider a personal bankruptcy.

Yet, if you’re on the road to bankruptcy, these same economic issues and employment woes can mean you may have fallen behind on your most recent car payments, leaving your precious vehicle as a prime target for repossession by your car’s creditors. And while your bankruptcy filing’s “automatic stay” suspends a creditor’s ability to repossess most assets, you may be wondering what happens when your car is taken prior to your filing.

As with most things in bankruptcy, whether you can get your car back from your creditors largely depends on your ability to act quickly, diligently and with a purpose.

Once your vehicle has been repossessed, it is absolutely vital that you immediately seek the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy attorney, informing the attorney of the status of your car and that you need to file bankruptcy right away. While the repossession was likely caused by an inability to afford your car payment, this first, best step to get your car back through bankruptcy will require that you have enough funds to pay your attorney, the bankruptcy court filing costs, as well as the requisite credit counseling fees.

Another potential challenge, comes in the form of one word: paperwork. As time is of the essence to save your car, you must be able to provide instant information about your current financial situation so that you can file quickly and without any hidden loopholes. Typically, you will have ten days between the date of your car’s repossession to the time that the creditor actually sells the car. As a result, you and your lawyer will need to move fast.

Once you file for bankruptcy, it’s important to note that any further creditor action is stopped by the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay.  While the automatic stay also means that the creditor cannot sell the car once you file, it does not assure the return of your vehicle. But take heart: for a pre-petition repossession, most bankruptcy courts have procedures by which a debtor whose car was repossessed may be allowed to get the vehicle back once the bankruptcy case is filed, including the potential that the debtor will be required to pay back possession and storage fees accrued in the interim, provide proof of car insurance, and have money on-hand to pay the various court and repossession fees.  In all cases, though, the process is neither cheap, nor easy: something the bankruptcy bound individual may always want to avoid.

So, to avoid any headaches, hassles or hardships the best rule of thumb is, if you are going to file bankruptcy, do so before your car gets repossessed.  In short, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you not only conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, but also keep a much-needed car, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— to keep you moving (literally and figuratively) in your fiscally-viable future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button and let these experts take the wheel to so you can start down the road to your next best financial steps.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, February 24, 2010 @ 1:03 pm

While the current economic forecast is considered less dismal than in past months, the Federal Reserve released a forecast this week predicting unemployment will stay high over the next two years—noting that recession-scarred employers are likely to stay conservative in their hiring practices even as recession-scarred citizens continue their search for a dwindling number of jobs.

According to The Huffington Post, in the Fed’s late January meeting, the central banking system left rates at a record low—near zero—“to help nurture the recovery and drive down unemployment. And it pledged to hold rates at ‘exceptionally low’ levels for an ‘extended period.’ Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, in remarks last week, suggested the Fed is still months away from raising rates and draining money out of the financial system. The recovery is still fragile and unemployment, now at 9.7 percent, is high. In its economic forecast, Fed policymakers said it will take “some time” for the economy and the jobs market to get back to normal. They did not spell out how long that would be. Previously, they suggested it could take five or six years for economic conditions to return to full health. A ‘sizable minority,’ though, said they thought it could take more than five or six years for the economy and the job market to return to normal. The Fed said the unemployment rate this year could hover between 9.5 percent and 9.7 percent and between 8.2 percent and 8.5 percent next year. By 2012, the rate will range between 6.6 percent and 7.5 percent, it predicted.”

These forecasts have apparently changed very little from the projections released by the Fed towards the end of 2009. However, what is noteworthy is the fact that these numbers suggest unemployment will remain higher than normal unemployment rates (between 5.5 percent and 6 percent) just as the country heads into this year’s midterm congressional elections and the 2012 presidential election. Unless things change dramatically soon, this is bad news for incumbent members of Congress, and possibly the current administration, and bodes well for newcomers to the political scene willing to challenge their tenured counterparts on “The Economy, stupid.”

As the Huff Post reports, “Fed policymakers ‘expect that the pace of the economic recovery will be restrained by household and business uncertainty, only gradual improvement in labor market conditions and a slow easing of credit conditions in the banking sector,’ according to the forecast.

Against that backdrop, the Fed expects the economy will grow between 2.8 percent and 3.5 percent this year. Growth will pick up to between 3.4 percent and 4.5 percent next year and log similar growth in 2012. The economy would need to grow by at least 5 percent a year to make a dent in the unemployment rate, analysts say.”

Further forecasts into the Fed’s view of (and moves in) the current “up and down” economy, as well as its strategy for curtailing stimulus money, will likely come at next week’s House Financial Services Committee hearing. Wednesday’s meeting will feature Chairman Bernanke delivering the Fed’s twice-a-year economic report to Congress—a report that will likely show growth, just not enough for the millions of unemployed Americans.

Every week bankruptcy attorneys continue to meet with dozens of people in financial distress due to these very employment woes.  In each case, these same unemployed people, having heard no signs of relief from the government, come into law offices feeling hopeless and at the end of their rope, perceiving no alternatives to their continuing fiscal problems.  Almost every time, however, it seems when these same clients leave these offices, they finally feel some sense of relief for the first time since the job recession started; they are reassured that the bankruptcy laws and the bankruptcy system offers them the possibility of a new start—at an affordable cost—and with it a financially viable and secure future. In short, bankruptcy relief ends worry and stress for many jobless Americans living on the financial brink.

For reliable bankruptcy advice that you can trust, contact The Law Firm of John T. Orcutt. And to find out more about your bankruptcy options, visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, February 24, 2010 @ 11:56 am

In his February 20, 2010, article “Millions of Unemployed Face Years Without Jobs,” The New York Times’ Peter S. Goodman paints a dour portrait of what he calls “the new poor” — “people long accustomed to the comforts of middle-class life who are now relying on public assistance for the first time in their lives — potentially for years to come.”

With little good news for the millions of Americans who remain out of work, out of savings and at the end of their unemployment benefits, Goodman points to holes in America’s social safety net, built for short-term gaps between jobs, further strained in an unprecedented economic environment where work may be scarce for years, even as the American economy shows signs of a rebound.

“Every downturn pushes some people out of the middle class before the economy resumes expanding. Most recover. Many prosper. But some economists worry that this time could be different. An unusual constellation of forces — some embedded in the modern-day economy, others unique to this wrenching recession — might make it especially difficult for those out of work to find their way back to their middle-class lives.

Labor experts say the economy needs 100,000 new jobs a month just to absorb entrants to the labor force. With more than 15 million people officially jobless, even a vigorous recovery is likely to leave an enormous number out of work for years.

Some labor experts note that severe economic downturns are generally followed by powerful expansions, suggesting that aggressive hiring will soon resume. But doubts remain about whether such hiring can last long enough to absorb anywhere close to the millions of unemployed.”

Goodman cites a confluence of unfortunate financial factors—products of both our modern economy paired with the recent recession—as the reason it is now so challenging for the unemployed to “find their way back to their middle-class lives.”

First, there’s a scarcity of jobs. Fewer unions to protect full and temporary employees, the export of formerly American factory and white-collar jobs to overseas competitors, and an upsurge of innovation and automation, have all contributed to a smaller U.S. job pool for millions looking for work.

“Additionally, America has fewer protections for its beleaguered workforce. “Some poverty experts say the broader social safety net is not up to cushioning the impact of the worst downturn since the Great Depression,” writes Goodman. “Social services are less extensive than during the last period of double-digit unemployment, in the early 1980s.”

And then there are the millions of American households, that, due to the employment meltdown, have gone from two incomes, to none. Languishing in a “desert of joblessness,” many families, previously able to simply bounce back after a job loss, pay cut, or disability—are now finding themselves using food banks, charitable giving, and facing homelessness.

While recent reports of the nation’s financial future remain nothing short of bleak, the good news remains that through bankruptcy laws, Americans facing unemployment can take their future into their own hands, stop drowning in health care, consumer and mortgage debt, and begin on the road to a more viable financial future.

Even if major sacrifices just aren’t enough to keep you afloat, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, February 12, 2010 @ 5:44 pm

The Making Home Affordable program was designed to be the savior of the crashing real estate economy. People nationwide were taking solace in the President’s effort to save our homes and lead us through the worst economic situation our country has faced in almost 100 years. Hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure due to the bubble bursting on a plague of poorly schemed sub-prime mortgages rejoiced in what seemed to be a cooperative effort on the part of the a supportive new Washington administration and the Wall Street.

Unfortunately, the program has landed far from expectations. The foreclosure rate has seen only minor blips in decline and it has become difficult to hear government officials even address the existence of the program, unless to defend it. Additional programs have been introduced to support it but larger menu items are being devoured by the House and Senate and the status of homeowners has been given a backseat. Meanwhile, the numbers of properties in foreclosure and pre-foreclosure continue to grow.

Accepted into the trial HAMP modification program for six months, Bert Carvajal of south Florida was eventually denied full participation in the President’s program. He was also deemed ineligible for any assistance from his lender, JPMorgan Chase. His situation is no different than that of most Americans in trouble with their mortgage. His construction management income was sapped by a declining housing market and he simply fell behind on the payments that keep a roof over his family. He is now behind on property taxes too, so he owes his bank and the county.

Mr. Carvajal’s best option may be to soon file bankruptcy. In Chapter 13, he can catch up on the missed mortgage payments, and pay back the property taxes over a period of up to 5 years.

Jag Bhangu was also recently denied a mortgage modification because he still has equity in his home. However, that doesn’t mean he can afford to pay for it. And, given his position as a mortgage consultant, one would think the bank would by sympathetic to his situation of lost income. In the last couple of years, his income dropped 70 percent from where it was when he was approved for the loan.

Bhangu was granted a trial modification under Obama’s plan for nine months but then declined for permanent adjustment. He continues to speak with people at CitiGroup about another modification but he is not hopeful that it will happen.

If you’re getting the runaround from your mortgage lender, talk to a bankruptcy attorney today to discuss how a Chapter 13 can help you and your family hold on to your most precious asset- your home. Call today. In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt for a free initial debt consultation. 1-800-899-1414. Or visit www.billsbills.com and fill out our debt questionnaire. With offices in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville, help is just a phone call away.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 9, 2010 @ 6:39 pm

If you couldn’t tell by the utter onslaught of tax preparation service ads and the sudden presence of temporary cubicles in that once abandoned retail space at the corner of your favorite strip mall, let us be the first to remind you that it’s tax season.

We take interest in this time of year because tax returns can mean one of two things to our readers: more debt or more money. Since we are all about helping you figure out what to do with your debt, we hope this post will educate you regarding what tax season can mean for your financial well-being.

There are number of tax deductions out there that get ignored by a lot of families. Worse yet, they are not even addressed by many of the “come-and-go” tax return preparation services out there. On that note, we encourage you to take caution when deciding who to work with if you are not someone who handles returns on your own. We should also point out that there is good reason to hire someone to help with your tax returns, primarily to alleviate stress and ensure they get done correctly.

That being said, make sure that the person you hire is an actual financial professional, not someone who was just trained to punch data into a computer program. Ask friends or co-workers if they can recommend a reliable Certified Public Accountant that has a tax service. Yes, it will cost you more money, but not that much more.

If you have no choice but to use a temporary tax shop, ask for the most senior member of the team. Many of these operations do have supervisors on staff with actual accounting and tax experience. Remind them that there are countless shops just like theirs that would prefer your business to encourage the top person to give you appropriate attention.

To further ensure you are getting the service you deserve, remind your tax preparer about the most often missed tax deductions. An article on MSNBC.com highlighted seven of them, which do require you to itemize:

• Home ownership deductions can include mortgage interest, property taxes, fees involving the sale of your home and agent commissions.
• In North Carolina, the personal property tax you pay on your car each year can also be a deduction.
• Always hang on to your receipts for charitable donations, even the bags of clothes you gave to Goodwill. When any charity asks you if you want a receipt, say yes.
• Did you know you can deduct mileage expenses if you use your own car in a charitable effort? You can. Go back and write down when you did and even keep receipts for bus trips to the location of your volunteering. Parking fees and other tolls count, too.
• If you had to travel for work, keep track of any dry cleaning and laundering receipts for clothes you needed on behalf of the company. This only counts if you are required to look the part and don’t try it with the torn jeans you wear on the flight.
• Also related to business travel are the costs of shipping materials or paying for your baggage, which many airlines now require. So hang on to those receipts as well.
• Other miscellaneous deductions related to work include costs for faxes, Internet access or hotel phone calls.  You may also be able to deduct moving expenses. Make sure you provide good proof that the costs you incurred are directly related to the available deduction category.

We would hate to see your tax bills become the reason you have to file bankruptcy.   However, if you have been stuck with a large tax bill from the past, or if you anticipate owing taxes that you can’t pay all at once, you should consider bankruptcy as an option to either discharge taxes eligible for discharge or pay certain taxes that can’t be discharged over a period of several years through a Chapter 13 plan.   If you have any questions about how tax bills are handled in Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, give us a call, we’ll be glad to help.  Call 1-800-899-1414 to schedule a FREE consultation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 9, 2010 @ 6:25 pm

Very few people set out to open a credit card account intent on not paying off the balance.  Those who do are assumed to be criminals, usually identity thieves or some other sort of con artist.

Credit card debt, and all other forms of long term financial drain that lead good people into the need to file bankruptcy, is very often caused by a setback of some kind, like illness or job loss.  And if recent unemployment predictions are on track, we can expect the bankruptcy rate to continue to climb.

The News & Observer published an Associated Press report about the impact job losses are having across the country. The piece also warned of a dire future.

On February 5, the Labor Department will release its January unemployment numbers. Industry analysts expect to read that an additional 800,000 positions have been lost since March of last year. That’s almost 1,000,000 more people out of work. In total, we can blame the loss of almost 8 million jobs on the Great Recession.

The Labor Department’s report will also illustrate the theory that another four years of healthy fiscal growth will be needed to return to the country’s employment figures to stable.

Job reports are notoriously vague, as the report will demonstrate that 5,000 jobs were added to the economy last month. For some, that signifies a positive sign. As does the rise of gross domestic product statistics, which show that this critical metric has climbed for the second quarter in a row.

Nevertheless, that small number is not enough to prevent the national unemployment rate from experiencing a slight increase. When the numbers come out, which are based on unemployment insurance tax figures turned in to state governments by companies, most are expecting to see 10.1 percent of the country’s workforce out of job.

As our economy becomes ever more global and harder to track, the further out of touch those making the important decisions about our country’s financial health become with the everyday workforce. All the statistics, theories and Wall Street rallies do not mean anything to the unemployed parents of four children.

Whether it’s out of fear of new taxes, the expiration of existing tax programs, health care requirements or lack of credit to fuel growth, the fact remains that companies are simply not hiring. Stimulus projects designed to spark growth, like home buyer tax credits, are soon to expire and creating the fear that the faint signs of recovery will dissipate.

Signs of productivity increases can be attributed in part to business practices designed to get more out of fewer employees. It helps that those still holding a job are willing to do more to protect it, now that the realization of the recession has become clear to everybody, not just line workers and cubicle drones.

So what does all this mean for bankruptcy rates? Quite a bit actually. It isn’t difficult to connect the sudden loss of income with the inability to pay bills. Today’s conditions are making it worse though. At one time, jobs were easily found, shortening the time frame a person was without income. In that window of unemployment, people could get by on savings or available credit. With credit limits being reduced, loans hard to come by and savings at all time lows, the need to file for legal protection becomes necessary sooner than ever.

If you are out of work and see the window of financial viability starting to close, maybe it’s time to call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt at 1-800-899-1414 to explore some options.  Bankruptcy might just be your best way “Out of the Red and Back in the Black.”

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 9, 2010 @ 11:14 am

You know your creditors: those nice folks who gave you something you wanted — goods, services, or money — in exchange for your promise to pay them back at a later date.  But those same nice folks can turn nasty when you can’t or won’t pay back your debts, hiring collection agencies to hound you every chance they get.  So, in these unfriendly economic times, what can you do when your creditors come calling? Can you keep bill collectors at bay? How should you conquer your collection fears and fight back?

Believe it or not, laws do exist at both the state and federal level to protect average Americans like you and me from harassing debt collectors.  That’s right:  between the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, many of the actions that debt collectors take for creditors are strictly prohibited.

No one knows that better than Craig Cunningham. As the Dallas Observer reported, the Texas resident understand exactly how to get creditors off his back. Craig sues them.

According to the Dallas Observer, “While most Americans with unpaid bills dread the collector’s call, Cunningham sees them as lucrative opportunities. Many collection and credit card companies, intentionally or not, violate little-known consumer rights laws, and Cunningham’s favorite pastime is catching them doing so and then suing them. In fact, it’s a profitable side job.”

After amassing over $100,000 in debt and becoming the target of creditor calls, this so-called “man with a plan” hired a lawyer from whom he learned the ins and outs of consumer rights. Using this knowledge, he taped creditor calls and saved their repeated and aggressive correspondence as evidence for eventual lawsuits against these same various debt collectors found to be violating national or state consumer protection law. From there, several court settlements followed providing Cunningham with a boon for his new “business.”

“Most collection agencies, it seems, prefer out-of-court settlements (which often involve a statutory fine) to taking a case to trial, since settlements save them money. The Observer notes that Cunningham has thus far earned $20,000 from suits against law-breaking collectors.”

Cunningham’s “collection baiting” turns their aggressive attempts to retrieve creditor’s money into a “financial liability” by hiding behind consumer rights and protections laws. These laws prohibit creditors from performing what might, in this economy, seem normal behaviors, including:

• Calling you repeatedly with intent to annoy or harass;
• Calling you outside of certain morning and evening hours;
• Contacting you directly when you have indicated that you have legal representation;
• Contacting you using certain types of media; and
• Lying about their ability to take legal action against you to collect on a debt.

While many consumers are unaware of their rights against these types of creditors, as in all cases, knowledge is power. For information about your consumer protections, learn more about the  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (PDF).

And if you’re facing creditors, don’t forget that bankruptcy can be the most reliable way–to avoid the creditor crunch.

In fact, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, February 7, 2010 @ 12:54 pm

In the Bad Ideas for the Bankruptcy Bound series, you’ve received an introductory look at the many reasons why it’s never a good idea to hide, or attempt to hide, a bankruptcy filing from your spouse. In later discussions we’ve seen how to avoid many of the pitfalls and pratfalls of filing for personal bankruptcy, including transferring property, using credit and avoiding creditors. Here, we’ll expand on why automatic bill payments from your checking account can lead to a loss of precious control for the bankruptcy bound.

Without a doubt, the ease and convenience of having recurring monthly bill payments paid through an automatic deduction from a checking account has made the time-saving process a no-brainer for many time-stretched citizens.  From car payments to credit card bills, automatic bill pay seems a trusty deduction process that avoids snail mail send outs, freeing up time, and peace of mind, to move on to bigger and better things.

But many argue that “free time” is precisely the problem for many cash-strapped citizens.

While auto pay allows for other things, it also frees up space for financial matters to go unnoticed. Precisely the same logic applies in credit card spending: you pay for items without the immediate financial repercussions, and pressing conclusions, that you’re spending money you don’t have.

Not thinking about fiscal matters is not only the exact opposite thing a cash-strapped person needs to do, but it also leads to a continuous cycle of avoiding the painful, but necessary, lessons of budgeting funds and reacting to changing financial circumstances: precisely the same denial of dire financial straits that put so many in a poor economic condition in the first place.

Like a credit card, having an automatic debit of a car payment, or gym fees, or house note, taken directly from your checking account, deprives you of the ever-important opportunity to think, however briefly, about the quality (and quantity) of your spending.  The auto pay acts like a thief in the night, taking from your precious and limited funds without concern or awareness for your balances. Too many of these “takings” can wreck monthly finances and take away a person’s power to prioritize each precious payment.

As such, in addition to making budgeting difficult, automatic bill payments from your checking account also take control away from the debtor—removing any option to determine when to pay which creditor and how much. This small fact can have a major impact on basic needs as auto pay can give your gym membership payments priority over that of your mortgage or car notes.  Not only that, but depleted accounts can mean substantial upturns in interest when credit card bills come due unexpectedly through the auto pay process.

What’s worse, if you’re considering bankruptcy, automatic bill payments can be especially inconvenient in terms of losing track of who’s getting what. Long story short, auto pay plus bankruptcy can mean you unwittingly pay out to creditors from whom your debts are discharged. For example, once you file for bankruptcy, non-exempt bills currently paid by auto pay will be discharged—either through a bankruptcy discharge of the underlying debt, or through a Chapter 13 plan to pay back debt incrementally.  Untracked auto payments can mean your creditors get payments they don’t deserve—especially if it takes transactional time to cease the automatic  debits.

So whether you’re filing for bankruptcy or not, begin 2010 by taking control of your personal finances. Pay your bills with your checkbook, confronting your debt head-on.  After all, it’s your money—treat it like you own it, and remember to “check” before you “spend.”

If you are considering bankruptcy, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you make the right spending decisions, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a financially viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, February 7, 2010 @ 7:43 am

Facing foreclosure.

Escalating medical costs.

High interest credit crunch.

Rising unemployment.

And that’s just January 2010.

While times are admittedly tough for everyone—with the poor getting poorer and even the recently rich and famous falling on hard times—a truly unique phenomenon of the recent global recession and continual economic downturn is how catastrophic it’s been for our country’s middle class, driving many in the majority further and “further from the American Dream” and, in some cases, “directly into poverty.”

As The Huffington Post reported this week in Laura Bassett’s insightful article “Middle Class No More, Families Struggle to Fight off Homelessness,” those in power are not blind to the desperate bind of average Americans: “President Obama, in his remarks to Senate Democrats on [February 3], pointed out that the middle class was hurting even before the recession. ‘Part of the reason people are feeling anxious right now, it’s not just because of this current crisis — they’ve been going through this for 10 years. They’ve been working and not seeing a raise. Their costs have been going up, their spouses going to the workforce — they work as hard as they can. They’re barely keeping their heads above water. They’re trying to figure out how to retire. They’re seeing more and more of their costs on health care dumped in their lap. College tuition skyrockets….They are more and more vulnerable, and they have been for the last decade, treading water.’”

As part of Huff Post’s Bearing Witness 2.0 project, the online aggregator has culled a host of local stories of formerly middle-class folks who are now “struggling to stay afloat.” If you or someone you know is similarly situated, you’re encouraged to e-mail your story.

One such troubling tale is that of construction worker Troy Renault who, along with his wife and five children, has been forced from their 1900 square foot home in Lebanon, Tennesse into a donated 215 square foot trailer nestled in a local campgrounds. The cause of their “slide into homelessness?” Renault lost his job two years ago and the family was forced to make difficult choices. As Renault told Mike Osborne for Voice of America News, “You wind up starting to think to yourself, ‘Okay. Do we go ahead and make the house payment and keep a roof over our head but have no lights and no water, or do you go ahead and keep those utilities on and forego the house payment, and hope that you can get it caught up?’ And it just kept going where it got further and further behind until we wound up losing the home.” Osborne writes: “Tammy Renault says her family is getting a crash course in what it means, socially, to be labeled homeless. ‘It’s being called names. It’s being ridiculed. It’s running into people that have seen you in your highest and are not even speaking to you anymore because they’re too afraid for where you are and don’t know what to say.’

Stories like the Renault’s are made more difficult with the onset of winter, as many former middle class citizens, and now, newly disenfranchised, are forced to make decisions of life or death.  As Steve Neavling reports in the Detroit Free Press, Michigan area middle classers can barely afford heating bills that would keep their families warm in another brutal Midwest winter. “Unemployed and unable to find work, 42-year-old Jim Lowe received a shutoff notice at his home last week and says he’s unable to pay the $174 that’s overdue. ‘It’s definitely a wake-up call,’ Lowe told Neavling. ‘We’re three months behind on all of our bills. I just pray this gets better soon.’ State and local agencies estimate an unprecedented 150,000 metro Detroiters are at risk of having their heat shut off if they don’t receive help paying their bills. The number of people seeking state assistance so far this winter jumped 30% over last year at this time, according to the state Department of Human Services.”

And yet while unemployment, arrears in a mortgage, and other unexpected challenges for members of the middle class may be life-altering, they need not be life-threatening. Bankruptcy provides, in the form of Chapter 13 and Chapter 7,  an undeniable array of options for those with mounting debt and facing foreclosure.

The key is knowing who can help. A qualified bankruptcy attorney can assist proud, but struggling, citizens to conquer their fears of losing it all.  Specifically, the bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button. We’re here to help.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 2, 2010 @ 3:29 pm

It’s almost February and ‘tis the season for thinking about tax time—even more so if you find yourself considering the benefits of bankruptcy. So, if you believe bankruptcy is the right option to help you start fresh in 2010, in addition to trying to get your 2009 taxes filed in a timely manner, and wondering whether you can discharge any income tax debt in your bankruptcy filing, you may also be thinking about how you can protect your precious tax refund from creditor claims.

But, just in time to file (for taxes and/or bankruptcy), here are some timely tips for protecting your tax refund:

Alter Your Exemptions
If you’re expecting a larger tax refund in the same year you plan to file for bankruptcy, your first best step is to alter your tax exemptions and allowances in the months prior to a bankruptcy filing. Increasing your exemptions now means you’ll receive more money in your paycheck to use throughout the year and less money in the form of a lump sum tax return. In addition to the benefit of being able to apply that money to necessities throughout the year, that’ll be less money available for creditors to seize at the time of any necessary bankruptcy filing.

Apply for Advanced Earned Income
If you receive what’s known as an “earned income” tax credit you can also head off some bankruptcy issues by providing your employer with a W-5.  This special tax form allows you to receive your earned income credit on a monthly, weekly or quarterly basis. And like the tax refund, this process disburses this money directly to you, keeping your money out of government coffers and potentially out the hands of awaiting creditors.

Know Your Refund
While some can’t wait to file, many people time their bankruptcy for a time following the potential for receiving a non-exempt, but sizeable, sum.  As such, when considering your bankruptcy, it’s important to determine what your refund will be. Depending on whether you’re receiving a generous refund, you may consider holding off on your bankruptcy filing until you have had an opportunity to use the refund on your family’s necessities—spending the money on food, clothing, medical co-pays, car repairs, etc., keeping all receipts as you spend.  In the alternative, if you are planning to file for bankruptcy, do not use your tax refund to pay back relatives or friends, large sums of unsecured debt to any one unsecured creditor, or purchase luxury items, all of which could cause a problem with your bankruptcy filing in terms of creditor claims.

Know the Rules for the State You’re In
Your own state’s laws could mean your refund is partially or fully exempt from creditor claims. As a result, it is essential that you consult with a qualified bankruptcy attorney to review your individual bankruptcy situation in and around tax time. This consultation can assure you’ve attempted to protected your precious tax refund from every imaginable angle.

If you are considering bankruptcy, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you with additional tax decisions, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a financially viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at http://www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, February 2, 2010 @ 2:30 pm

Many of our clients automatically assume they will lose their rental property if they file for bankruptcy. Isn’t that the whole idea of bankruptcy? That you give up everything you have, with a few exceptions, in exchange for getting the debt collectors off your back?

Well, no. Many factors come in to play in determining whether or not you will be forced to sell your rental property, including whether you file chapter 7 or chapter 13, how much money you owe on the property and how much income you receive from it.

Let’s start with chapter 7. If you file chapter 7, you get an exemption for the equity in your primary residence – how much depends on the state you live in – but rental property doesn’t qualify for the standard residence exemption. Therefore, you will only be able to protect the property from sale if you can cover it under your available wildcard exemption. The North Carolina wildcard exemption is $5,000.00 per filer- not much. However, your state may have additional protections if you own the property jointly with your spouse. In North Carolina, if you own the property jointly with your spouse, the property is only subject to claims of joint creditors. If all of your debt is in the name of one spouse or the other, the property may be protected- regardless of the amount of equity. Talk to a experienced bankruptcy attorney, who can examine how you hold title and if you have any joint debt.

But what if you don’t have any equity in the house, or minimal equity? What if, for example, the house is worth $100,000 and you owe $120,000, or even $99,000? The trustee’s job is to determine whether or not there is money for your creditors, not to take away everything that belongs to you. He will determine the property’s worth, then subtract the projected sales costs, selling it and paying taxes on the proceeds. If it’s not worth the trustee’s time and effort, it’s unlikely that he will try to sell it.

With Chapter 13, there are additional caveats and concerns. In general, you should be able to keep your rental property in a Chapter 13 filing. In fact, since the rental property is not your primary residence, you might be eligible for cramdown under chapter 13 – meaning that if you owe more than the property is worth, the bankruptcy judge is able to alter the terms of the mortgage to reflect the property’s current value rather than the amount you originally agreed to pay for it. This could lower your monthly mortgage payments, as well as the long term amount you have to pay to the bank for the property. Cramdown isn’t allowed on primary residences, but it is allowed on other secured debts, including rental property.

Do note, however, that rental property can, under certain circumstances, cost you money. The trustee in a Chapter 13 case will look at all the costs associated with the property – your mortgage payments, plus taxes, insurance, upkeep and repairs. If these costs outweigh the income the property brings in, the trustee may object to your plan on the basis that the money you’re spending on the property should be distributed to your unsecured creditors. In such a case, surrendering the property may be your best option. However, this is a very fact-sensitive issue and depends on how your jurisdiction interprets very complex provisions of the bankruptcy code. Only an experienced bankruptcy attorney can advise you on your specific situation. Bottom line- if you’re deeply in debt, talk to a bankruptcy attorney and get the real facts. In North Carolina, call the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Convenient office locations in Raleigh, Durham, Wilson and Fayetteville. Call today: 1-800-899-1414 or visit www.billsbills.com for more information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 4:46 pm

You may have read on the blog, or elsewhere, that many are calling our current economy a “middle class recession.” This is because the numbers are way up on bankruptcies filed by those who make more than $60,000 per year, up 6.9 percent from 2008. Bankruptcies on the whole are up 36.5 percent from this time last year.

So why does it matter how much money a person makes when filing bankruptcy? Well, because bankruptcy is often considered an escape route for the financially unreliable or worse yet, “something poor people do.” It’s just not true.

Today, bankruptcies are increasing among people in the real estate profession, namely developers and agents. When the housing bubble dissolved, so did the incomes for a lot of American families.

There are different types, or “chapters” of bankruptcy for a reason. Basically, some versions are better suited to different situations. Chapter 7, for example, is typically filed by those who may have lost a job or for some reason may not have regular source of income. It wipes out all debts, but also mandates a person dispose of their “non-exempt assets” as a way to repay creditors to whatever extent possible. If you have equity in property beyond available exemption limitations, you may have a “non-exempt asset”.  Many states’ exemptions, as well as the federal exemptions, provide some measure of protection for everything from your home to retirement accounts. It is not often the case that a family has assets beyond what available exemptions can protect.  Even if available exemptions do not cover all of a person’s property, Chapter 13 provides a way to pay the equity above available exemptions to unsecured creditors, so that a person may keep his property, if he can afford to do so.

For those who are still earning a living or at least have a source of money, Chapter 13 creates a three- to five-year payment plan. Your plan payment will largely consist of secured debt, like your car and mortgage payments. Because the plan payment can include your attorney fees, Chapter 13 is an attractive option if you do not have enough up-front money for Chapter 7 attorney fees.

Maybe you’re giving some thought to a debt-settlement firm instead of bankruptcy. Sure, it’s natural for you to want to negotiate your way out of debt. Unfortunately, many of these companies position themselves as an alternative to bankruptcy that will save your credit. More often, however, these debt settlement companies end up doing far more damage to your credit than if you had simply filed for bankruptcy from the start. Remember, just because you’re in a “debt-settlement” program, your creditors will continue to report your missed payments to the credit bureaus. A bankruptcy, while causing an initial hit to your credit score, will stop the negative reporting and allow you to rebuild your credit score faster.

Bankruptcy is an organized, legal process with pre-defined results. Debt settlement firms function under very little regulation and ask for payments before all the debts are settled, therefore the incentive to settle the debt is not as strong as if they were paid based on results or after everything is taken care of.  Thus, your “debt settlement” is by no means guaranteed.

And one more point on debt settlement agencies: the IRS considers forgiven debt as taxable income. In contrast, debt erased as part of a bankruptcy is not taxable.

Another important point about bankruptcy has to do with timing. It’s key that you don’t file too early or wait too long. Start by simply adding up what you owe and making a simple estimate on what it would take to pay it off yourself. If the discrepancy seems impossible to make up, or would force you to sacrifice your family’s needs just to make a dent in your debt load, then consult an experienced consumer bankruptcy attorney.

On the other hand, don’t wait until the car has been repossessed or the foreclosure notices start arriving. Use your head, remain calm, and speak with an attorney. The bankruptcy concept itself is fairly straightforward.  The process however, requires a good deal of legal expertise.  Engage it wisely.  Take time to understand the basics of filing.

From the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.  Helping families through bankruptcy since 1995. Call today to set up a free initial debt consultation in one of our 4 convenient office locations. Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 4:15 pm

Can your landlord evict you if you declare bankruptcy? That depends on the circumstances. If you’re not behind on your rent, your landlord may never have to know about your bankruptcy. As long as you keep paying your rent, it’s not really his business. A landlord can’t evict you just because you filed for bankruptcy.

If you are behind on your rent, however, the landlord is in a different position. If he’s already completed the proceedings for eviction, the landlord can proceed to evict you, despite the bankruptcy. Some states do not allow you to challenge this procedure. In states where you can challenge it, the proceedings are fairly onerous: you must file a paper stating that state law gives you the right to tenancy if you pay all the back rent, and immediately pay any current rent that is due. Then you have 30 days to pay all the back rent that you owe. If you don’t comply with these regulations, then eviction proceedings can continue. Note, too, that this doesn’t apply in the event that the owner can prove you’ve been doing drugs on his property or damaging it.

If the owner hasn’t yet filed for eviction, you’re in a much stronger position. Once you file for bankruptcy, the court imposes an automatic stay, which prevents the landlord from evicting you. The landlord can, however, apply to the court to lift the stay. In this case, eviction proceedings could begin in 2-4 weeks. You can use that time to look for a new place. Also, remember your rights during this time: the landlord cannot lock you out or remove your property until he gets a court order; he can’t barge in and he can’t threaten you. The sheriff can serve eviction papers, but she can’t arrest you.

If the landlord doesn’t apply to the lift the stay, you will have the length of the bankruptcy proceedings before eviction proceedings resume. Once again, we have the 2005 bankruptcy law to thank for this tilt of the law in favor of the creditor against the debtor. The law specifically allows for a ‘fast track’ proceeding to make evictions easier during bankruptcy.

Note, however, that filing for bankruptcy can still be helpful if you’re behind in your rent. If you owe back rent, that is included as a part of your unsecured debt – to be discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, or paid out over time or partially or fully discharged in a Chapter 13 filing.  Any rent that comes due after you file for bankruptcy won’t be included in the petition, however, and you will remain responsible for it.

As a final point, there are a few rare cases where your landlord might become involved in your bankruptcy even if you’re current on the rent. If you paid a rent deposit when you moved in, you have to list it as an asset. Unless it’s an extremely large security deposit, however, it’s most likely exempt and the trustee won’t bother with it. In addition, if you’ve filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the trustee will examine your lease. Most likely he will approve it; moving is expensive and it’s not in your creditor’s interest to have you shelling out money to find and move to a new place. You’d only be forced to move in the unlikely event that you’re paying way over market value for your apartment and there are an abundance of cheap places available.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 2:14 pm

One thing you may already know about most court proceedings, is that parties usually have the option to represent themselves without the aid of an attorney. This is called appearing ‘Pro Se’, which, in Latin means “for oneself”. In a bankruptcy proceeding, when money is tight, the thought of saving money by cutting out attorneys and their fees can be pretty tempting. But there are many reasons this is a bad idea.

Bankruptcy can be complicated and bankruptcy judges are a picky bunch. They expect that the preparation of the voluntary petition, schedules, or other documents will be done accurately and on time. A bankruptcy attorney can usually prepare the documents in much less time than it would take for you to figure it out on your own. He or she knows what items of personal property should or should not be included on the petition to avoid a dismissal of your case, and how to apply the Means Test to your situation.

Some courts may give pro se applicants some minor concessions or leeway so that the case can be moved along, but they are careful to avoid crossing the threshold of what may arise to the level of the Court doing the job that a litigant – or his or her counsel – should be doing. Also, many different communications are exchanged between a party and the court, the trustees reviewing the petition, as well as the creditors. Your actions, or lack thereof, during this time, can seriously affect the outcome of your petition, and may even lead to the worst outcome- a dismissal of your case.

Normally, when you retain an attorney to handle a bankruptcy, the attorney will contact creditors on your behalf and attempt to stop any embarrassing, annoying, or even harassing debt-collecting activities. Usually this stops the behavior, even though legally, the creditor still has the right to contact you. He or she can also give you advice on seemingly innocuous activities that could negatively impact your case, such as drawing on retirement funds to pay bills.

Then there is the significant issue of knowing the law. Since there are several sets of rules governing bankruptcy proceedings, trying to navigate all the rules at once can get very confusing. All parties to any bankruptcy proceeding must comply with the Local Bankruptcy Rules, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the case or other sanctions. Other important aspects of law can come into play at any time during this process as well, such as statutes of limitations, transfer of assets, or tax issues that can have a big impact on your proceedings as well.

Finally, many bankruptcy proceedings are entangled with other legal issues, such as divorce, civil court action, or foreclosure, which could affect the outcome of your bankruptcy proceeding, and vice versa.

Before deciding to gamble with your future, talk to an experienced bankruptcy attorney about it. You will find the cost well worth it.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 10:48 am

The decision to file for bankruptcy is never an easy one, especially where married couples are involved. Spouses must settle issues of dishonesty, mistrust, and frustration–and that’s even before any of the complex steps of collecting necessary documents and filing papers.

But the story for insolvent couples does have a caveat: joint bankruptcy protection. Married debtors can file their cases jointly with one trustee, one filing fee, and one total case. Debtors can bring to the table their joint debts as well as debts they hold only in their name. To be a joint case, the debtors need only be legally married.  And they must be a man and a woman.

Sounds simple right?

Well, for thousands of individuals living in America today, the latter designation raises difficult questions—especially in the growing number of states that recognize same-sex marriage or its legal equivalent (“civil unions”). Yet, as the constitutionality of laws and amendments forbidding marriage equality continue to be litigated across the country, same-sex debtors seeking bankruptcy relief  face even tougher challenges.

Because it is generally accepted that the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) would preclude the filing of a joint bankruptcy petition by a same sex married couple, these folks face two very different options: (1) make two separate bankruptcy filings, or (2) pursue the right to seek bankruptcy relief as would an opposite-sex married couple. 

While the second option would be a precedent-setting endeavor, fulfilling the true meaning of marriage equality, in reality pursuing this groundbreaking goal is largely antithetical to the larger motivations of most bankruptcy bound individuals, gay or straight: getting out of debt.

In practice, a married same-sex couple will need, more than their heterosexual counterparts, the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy attorney to pull together all of their required financial information;  ensure that it is complete and their disclosures accurate; and research and prepare a case that anticipates a variety of motions attacking the joint filing. Regardless of what “party-in-interest” files the case (as defined by the Bankruptcy Code and common law), the filing will likely be challenged, even before a judge reaches such substantive issues as income, assets, liabilities, and creditors.

In this case, like others for same-sex couples seeking right-giving precedents, while the Bankruptcy Code provides one standard, constitutional arguments will inevitably reveal others that need to be briefed and raised.  Same-sex couples must expect that any decision in their favor will be appealed, perhaps more than once to a US District Court, a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, a Circuit Court of Appeals, or maybe even the Supreme Court of the United States.  For debtors, this type legal wrangling adds ,ore time, more fees and inevitably more stress to what is undoubtedly an already nerve-racking situation.

As a result, for a married same-sex couple facing the need to file bankruptcy, the next steps can mark a tough decision: file singly or fight the system; seek your family’s financial security or a denigrated group’s fundamental rights; moving forward for your family or moving your family forward.  In the end, changing the current state of the law will take either an act of Congress or one or more very brave and very patient married same-sex couples who find themselves drowning in debt and who–in spite of these debts—also feel empowered to fight the good fight.

The state of marriage equality is not yet where it should be in the United States, and this seriously affects the legal rights of same-sex families.  But until the law changes, same-sex couples need expertise in the handling of their cases.

If you live in North Carolina where same-sex marriage is not legal, but are still considering bankruptcy, the bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, February 1, 2010 @ 10:23 am

If A Wealthy Developer Can Walk Away From The Mother Of All Underwater Mortgages, Why Can’t You?

Rachel Beck, national business columnist for The Associated Press, asked this very question in a recent article upon finding that heavily capitalized developer Tishman Speyer Properties was able to simply “walk away” from 11,232 Manhattan apartments because it couldn’t pay its mortgage, under the guise of “good business,” while at the same time, in the same country, Rick Gilson, a college custodial supervisor in South Dakota, resists walking away from the mortgage on his mobile home, fearing he’ll be considered “a deadbeat.”

As Beck found, “Those two borrowers face the same financial dilemma: Their mortgages far exceed the values of their properties. Yet one gets to walk away without guilt, while the other can’t. Mr. Gilson is scared to dump the mortgage on his mobile home. He owes $31,973, but the home is only worth about $14,000.” “I have 12 years of money put into this property that I will never get out,” said the 50-year-old Gilson. “But I am still paying because this is what I have been told to do. That’s what I think is right.”

As Beck illustrates, up to this point, the focus of the real estate crisis has been on individual Americans facing their own personal mortgage meltdowns. Today, one in four U.S. homeowners (nearly 11 million Americans) are underwater on their mortgages.  While some experts believe it makes sense to walk away if you’re deeply underwater as it’s not necessarily worth it to keep paying a mortgage when they can find comparable rental housing for less, the argument against walkaways is not only a dropping credit score, but that they will wreak economic havoc. Banks will have made more bad loans, will then make fewer loans and home prices will continue to plunge.

Obviously the rules are different, though, for what Beck calls “the walk away of all walk aways.”

That title goes to the 56-building Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village complex, the largest single-owned residential area in the city. Commercial real-estate firm Tishman and its partner, investment, paid $5.4 billion for the property, hoping to make money by converting rent-regulated apartments into high-priced luxury condos.

Enter the current housing crash and now the property’s value sits squarely at $1.8 billion: a difference not simply underwater, but drowning.  While Tishman has said that it was turning the property back over to creditors to avoid filing for bankruptcy protection, Tishman has failed to restructure $4.4 billion in debt, unable to find another buyer. So, Tishman exits the deal with a mark on its reputation, and yet a conciliatory $33 billion in assets.

Residential homeowners like Rick Gilson don’t have it so easy. With a mobile home that started depreciating the minute he moved in over a decade ago, he rents out the property just to make the payments, living in another home with his wife.

“I get so stressed over this,” Gilson told Beck. “It’s like the elephant in the room and there is nothing you can do about it.”

While the unfair truth is that real-estate tycoons can default on a $4.4 billion mortgage, but dis-similarly-situated individuals can’t walk away from a $31,000 loan, average Americans do have choices.  As homeowners languish waiting for more immediate mortgage help, many are turning to bankruptcy to stop foreclosure and other creditor actions. For reliable bankruptcy advice that you can trust, contact The Law Firm of John T. Orcutt. And to find out more about your bankruptcy options, visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, January 31, 2010 @ 6:10 pm

As the mortgage crisis continues on, ironically, President Obama seemed right at home at the podium during his 2010 State of the Union address just as millions of Americans face losing their home. As a result, many concerned citizens sought in the President’s national address any signs not only of “hope” or “change”—expressions made famous during his campaign days—but also second year specifics about what a new year would mean for the millions of average Americans, just like them, facing imminent foreclosure.

In that address, the President laid out an ambitious agenda attempting to attack one specific problem from every conceivable angle: the terrible economic squeeze on America’s middle class.  One portion of his plan mentioned helping Americans stay in their homes, retain their home’s value or absolve home debt, as the President works to “lift the value of a family’s single largest investment.”

President Obama revealed he intends to “step up” programs that encourage re-financing for affordable mortgages. Yet, while the President made clear that he would be increasingly busy in his second year on many fronts, many critics charged that his speech, as well as homeowner assistance policies to this point, has been short on specifics of how to put government to work for those average Americans facing the loss of their homes.

Under the President’s current and primary homeowner assistance plan, the Home Affordable Modification Program (or HAMP),  “responsible borrowers” who have unpaid principle balances of less than $729,750 (for one unit) from a mortgage originating prior to January 1, 2009 may qualify for loan modification assistance if your mortgage payment is greater than 31% of your monthly gross (pre-tax) income.

In addition to flack the President received for only providing housing help for the fuzzily defined “responsible homeower,” apparently the plan, as of last month, has been less than successful for even the most responsible of borrowers. According to a recent Treasury Department report, 27 percent of the 650,000 homeowners taking part in the mortgage modification program are now delinquent on their mortgage payments.  In fact, only 1,711 participating homeowners attempting to avoid foreclosure have been able to convert their modifications to permanent status. Homeowners facing foreclosure and needing help to secure a loan modification have been encouraged to visit http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov.

To clarify, this type of organized modification effort does not constitute a refinance as the President spoke of; it’s simply a retooling of the mortgage, including a term that might be extended or an interest rate that could be adjusted.  Yet last night, the only thing the President said about the help distressed homeowners might get was this:

The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments. This year, we will step up re-financing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages.

The President never specifically mentioned HAMP, how HAMP might need time to work, or how it could be fixed.  And, most notably for some, he did not mention the word “foreclosure,” at all.

So, as foreclosures continue to escalate, American homeowners may feel that they have increasingly fewer options other than bankruptcy. Of this option, the President had a more definite response, with recent efforts to allow bankruptcy proceedings to renegotiate all debts, including home mortgages.

As American homeowners search for more immediate and specific mortgage help, many are turning to bankruptcy to stop foreclosure and other creditor actions. For reliable bankruptcy advice that you can trust, contact The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt for a totally FREE consultation at 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, January 30, 2010 @ 3:37 pm

This unrelenting economic downturn has been rough on all Americans—whether they be single, dating, engaged, married or widowed. But, as anyone who has ever been married already knows: money can be the main cause of many a marriage’s marital strife. As a result, in this especially difficult economic climate—full of job insecurity, rising mortgage costs, health care uncertainties and other mounting money woes—times have never been tougher for couples pushed to the brink of bankruptcy.  Many are left to wonder, who or what can help?

Yet, no matter how tough the economic tide, laying blame to your spouse for your family’s financial problems can be a dead end road that often leads to, at best, long-term distrust, and, at worst, the dissolution of the entire marriage. As unfortunate as it is that one or the other spouse may be the cause of the couple’s insolvency, fortunately, the power of the Bankruptcy Code can provide hard-hit couples with a clean slate by which to not only discharge their shared debt but also provide a unique opportunity to learn valuable lessons in budgeting and other healthy financial behaviors, together. These lessons include:

Bankruptcy Ends the Blame
Unlike a disgruntled spouse, bankruptcy does not blame either party or search for a decisive reason behind a debtor’s insolvency.  Instead, a bankruptcy filing means an accounting of all relevant debts and responsive solutions to how to discharge them. As a result, this process takes the pressure out of solving previously insurmountable problems with debt and creditor claims, granting a clean slate by which one spouse can be forgiven, another can forget, and both can move forward into a financially viable future.

Bankruptcy Ends Arguments at Their Source
As anyone who is married can attest, marriage and debt can make for a very volatile mix.  Bankruptcy removes divisive topics like debt from most marital arguments—discharging creditor claims and giving the previously cash-strapped couple the chance to begin to save for their next best steps.

Bankruptcy Protects Marital Assets
Bankruptcy shields a married couple’s most valuable assets and precious income using the power of an “automatic stay.”  This court-mandated suspension of creditor claims can shield the marriage by protecting the innocent spouse from the financial indiscretions of the other—preventing wage garnishment, creditor lawsuits, and unwieldy interest fees.   

Bankruptcy Can Sooth Marital Stress
Finally, in addition to wiping away many of the most pressing debts affecting many couples these days—and thereby relieving some of the fodder for arguments and discord—being honest with your spouse, or each other, about a dire financial situation, will provide a healthy framework for your relationship. This honest dialogue sets a perfect stage for a safe financial future and provides a strong marital precedent to overcome other challenges that both husband and wife may face in the weeks, months, and years ahead.

If you are considering filing for bankruptcy to strengthen your union, as well as your finances, knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you make the right spending decisions, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a fiscally viable and secure portfolio.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 6:57 pm

Ugh. Debt. These days most Americans are sick of hearing the d-word. And who can blame us? Americans are in more debt now than ever before. Avoiding debt seems impossible…there are so many things you can’t even do without credit cards or loans that we now take debt as a matter of course. Despite our negative feelings about debt, Americans want to repay what we owe. In fact, this noble instinct is what keeps some people from filing for bankruptcy when they desperately need to do just that. Not only are people afraid of having a negative impact on their credit scores (which in fact may already be in the basement), they also feel that the right thing to do is pay back debt.

When it is possible, paying back debt is the right thing to do, no doubt about it, but most people who declare bankruptcy don’t end up in a bad situation because they made negligent mistakes or don’t feel like paying; instead, dealing with the curve-balls life throws at us can prevent us from meeting obligations. By the time people opt to declare bankruptcy, they are not unwilling to pay back debt they simply can’t. The thing to remember is that creditors know that and take these factors into account. This is the reason creditors charge higher interest rates when they extend unsecured credit. If bankruptcy is the right decision, you shouldn’t allow misgivings about not paying certain kinds of debts hold you back.

What many people don’t even consider is that declaring bankruptcy can actually help you pay back debts. Consider this example: Say you are considerably behind on payments that are secured by your home or your car. In such a situation, filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy can allow you to reach a compromise between what is feasible and what your creditors expect. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, a repayment plan could save your home from foreclosure by allowing you to catch up on back payments. Similarly, a Chapter 13 repayment plan can allow you to catch up on back payments for your car, helping you to avoid losing your vehicle to repossession. In both situations, the creditor is receiving payments for the credit they have extended, and you are working with a plan you can actually meet. This also applies to debts that you would not be able to discharge in a bankruptcy, such as child support payments and back taxes owed to the IRS. A Chapter 13 plan can help you make up for missed payments in the past while easing the pressure of being hassled and worried about never catching up. Eventually, with a good Chapter 13 plan, you are more likely to succeed in getting current on all your required payments.

A strategically timed bankruptcy can also help you in those situations where you may be able to pay off all your debts by selling assets, but you simply need more time. With aggressive creditors hassling you constantly, you may end up selling assets for less than they are worth, just to do so more quickly or to avoid penalties. This could land you with debts still to be paid and no assets to boot. A typical example is if your home is foreclosed on. Your home is not likely to sell for what it is actually worth if it goes through foreclosure. This means that you will no longer owe the mortgage company, but you will also lose the value in your home, if any, that exceeded the value of the mortgage. By declaring bankruptcy and forestalling foreclosure, you reap the actual benefit of your investment and potentially pay back everyone you owe.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 6:33 pm

It’s tax season. Which means that for most people, it’s time to realize just how much we give to Uncle Sam every year. For some, the prospect of a refund provides a glimmer of hope that some new money is coming in soon to pay off debts.

Just a quick little note on your tax dollars before we get into the meat of this post: it is actually better to owe just a little bit of money after filing because that means that you have used more of our your own money throughout the year instead of giving it all to the government. Sure, a nice windfall come April is a nice thing. But keep in mind that it’s your money—you’re just getting it later. And, when it comes to investing, “money now” is always better than “money later.”

Because it’s tax season, we thought it important to discuss how taxes and personal bankruptcy can relate to one another. It is possible to use bankruptcy as a way to get rid of large, outstanding tax obligations but it’s not as easy as discharging a few grand in credit card debt.

Chapter 13 bankruptcy in most cases requires you to pay back what’s owed within your monthly payment plan and Chapter 7 rarely allows for the complete expulsion of your tax debts. (If you’re not sure of the differences between Chapters 13 and 7, simply do a search on our blog for each.)

There are, however, some precedents set for removing tax obligations as part of a bankruptcy. Although we encourage you to understand that it is a complicated process and the results are not always what you may be hoping for.

(Understand this post is only scratching the surface. Only in person can we provide a full breakdown of taxes and bankruptcy.)

One reason tax debt and bankruptcy tend to get tangled is that past due taxes can fall into all three categories of debt type: Dischargeable, Nondischargebale priority debts, and Nondischargeable priority debts.

Provided you filed your taxes on time, legally and provide no evidence of tax evasion other than legitimately being unable to pay, you can discharge tax debt in Chapter 7 and 13. Still, what’s owed must be more than three years late and assessed more than 240 days before you file. That means that you were officially declared late and in debt that many days before you filed. This ensures the IRS that you are not declaring just to get rid of a recent tax debt.

BUT (you knew there was one), that 240 day window starts only after the last extension expires, not when the original debt was assessed. Other impediments to that three year time-frame include a 90-day addition if a previous bankruptcy case of yours was still open while you were assessed the tax debt; the addition of any time the IRS was prevented from collecting as a result of a court ordered due process hearing plus an additional 90 days; and any time that a debt assistance professional formally asked the IRS to temporarily halt collection efforts.

Basically, any effort you make to delay the collection of tax debt, even if perfectly legal, counts against your ability to discharge tax debt in a bankruptcy.

The key to bankruptcy and taxes, like all things in life really, is to be completely honest and upfront. Any attempt to hide or even coyly plead ignorance will be considered an attempt to obscure or defraud the court and even worse, the IRS. Not being able to pay your taxes, especially after a mid-year job loss, is a common thing. Don’t make it worse.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 25, 2010 @ 8:41 am

Part of understanding bankruptcy is knowing who the professionals are that you will meet and deal with along the way. From your attorney to even your creditors, it helps provide a solid foundation of comfort to actually understand the role of those who are playing a role in your financial future.

One of those individuals is the case Trustee, the most prominent member of the bankruptcy process. And, the involvement you have with the case trustee depends on which chapter of bankruptcy you are filing.

As you may know, the 2 main “chapters” are 7 and 13. Well over 95% of all bankruptcy cases filed are filed under Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.

Let’s start by talking about the Chapter 7 trustee.

In every district in the country, there are 1 or more attorneys who have been appointed to act as a Chapter 7 Trustee. These Trustees are also sometimes called panel Trustees. When you file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, one of these panel Trustees is assigned to your case.

The best way to think of this person is as an intermediary between you and the Court, an attorney whose job it is to make sure you have told the truth, the truth and nothing but the truth, to make sure that you have disclosed everything you are legally obligated to disclose, and to find and sell any ‘assets above exemptions’.

Fortunately, in our experience, in about 98% of Chapter 7 cases filed, there are no ‘assets above exemptions’ to sell. What does this mean for you? Just that if you file Chapter 7, there is very little chance you will lose any property you don’t want to lose.

As long as you have told the truth, disclosed everything, cooperate, and have no assets that cannot be protected by available ‘exemptions’, your contact with the Trustee should be a positive one.

However, the best approach is to assume that the Trustee assigned to your case is not your friend, so that you stay cautious and alert.

In most cases, you are first introduced to the trustee at your 341 meeting, also known as the “Meeting of Creditors”. Technically speaking, this meeting is held to provide your creditor an opportunity (in most cases, one last opportunity) to ask you questions. However, most of the time, none of the creditors show up, and then, it’s just you, your attorney and the Trustee. At this meeting the Trustee will ask you questions necessary to get to know you and your case better and necessary for the Trustee to carry out his or her duties. (There a number of posts here on the blog about this meeting. Take a look.)

Let’s say you are unlucky enough that your case falls in the approximately 2% of cases with more assets than can be protected. In this case, it is important that you understand that it is the Trustee’s duty to sell or dispose of those assets ‘above exemptions’, and to then distribute the proceeds to your creditors. Basically, anything not considered exempt property must be seized and sold by the trustee.

The type and amount of exemptions are, for the most part, set by the law of the State where you live. There are exceptions. Being set by State law, exemptions vary greatly. However, since in 98% of bankruptcy cases filed, there are no assets not covered by available exemptions, the exemptions statutes are, for the most part, fairly generous. However, make no assumptions in this regard. Always, always seek the help of an experienced, full time bankruptcy attorney. Such an attorney will be an expert in what exemptions are available in your State and how best to apply them. Such an attorney will also be able to tell you what is not protected.

The Chapter 7 Trustee is also responsible for tracking down any gifts you made just before filing, whether or not they were made in an attempt to hide assets or not. For example, if your nephew got a few thousand from you for his birthday the week before you filed bankruptcy, rest assured that your Trustee will be looking to get this money back. And, it’s not even safe to pay back relatives or friends prior to filing. These people are generally considered “insiders”, and, subject to certain exceptions, paying back insiders during the 12 months before filing bankruptcy is a “no no”, which will result in your Trustee being forced to try to get the money back.

Chapter 7 trustees are paid by a commission based on the amount of money they recover, so it stands to reason they’ll work hard to find and sell what property they can.

Now, let’s talk about Chapter 13.

The Chapter 13 Trustee, aka the Standing Trustee, is also first introduced to you at the 341 meeting. However, their role is more about ensuring your income is sufficient to pay your monthly Chapter 13 plan payment and that your proposed Chapter 13 plan is properly calculated. Assuming all goes well, it is then this Trustee’s job to collect from you your plan payment and to distribute it to your creditors.

Like the Panel Trustee, the Standing Trustee is paid a commission. However, unlike a Chapter 7 Trustee, the Chapter 13 Trustee gets his commission not from what he takes and sells, but rather out of the money you send in each month. Chapter 13 Trustees do not sell things. That’s just not his job.

The best way to think of your Chapter 13 Trustee is as the Chief Financial Officer in charge of your Chapter 13 plan. He runs the business of your Chapter 13 case. He figures out what is needed, and then accounts for and distributes the money you send in each month.

Your relationship with your Chapter 13 Trustee will be vastly different than the one you would have with a Chapter 7 Trustee. Chapter 7 Trustees live, for lack of a better way of saying it, for what they can “kill and eat”. Chapter 13 Trustee do not. Chapter 13 Trustees live off a percentage of what you send in each month. The Chapter 13 Trustee only succeeds in getting paid, if you succeed in making your payments. Therefore, as a general rule, Chapter 13 Trustees, at least those who recognize, so to speak, which “side their bread is buttered”, will go everything in their power to help you make a go of it in Chapter 13.

In most cases, as long as you make your required Chapter 13 plan payment, you can think of the Chapter 13 Trustee as more of a friend than adversary. He or she still has to do the job, but doing the job includes doing the best that can be done to make sure you do yours and that you get the full benefit of bankruptcy, all the way to the desired “discharge”.

If all of this is confusing and scary, we understand. Bankruptcy law is complicated and complex, to say the least. Need an expert? In North Carolina, there are many, good, experienced bankruptcy attorneys.

One is the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, serving 30 counties in middle and eastern North Carolina. John Orcutt offers a Free initial consultation at 4 different locations: Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson. Call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 or visit his website for tons of info on bankruptcy: www.billsbillsb.com .

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, January 24, 2010 @ 6:51 pm

The United States has always been a nation of givers. Despite the recession and high unemployment, approximately 80% of Americans continued to give to religious and/or secular charities. This trend has continued in earnest following the recent catastrophe in Haiti. A new survey released by Zogby Interactive found that 64% of Ameircan adults have given or intend to give to relief efforts to aid to the earthquake-ravaged nation. The survey, released on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, found that 33% of respondents have already made a donation.

Perhaps you’re worried that declaring bankruptcy means you cannot donate. But, in fact, bankruptcy laws protect both debtors’ rights to give back. And now for those affected by the recession or for those bankruptcy bound, there’s even more reason to give back to Haiti.

As The Huffington Post reported on January 22, Taxpayers will now be able to write off charitable donations made by the end of February to Haitian relief efforts when they file their 2009 taxes under a bill President Barack Obama signed Friday. Under current law, donors would have to wait until they file their 2010 returns next year to take the deductions. The measure received final approval from Congress on January 21.

The hope is to encourage more donations.  And now is your chance to answer that call.

According to President Obama and Charity Navigator, an independent evaluator working to “advance a more efficient and responsive philanthropic marketplace,” listed below are prominent relief organizations, all of which are in dire need of donations specifically for Haitian relief efforts.

The American Red Cross has a full-time staff in Haiti, providing ongoing HIV/AIDS prevention and disaster preparedness programs. The Red Cross has already pledged an initial $200,000 to assist communities impacted by the earthquake. They seek additional donations to continue providing food, water, temporary shelter, medical services and emotional support.

Clinton Bush Haiti Fund is the unprecedented collaboration effort at the request of President Obama partnering former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton to help the Haitian people reclaim their country and rebuild their lives through donations of basic needs– food, water, shelter, and first-aid supplies.

Direct Relief International is a U.S.-based organization that provides medical assistance to impoverished nations. Direct Relief has committed up to $1 million to aid emergency response efforts, including medicine, supplies and food.

Doctors Without Borders is currently on the ground in Haiti continuing their mission as an international medical humanitarian organization working to assist people whose survival is threatened by this catastrophe.

Operation USA operates in Haiti, and is sending additional medical aid, water-purification supplies and food supplements to the hard-hit nation.

Convoy of Hope has established a command center just outside of Haiti’s capital where it is distributing food, water and supplies to the victims of the earthquake.

Oxfam America uses advocacy and education to aid areas in need of assistance. Oxfam is coordinating international aid groups to bring emergency water and sanitation services to Haiti.

Partners in Health has launched the Stand With Haiti campaign, bringing modern medical care to this nation and other countries around the world. Partners in Health has worked in Haiti for nearly 25 years and, since the earthquake, continues to provide medical assistance.

The Salvation Army is mobilizing personnel and supplies to assist in the relief effort in Haiti. The Salvation Army has already dedicated $850,000 in direct aid to the country; further donations can be made online or by calling 1-800-SAL-ARMY. The Salvation Army is also collecting $5 dollar donations by text. Mobile phone users in the United States can text the word HAITI to 52000.

UNICEF saw its offices in Port-au-Prince suffer heavy damages in the earthquake, but is ready to provide relief, deploying essential aid such as safe water, sanitation supplies, therapeutic foods, temporary shelter materials and medical supplies– all to assist in recovery efforts.

World Vision has worked in Haiti for 30 years, and is seeking donations to provide victims with food, water, blankets and tents.

Yele Haiti is entertainer Wyclef Jean’s own charitable organization and has established an online donation site to help victims of the earthquake. Through Jean’s Twitter account, the Haitian native also asks his fans to lend a hand, by making a $5 donation by texting YELE to 501 501.

Want to find out more about how the bankruptcy laws protects givers, givers who may end up needing help themselves? Check it out with the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. In North Carolina, call for a totally FREE consultation. Call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 or visit their website at www.billsbills.com.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, January 24, 2010 @ 10:36 am

It’s almost February and ‘tis the season for thinking about tax time—even more so if you find yourself considering the benefits of bankruptcy. So, if you believe you’re bankruptcy bound in 2010, in addition to trying to get your 2009 taxes filed in a timely manner, you may also be wondering whether you can discharge any income tax debt in your bankruptcy filing.

Well, it’s also time for insolvent taxpayers to take heart. When filing for bankruptcy a qualified attorney will compile a list of all of your debts, including credit cards, medical bills, car loans, mortgage debts, lawsuits and even information about stuff that you think you may owe, but for which creditors have yet to come calling.  In this long list of potential debts and inferences of insolvency, the lawyer will also require information about your taxes, including any federal income taxes you may owe, along with income tax due to your state or to any other state where you may have lived.

This comprehensive look at your debts, including your tax debt, is a good thing.  You are not only required by the Bankruptcy Code to include income tax debt in the common Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case, but also because, in some cases, your tax debt can be minimized or completely eliminated by bankruptcy.

The question of whether your income tax can indeed be discharged by filing for bankruptcy ultimately depends on how old the tax debt is and when you filed that tax return.  In order to be dischargeable, your tax debt for the tax year in question must meet the following conditions:

• The due date for filing your tax return is at least three years ago.
• Your tax return was filed at least two years ago.
• The tax assessment is at least 240 days old.
• Your tax return was not fraudulent.
• You are not guilty of tax evasion.

For example, say you filed your 2005 tax return showing $6000 in outstanding debt on April 7, 2006.   On April 16, 2009, (three years later) that $6000 became dischargeable, meaning the tax debt could be eliminated in a Chapter 7 filing and treated as just regular old dischargable, unsecured debt in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. If, on the other hand, you did not file your 2005 return on time, waiting until December 15, 2009 to do so, your tax debt would not be dischargeable as of today (January 16, 2010) because fewer than two years had passed since you filed your return. In this case, you would simply have to wait to file bankruptcy until at least December 16, 2011.

Not surprisingly, the rules about discharging tax debt in bankruptcy can be confusing. For instance, only “income” taxes can be discharged in bankruptcy, whereas employee withholding (form 940 and 941) and sales taxes cannot.

Also…tax returns filed on your behalf by the IRS do not count for purposes of discharging tax debt.

And…tax debt that is secured by a tax lien may be dischargeable, but may still need to be paid to the extent that the lien is secured by the things you own. 

As a result, if you’re considering bankruptcy in 2010 and are concerned about the tax implications, including when to file, whether you can keep your tax refund, whether your tax debt is dischargeable, and any other factors in your personal circumstances that might require consideration, it’s important to speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney who can competently guide you on the right path to the best result.

The bankruptcy lawyers at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, January 24, 2010 @ 8:18 am

Brent T. White, a law professor at the University of Arizona, has a provocative new study out, “Underwater and Not Walking Away.” He points out that as many as 32 percent of all homeowners are ‘underwater’ on their mortgages – they owe more money than their houses are worth. The media has produced a series of articles decrying homeowners who simply stop paying on these ‘upside down’ mortgages as irresponsible and even obscene. In fact, White notes, less than three percent of people whose primary residences are foreclosed on are people who could have continued to pay their mortgages. There are no discernible difference in foreclosure rates in places where housing prices have dropped steeply. Rather, foreclosure rates closely track unemployment rates, suggesting that it’s generally people who lose their jobs and are no longer able to pay their mortgages who lose their homes to foreclosure.

This is true even when it would make more financial sense for people to walk away. Nationwide, housing prices have dropped 30 percent since their peak in 2006; in some cities, drops have been much steeper. Parts of California, for example, have seen drops of 65%. The result is that many people could pay rent on a new house at only a fraction of their monthly mortgage. Homeowners in this situation could save tens of thousands of dollars by walking away. So why don’t more of them do so?

Emotions of fear, guilt and shame come together to encourage people to act against their own self-interests, White argues. There’s a concerted message being put out not only by the banking industry, but also by the government, the media and even non profit consumer counseling agencies that ‘good people’ live up to their responsibilities and don’t walk away from their obligations. That message is allowing the banking industry to shift not only the responsibility, but also the consequences, of the housing crisis entirely onto the shoulders of homeowners.

Certainly there are some negative consequences to society of walking away – foreclosures tend to cluster in neighborhoods, and neighborhoods with a large number of foreclosed homes often become run down and dangerous. But what about the consequences to society of staying and struggling to pay these huge mortgages? Doesn’t that empower a banking industry that made poor decisions and led the economy into this trap?

White points out that in a stable housing market, a house should be about 15 to 16 times the price of a year’s worth of rent. In some markets, the average mortgage being written was 38 times the price of a year’s rent. Shouldn’t the bankers, experts in housing prices, be held to some account for writing these kinds of mortgages and letting housing prices get out of control?

The guilt, shame and fear that White writes about seems to apply only to consumers. We see this echoed in the way people think about credit card debt and bankruptcy. When consumers are unable to pay their debts, they are somehow shirking their responsibilities; when banks can’t pay what they owe, they find themselves ‘undercapitalized.’

This isn’t to say that financial irresponsibility should be more acceptable. However, maybe we need to rethink the way we hold consumers to a higher moral standard than lenders, and instead force the same financial accountability on all parties.

If you’re considering letting your house go, protect yourself from deficiency liability by filing for bankruptcy. For more information, visit our website www.billsbills.com and call to set up your free initial debt consultation. Serving North Carolina families since 1995, the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, January 23, 2010 @ 7:15 am

You know your creditors: those nice folks who give you something you want — goods, services, or money — in exchange for your promise to pay them back at a later date.  In practical terms, a creditor can be a credit card company, a bank, a hospital, your local dentist, or any person or company to whom you owe a debt.

But, in these unfriendly economic times, [exactly] what happens when you can’t or won’t pay back that debt? What should you do when your creditors come calling? Can you keep creditors at bay or are you bankruptcy bound? Conquer your fears of dealing with your debt and remember the bankruptcy basics necessary to keep you from a creditor crunch.

Remember: Filing a Lawsuit Against a Debtor is not a Creditor’s First Choice
Keep in mind, creditors normally don’t want a lawsuit any more than you do. In fact, a creditor will not normally file a lawsuit against you until after many months and sometimes years of pursuing you for non-payment. Plus, creditors know that even if they file a lawsuit, it can be quickly neutralized by your bankruptcy filing—dispensing with your unsecured, and in some cases, even secured debt.

To Answer or Not to Answer
When you fail to respond to a creditor’s lawsuit, the creditor will gain a default judgment. This judgment will give the creditor the right to take certain collection actions against you, which could include seizing your bank accounts or garnishing your wages. In the alternative, if you respond to a creditor’s lawsuit—providing an “answer”—it can buy you precious time to secure more savings or take an excellent opportunity to file Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

The Consequences of Judgment Day
A judgment is a judicial order that, if it is not obeyed, will invoke legal consequences.  In extreme cases, a failure to pay a judgment filed on behalf of your creditors could result in a bench warrant issued by the court for your arrest. Keep in mind, only bankruptcy can help you avoid this type of judgment.

Settling What Constitutes A Settlement
Creditors file lawsuits because they simply want some kind of payment and, in the process, are often willing to settle for a lesser amount for repayment. Yet, while creditors want these types of settlements, it’s important to make sure your settlement offers are in writing.  Additionally, you should also be wary of so-called “debt settlement” firms who claim they can settle your debts for pennies on the dollar. Remember: you don’t need a firm to settle your debts…creditors filing lawsuits often offer settlement amounts; but the forgiven debt may be taxable. In the end, keep in mind that debts settled or discharged in bankruptcy are not taxable.

Worried About Wage Garnishment?
As mentioned, any creditor who wins a judgment against you can also garnish your wages or seize your bank accounts.  Only bankruptcy can stop your wages garnishment or a bank seizure order to raid your valuable accounts.  If a creditor seizes your wages or accounts after you file bankruptcy, you do have legal recourse and it’s even possible to get those assets back.

Knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help you conquer your creditors and face your financial fears, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a viable and secure future.  The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 21, 2010 @ 11:50 am

The latest chapter in the Obama administration’s attempts to make lenders modify mortgages is to send SWAT teams – no, I’m not kidding, really, SWAT teams – into the call centers of major lenders to try to ensure that they follow the proper procedures and actually modify loans. Seriously, wouldn’t it be a whole lot easier just to pass cramdown and allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages than to try to sweet talk, bribe or otherwise convince bankers to do it on their own?

Because they’re not. Making Homes Affordable, the program implemented by the government last May, is designed to encourage banks to modify the loans of homeowners who are having trouble making mortgage payments. Mortgage companies are reluctant to do that, however: they make more money in interest and fees when a mortgage goes into foreclosure, than they make from the government when they successfully modify it. The government had hoped to have 3-4 million mortgages modified by the end of last year. As of mid December, the count was at 750,000 – the vast majority of those were still in the trial stages.

The news reports of lenders dragging their feet are backed up with anecdotal evidence from homeowners, who report that they call the lenders over and over, file and refile the same documents, and then call back, only to be told that no one knows anything about their case. Lenders counter that people don’t send them the requested documents. Really? Desperate homeowner, one last shot at keeping their home, and they can’t be bothered to fax some papers? The lender argument is a little hard to believe.

Hence, the SWAT teams. These are teams of three people, sent into the call centers of the seven largest loan servicers to make sure that the bank representatives are giving accurate information, filing forms properly, etc. Experts are not impressed – many say the initiative is unlikely to work. Some have called for putting permanent government observers in the call centers. They note that private insurers already have their people inside the call center, to help prevent the loans they’ve insured from going into foreclosure.

Unfortunately, neither temporary nor permanent government observers in the call centers seems likely to work. This is another initiative – like the ‘foreclosure hall of shame’ that was supposed to embarrass the lenders into modifying loans – that the banks will evade and ignore until the administration acknowledges it isn’t working and moves on to something else. The fact is, lenders aren’t going to modify substantial numbers of mortgages until they are forced to. Unless an initiative like cramdown is passed, which takes the decision to modify or not and how much out of the bank’s hands and gives it to a neutral party, foreclosures will continue to rise.

Fortunately, homeowners finding it difficult to pay their mortgage may have another option to save their home: bankruptcy. Your bankruptcy attorney will return your phone calls, keep your files organized, and not make you fax documents four or five times. In addition, he or she will help you map out a plan that will lead you to financial freedom. The Obama administration may sincerely want to help homeowners. But as long as they expect bankers to do it out of the kindness of their hearts, you’re probable better off filing for bankruptcy.

Brought to you by the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Providing North Carolina homeowners real foreclosure relief since 1995. Is your lender not working with you? Call today and find out how a bankruptcy can save your home. 1-800-899-1414. Convenient offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville, and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 21, 2010 @ 7:45 am

According to a January 8 article in the Huffington Post, lack of confidence in the recent economic recovery led employers to shed an unanticipated 85,000 jobs in December 2009—even as the unemployment rate held steady at 10 percent.  While it may seem strange that unemployment rates flatlined as American jobs continue to disappear, the explanation is even more disconcerting; in truth, the rate would have been higher if more people had been looking for work instead of ending their search because they can’t find jobs.

As the Huffington Post reported: “The sharp drop in the work force – 661,000 fewer people – showed that more of the jobless are giving up. Once people stop looking for jobs, they’re no longer counted among the unemployed. When discouraged workers and part-time workers who would prefer full-time jobs are included, the so-called “underemployment” rate in December rose to 17.3 percent, from 17.2 percent in November. That’s just below a revised figure of 17.4 percent in October, the highest on records dating from 1994.”

Many had hoped the latest Labor report would support the premise that the economy had actually begun to rebound, gaining jobs for the first time in two years.  As such, the divide between the have nots and notions from economic “experts” continues to grow as Main Street unemployment once again negatively contrasted Wall Street perceptions of economic improvement. “One word sums it up: Disappointment,” Jonathan Basile, an economist at Credit Suisse told Huffington Post. The drop in the labor force, Basile said, “tells me that Main Street doesn’t believe there’s a recovery yet, because they’re not out looking for jobs yet.”

As it is, the unemployment rate holds steady at 10%.

In terms of job creation, the bar is now a bit lower for a “happier new year.” Friday’s report caps a 2009 considered another terrible year for U.S. workers. The economy has lost more than 7.2 million jobs since the recession’s beginnings in December 2007. And while layoffs have slowed, they have hardly ended, with December’s numbers providing another staggering reminder.

“The economy is in a rough situation,” Labor Secretary Hilda Solis acknowledged in an interview with The Associated Press. She said she thinks companies are reluctant to ramp up hiring because they’re waiting to see what new stimulative steps the government will take to provide relief.

In an attempt to offset these negative numbers, President Obama has presented $2.3 billion in tax credits that Congress has already approved to create 17,000 green jobs.  Meanwhile, Congress is considering a “jobs bill” that would contribute $174 billion in unemployment benefits. Our nation’s leaders understand that if jobs remain scarce, consumer confidence and spending will continue to flag, slowing the economic recovery.

While recent reports of the nation’s financial future remain nothing short of bleak, the good news remains that through bankruptcy laws, borrowers facing unemployment can take their future into their own hands, stop drowning in health care, consumer and mortgage debt, and begin on the road to a more viable financial future.

Every week bankruptcy attorneys continue to meet with dozens of Americans in financial distress due to employment woes.  Each time those who have encountered job misfortune come into law offices feeling hopeless and at the end of their rope, perceiving no alternatives to their continuing fiscal problems.  Almost every time, however, it seems more and more when these same clients leave these offices, they finally feel some sense of relief for the first time since the job recession started; they are reassured that the bankruptcy laws and the bankruptcy system offers them the possibility of a new start— at an affordable cost—and with it a financially viable and secure future. In short, bankruptcy relief ends worry and stress for many jobless Americans living on the financial brink.

For reliable bankruptcy advice that you can trust, contact The Law Firm of John T. Orcutt. And to find out more about your bankruptcy options, visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, January 20, 2010 @ 11:34 am

In this special series, entitled “Bad Ideas for the Bankruptcy Bound,” we’ll introduce what to avoid when bankruptcy is your next, best step.

Love may move mountains,
but money can crumble the strongest marriage.
– Ron, Lieber, The New York Times

Everyone who’s married knows: money can be a primary cause of marital strife. As a result, in this especially difficult economic climate—full of job insecurity, rising mortgage costs, health care uncertainties and other mounting money woes—many debtors who have accumulated all kinds of debt without the knowledge of their spouse are sometimes tempted to file for bankruptcy “secretly” and avoid sharing the financial “bad news” with their spouse.

Regardless of the fiscal reason, this path can lead to losing it all with your better half. While one petitioning spouse doesn’t mean the other has to file for bankruptcy also, it’s assuredly never a good idea to hide a filing from your husband or wife. Here’s why:

Disclosure of Your Debts is Inevitable
While married people like you have a legal right to file for bankruptcy by your lonesome, what you don’t have readily available is any way to keep the news of your bankruptcy filing from your spouse. When you stop paying your creditors in anticipation of your bankruptcy filing, inevitably these same creditors will begin calling and writing your home—the same space you share with your unknowing spouse.  Remember, the bad news of your insolvency can come from you or them, with a bit less sensitivity from the latter.

You’ll Need Your Spouse’s Support
Married folks who file for bankruptcy must provide information regarding their spouse’s pay, last year’s tax returns, proof of retirement and an array of other information that might require your better half’s information and input.  Keep in mind, your requests for this information will ultimately raise your spouse’s suspicions and the likelihood of your spouse finding out—one way or another.

Joint Accounts Automatically Get Your Spouse Involved
Filing for bankruptcy means that if your spouse’s name appears on any of your debts—such as joint credit cards, mortgages, or the like—they’ll find out the hard way when creditors pursue them for an alternative way to get paid.  In addition, if your spouse is using one of the forms of credit that will be included in the bankruptcy filing, you’ll need to tell him or her to stop using this credit before you file—another reason your spouse will be alerted to your insolvency.

Don’t Risk More Stress in Insolvency
Obviously, hiding your debts from your spouse is dishonest. Hiding your bankruptcy from your spouse, as you’ve seen, is almost impossible.  Both non-disclosures will add unnecessary stress and strife to your relationships. And amid these harsh economic times, life can be tough enough without all of this interpersonal withholding.  The first step to a fresh financial start together, is being honest about your bankruptcy with your spouse. Don’t forget, there is no more ruinous a financial move than a divorce and no greater road to divorce than fiscal dishonesty.

Knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney can also help lessen the marital stress of bankruptcy, yielding the right kinds of support, information and insights—at a low cost— for a financially viable and secure future.  A good bankruptcy attorney can also dispel the many myths and stigmas of bankruptcy, offering truthful information about this powerful form of debt elimination. The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 19, 2010 @ 3:02 pm

So you’re drowning in debt and desperate for a way out. A friend or relative asks if you’ve considered a 401k loan. “They’re quick, simple to qualify for, and here’s the best part: you’re paying the interest to yourself.” Sounds like a brilliant solution, right? Why pay 25% interest to a credit card company when you could be paying 6% interest to yourself?

Stop. You want to think long and hard before you take out a 401k loan, especially if you’re already in debt.
Fayetteville debt relief,
The most important thing to know is that, in bankruptcy, your retirement savings – 401k accounts, pensions, 403b accounts, traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs and even plans for small business owners and the self employed – are protected from your creditors. That bears repeating. If you declare bankruptcy, you keep all the money in your retirement accounts.

If you’ve taken the money out in the form of the loan, however, your creditors can take that money.

Moreover, failure to pay back a 401k loan comes with serious drawbacks. If you lose or change jobs, you have to pay back the entire sum within 60 days. If you’re unable to make payments on the loan – or the lump payment in the case of changing jobs – you’re required to pay all taxes on the outstanding money, plus a 10% penalty.

In addition, recent court cases have determined that because you’re paying the money to your own account, a 401k loan cannot count as debt, and is not part of the Means Test. This means that you could be tipped into a Chapter 13 plan even if you’re spending significant amounts of money repaying a 401k loan. If you’ve already borrowed the money, though, don’t despair. It’s true that it might bump you into filing Chapter 13 rather than Chapter 7. However, while the Means Test is very similar to the disposable income formula in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, there’s one important difference and that’s the 401k. You’re allowed to both contribute to your 401k in a Chapter 13 plan, and to repay your 401k loan, and take both as a deduction on the means test. This means your plan payment may actually be lowered if you are making a 401k repayment.

There may be times when 401k loans aren’t a terrible idea, even if you’re facing bankruptcy. It might make sense, for example, to take out the loan in order to catch up with mortgage payments before you file bankruptcy. But this is a situation where you should really discuss the pros and cons of your actions with a bankruptcy attorney before undertaking the loan. One important rule of thumb: it doesn’t make sense to take the loan out to repay unsecured debt, debt that will most likely simply be dismissed in bankruptcy.

One final note: not every 401k plan permits loans for any reason. Some plans restrict them to specific purposes, such as first time home loans, medical expenses, college tuition or mortgage payments. Before even considering this option, you need to make sure it’s available to you.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 19, 2010 @ 2:56 pm

No doubt in the last several years you’ve heard the phrase “Too Big to Fail” more than once. This oft-used phrase refers to the regulatory idea that many of the largest and most interconnected businesses are, in fact, so large that a government cannot allow them to fail because their failure would have a disastrous effect not only on the business itself, or even the larger industry, but also to the greater economy.

Early in the economic meltdown and late in 2008, General Motors Co. was considered just such a company. And given their huge presence in the U.S. economy, bankruptcy appeared unthinkable. Yet the unthinkable became inevitable in June 2009 as GM finally filed for Chapter 11 after years of losses and market share declines capped by a dramatic plunge in sales.

In Michael McKee’s Bloomberg article, “GM’s Long Decline May Make Bankruptcy ‘Irrelevant’ to Economy” of the car company’s “failure” he wrote:

“General Motors Corp. once mattered so much to the U.S. economy that a two-month strike in 1970 helped trigger a 4.2 percent drop in gross domestic product for the fourth quarter, as national auto production fell 82 percent.

Then, GM accounted for about half the cars and light trucks sold in the country. Now, GM controls just 20 percent of the market, and analysts say its bankruptcy filing will barely register in the broader economy.

GM’s drawn-out restructuring, an increase in U.S. manufacturing by foreign carmakers and the recession-induced decline in auto sales all have meant more to the economy than today’s legal filing.

“Bankruptcy now is irrelevant in terms of the economic consequence of what’s happening to GM,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com in West Chester, Pennsylvania. “Either way, it’s going to be a shadow of what it was, in terms of jobs and income.”

GM has been reducing payrolls for three decades. Its U.S. employment peaked in 1979 at 618,365, when it was the nation’s largest private employer and auto manufacturing accounted for 4.1 percent of GDP. At the end of this year’s first quarter, autos were 1.5 percent of the economy, and GM had 88,000 U.S. workers.”

But as unthinkable as it was last year to let GM go bust, and how “irrelevant” bankruptcy seemed at the time as a viable solution, GM has taken a surprising post-bankruptcy turn.

In short, it was too big. It failed. Nothing bad happened. And now it’s back again.

That’s right, after an aggressive bankruptcy-inspired restructuring and reorganizing, GM, even amid weak car sales, is talking about making a profit this year. According to this week’s Wall Street Journal, General Motors Co. will make money in 2010, its chairman said, “a bold and surprising forecast for a business that exited bankruptcy proceedings just last summer and hasn’t turned an annual profit since 2004.” “My prediction is we will be” profitable in 2010, Edward E. Whitacre Jr. told reporters at GM’s Detroit headquarters, a sign of rising confidence that also sets a tough benchmark for the still-struggling car maker’s employees. “Do we have obstacles in the way? Yes. But we have a good management team and a good plan in place.”

The moral of the story?  Bankruptcy works.

Now in addition to convincing Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, and Ben Bernanke that it’s okay to let financial firms sink into insolvency—for a restructured and reorganized future—the way small banks and businesses do every week under Chapter 11,  it’s also essential to understand that bankruptcy can work for you…and isn’t a failure… but the possible key to a stronger and more productive financial future.

For more information on getting back on your feet like GM through bankruptcy visit the experienced bankruptcy lawyers of The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 19, 2010 @ 11:23 am

In the Preventing Foreclosure series, you’ve received an introductory look at how to stay in your home, either through bankruptcy proceedings or via negotiations with your mortgage lender, with later discussions specifically devoted to how Chapter 13 or Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings can force creditors to end their collection activities and delay a foreclosure sale.

In Part II of this six-part series, we elaborated on the ins and out of working with your mortgage lender, including timelines, terms, and trends, including forbearance, mortgage modification, loan reinstatement, and the short sale. Here, we’ll expand on the process behind the real estate concept of a  “short sale,” including the ins and outs of this option for homeowners seeking to avoid foreclosure and settle with their lender.

Part V – The Short Sale

If you’re one of many mortgage holders in arrears due to a recent job loss, extended unemployment, medical costs, divorce, or just an adjustable rate mortgage that’s on the rise, you may be facing foreclosure. But, foreclosure can ruin your credit and make it impossible to acquire a new home, leaving you without your biggest and best asset in an uncertain economic climate.

You may have heard of one alternative to foreclosure: the short sale. A short sale occurs when the outstanding loan against your home is greater than what the property can be sold for. For some homeowners, this may be a viable solution. However, for many, it’s just a false glimmer of hope that may leave the homeowner worse off than before the short sale. Here’s a brief overview of the necessary steps of a short sale:

Verify Your Property Value
If you’re using a real estate agent, they’ll provide you with an estimate of market value. If you are selling the property yourself, do your own homework, assessing the market in your area for a proper property price.

Calculate the Costs
Add up all the costs of selling your property, including the closing costs. If you are selling the property on your own, a real estate attorney can help.

Assess the Amount Owed
Determine the amount owed against the property, including all loans, minus the total amount owing against the property from the estimated proceeds of the sale—ultimately a negative number.

Locate Your Lender
Contact your mortgage lender or lenders for their particular short sale procedures. Some lenders are willing to work with you by reducing the amount owed or making other arrangements.

Sell the property
If your lender agrees to a short sale, the next step is hiring a real estate agent—one willing to work for a smaller commission. At the same time, you’ll also need to scale back your own spending as another sign of good faith to your lender. Once a buyer is secured, you can then sell the house for a loss, and, with the lender’s permission, they agree to call it even, with no damage to your credit or ability to procure a new home in the future.

Review the Risks
In addition to the potential that your lender will deny you a short sale, the short sale process does have consequences. Your lender may not be willing to eat the loss, leaving you on the hook for the difference. Make sure they are willing to give you complete forgiveness of the debt, and that they will not hold you personally liable for the difference between what the property sells for and what you owe. Get this in writing. Even if your lender does absorb the loss, the IRS may treat this difference as taxable income, leaving you with a significant chunk to cover come tax time.

As a result, the best alternative is, of course, keeping your home—either by restructuring or reinstating the loan.  Your best bet is contacting a bankruptcy attorney as soon as you start feeling pinched to make the mortgage payment. Chances are you have other unsecured debt that can be eliminated, freeing up more money to pay your mortgage. If you have two mortgages and your home is now worth less than what you owe on the first, a bankruptcy can get rid of the 2nd. That’s right, you may be able to eliminate your 2nd mortgage.

In Part VI, we’ll conclude the Preventing Foreclosure series with a broader look at your bankruptcy options.  And, as always, to learn more about your options, contact the experts at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 18, 2010 @ 6:48 pm

In 2005, Congressional changes to the Bankruptcy Code made bankruptcy filing more cumbersome by requiring quite a bit more red tape, leading to a significant drop in filings the following year (2006). But, as a result of the economic downturn, during the past three years, bankruptcy filings have risen back to the levels seen before Congress’ 2005 bankruptcy overhaul.

In fact, despite notions that the economy improved last year, 2009 appears to have been a devastating year for the finances of American people—and businesses—beleaguered by an unending stream of bad economic news.

According to an Associated Press report on January 4, 2010, U.S. consumers and businesses are filing for bankruptcy at a pace that made 2009 a year with the seventh most filings on record, garnering more than 1.4 million bankruptcy petitions. This record number represented a staggering increase of 32 percent from 2008.

These statistics, gathered by the National Bankruptcy Research Center (NBRC), measure consumer and business filings from December through November. December 2009 filings are not included in the total. Of the 1.43 million bankruptcies in 2009, 116,000 were recorded in December 2009, up 22 percent from the same month the year prior—a sign that bankruptcies aren’t exactly slowing down.

Another sign of a continuing wave of insolvency is that recent, recession-driven bankruptcies have occurred in mini waves of their own, beginning nearly two years ago with a run of adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM)-related filings; followed closely with an upsurge of filings from the newly unemployed; and finally, and more recently, with findings that wealthy individuals and business owners are now succumbing to the economic effect of lower incomes and shrinking home values.

The increase includes a significant upturn in 2009 Chapter 7 (liquidation) filings, which increased by more than 42 percent compared to this time last year. Conversely, Chapter 13 filings have increased at only 12 percent. The steady decline in Chapter 13 filings, stands in direct contrast with the strong push by Congress in its 2005 bankruptcy legislation to encourage bankrupt consumers to choose Chapter 13—with its focus on creditor repayment—rather than Chapter 7. The figures seem to yield not only a failure in the policies and goals of the Congressional overhaul, but consumers desire to wipe their financial slate clean, and quickly, in lieu of holding on to, for example, their home, or other non-exempt possessions.

In fact, states with high foreclosure rates are leading the way in bankruptcies as well; again, signaling the housing crisis, adjustable mortgages, and a loss of home equity, as primary factors in many Americans’ decision to file. According to the NBRC, nationwide, filings to date amount to almost 11,500 filings per million households with the highest filing rates in Nevada (two-and-half times the national average), followed by Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, and Indiana (with one and a half times the national average).

Is the housing market, job market, or a combination of factors hitting you and your household hard? If so, the numbers above show you’re not alone. In fact, there’s strength in these numbers—knowing a qualified bankruptcy attorney has helped many weed through the bankruptcy laws and the bankruptcy system, yielding the possibility of a new start— at a low cost— for a financially viable and secure future.

The bankruptcy experts at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt offer a totally FREE debt consultation and now, more than ever, it’s time to take them up on their offer. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414, or during the off hours, you can make your own appointment right online at www.billsbills.com. Simply click on the yellow “FREE Consultation Now” button.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 18, 2010 @ 6:43 pm

Is there any way to lower your car payments in bankruptcy? The answer, which may surprise you, is maybe. While Congress recently rejected attempts to pass a law that would allow bankruptcy judges to ‘cramdown’ mortgages, there do exist some limited possibilities for revising auto loans.

Basically, debtors who owe more than their car is worth – and who doesn’t, especially if you bought it new? – may be eligible to eliminate the portion of the debt that exceeds the value. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the debt would be divided into ’secured’ debt (the value of the car) and ‘unsecured’ debt (the excess money on the loan), and the car loan would be revised to repay only the secured portion.

However, this option is generally only available for people whose car loans originated more than 910 days before they declared bankruptcy. Some courts have allowed, in limited form, for the portion of a car loan that was ‘rolled over’ from a previous car loan, to be treated as unsecured debt even in a more recently originated loan. However, note that a recent decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit – whose jurisdiction includes North Carolina – has determined that this portion of a car loan is included as secured.

On the other hand, some attorneys report that some lenders are willing to renegotiate the loan, even if it originated in the last 910 days. While the law doesn’t require them to renegotiate, it doesn’t prevent them from doing so either. It’s at least worth asking, before you take up your other options.

If your loan originated less than 910 days ago, and your lender refuses to renegotiate, what are your other options as you go through bankruptcy? You can simply surrender the car. Lenders don’t like this option, but if you’re filing bankruptcy, they have no choice. They will take back the car and then sell it at auction. The difference between what you owe and what they sell it for will be entered against you as a deficiency balance. However, even in a Chapter 13, there is little chance the creditor will receive any return on its deficiency balance.

You can also reaffirm the loan. In this case, you agree to continue making the payments on the car even after you file for bankruptcy. Note carefully, though, if you choose this option and then default on the loan, you will be responsible for the deficiency balance, and the lender can sue you for it. Reaffirming your car loan has some advantages though: you get to keep your car, which means you don’t have to look for a new car loan with a recent bankruptcy on your record. Making these payments on time is also a good way to rebuild your credit – just make sure the lender is reporting them to the credit agencies.

As always, remember that the best way to negotiate this maze is with the help of a good bankruptcy attorney.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 9:30 am

More than 1.4 million Americans filed for bankruptcy in 2009; surprisingly, a large number of filers were over the age of 65. Senior citizens were traditionally less likely to file bankruptcy for a number of reasons. Until recently, for example, senior citizens held less credit card debt than younger people. They have less time to repair their credit rating after a bankruptcy as well, and may feel that the perceived harmful effects of bankruptcy will haunt them forever. Considering that many myths about bankruptcy are deep-rooted, older Americans may be more likely to hold strong feelings associating bankruptcy with shame and failure.

Nonetheless, bankruptcies among the plus 65 set continue to grow. Between 1991 and 2007, bankruptcy filings among Americans 65 and older went up 125 percent; for those between ages 75 and 84 they increased an astonishing 433 percent. The recession that began at the end of 2007 has hit seniors particularly hard. The crash of the stock market meant that many seniors wound up having far less money to see them through retirement than they had hoped. While younger workers have a couple of decades to rebuild their portfolios and 401k accounts, older Americans, who need to use that money now, do not. Furthermore, many older Americans live on a fixed income – social security payments or pension payments – and they have few options to increase that income. With a national unemployment rate hovering around 10%, jobs are difficult to find for anyone. Given that many companies have a bias – legal or not – against hiring older workers, senior citizens often find it difficult to get work.

While seniors once had a reputation for eschewing credit cards and paying with cash, in recent years, credit card companies have been aggressively marketing to senior citizens. Most doctors and pharmacies now take credit cards for prescriptions and co-pays; many strapped seniors have no choice but to put those purchases on credit. The average senior now has slightly more credit cards debt than his or her younger counterparts.

The good news is that bankruptcy offers seniors the same protections it offers all Americans: a chance to keep your home. Freedom from the incessant calls of creditors. If you’re on a fixed income, chances are good that you will qualify for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which will simply discharge your unsecured debt.

Why waste your golden years worrying about credit card debt? See a bankruptcy attorney today, and determine the best course for you, to bring you to financial freedom.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, January 10, 2010 @ 9:08 am

Before filing for bankruptcy protection, it is well worth your time to seek out alternatives. Here are a few you for you to consider:

You know what budgeting is, but maybe you haven’t given it serious thought.  If you are finding yourself squeezed every month as you try to make payments to your creditors, it is possible that some creativity and sacrifice can give you enough breathing room to build and execute an escape plan. Check with your employer to see if the company offers an Employee Assistance Program with financial counseling services, as they can provide guidance about possible options. If some budgeting and perhaps very judicious borrowing could help you pay back your debts within 3 years while allowing you to live relatively comfortable, budgeting could be a good alternative for you.

What does judicious borrowing mean, exactly? Well, for one thing, it means no more loans from predatory outfits like payday loan stores, and it may also  mean no more borrowing from credit cards and banks–these ostensibly legitimate outfits can be as exploitative as anyone.  If you can borrow the money from a family member, or perhaps receive a low interest loan from a credit union or other borrower friendly institution, a loan can give budgeting the necessary punch to make it effective.

There are downsides, however; borrowing money to get your way out of debt is a little like a sale that promises you will save money by spending–  a contradiction in terms. The point of borrowing to get out of debt is to replace your existing debt with lower overall payments and/or monthly payments. If you aren’t saving money, borrowing more is just asking for trouble!

You may not be in a position to do the kind of borrowing that can be labeled judicious; if you are considering bankruptcy, chances are good that your credit is hurting, and low credit makes for bad loans–or no loans at all.  Borrowing from family has downsides, too: what if you become unable to repay the debt, for whatever reason? Financial problems can drive families apart, so it is important to tread carefully.

Another alternative is selling assets. If you have valuable assets, it is possible that filing for bankruptcy could cause you to lose those assets  anyway ( but this does not, of course, include your personal home or car, which bankruptcy can help you save.)  In that case, selling assets might be a good idea. On the other hand, this is just like the judicious borrowing example given above; how likely is it that you have valuable assets sitting around if you are in enough financial trouble to seek bankruptcy protection? Watch out for third party security interests in your assets; some assets may not be sale-able while someone else  (say, a lender) has an interest in the asset, so be sure to check any agreements concerning that asset before you proceed.

Budgeting can also receive a boost from restructuring of your debt; if you are able to refinance your house, transfer credit card balances or seek out other methods, you  may be able free up enough cash in your lowered payments to pay back the principals on your debts. This solution also comes with downsides and caveats, however: you may not be eligible to restructure any of your debts (especially now that banks are being so tightfisted over lending), and sometimes restructuring debt sounds a lot better  than it turns out to be: transferring balances to take advantage of lower interest rates can end up backfiring if you are unable to pay before the grace period ends and if the regular interest rate is higher than the one you gave up. Refinancing can sometimes result in lower payments and less money paid overall, but those savings sometimes end up being passed to third parties in the form of fees or commissions.

As you can see, alternatives are out there, but the drawbacks, caveats and requirements mean that no one solution will act like a miracle cure. Give equal consideration to all your options–including filing for bankruptcy protection.

So…why settle for an alternative? Stuck with what seems like a mountain of bills you cannot pay or get a handle on? Maybe the best ‘alternative’ is to just look into filing bankruptcy. The truth is: It does so much more for so much less that everything else. The fact is that, had the bankruptcy laws not already been on the books, the creditor lobby would surely block their creation. Bankruptcy is just that good. You should check it out and you have nothing to lose. Many bankruptcy attorneys offer a totally FREE initial consultation, just for this purpose. In North Carolina, so does the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 or visit their website at www.billsbills.com . They have offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Thursday, January 7, 2010 @ 12:27 pm

Are you putting off declaring bankruptcy because you’re afraid you’ll never be able to rent an apartment again? Have you heard horror stories from friends or relatives about how they got turned down for a rental because of their bad credit? Relax. Having a bankruptcy on your credit report won’t prevent you from finding a great place to live.

It’s true that some places – particularly apartment complexes – do check your credit, and do accept or deny your application based on the results. If you have your heart set on living in a place like this, do yourself a favor: call them up beforehand, and ask what their requirements are. Be specific. Ask if they refuse to rent to anyone with a bankruptcy on their record. Find out your credit scores in advance, and ask the apartment manager if your scores sound like they’re in the right range. If not, you’ve just saved yourself the $40-50 application fee. If the manager says, “well, they’re a little low,” offer to bring documentation showing your reliability: pay stubs from work, bank statements, savings accounts, rental history, letters of recommendation. Some apartment complexes will rent to people with lower credit for an additional deposit.

Remember, too, not every apartment owner will check credit. Many individual owners don’t do a credit check. Even those who do are likely to listen to your story about what happened, and why you declared bankruptcy. Be brief but honest; most importantly, explain how your situation has changed. Make sure they understand that the bankruptcy means you owe less (or no) money now, and are therefore better placed to make the rental payments. Again, bring documents to support your story. You can also point out that since a person can’t declare bankruptcy for another seven years, you are actually, in some ways, a better risk than someone who hasn’t declared bankruptcy – if you stop making payments, they could take you to court and you wouldn’t be able to discharge those debts. Be careful with this argument though: although it’s both true and valid, some landlords might consider the fact that you’re bringing up the possibility of not paying rent as a bad sign.

Another suggestion is to look for places to rent that are less strict. Some rentals will advertise: no credit check required. Check out apartments that are offering specials: one month free if you rent by June 1st, for example, or no deposit required. Generally, this indicates a place with low occupancy, and owners who can’t afford to be quite as picky.

Finally, once you get established in a new apartment, do everything you can to maintain the path to financial stability you started by declaring bankruptcy. Take steps to rebuild your credit. Begin to establish a nest egg so that you have some savings in case of emergencies. Most importantly, pay your rent on time every month. If you need to rent another place in the future, having a solid record of making monthly payments could be invaluable.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, January 6, 2010 @ 8:20 pm

Throughout the Chapter 12 Bankruptcy series we’ve explored how bankruptcy bound family farmers and fishermen can reap the many rewards and special rights provided by a Chapter 12 filing. This series included an introduction to the concept of Chapter 12, along with additional benefits drifting from this protection; a detailed look at how this process works for farming and fishing families; and what you can expect at a Chapter 12 hearing—from the earliest bankruptcy petition to the negotiated repayment plan. In the conclusion of this four-part series, we share the specifics behind, and results of, this type of bankruptcy discharge, along with an understanding of Chapter 12 debt relief exemptions, and the ins and outs behind what is known as the Chapter 12 “hardship discharge.”

Under Chapter 12 bankruptcy laws, if you were initially defined under the Bankruptcy Code as a family farmer or fisherman at filing, you can receive a debt discharge after completing all necessary payments under your court-sanctioned Chapter 12 repayment plan. In some cases, in order to ensure this discharge, you must also certify that all domestic support obligations due prior to making this certification have been paid.

The effect of the Chapter 12 bankruptcy discharge involves releasing you from all debts provided for by the repayment plan, with a few exceptions. This means that your farm or fishery’s financial slate is clean, and any creditors  (whether priority, secured, or unsecured), who were provided for in full or in part under your repayment plan may no longer start or continue any legal action against you to collect any discharged debt obligations.

There are a few exceptions to the Chapter 12 bankruptcy discharge. According to the Bankruptcy Code, certain categories of debts not discharged in Chapter 12 proceedings include: “debts stemming from domestic support such as alimony and child support; money obtained through filing false financial statements; debts for willful and malicious injury to person or property; debts from fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, embezzlement or larceny, and any debts for death or personal injury caused by the debtor’s operation of a motor vehicle while the debtor was intoxicated.”

Your Chapter 12 plan usually lasts three to five years and normally provides for full repayment of all priority claims. Any debts that are not discharged will need to be paid in full under your individual repayment plan. Because an added benefit of Chapter 12 bankruptcy is that payments to secured creditors can sometimes continue longer than the three-to-five-year period plan, these debts are therefore not discharged until fully paid.

Another benefit of Chapter 12 bankruptcy is the “hardship discharge.” The court may grant you a “hardship discharge” even if you’ve failed to complete all of the payments under your repayment plan. This type of discharge is available when your failure to complete payments under your individual repayment plan is due to circumstances beyond the debtor’s control and through no fault of the debtor, such as injury or illness that prevents you from keeping an income. In some cases, the Chapter 12 hardship discharge falls under many of the rules and limitations applied in Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases.

During the complex Chapter 12 process, primarily used to bail out working families who are, in this savage economy, beleaguered and bankruptcy bound, it’s always helpful to seek the assistance of a qualified bankruptcy lawyer. While the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt do not file for Chapter 12 relief, we will evaluate your unique financial situation and refer you to a Chapter 12 bankruptcy expert if needed. Call today to set up your free initial consultation. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 5, 2010 @ 1:52 pm

Foreclosure is a common precursor to bankruptcy. More often than necessary, it happens before a family really knows where to turn for help.

Worse yet, those who lose their home in foreclosure continue to spiral into debt and end up filing bankruptcy long after it could have been used to help save their home in addition to relieving them from the agony of overwhelming monthly credit card bills and other debts. Fortunately for many citizens of North Carolina, a foreclosure prevention program has become a model for the nation and to date has assisted more than 2,500 of us from having to give back the property we worked so hard to obtain.

Called the State Home Foreclosure Prevention Project, this unique effort provides those worried about making their mortgage payment a hot line that provides advice, counseling and insight on how to work with your home’s mortgage lender to avoid having to surrender your deed back to the bank. While it certainly cannot help everyone who calls, two out of every three families needing help are getting it. And, more than 5,000 additional mortgages are still being re-negotiated.

It was originally created to assist those victimized by the sub-prime loan mortgage crisis but has since been expanded to help homeowners who have traditional loans but may be struggling with their house payment as a result of other debt forms or unemployment.

It should be noted that this program is not a debt or credit counseling service. It is designed specifically for those affected by the swath of spiking mortgage rates that resulted in the systemic plague of foreclosures nationwide, decimating the national real estate market and bolstering our economic demise.

Similar federal programs, such as the Making Home Affordable plan rolled-out last year, have not met expectations. North Carolina has managed, proportionally, to create an impact. The state banking commission has estimated that the total number of mortgages saved to date has stopped $218 million in property value and mortgage holder losses. Should those families currently working with the program be saved, the totals could more than double that number.

Yet, there remain a number of pain points in the state’s efforts to stave off foreclosures. Chris Kukla, a high level government affairs adviser at the Center for Responsible Lending, stated that a number of mortgage counseling companies and other private organizations are doing a “horrible job” in loan reorganization. Whether it be not hiring enough people to answer call-in questions or simply not understanding the paperwork process and related legalities, many of the efforts that have erupted on to the market at the height of the recession are too profit driven to provide real service.

The importance of this program to those considering bankruptcy is that it can help you alleviate one of your largest monthly financial headaches. Understand of course, that it does not eliminate your mortgage, but simply re-aligns it in a more reasonable payment plan. With this added stability, a troubled homeowner could arrive at a less pressure-driven decision to file bankruptcy and feel more confident in the outcome.

Remaining in one’s home is one of the most important factors for someone who files for bankruptcy protection, despite the fact that the majority of those who file do just that — stay in their homes. It seems that over the years, perhaps since the 2005 changes to the bankruptcy law, or maybe as a result of today’s hyper-sensitivity to the housing crisis, the fear of foreclosure has permeated the mindset of everyone facing financial trouble. Between programs like the State Home Foreclosure Prevention Project and the expertise of the bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, you have more than enough ways by which to remain safe and sound at home.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 5, 2010 @ 11:46 am

America is a nation of givers. Despite the recession and high unemployment, approximately 80% of Americans continued to give to religious and/or secular charities. Many people who’ve lost their jobs or accumulated large amounts of debt nonetheless continue to struggle to donate to churches and causes they believe in. Perhaps you’re worried that declaring bankruptcy would put an end to your ability to donate. Or perhaps, even worse, you’re afraid that the bankruptcy trustee would be able to recover any gifts you’ve made to your church in the past year.

In fact, bankruptcy laws protect both debtors’ rights to donate and religious charities’ rights to keep donated money. Debtors taking the ‘means test’ to determine whether or not they can file chapter 7, can allocate as much of their income to charity as desired- so long as the charitable giving is in line with past practices, and not merely a strategy to pass the means test. Similarly, Chapter 13 filers can use charitable contributions to reduce their disposable monthly income, and more importantly, reduce their monthly plan payment.

It’s true that a series of bankruptcy cases had surprising and sometimes contradictory findings after the passage of the 2005 bankruptcy act. One prominent case in New York, in 2006, for example, found that Chapter 13 filers could not tithe or make any other donations until they had paid off their credit card debt. However, Congress quickly passed the Religious Liberty and Charitable Donation Clarification Act of 2006, which clarified that Americans filing Chapter 13 do have the right to make charitable donations. It built on another act of Congress, the Religious Liberty and Charitable Donation Act of 1998.

Prior to the 1998 act, bankruptcy trustees frequently sued for the return of charitable gifts. Some trustees argued that charitable deductions to churches were donated without any ‘reasonably equivalent value’ being given in return. Therefore, they should fall into the category of fraudulent transfers – payments made to one person or creditor that are more than what they owe, or what they’re valued for, thus shortchanging everybody else. Bankruptcy attorneys argued no, that in fact the donor does receive something of value in exchange for the donation: preaching, teaching, spiritual instruction, etc. The trustees countered that the donor would receive those things whether or not they gave money. Many bankruptcy courts allowed the trustees to recover the money – which caused great hardship for some charities, who had already spent that money. However, the 1998 act clarified that gifts up to 15% of the donor’s income in the year before bankruptcy are not recoverable. In addition, gifts of more than 15% may be exempt if the debtor can show that these are consistent with their past practices. If you have given 20% of your income to your church every year for the past five years, for instance, the church would be able to keep the entire 20%.

Do note, however that bankruptcy courts can still consider these donations fraud if they look like a deliberate attempt to not pay your creditors. The courts will look at timing, the amount of the payments, and the circumstances surrounding your gifts. So if you’re an avowed atheist who hasn’t been to church in ten years, and you suddenly decide to donate 15% of your income to the Church of the Fallen Brethren the day before you declare bankruptcy – watch out. The court will most likely consider that fraud.

However, if you’ve been consistently donating to your church over the years, declaring bankruptcy shouldn’t hinder your ability to give them your financial support. In fact, bankruptcy could protect this support, and make it easier for you to give to an organization that really matters to you.

Think you may need to consider filing bankruptcy…or know someone who may need to. Keep the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt in mind, a North Carolina bankruptcy law firm offering a totally FREE and confidential initial consultation, with offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson. Just call toll free to 1-800-899-1414 or visit their website at www.billsbills.com for tons of information about every aspect of bankruptcy and bankruptcy law.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, January 5, 2010 @ 6:29 am

The New York Times recently published an insightful article detailing the struggles of homeowners facing foreclosure in the outer boroughs of New York City. At the New York State Supreme Court building in Jamaica, Queens, they come face-to-face with the lawyers representing the banks and the loan servicers that are pursuing foreclosure on their homes. These lawyers oversee large caseloads and don’t appear to the Times reporter have the time to delve into each individual matter.

New York state lawmakers have passed laws requiring lenders to negotiate with homeowners in court. That’s why the court’s docket is full of homeowners facing foreclosure. However, the banks in question, and the loan servicers that represent them, aren’t cutting deals to modify mortgages, despite the efforts of lawmakers to force the banks to do so. As a court referee says in the article, “I have yet to see an attorney for a servicer cut a deal.”

The evidence suggests there isn’t enough incentive for lenders and servicers to try to bargain with homeowners. The federal government has provided small financial incentives to services to allow loan modifications. But, because the servicers also make money from the foreclosure process, especially through fees charged to homeowners, the servicers don’t have as much of a reason to take the federal government’s money.

Even when modification is a possibility, the modification process often breaks down over logistics. For instance, homeowners often struggle to produce all of the paperwork lenders demand to see in order to process a modification. The Times also reports on an initiative to bring the documentation process online, allowing homeowners to store their documents in a database for safekeeping and to electronically track the progress of their modification efforts. A consultant quoted by the Times, however, remains pessimistic, stating bluntly, “[m]arginal improvements are not going to have a significant impact on increasing loan modifications.”

It should be good news for homeowners that the federal and state governments have stepped in to provide incentives for lenders and servicers to modify mortgages. However, an incentive is only an incentive, and sadly, evidence suggests that lenders and servicers generally choose to foreclose rather than modify. If you are a homeowner experiencing difficulty making your mortgage payments or facing foreclosure, relying on modification as a last resort may land you in a lot of trouble.

Filing for bankruptcy, on the other hand, can in many instances protect your home from creditors and keep foreclosure out of the picture. If you have a regular income, a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing offers the opportunity to catch up on your missed mortgage payments, and your home will be protected by the bankruptcy court’s automatic stay, which stays, or freezes, collections actions, including foreclosures. A Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing may also protect your property, depending on the circumstances and the extent of your other outstanding debt. If you are looking for bankruptcy advice you can trust, do not hesitate to contact the attorneys at The Law Firm of John C. Orcutt.

If you’re one of the many North Carolina homeowners facing foreclosure, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt today to discuss how Chapter 13 bankruptcy can save your family’s home. Call today: 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 4, 2010 @ 12:08 pm

In states like North Carolina—composed largely of rural areas dotted with farmland and abutting the ripe fishing grounds of the Atlantic—Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be exceptionally helpful to working farming and fishing families who might otherwise be bankruptcy bound.

In part one of the four-part series, entitled Chapter 12 Bankruptcy, we introduced the concept of Chapter 12, provided a brief overview of the special rights related to this protection, and shared who (or in some cases, “what”) qualifies as a family farm or family fisherman under the Bankruptcy Code. In this section, we’ll discuss how a Chapter 12 bankruptcy works, from initial petition filing to debt repayment planning.

If you qualify under the Bankruptcy Code’s broad definitions of a “family fisherman” or “family farmer,” a Chapter 12 case begins by filing a petition with the bankruptcy court where you live or the location of the “principal place of business” for your corporation or partnership. A qualifying husband and wife “family farmer” or “commercial family fisherman” may file. Unless the court orders otherwise, the petition includes a statement of your assets and liabilities; current income and expenditures; current business contracts and leases; and a general statement of your financial affairs.  In order to satisfy all of these petition requirements, you’ll need to gather a list of all creditors and the amounts and nature of their claims; the source, amount, and frequency of your income; a list of all of your property; and a detailed list of your monthly farming/fishing expenses, as well as living expenses, including food, shelter, utilities, transportation, feed, fertilizer, etc. In order to completely evaluate your household’s financial position, married individuals must gather this information for each spouse regardless of whether they are filing a joint petition, separate individual petitions, or even if only one spouse is filing.

Upon filing for Chapter 12, you must pay a filing fee and a miscellaneous administrative fee with the clerk of court. With the court’s permission, and with specific deadlines, these fees may be paid in installments. Failure to pay these fees may result in dismissal of your case.

Filing the petition under Chapter 12 provides an automatic stay that stops most collection actions against you or your property. Under the automatic stay protection (a protection that exists under all forms of bankruptcy), any creditors—public or private—are not allowed to call you or send you collection letters. During the proceeding, they cannot continue any legal action against you, foreclose on your home, or repossess your car and other assets. And–even if a garnishment order has been issued–the automatic stay stops garnishment of your wages. Additionally, a Chapter 12 filing has the added benefit of protecting co-debtors (those liable with the debtor) from eager creditors seeking collection of consumer debts incurred by a personal, family, or household purpose.

When you file for Chapter 12 bankruptcy, an impartial trustee is appointed to evaluate the case and serve as an agent, for collecting your payments and making distributions to your creditors. Following your filing, the Chapter 12 trustee will hold a “meeting of creditors” at which you will discuss your financial affairs and the proposed terms of your repayment plan. From this meeting, parties typically resolve problems and repayment schedules. Afterwards, you, your trustee, and interested creditors attend a hearing confirming your personal Chapter 12 repayment plan.

Whether your bankruptcy is simple or complex, you’ll need an expert attorney to navigate the waters. Contact the experienced attorneys at The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. Please note that while the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt does not file under Chapter 12, our office can evaluate your personal financial situation and refer your case to an experienced Chapter 12 practitioner if needed. Call us today: 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, January 4, 2010 @ 7:58 am

Did you find yourself standing around at the stroke of midnight on New Year’s night, hard pressed to think of something, anything, that, in the current economy, you could resolve to do when all you currently think about is money? Whether you were in Times Square or a tiny gathering, you probably weren’t alone. Millions of Americans facing foreclosure of their homes, looming unemployment, mounting consumer and health care debt, and other tenuous financial situations during this still unfolding financial downturn are also struggling to start anew despite facing insolvency. Well, in addition to shedding those pounds and quitting those unhealthy vices, get ready to start your latest (and greatest) resolution with four steps to get yourself on the road to financial fitness in 2010.

Act Now and Assess Your Finances
Figuring out your financial future is sometimes as easy as understanding where you stand today in your day-to-day fiscal life. Are you currently unemployed or feel as though you could lose your job soon? As such, do you have enough money for you debts and everyday expenses?  Are you a homeowner facing foreclosure? Do you have substantial healthcare bills or an ongoing medical condition? Do you have multiple credit card balances or mounting business expenses? Have you recently filed for bankruptcy? What other financial circumstances are you facing? The answers to these questions and others can supply the necessary starting points for charting your next solvent steps.

Put Together a Financial Plan
Financial planning doesn’t necessarily mean hiring someone else to assess your portfolio. It can start by simply tracking your personal spending for a month, while keeping in mind your desire to pay down any debt (consumer, mortgage, or otherwise), reduce expenses, increase your income or discharge debt in bankruptcy.  Once you establish a system you’re comfortable with, you can more closely keep track of your current financial situation, including how much money you may be wasting on unnecessary items and interest and how much savings you can accumulate under a new, leaner budget.

Save Up for the Unexpected
If you’re facing unemployment, increased interest on credit cards or mortgages, or high medical costs, personal savings can provide a much-needed security blanket for tough economic times. To avoid hefty hardships from expected bills, start with a target savings of at least three months of income.  This necessary nest egg can be a lifesaver in these uncertain economic times and provide much-needed peace of mind.

Consider a Clean Slate Through Bankruptcy
Once your plan is in place, you may come to the conclusion that that you don’t have enough money to cover your many monthly expenses, pay mounting debts or save for your financial future. At that point, you may want to consider bankruptcy. A bankruptcy filing can discharge debt and allow you to save for your next steps, including a new home, your child’s college fund, and a pleasant retirement.  In fact, every year bankruptcy attorneys meet with hundreds of people in financial distress.  Each time those who have encountered misfortune, bad judgment, or business failure walk into law offices feeling hopeless and at the end of their rope, perceiving no alternatives to their continuing fiscal problems.  Almost every time, however, it seems more and more when these same clients leave these offices, they feel hope, relief and even, resolved, often for the first time in months or years—resolved that the bankruptcy laws and system offers them the possibility of a new start— at a tolerable cost—and with it a financially viable and secure future. In short, on a personal level, bankruptcy relief ends worry and stress of living on the financial brink…a resolution we can all appreciate.

If you’re bankruptcy bound, learn more by visiting The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, January 1, 2010 @ 5:20 pm

When many people think about bankruptcy, what normally comes to mind is what is represented in Chapters 7 and 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. In Chapter 7, you can discharge all of your debts and, in return, may lose non-exempt assets. Under Chapter 13, you may hold on to your assets, such as their home, but devote income in the near future to repaying your outstanding debts. Under both forms of bankruptcy, there are limitations to what you can do to modify your debts.

However, in states like North Carolina—composed largely of rural areas dotted with thousands of acres of farmland and abutting the ripe fishing grounds of the Atlantic—the lesser known Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be exceptionally helpful to working families who might otherwise be bankruptcy bound. Under the Bankruptcy Code, these protected groups have special rights, not found in the more common areas of Bankruptcy law.

In the special four-part series, entitled “Chapter 12 Bankruptcy,” we’ll introduce the concept of Chapter 12 along with the special rights related to this protection, as well as examine specifically how this process works for farming and fishing families, what you can expect at a Chapter 12 hearing, and the results of this type of bankruptcy discharge.

As mentioned, family farmers and family fishermen have special rights within the safe harbors of the Bankruptcy Code. For instance, a Chapter 12 bankruptcy can be attractive to qualifying parties, because, under this type of protection, creditors cannot file an involuntary bankruptcy petition against a family farmer or fisherman to recover even some of their money.  Additionally, under a Chapter 12 case the debtor is allowed to modify the mortgage lien on a farmer’s home or fisherman’s residence, important to not only stop foreclosure but also modify the terms of the loan.

But, first and foremost, it’s important to understand who (or what) constitutes a family farmer or fisherman.

According to the Bankruptcy Code, a family farmer is:

• a person or married couple (or, in some cases a corporation owned or controlled by a single family) engaged in a farming operation with debts not more than $3,237,000;
• no less than half of these debts (except for the residence) come from the farming operation for either the current year or each of the past two years; and
• the family farmer must be involved in “farm operations” which is a rather broad term. To be eligible for chapter 12, the family farmer must have a regular income, sufficiently stable to be able to make regular monthly payments during the term of the Chapter 12 plan.

Similarly, a family fisherman is:

• a person or married couple (or in some cases) a corporation owned or controlled by a single family) engaged in a commercial fishing operation with debts not more than $1,642,500;
• at least 8% of these debts (except for the residence) stem from the fishing operation for either the current year or each of the past two years; and
• the commercial fisherman must be involved in “commercial fishing operations,” also a broad term. To be eligible for chapter 12, the family fisherman must have a regular income sufficiently stable to be able to make regular monthly payments during the term of the bankruptcy plan.

While North Carolina has many urban areas, plenty of family farms and fisheries still exist throughout the state.  If you are struggling with mounting debts, and believe that bankruptcy may be your lifeline, visit the experienced attorneys of The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt online.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, December 30, 2009 @ 10:49 am

You don’t have to be Chrysler or GM to consider bankruptcy. Maybe you are a small business owner with just a few employees and are struggling to keep everyone on the payroll while you fight off creditors, waiting for the next big contract to come through. You’re not alone. Here are the things you might consider as you look down the road.

This article assumes you’ve exhausted your credit and financial resources and are considering bankruptcy. Your best option when considering bankruptcy is to consult with a qualified bankruptcy attorney who can counsel you on your specific situation. You may find that bankruptcy is not the best move for you, but a qualified attorney will help you make that decision.

There are several different kinds of bankruptcy which may come in to play for you, as a small business owner. Here is a brief overview.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy:
This is sometimes called “straight bankruptcy,” as it is what most people associate with the term “bankruptcy” comes up. Depending on which set of exemptions are available to you under state or federal law, there is often a lengthy list of items of property which you can exempt from liquidation when you file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.  However, if there are any assets outside of your available exemptions, the Chapter 7 trustee will likely seize and sell that property and distribute the resulting proceeds amongst your unsecured creditors.

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy:
You may have heard of a company that goes into “reorganizational bankruptcy.”  Most often, this refers to Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Although this type of bankruptcy is often used by large corporations, small business may also file for protection under Chapter 11. As with the other forms of bankruptcy, certain rules and qualifications apply which may not make Chapter 11 a proper fit for your business’s needs.

Chapter 12 Bankruptcy:
If your business is a family farm, or a family fishing business, Chapter 12 bankruptcy may be your best option. Chapter 12 is tailored to the special conditions that come from individuals, families or small businesses which make their living from the land, streams or sea.

Chapter 13 Bankruptcy:
You may consider Chapter 13 bankruptcy if your business is just yourself, or if your business is unincorporated and operates as a sole proprietorship.  As with personal Chapter 13 bankruptcy, this process gives you a chance to reorganize and repay many of your debts under court protection, rather than wiping debts clear from your books.  Under some circumstances, you may not have to pay any of your unsecured debt.  Only an experienced bankruptcy attorney can properly advise you on your particular set of circumstances. Chapter 13 stops the clock on debt collection while you make progress to get back on your financial feet by paying a monthly amount as part of your Chapter 13 personal reorganization.

As with any major decision in your personal or professional life, you should consult with an attorney who is an expert in bankruptcy before moving ahead. A qualified bankruptcy attorney will give you sound advice on whether or not bankruptcy is the right choice for you, and under which of the various chapters of bankruptcy you should file for protection from your creditors.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 29, 2009 @ 6:00 pm

It hardly seems fair.

Those needing help with a bad mortgage that can be blamed on banking industry profit strategies are now faced with the problem of having their credit ratings ransacked as a result of enrollment in a federally-backed mortgage modification program.

The subprime mortgage crisis forced hundreds of thousands of Americans into bankruptcy or foreclosure. As the government realized, despite its public reticence, that it played a tremendous role in the state of its citizens’ bleak checking accounts, it announced the creation of the Making Home Affordable program, a concerted effort to offer banks financial incentives to adjust their customers’ mortgages at more favorable terms to the customer.

In the program’s wake arose countless private organizations and state-run mortgage assistance efforts. However, deep under the surface of the seemingly endless field of good will grows a bitter small seed of realization that your credit rating will experience increased erosion by entering into a mortgage modification plan… As if the impact of missed home payments and additional debt wasn’t already hard enough to swallow.

Jason Axelrod, a Chicago city employee, was one of many Americans who recently realized that seeking mortgage help would lead to negative consequences. He enrolled in a trial modification a number of months ago, at which point he sustained a reputable credit score of 750. With overtime cut and a quick jump in property taxes, it became increasingly difficult for him keep his monthly payments on track. The mortgage modification adjusted his payments by $565.

Trial modifications are generally intended to last a few months while banks and program representatives collect paperwork and gauge the homeowner’s ability to handle the new payments.

Eight months later, Jason remains in a morass of confusing paperwork and has yet been able to provide his lender with the appropriate paperwork to finalize the trial plan into a permanent one. Oh, and his credit score, despite no additional big ticket items or debt troubles, has dropped by more than 100 points. He was recently offered a car loan at 12 percent interest. He had previously enjoyed a low rate of 4.7 percent.

It is during the trial period that industry guidelines require lenders to report information on those enrolled. Specifically, the credit bureaus want to know a borrower’s status before entering the program. And it is in this reporting effort where the less-than-above-board practices of the credit bureau come into play. Essentially, to the folks at Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, the mortgage modification enrollment process is simply another credit checkpoint, supplied by the government, that they use to collect information on consumers. It’s like shooting debtors in a barrel.

A jointly devised coding program was installed to signify a borrower’s status as a “partial payee.” The presence of this code alone is enough to negatively impact credit standing. The full scope of its impact is based on a number of mortgage payment factors, such as number of missed payments before enrolling in the assistance program.

However, according to the Treasury Department, even those who were current on their mortgage could see their credit score cut by 100 points, simply because they chose to enroll in a program offered by the government.

At the start of September 2009, 24,000 people current with their mortgage entered into trial modifications. Just after Thanksgiving, the total number of trial modifications was just under 700,000. That’s a lot of credit reports. And most likely, a lot of frustration.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Monday, December 28, 2009 @ 7:10 am

The New Year is a few days away. And without doubt, millions of Americans will welcome 2010 with grand hope, desperate to put 2009 far behind them, the year the Great Recession took hold of our collars and shook us into submission. Unfortunately, many Americans will greet the end of the 2000’s first decade still in debt and financially directionless.

But that doesn’t have to be the case.

Bankruptcy, despite all you may think you know about it, can make 2010 the year you really start over, the year things become as you make them, the year you regain control.

The federal government is reporting that with 2009’s end, so goes the worst national economic era to strike the 50 states in decades. Much of this optimism, unfortunately, has failed to provide security. The talus is simply too loose, the slope too steep and the edge too precipitous for Americans to feel confident in the footholds being provided. Unemployment continues to shroud our workforce in a cloak of despair and frustration. All the positives can be too easily brushed off as temporary, government-designed band-aids that do nothing for long-term care and instead will soon peel off, exposing our credit card cuts and sub-prime avulsions to additional economic bacteria.

However, treatments are plentiful. And bankruptcy is one of them.

The bankruptcy process, when handled by a competent, established attorney, is a very respectable way to handle the stress and prevent the longstanding financial damage that un-attended-to debt can do to a family.

Most people who give thought to bankruptcy quickly brush it off as an escapist’s tool; something the irresponsible do to cover their mistakes. Well, if you were to start asking around, it would take little time for you to uncover that most of those who have filed for protection are professional, educated and careful with their money. You will also find that things like sudden unemployment, medical bills and emergency life expenses do not discriminate. They affect everyone and if we were universally prepared for those types of setbacks, we wouldn’t need the bankruptcy code.

Back in 1934, the U.S. Supreme Court established the need for a federal measure that could assist the honest debtor in repairing their economic wherewithal. That same year, an opinion was written on the matter that said:”(Bankruptcy) gives the honest but unfortunate debtor … a new opportunity in life and a clear field for future effort, unhampered by the pressure and discouragement of preexisting debt.”

A few years ago, the lending industry powered a major revision to the bankruptcy code called The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. Despite its title, it was designed to make filing bankruptcy more difficult. It was meant to perpetuate the stigmas and make people less tolerant of those who have to file.

The law changes included the “Means Test,” which was designed to qualify a person for Chapter 7. If you made too much money, suddenly you are not eligible to file under the same guidelines as others. The questionable constitutionality aside, the law served to make the bankruptcy code that much more tedious and frustrating for people. Without question, it prompted many people to avoid filing altogether and made the protection of our established laws that much more difficult to obtain. But don’t buy into the myths or the hype. For 99.9% of you, bankruptcy is still a valid option. And the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt know how to make the new bankruptcy laws work for you!

If you want 2010 to ring in on a positive note, don’t do what you did in 2009. Let facts drive your decisions, not misappropriated stigmas and half-truths. It’s your New Year, give yourself a reason to make it a happy one.

In North Carolina, contact the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt. 1-800-899-1414.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, December 27, 2009 @ 5:31 pm

If the present economic environment wasn’t Scrooge enough, just in time for the holidays, it appears the Obama Administration’s Making Home Affordable foreclosure prevention plan has failed to meet its goal of helping millions of Americans avoid foreclosure.

In fact, according to a recent Treasury Department report, 27 percent of the 650,000 homeowners taking part in the mortgage modification program are now delinquent on their mortgage payments.  Reflecting the mortgage industry’s aversion to permanently modify mortgages, of that number, only 1,711 participating homeowners attempting to avoid foreclosure have been able to convert their modifications to permanent status. Homeowners facing foreclosure and needing help to secure a loan modification were encouraged to visit http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov.

Crunching these paltry numbers translates into even more disturbing results for many seeking good news about federal mortgage relief and a way to save their homes.  According to Shahien Nasiripour’s recent report in The Huffington Post, results of the President’s $75 billion foreclosure program mean that, for example, out of every 100 homeowners who came to JPMorgan Chase for modification assistance under Making Home Affordable, just 15 have or will likely receive a permanent payment reduction. So, what happened to the other 85? Nasiripour says:

“for every 100 trial plans initiated from April through September 2009 under the Home Affordable Modification Program:

• 29 borrowers did not make all required payments under their trial plan;
• 20 borrowers did not submit all documents required for underwriting;
• 31 borrowers submitted all required documents but the documents did not meet HAMP underwriting standards, due to such things as missing signatures or nonstandard formats;
• 4 borrowers were or are likely to be rejected for undisclosed reasons;
• 1 borrower will not or is not likely to get their payment lowered.”

This Huff Post data comes from the prepared remarks bank officials planned to make before the House Financial Services Committee. The testimony was posted on the committee’s website.

To date, critics say the response of legislators and the Treasury Department to this dire news has been sorely inadequate. While several weeks ago mortgage lenders were threatened with losing access to precious incentives if they didn’t increase permanent mortgage modifications, with millions of homeowners facing foreclosure, failing banks still received billions in bailout money with no real implications for not helping the same struggling borrowers, and by extension communities, avoid the negative impact of foreclosure.  While the Treasury Department has recently extended the modification program, this system on its own appears to have provided few long-term solutions to this continuing housing crisis.

To help homeowners avoid foreclosure in the long-term, industry insiders and other commentators insist legislators will need to force banks to modify mortgages in ways that are affordable over the long-term. Since many the rising numbers of unemployed homeowners are unable to pay their mortgage even with unemployment insurance benefits, one suggested change would be to allow unemployed homeowners a mortgage deferment while they’re looking for work.

Homeowners who are having difficulty making their mortgages may be considering filing for Chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy protection. Another option for legislators is giving the bankruptcy courts the power to modify these same underwater mortgages during Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

As American homeowners languish waiting for more immediate mortgage help, many are turning to bankruptcy to stop foreclosure and other creditor actions. For reliable bankruptcy advice that you can trust, contact The Law Firm of John T. Orcutt. And to find out more about your bankruptcy options, visit The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt’s “Things to See and Hear” information.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Wednesday, December 23, 2009 @ 5:49 pm

Even in these tough economic times, everyone wants their family and friends to have a nice holiday—full of fun, frivolity and festive giving. And, even if you find yourself among the millions considering bankruptcy in the New Year, you may believe, now more than ever, that it’s open [holiday] season to shop for pricey presents using problem credit cards. In fact, many Americans do charge up expensive tabs in the months preceding the Christmas season when anticipating a bankruptcy—hoping to secure some great gifts prior to wiping away these same debts, along with many others, in January or February.

However, it’s never been more important to avoid a holiday spending binge when seeking this fresh financial start. While prudence alone should speak to some of the reasons to avoid abusing bankruptcy for seasonal gains, the Bankruptcy Code itself addresses the issue of this type of credit card debt as well. Section 523(a)(2) exempts from discharge, any debt that was obtained if an individual made material and false representations about his financial condition (i.e. lies on the credit application). Section 523(a)(2)(C) provides that:

1. consumer debts owed to a single creditor and aggregating more than $500 for luxury goods or services (luxury goods defined as goods or services reasonably not necessary for the support or maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor) incurred by an individual debtor on or within 90 days before the order for relief under this title are presumed to be nondischargeable; and

2. cash advances aggregating more than $750 that are extensions of consumer credit under an open end credit plan obtained by an individual debtor on or within 70 days before the order for relief under this title, are presumed to be nondischargeable;

Section 523(a)(2)(a) excepts from discharge money, property or services incurred by false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud (i.e. incurring debt that you knew or should have known that you would not be able to repay).

In layman’s terms, this translates into a stern warning against unnecessary, binge spending in the months leading up to your bankruptcy. As a result, if you do decide to charge up hundreds or thousands of dollars in charges in November or December and then try to discharge that debt in January or February, credit card lenders have three viable arguments they can use to object to discharging your debt in a bankruptcy case. This type of “discharge litigation” not only risks hefty exemptions from your debt relief, but it is also costly to defend, adding more expensive fuel to the insolvency fire.

What can be even more expensive is how these holiday spending sprees can create potential delays in your bankruptcy filing. Often, a bankruptcy attorney will advise clients in the New Year who reveal large Christmas credit card statements, to wait four to six months at a minimum before filing for bankruptcy—during which time you must continue to make regular payments on your new, larger holiday balances.

If you are already in debt, credit card or otherwise, or facing a loss of income, it’s essential to fight the urge to use plastic to purchase that big screen television, new game console, latest toy or anything else you can’t afford. And, if you’re bankruptcy bound, but must spend during this holiday season, as an alternative to credit, try carrying cash, checks or debit cards. As a result of using the money you actually have, you may make more thoughtful purchases and spend less this season, and, in the end, spend less time digging yourself out of post-holiday season debt and its inevitable barriers to bankruptcy.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, December 20, 2009 @ 8:22 am

Creditors around the country probably still secretly wish that Debtor’s Prison still existed so that they could send all the people that do not pay their bills there. Thankfully, the founding fathers had the foresight to do away with such an antiquated notion back when the country was formed and even provide the foundation for the bankruptcy laws that we now have today.

Little do most people know but the founding fathers were not the best at managing their own finances as they were in managing a war for independence. After all, these people did dump thousands upon thousands of dollars in tea into Boston Harbor! Most people are not aware, but the third president of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, was on the verge of bankruptcy for many years.

Luckily our founding fathers had the understanding that financial turmoil could strike any American, usually honest people that made a few too many mistakes or fell on hard times that would have trouble making ends meet and fulfilling their financial obligations. The first law allowing for people to wipe their debts clean was passed in 1800, but the power of business was evident even then and the law was repealed three short years after it was enacted. States tried to follow suit by enacting their own bankruptcy laws, but the Supreme Court quickly put a stop to this exercise.

The first federal law to pass that helped debtors came about in 1833. However, it was not until 1841 that bankruptcy laws became more of a remedy for debtors than creditors. Much like the law in 1800 though, this one was abolished three short years later as well. Another effort lasted a few years longer following the end of the Civil War with the passage of the Bankruptcy Act of 1867; eleven years later business interests once again prevailed as the law was done away with.

The underlying rationale for the repeal of each bankruptcy law was that it should be up to the creditor and/or the court if someone should be able to declare bankruptcy and wipe out their financial obligations. It was not until the late 1890s that the idea that honest people should be allowed a way out from the financial hole of too much debt without the creditors/ courts giving the okay. This unconditional discharge finally became law with the passage of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898.

Creditors undoubtedly still try to get this law overturned. It worked at other times in history so why not? However, in a country founded on the concept of new beginnings the concept of being allowed to escape persecution of a financial nature appears to have become an inherent right.

So when you are pondering the decision to file for bankruptcy keep this in mind: it took nearly a hundred years for that right to be secured; it is yours- use it. Also, if it was good enough for Thomas Jefferson than it is good enough for you too!

If you are in North Carolina, talk to the experienced bankruptcy attorneys at the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt today to discuss how bankruptcy can help you save your family home from foreclosure, decrease your auto payments, and get rid of your burdensome credit card debt once and for all. Call 1-800-899-1414 today to set up your free initial consultation. Convenient offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville and Wilson.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, December 20, 2009 @ 6:52 am

Thus far in the Preventing Foreclosure series, you’ve received an introductory look at how to hold on to your home; learned the best ways to work with your mortgage lender; and were provided with a more permanent plan to keep your house through Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

But Chapter 13 isn’t the only option for average Americans struggling with mortgage debt and facing foreclosure. With Part IV of this six-part series, it’s time to get a better understanding of how filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy can also help protect yourself and prepare you for a stronger financial future.

Part IV – Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

Stop Foreclosure
As is the case with Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay is a powerful court order that kicks in as soon as you file your bankruptcy papers. In addition to pausing any foreclosure proceedings, the automatic stay will put a stop to all forms of collection by creditors, including, repossessions, garnishment, lawsuits, and harassing phone calls. If you’ve made the decision that you simply can’t afford your mortgage payment, consider a pre-foreclosure Chapter 7. Your unsecured debt will get wiped out, and the bankruptcy will stall the foreclosure, giving you some time to save up some money for your next step.

Protect All of Your Property
Chapter 7 bankruptcy is, in some ways, win-win situation for homeowners facing foreclosure. Chapter 7 dispenses all of your unsecured debts, including credit cards and health care bills. While creditors, in turn, are entitled to proceeds from a sale of some of your valuable assets, in almost every personal Chapter 7 bankruptcy case there is no property sales of any kind. Thanks to Chapter 7 bankruptcy exemptions, most or all of your property is probably fully protected from sale or repossession, including your home and possibly your cars. With the recent passage of new homestead exemption legislation in North Carolina, chances are, all of your property is protected.
Keep in mind, if you own more than one home, vacation properties or a more expensive home (with a value above your state’s maximum amount) you may want to protect these properties by filing Chapter 13 bankruptcy instead—a better option to protect a home for families with more regular or disposable income.

Dispense With Other Homeowner Debts
Chapter 7 bankruptcy may not only cancel all mortgage debt, but also dispenses with additional mortgages and home equity loans. In addition to removing mortgage debt, new tax laws mean you may no longer face tax liability for defaulting on a mortgage or home-improvement loan.

Avoid Dead-End Solutions and Foreclosure Scams
Amid an uncertain economic period full of rising unemployment, high debt loads, plunging housing values and wobbly stock prices, Chapter 7 bankruptcy provides safe and legal solutions to your foreclosure fears and avoids today’s endless array of rescue scams preying on the vulnerability of desperate homeowners.

Sometimes its Better to Just Walk Away
As 2009 comes to an end, more than 3 million foreclosures are predicted, as homeowners are increasingly incapable of paying the mortgage during this brutal recession. Filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy pending foreclosure can provide a much-needed stopping point for those drowning in homeowner debt—as well as debts related to credit cards, medical bills, and more—and a comparable starting point for a family’s more viable financial future. The lending industry has taken advantage of consumers, driving home prices to unrealistic heights. With home prices collapsing, and many homeowners owing more than their home is worth, it makes better financial sense to walk away. Chapter 7 allows you to do so with a clean slate.

To get the big picture on how Chapter 7 works and how the laws in North Carolina can help you, speak with a professional bankruptcy lawyer at the The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Saturday, December 19, 2009 @ 10:10 am

Back in 2005, credit card companies were convinced – or at least tried hard to convince everyone else – that there was a bankruptcy crisis in the United States. Bankruptcy rates had doubled since 1980, they pointed out. ‘Shopaholics’ were charging everything under the sun and then declaring bankruptcy, forcing the credit card companies to eat their debt. They then had no choice but to pass these expenses on to consumers in the form of higher fees and interest rates.

In 2005, the major banks spent tens of millions of dollars lobbying Congress to make it harder for consumers to declare bankruptcy. Despite protests from lawyers, judges and law professors working in the system, Congress passed the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. Insiders pointed out that the law was essentially written by the credit card companies; a single law professor and four credit industry lobbyists actually wrote the legislation.

Nearly everyone agrees that the laws made filing for bankruptcy more burdensome for debtors. Perhaps the most pernicious element, and the one the credit card companies fought hardest for, is the means test. The means test looks at your prior six months of income to determine whether you qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. If your income is too high, you may need to increase certain expenses which qualify as deductions (much like tax deductions). If your income is still too high, you may need to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which offers the same relief as a Chapter 7, but requires a payment plan. The Chapter 13 payment plan can last anywhere from 15 months to 5 years, depending on your particular jurisdiction.

A boon for the credit card companies and consumers who pay their debts, right? Well, certainly the credit card companies did well for a while– their profits rose thirty percent between 2005 and 2007. However, the decline in interest rates and fees they promised would accompany this never happened – in fact, interest rates and fees increased over this period. Things got so bad that Congress finally passed another bill last May, this one regulating industry practices: they set limits on credit card fees and interest rates and will require lenders to be transparent in their communications, starting in July of 2010.

More importantly, recent studies suggest that the new bankruptcy law may have contributed to the rise in foreclosures – costing the banks billions of dollars – and to the housing crisis in general. Now that many consumers mistakenly believed that bankruptcy was not an option, in many cases they simply walked away from their homes instead of declaring bankruptcy and continuing to make their mortgage payments. Feeling that they couldn’t make both their mortgage and credit card payments, they may have opted to make neither. As foreclosure rates rose, slumping housing prices feel even further. Neighborhoods with a number of foreclosures went into deep decline. Banks lost money, the country slid into recession.

Does this mean that the bankruptcy law caused all of this? No, of course not. Many factors contributed to the recession, included the derivatives trading on Wall Street, the government trying to finance two wars without raising taxes, etc. However, it is clear that the idea that banks would pass on savings to consumers was unrealistic. It’s also clear that removing consumer options resulted in financial decisions that ultimately hurt the banks as well as consumers. (Other studies argue that stringent bankruptcy laws discourage risk and entrepreneurship; it’s no accident that many countries in the EU are loosening their bankruptcy laws during this recession.) The obvious conclusion is that Congress, and not the banks, should write laws. And that they should listen to the experts – in this case, the lawyers and judges involved in bankruptcy proceedings – instead of lobbyists with an agenda.

The good thing is that, in many jurisdictions, judges have construed the new law in favor of debtors. The means test is not bullet proof, and Chapter 7 is still a viable option for most consumers. And with the rising tide of delinquent mortgages, Chapter 13 bankruptcy remains the best way to save your family’s home. Contact a bankruptcy attorney today and get the truth about bankruptcy. And visit http://www.billsbills.com/truth_bankruptcy_book.php for more of the truth.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Friday, December 18, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

Last Friday, the House of Representatives passed a wide-reaching swath of financial reforms, designed to reign in the worse excesses of the banking industry. Democratic lawmakers are hailing the bill as a huge victory for consumers. However, one important provision failed to pass: cramdown.

‘Cramdown’ would allow bankruptcy judges to reduce the principle balance of the mortgage on a primary residence in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, resulting in lower monthly payments for the filer. It’s important to note that bankruptcy judges are already allowed to practice cramdown for a variety of debt, including boats, cars, vacation homes and family farms. In fact, prior to changes in the bankruptcy laws in 1978, they were able to cramdown residential mortgages as well.

Support for cramdown began gaining strength last spring, when the drop in housing prices caused a rise in foreclosures and a spike of people ‘under water’ in their homes. As the recession got worse, more people became vulnerable. Many Democratic lawmakers argued that cramdown was a necessary provision that would allow more people to stay in their homes. The banking industry countered that it would raise costs for everyone and divert capital from the mortgage market at a time when it desperately needed more, not less funds. Observers pointed out that banker’s fears were unrealistic; banks already eat the loss in a foreclosure, so how would this law upset the whole system?

Meanwhile, the Obama industry introduced housing reforms, notably the Making Houses Affordable, a program designed to encourage mortgage companies to voluntarily modify loans and keep people in their homes. While the program does offer some financial incentives, industry observers note that mortgage companies make far more money from the fees involved when a homeowner goes foreclosure.

In April, the House passed cramdown, but it stalled – badly – in the Senate. Twelve Democrats joined with every Republican to defeat it.

This fall, nearly everyone agrees that the MHA program has been a failure. Far fewer loans have been modified than the administration hoped; foreclosure rates continue to rise across the country. It’s hard not to see the lack of cramdown as a pertinent factor. Cramdown would offer the homeowner some leverage. If mortgage companies refused to modify loans, the homeowner could have filed bankruptcy and the decision to modify or not would have rested with an independent party, the judge. As it is, judges are unable to modify the loans, which leaves the entire decision in the hands of the mortgage company.

That’s why Democrats in the House included cramdown again, in the package of regulatory reforms they voted on last Friday. However, this time – under some pressure from small banks and credit unions – the measure failed to pass even the House.

What’s the future for cramdown? It doesn’t look good. Without some radical change somewhere, it doesn’t look like cramdown will even come up for a vote again. This is too bad; this provision would not only be very helpful to many individual homeowners, it has the potential to send ripples through the housing market as well.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Tuesday, December 15, 2009 @ 1:48 pm

In these painful financial times, the toughest bind facing many Americans is financing their well- being. While it’s vital to stay healthy and seek medical help when necessary, with health care costs on the rise and health care reform largely in limbo, the results of putting wellness over wealth can be financially devastating.

As the New York Times reported, (from the November 25, 2009, article “From the Hospital Room to the Bankruptcy Court” by Kevin Sack), many Americans are merely “one accident or illness away” from a “medical bankruptcy.” And while there is no medical bankruptcy per se—rather merely a standard filing that includes the wiping away of medical bills—more and more people are filing for bankruptcy because of these bills with the ubiquitous term “medically bankrupt” having become largely a sign of the economic times. “This has really become the insurance system for the country,” said Susan R. Limor to the New York Times in the same article. Limor is a bankruptcy trustee who calculated that 13 of the 48 Chapter 7 liquidation cases on her docket included medical debts of more than $1,000. Under Chapter 7, a debtor’s assets are liquidated and the proceeds are used to pay creditors; any remaining debts are discharged, and filers are left with a 10-year mark on their credit ratings.  “You can’t believe how many people discharge medical debts,” Limor said. “It’s a kind of trailing indicator of who’s suffering in this economy.”

And those suffering are not alone. According to a recent study from Harvard University, today medical bills make up well over half of all bankruptcy filings (62% in 2007), accounting for the bankruptcies of between 1.5 to 2 million Americans each year. Moreover, of those filing for bankruptcy, three-quarters have medical insurance.  In many cases, this crippling debt is the result of insurance co-pays and deductibles, which can run into the tens of thousands of dollars. Yet, some who file for “medical bankruptcy” do so even with relatively small medical bills because, left to their own devices, many hospitals and medical practices refuse to make arrangements for debt relief or installment plans.

As such, the alternatives to a medical bills-inspired bankruptcy can be worse. Medical debt—from hospitalization to medication—is unsecured with no guarantee available for creditors, like insurance companies, hospitals and doctors, to take back. As a result, without filing medical bankruptcy, health care debts can be tied to the collateral you do own. A hospital or insurance company can also garnish your wages, and even claim a portion of the equity in your home, business or other large assets.

As the New York Times article illustrated, if you’re plagued by medical debts and other related health care costs, Chapter 7 bankruptcy may be the only viable solution for you. Filing for Chapter 7 can eliminate most of your debts, including those arising out of medical expenses—whether they’re billed from your hospital or charged on your credit card.  An experienced attorney can evaluate your precise financial problems—medical or otherwise—and work out how the implications are likely to affect you. You’ll also learn the best ways to most effectively deal with creditors, along with possible solutions to improve your credit scores and credit ratings so that any effects of the bankruptcy might be minimized. The same lawyer can help you file for bankruptcy, as well as represent you in the bankruptcy court. For more information about the benefits of filing for bankruptcy, including alleviating medical debts, visit the experienced attorneys of The Law Offices of John T. Orcutt online.

+ Continue reading this article

Published Sunday, December 13, 2009 @ 6:54 pm

In Part I of the Preventing Foreclosure series, you received an introductory look at how to keep your home, with Part II of this six-part series emphasizing the power of being proactive, providing even more specifics on the best ways to prevent impending foreclosure proceedings by working directly with your mortgage lender before you find yourself falling behind.

If you are already behind on your mortgage payments, it’s hard to negotiate with your lender. With so many Americans behind on their mortgages, loan servicing companies simply don’t have the manpower to address every delinquent mortgage. But you have options- Chapter 13 or Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings can force creditors to end their collection activities and delay a foreclosure sale.

Part III – Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

When examining your options for saving your home, if you find you are in arrears, but also have regular income to catch up with those back payments, just not all at one time, you may find that Chapter 13 bankruptcy is your best first step in protecting your biggest asset. As such, filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy stops foreclosure on your home and restructures your debt into a more manageable payment plan— allowing homeowners to pay back what they owe on their mortgage over time, often at a percentage of the cost.

Good Way to Pay With the Automatic Stay

Under the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor in Chapter 13 bankruptcy is protected by the automatic stay. This stay stops creditors in their tracks and prevents their collection actions, including foreclosures. This stay continues working throughout the duration of your bankruptcy case, as long as you adhere to the guidelines set by the court; meaning as long as you remain current on your payments to your bankruptcy trustee, you should come out of the bankruptcy current on your mortgage and with your home.